RESUMEN
PROBLEM: Despite the pressing need to grow the Australian midwifery workforce, the rising cost of living is making midwifery education programs unaffordable for many. Understanding of the financial hardships faced by Australian midwifery students is currently limited. BACKGROUND: Attrition from midwifery programs is high and rising. In Australia, this is further compounded by the financial pressures brought about by the cost-of-living crisis. Attending compulsory unremunerated clinical placements and being 'on call' for continuity of care experiences contributes to the financial challenges of midwifery students. AIM: To identify and synthesise available literature addressing financial hardship faced by Australian midwifery students during their studies. METHODS: Arksey and O'Malley's framework guided this scoping review. Six databases were searched between January 2020 and April 2024. The key findings of eight included papers were thematically analysed. FINDINGS: Four themes were identified; "Attending placements and supporting COCE's as key contributors to financial hardship", "Impacts of financial hardship on midwifery students and their wider family", "Impacts upon the future growth and diversity of the profession" and "The need for universal financial support". DISCUSSION: The findings highlight the nature of financial challenges, causational factors and the consequences of financial hardship associated with completing midwifery programs in Australia. Appropriate universal financial support is urgently needed if we are to grow and sustain the midwifery workforce. CONCLUSION: With no primary studies specifically exploring financial hardship faced by Australian midwifery students, further research is required to understand the challenges they face and evaluate the efficacy of funding initiatives.
Asunto(s)
Partería , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , Australia , Partería/educación , Partería/economía , Femenino , Estrés Financiero , Embarazo , Enfermeras Obstetrices/educaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In many countries, the healthcare sector is dealing with important challenges such as increased demand for healthcare services, capacity problems in hospitals and rising healthcare costs. Therefore, one of the aims of the Dutch government is to move care from in-hospital to out-of-hospital care settings. An example of an innovation where care is moved from a more specialised setting to a less specialised setting is the performance of an antenatal cardiotocography (aCTG) in primary midwife-led care. The aim of this study was to assess the budget impact of implementing aCTG for healthy pregnant women in midwife-led care compared with usual obstetrician-led care in the Netherlands. METHODS: A budget impact analysis was conducted to estimate the actual costs and reimbursement of aCTG performed in midwife-led care and obstetrician-led care (ie, base-case analysis) from the Dutch healthcare perspective. Epidemiological and healthcare utilisation data describing both care pathways were obtained from a prospective cohort, survey and national databases. Different implementation rates of aCTG in midwife-led care were explored. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the budget impact estimates. RESULTS: Shifting aCTG from obstetrician-led care to midwife-led-care would increase actual costs with 311 763 (97.5% CI 188 574 to 426 072) and 1 247 052 (97.5% CI 754 296 to 1 704 290) for implementation rates of 25% and 100%, respectively, while it would decrease reimbursement with -7 538 335 (97.5% CI -10 302 306 to -4 559 661) and -30 153 342 (97.5% CI -41 209 225 to -18 238 645) for implementation rates of 25% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis results were consistent with those of the main analysis. CONCLUSIONS: From the Dutch healthcare perspective, we estimated that implementing aCTG in midwife-led care may increase the associated actual costs. At the same time, it might lower the healthcare reimbursement.
Asunto(s)
Presupuestos , Cardiotocografía , Partería , Humanos , Femenino , Países Bajos , Embarazo , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/economía , Partería/métodos , Cardiotocografía/métodos , Cardiotocografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiotocografía/economía , Cardiotocografía/normas , Presupuestos/estadística & datos numéricos , Presupuestos/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/economía , Atención Prenatal/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the economic impact of upscaling access to continuity of midwifery carer, compared with current standard maternity care, from the perspective of the public health care system. METHODS: We created a static microsimulation model based on a whole-of-population linked administrative data set containing all public hospital births in one Australian state (Queensland) between July 2017 to June 2018 (n = 37,701). This model was weighted to represent projected State-level births between July 2023 and June 2031. Woman and infant health service costs (inpatient, outpatient and emergency department) during pregnancy and birth were summed. The base model represented current standard maternity care and a counterfactual model represented two hypothetical scenarios where 50 % or 65 % of women giving birth would access continuity of midwifery carer. Costs were reported in 2021/22 AUD. RESULTS: The estimated cost savings to Queensland public hospital funders per pregnancy were $336 in 2023/24 and $546 with 50 % access. With 65 % access, the cost savings were estimated to be $534 per pregnancy in 2023/24 and $839 in 2030/31. A total State-level annual cost saving of $12 million in 2023/24 and $19 million in 2030/31 was estimated with 50 % access. With 65 % access, total State-level annual cost savings were estimated to be $19 million in 2023/24 and $30 million in 2030/31. CONCLUSION: Enabling most childbearing women in Australia to access continuity of midwifery carer would realise significant cost savings for the public health care system by reducing the rate of operative birth.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Queensland , Femenino , Embarazo , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Adulto , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Partería/economía , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Simulación por ComputadorRESUMEN
Over the last 6 years, the Pennsylvania Affiliate of the American College of Nurse-Midwives has worked to meet the needs of its diverse membership and increase the capacity of the affiliate board by taking a series of strategic steps. This article details the key components of this journey, which has culminated in a successful annual conference with over $118,000 in net revenue to help meet affiliate goals, including pursuing midwifery modernization legislation for Pennsylvania and an increase in our affiliate membership by almost 100 individuals. The annual conference, Midwifery Forward, which completed its fifth year in 2023, has also given our community of midwives a yearly reason to gather and reconnect, celebrate accomplishments, welcome new graduates, and make plans for the year ahead. The goal of this article is to share the specifics of our strategic planning, so that other affiliates and organizations may benefit as they develop strategic plans in the larger effort to increase membership and engagement and generate sustainable income for their midwifery organizations.
Asunto(s)
Obtención de Fondos , Partería , Enfermeras Obstetrices , Sociedades de Enfermería , Humanos , Partería/economía , Pennsylvania , Objetivos Organizacionales , Modelos Organizacionales , FemeninoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nearly 30 years post legalisation and introduction, midwifery is still not optimally integrated within the health system of Canada's largest province, Ontario. Funding models have been identified as one of the main barriers. METHODS: Using a constructivist perspective, we conducted a qualitative descriptive study to examine how antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum funding arrangements in Ontario impact midwifery integration. We conceptualized optimal 'integration' as circumstances in which midwives' knowledge, skills, and model of care are broadly respected and fully utilized, interprofessional collaboration and referral support the best possible care for patients, and midwives feel a sense of belonging within hospitals and the greater health system. We collected data through semi-structured telephone interviews with midwives, obstetricians, family physicians, and nurses. The data was examined using thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 20 participants, including 5 obstetricians, 5 family physicians, 5 midwives, 4 nurses, and 1 policy expert. We found that while course-of-care-based midwifery funding is perceived to support high levels of midwifery client satisfaction and excellent clinical outcomes, it lacks flexibility. This limits opportunities for interprofessional collaboration and for midwives to use their knowledge and skills to respond to health system gaps. The physician fee-for-service funding model creates competition for births, has unintended consequences that limit midwives' scope and access to hospital privileges, and fails to appropriately compensate physician consultants, particularly as midwifery volumes grow. Siloing of midwifery funding from hospital funding further restricts innovative contributions from midwives to respond to community healthcare needs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant policy changes, such as adequate remuneration for consultants, possibly including salary-based physician funding; flexibility to compensate midwives for care beyond the existing course of care model; and a clearly articulated health human resource plan for sexual and reproductive care are needed to improve midwifery integration.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna , Partería , Médicos de Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Partería/economía , Partería/organización & administración , Ontario , Médicos de Familia/economía , Médicos de Familia/organización & administración , Investigación Cualitativa , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mothers in Germany are entitled to midwifery care; however, they face a lack of skilled professionals. While the reliability of the access to midwifery is of great public interest, we know little about clients' preferences. OBJECTIVES: We conduct a discrete choice experiment to study preferences and willingness to accept copayment for the entire scope of midwifery care (pregnancy, delivery, and postnatal). Thereby, we aim to provide policy recommendations for priority settings in times of scarcity. Furthermore, we evaluate to what extent midwives' education matters to parents and assess the degree of support for the latest Midwifery Reform Act that transfers education from vocational schools to universities. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment with separated adaptive dual response. SETTINGS: Online Survey promoted through Facebook to parents in Germany. RESPONDENTS: 2080 respondents completed the experiment. They all have or are expecting at least one natural child, mainly born between 2018 and 2020 (87%). The average respondent is female (99%), 33 years old, with a university degree (50%). METHODS: We use a d-optimal fractional factorial design and obtain individual parameter estimates through a Multinomial Logit analysis with Hierarchical Bayes estimation techniques. We calculate willingness to pay and importance weights and simulate uptake probabilities for different packages of care. To avoid extreme choice behavior, we apply separated adaptive dual response. RESULTS: Home visits during the postnatal phase are most important (importance weight 50%); online support is demanded when no personal support is available. We find that 1:1 care during delivery is highly preferred, but one midwife supporting two women intrapartum is still acceptable. The midwife´s education plays a minor role with an importance weight of 3%; however, we find a preference for midwives trained at vocational schools rather than at universities. CONCLUSIONS: In times of scarcity, postnatal care in the form of home visits should be prioritized over pregnancy counseling, and online services should be promoted as an add-on but not as a substitute for personal support. There is a high level of willingness to accept co-financing to ensure the availability of services usually covered by health insurance.
Asunto(s)
Partería , Madres , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Partería/economía , Embarazo , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: poor access to maternal health services is a one of the major contributing factors to maternal deaths in low-resource settings, and understanding access barriers to maternal services is an important step for targeting interventions aimed at promoting institutional delivery and improving maternal health. This study explored access barriers to maternal and antenatal services in Kaputa and Ngabwe; two of Zambia´s rural and hard-to-reach districts. METHODS: a concurrent mixed methods approach was therefore, undertaken to exploring three access dimensions, namely availability, affordability and acceptability, in the two districts. Structured interviews were conducted among 190 eligible women in both districts, while key informant interviews, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted for the qualitative component. RESULTS: the study found that respondents were happy with facilities´ opening and closing times in both districts. By comparison, however, women in Ngabwe spent significantly more time traveling to facilities than those in Kaputa, with bad roads and transport challenges cited as factors affecting service use. The requirement to have a traditional birth attendant (TBA) accompany a woman when going to deliver from the facility, and paying these TBAs, was a notable access barrier. Generally, services seemed to be more acceptable in Kaputa than in Ngabwe, though both districts complained about long queues, being delivered by male health workers and having delivery rooms next to male wards. CONCLUSION: based on the indicators of access used in this study, maternal health services seemed to be more accessible in Kaputa compared to Ngabwe.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Salud Materna , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/provisión & distribución , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/economía , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/economía , Población Rural , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven , ZambiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Decision-makers need quantifiable data on costs and outcomes to determine the optimal mix of antenatal models of care to offer. This study aimed to examine the cost utility of a publicly funded Midwifery Group Practice (MGP) caseload model of care compared to other models of care and demonstrate the feasibility of conducting such an analysis to inform service decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To provide a methodological framework to determine the value of public midwifery in different settings. METHODS: Incremental costs and incremental utility (health gains measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)) of public MGP caseload were compared to other models of care currently offered at a large tertiary hospital in Australia. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Short Form scores were converted into utility values by mapping to the EuroQol 5 dimensions and then converting to QALYs. Costs were assessed from a health system funder's point of view. RESULTS: There were 85 women in the public MGP caseload care group and 72 received other models of care. Unadjusted total mean cost for mothers' and babies' health service use from study entry to 12 months post-partum was $27 618 for MGP caseload care and $33 608 for other models of care. After adjusting for clinical and demographic differences between groups, total costs were 22% higher (cost ratio: 1.218, P = 0.04) for other models of maternity care. When considering costs to all funders, public MGP caseload care cost $5208 less than other models of care. There was no significant difference in QALY between the two groups (difference: 0.010, 95% CI: -0.038, 0.018). CONCLUSION: Public MGP caseload care costs 22% less than other models of care, after accounting for differences in baseline characteristics between groups. There were no significant differences in QALYs. Public MGP caseload care produced comparable health outcomes, with some indication that outcomes may be better for lower cost per woman.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/economía , Práctica de Grupo , Hospitales Públicos , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Partería/economía , Australia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Embarazo , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite skilled attendance during childbirth has been linked with the reduction of maternal deaths, equality in accessing this safe childbirth care is highly needed to achieving universal maternal health coverage. However, little information is available regarding the extent of inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care in Tanzania. This study was performed to assess the current extent, trend, and potential contributors of poor-rich inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care among women in Tanzania. METHODS: This study used data from 2004, 2010, and 2016 Tanzania Demographic Health Surveys. The two maternal health services 1) institutional delivery and 2) skilled birth attendance was used to measures access to safe childbirth care. The inequalities were assessed by using concentration curves and concentration indices. The decomposition analysis was computed to identify the potential contributors to the inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care. RESULTS: A total of 8725, 8176, and 10052 women between 15 and 49 years old from 2004, 2010, and 2016 surveys respectively were included in the study. There is an average gap (>50%) between the poorest and richest in accessing safe childbirth care during the study period. The concentration curves were below the line of inequality which means women from rich households have higher access to the institutional delivery and skilled birth attendance inequalities in accessing institutional delivery and skilled birth attendance. These were also, confirmed with their respective positive concentration indices. The decomposition analysis was able to unveil that household's wealth status, place of residence, and maternal education as the major contributors to the persistent inequalities in accessing safe childbirth care. CONCLUSION: The calls for an integrated policy approach which includes fiscal policies, social protection, labor market, and employment policies need to improve education and wealth status for women from poor households. This might be the first step toward achieving universal maternal health coverage.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Parto , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Salud Materna , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/economía , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/economía , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Tanzanía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The uptake of skilled pregnancy care in rural areas of Nigeria remains a challenge amid the various strategies aimed at improving access to skilled care. The low use of skilled health care during pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum indicates that Nigerian women are paying a heavy price as seen in the country's very high maternal mortality rates. The perceptions of key stakeholders on the use of skilled care will provide a broad understanding of factors that need to be addressed to increase women's access to skilled pregnancy care. The objective of this study was therefore, to explore the perspectives of policymakers and health workers, two major stakeholders in the health system, on facilitators and barriers to women's use of skilled pregnancy care in rural Edo State, Nigeria. METHODS: This paper draws on qualitative data collected in Edo State through key informant interviews with 13 key stakeholders (policy makers and healthcare providers) from a range of institutions. Data was analyzed using an iterative process of inductive and deductive approaches. RESULTS: Stakeholders identified barriers to pregnant women's use of skilled pregnancy care and they include; financial constraints, women's lack of decision-making power, ignorance, poor understanding of health, competitive services offered by traditional birth attendants, previous negative experience with skilled healthcare, shortage of health workforce, and poor financing and governance of the health system. Study participants suggested health insurance schemes, community support for skilled pregnancy care, favourable financial and governance policies, as necessary to facilitate women's use of skilled pregnancy care. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to the literature, a rich description of views from policymakers and health providers on the deterrents and enablers to skilled pregnancy care. The views and recommendations of policymakers and health workers have highlighted the importance of multi-level factors in initiatives to improve pregnant women's health behaviour. Therefore, initiatives seeking to improve pregnant women's use of skilled pregnancy care should ensure that important factors at each distinct level of the social and physical environment are identified and addressed.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud , Atención Prenatal , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Seguro de Salud , Muerte Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Partería/economía , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Nigeria , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/economía , Investigación Cualitativa , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Derechos de la Mujer/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rural and regional health services often find it difficult to maintain their maternity service and skills of their maternity workforce and enable women to give birth close to home. The Maternity Connect Program is a professional development initiative aimed at supporting and upskilling rural and regional maternity workforces to meet their maternity population care needs. AIM: To evaluate the Maternity Connect Program from the perspectives and experiences of participating midwives/nurses and health services. METHODS: A retrospective audit of data routinely collected as part of the Maternity Connect Program: initial needs assessments (baseline survey), and one month and six months post-placement surveys completed by participants, placement health services and base health services. The main outcome measures were: participants' (midwives and health services) level of satisfaction with the Program; and changes in midwives'/nurses' perceived level of confidence in performing key midwifery skills after participating in the program. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 97 midwives/nurses; n = 23 base health services; n = 4 placement health services) were satisfied with the program and there was an increase in midwives/nurses' confidence when providing specific aspects of maternity care (birthing, neonatal and postnatal). Midwives/nurses report transferring skills learnt back to their base health service. CONCLUSION: The Maternity Connect Program appears to be a successful educational model for maintaining and increasing clinician confidence in rural and regional areas.
Asunto(s)
Parto Domiciliario/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Partería/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical interventions known to reduce the risk of caesarean delivery include routine induction of labour at 39 weeks, caseload midwifery and chart audit, but they have not been compared for cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To assesses the cost-effectiveness of three different interventions known to reduce caesarean delivery rates compared to standard care; and conduct a budget impact analysis. METHODS: A Markov microsimulation model was constructed to compare the costs and outcomes produced by the different interventions. Costs included all costs to the health system, and outcomes were quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained. A budget impact analysis was undertaken using this model to quantify the costs (in Australian dollars) over three years for government health system funders. RESULTS: All interventions, plus standard care, produced similar health outcomes (mean of 1.84 QALYs gained over 105 weeks). Caseload midwifery was the lowest cost option at $15 587 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15 269, 15 905), followed by routine induction of labour ($16 257, 95% CI 15 989, 16 536), and chart audit ($16 325, 95% CI 15 979, 16 671). All produced lower costs on average than standard care ($16 905, 95% CI 16 551, 17 259). Caseload midwifery would produce the greatest savings of $172.6 million over three years if implemented for all low-risk nulliparous women in Australia. CONCLUSIONS: Caseload midwifery presents the best value for reducing caesarean delivery rates of the options considered. Routine induction of labour at 39 weeks and chart audit would also reduce costs compared to standard care.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/economía , Auditoría Clínica/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/economía , Partería/economía , Australia , Auditoría Clínica/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Financiación Gubernamental , Humanos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/métodos , Cadenas de Markov , Partería/métodos , Paridad , Embarazo , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Access to Caesarean section (C-section) remains inadequate for some groups of women while others have worryingly high rates. Understanding differential receipt demands exploration of the socio-cultural, and political economic, characteristics of the health systems that produce them. This extensive institutional ethnography investigated under- and over-receipt of C-section in two rural districts in Pakistan - Jhelum and Layyah. Data were collected between November and July 2013 using semi-structured interviews from a randomly selected sample of 11 physicians, 38 community midwives, 18 Lady Health Visitors and nurses and 15 Traditional Birth Attendants. In addition, 78 mothers, 35 husbands and 23 older women were interviewed. The understandings of birth by C-section held by women and their family members were heavily shaped by gendered constructions of womanhood, patient-provider power differentials and financial constraints. They considered C-section an expensive and risky procedure, which often lacked medical justification, and was instead driven by profit motive. Physicians saw C-section as symbolizing obstetric skill and status and a source of legitimate income. Physician views and practices were also shaped by the wider health care system characterized by private practice, competition between providers and a lack of regulation and supervision. These multi-layered factors have resulted in both unnecessary intervention, and missed opportunities for appropriate C-sections. The data indicate a need for synergistic action at patient, provider and system levels. Recommendations include: improving physician communication with patients and family so that the need for C-section is better understood as a life-saving procedure, challenging negative attitudes and promoting informed decision-making by mothers and their families, holding physicians accountable for their practice and introducing price caps and regulations to limit financial incentives associated with C-sections. The current push for privatization of health care in low-income countries also needs scrutiny given its potential to encourage unnecessary intervention.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea/psicología , Partería/métodos , Madres/psicología , Enfermeras Obstetrices/psicología , Parto/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Población Rural , Cirujanos/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antropología Cultural , Cesárea/economía , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/economía , Motivación , Pakistán , Embarazo , Población Urbana , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Home births provide women a birth choice where they may feel more comfortable and confident in their ability to give birth. PROBLEM: Most women in Victoria do not have publicly funded access to appropriately trained health professionals if they choose to give birth at home. METHODS: This paper describes the process of setting up a publicly funded home birth service and provide details of description of the set up and governance. We also report outcomes over 9 years with respect to parity, transfer to hospital, adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 191 women who were still booked into the home birth program at 36 weeks gestation, 148 (77.5%) women gave birth at home and 43 (22.5%) women were transferred into the hospital. The overall rate of vaginal birth was also high among the women in the home birth program, 185 (96.9%) with no added complications ascribed to home births. Such as severe perineal trauma [n=1] 0.6% PPH [n=4] 2.7%, Apgar score less than 7 at 5min [n=0] admissions post home birth to special care nursery [n=2] 1.35%. DISCUSSION: This unique study provides a detailed road map of setting up a home birth practice to facilitate other institutions keen to build a publicly funded home birth service. The birth outcome data was found to be consistent with other Australian studies on low risk home births. CONCLUSION: Well-designed home birth programs following best clinical practices and procedures can provide a safe birthing option for low risk women.
Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/economía , Parto Domiciliario/economía , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Partería/economía , Adulto , Australia , Femenino , Parto Domiciliario/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos de Enfermería , Paridad , Embarazo , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de SaludAsunto(s)
Aniversarios y Eventos Especiales , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Recursos en Salud/economía , Partería/economía , Enfermería Obstétrica/economía , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gaps in postnatal care use represent missed opportunities to prevent maternal and neonatal death in sub-Saharan Africa. As one in every three non-facility deliveries in Nigeria is assisted by a traditional birth attendant (TBA), and the TBA's advice is often adhered to by their clients, engaging TBAs in advocacy among their clients may increase maternal and neonatal postnatal care use. This study estimates the impact of monetary incentives for maternal referrals by TBAs on early maternal and neonatal postnatal care use (within 48 h of delivery) in Nigeria. METHODS: We conducted a non-blinded, individually-randomized, controlled study of 207 TBAs in Ebonyi State, Nigeria between August and December 2016. TBAs were randomly assigned with a 50-50 probability to receive $2.00 for every maternal client that attended postnatal care within 48 h of delivery (treatment group) or to receive no monetary incentive (control group). We compared the probabilities of maternal and neonatal postnatal care use within 48 h of delivery in treatment and control groups in an intention-to-treat analysis. We also ascertained if the care received by mothers and newborns during these visits followed World Health Organization guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 207 TBAs participated in this study: 103 in the treatment group and 104 in the control group. The intervention increased the proportion of maternal clients of TBAs that reported attending postnatal care within 48 h of delivery by 15.4 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9-22.9]. The proportion of neonatal clients of TBAs that reportedly attended postnatal care within 48 h of delivery also increased by 12.6 percentage points [95% CI: 5.9-19.3]. However, providers often did not address the issues that may have led to maternal and newborn postnatal complications during these visits. CONCLUSIONS: We show that motivating TBAs using monetary incentives for maternal postnatal care use can increase skilled care use after delivery among their maternal and neonatal clients, who have a higher risk of mortality because of their exposure to unskilled birth attendance. However, improving the quality of care is key to ensuring maternal and neonatal health gains from postnatal care attendance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered in clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02936869 ) on October 18, 2016.
Asunto(s)
Partería/economía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Posnatal/economía , Derivación y Consulta/economía , Reembolso de Incentivo , Femenino , Humanos , Partería/métodos , Nigeria , EmbarazoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Antenatal care (ANC) during pregnancy and skilled birth attendance (SBA) during delivery are important policy concerns to reduce maternal deaths. Bangladesh is one of the developing countries which has made remarkable progress in both services during the last couple of decades by improving the SBA service rate from 16% in 2004 to 42.1% in 2014. However, this rate remains below the targeted level (50%) of the Health Population and Nutrition Sector Development Program set by the Ministry of the Health and Family Welfare of Bangladesh. This article explored the sociodemographic factors associated with the ANC and SBA service attainment. Furthermore, the possible implication of using ANC on SBA was also investigated. STUDY DESIGN: The study followed a cross-sectional design using the Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2014, with a sample of size 4603 women with at least one live birth 3 years preceding the survey. METHODS: Following a bivariate analysis, linear mixed-effect models were used to assess the relationship between sociodemographic factors and the outcome indicators (ANC and SBA). Finally, the association between SBA and ANC was evaluated through another mixed-effect model. RESULTS: Wealth index, participation in household decisions, and partner's and respondent's education were significant predictors of ANC; whereas, residence, age at first birth, wealth index, working status, participation in household decisions, and partner and respondent's education were significant for SBA. Female education and household affordability were the strongest predictors for both ANC and SBA. ANC showed significant association with SBA as women accessing essential ANC during delivery seemed to be 4 times more likely (95% confidence interval: 3.05-5.93) to avail SBA services. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, four factors were significant: residence, wealth index, education, and ANC access. Women residing in urban areas, having higher financial solvency, completing higher education, and accessing ANC by skilled personnel were more likely to receive SBA at delivery than their counterparts. Accessibility to skilled care during pregnancy leads to increased professional care during delivery. Thus, policies to encourage women and heads of families to seek skilled care during pregnancy would be beneficial to reach the maternal healthcare targets of Bangladesh.
Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Escolaridad , Familia , Partería/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Bangladesh , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Partería/economía , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/economía , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is growing demand for high quality evidence-based practice in the fight against negative maternal health outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Zambia is one of the countries that has transposed this evidence-based approach by outlawing Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs) and recommending exclusive skilled-care. There is division among scholars regarding the usefulness of this approach to maternal health in SSA in general. One strand of scholars praises the approach and the other criticizes it. However, there is still lack of evidence to legitimize either of the two positions in poor-settings. Thus the aim of this study is to fill this gap by investigating local people's views on the evidence-based practice in the form of skilled-maternal-care in Zambia, by using Mfuwe as a case study. METHODS: With the help of the Social Representation theory, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were conducted in Mfuwe, Zambia with 63 participants. FINDINGS: The study shows that the evidence-based strategy (of exclusive skilled-care) led to improved quality of care in cases where it was accessible. However, not all women had access to skilled-care; thus the act of outlawing the only alternative form of care (TBAs) seemed to have been counterproductive in the context of Mfuwe. The study therefore demonstrates that incorporating TBAs rather than obscuring them may offer an opportunity for improving their potential benefits and minimizing their limitations thereby increasing access and quality of care to women of Mfuwe. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that while evidence-based strategies remain useful in improving maternal care, they need to be carefully appropriated in poor settings in order to increase access and quality of care.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Servicios de Salud Materna , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Salud Materna , Servicios de Salud Materna/economía , Partería/economía , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Salud Rural , ZambiaRESUMEN
Objetivo: Analizar el nivel de eficiencia del cambio en el protocolo de seguimiento de embarazo de bajo riesgo, desarrollado e implantado en atención primaria y atención hospitalizada. Metodología: Se calcula el coste económico teórico y real del seguimiento del embarazo de bajo riesgo desde febrero hasta julio de los años 2016 y 2017. Se comparan ambos costes y se calcula el ahorro teórico y real. El nuevo protocolo supone principalmente un cambio en la distribución de visitas entre el hospital, realizadas por obstetras, y la atención primaria, realizadas por matronas. La evaluación se hace en función del ahorro económico teórico previsto por la implantación del protocolo y el ahorro real generado durante el periodo de febrero-julio de 2017, según las tarifas de consultas publicadas en el Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias. Resultados: Disminución de un 75% de las consultas en el hospital antes de la semana 37 de gestación y un aumento del 100% en atención primaria. Dado el número de embarazos desde febrero hasta julio de los años 2016 y 2017, el ahorro teórico estimado es de 175.456,4 Euros, y el ahorro real de 20.007,2 Euros. Discusión: El análisis entre la situación teórica y la real muestra un alto número de consultas en atención primaria, una disminución menor de la esperada en las consultas de atención especializada y un inexplicable aumento de las consultas de embarazo de alto riesgo. Conclusiones: Es preciso realizar una revaluación una vez pasado el periodo de implantación, reconducir a atención primaria los controles de embarazo de bajo riesgo que siguen realizándose en el hospital, revisar el registro de visitas en atención primaria y evaluar el aumento de las consultas de embarazo de alto riesgo
Objective: The objective of this work is to analyze the efficiency level of the change in the protocol of low risk pregnancy, monitored, developed and implanted in primary care and hospitalized care. Methodology: The theoretical and real economic costs of monitoring low-risk pregnancy from February to July of 2016 and 2017 are calculated. Then, both costs are compared and finally, the theoretical and real savings are calculated. Mainly, the new protocol involves a change in the distribution of visits between hospitals made by obstetricians, and primary care, performed by midwives. The evaluation is based on the theoretical economic savings foreseen by the implementation of the protocol and the real savings generated during the period of February-July 2017, according to the consultation rates published in the Official Gazette of the Principado of Asturias. Results: Reduction of 75% of consultations in hospital before week 37 and a 100% increase in primary. Given the number of pregnancies of the period February-July 2016 and 2017, the estimated theoretical saving is 175.456.4 Euros and the real saving is 20.007.2 Euros. Discussion: The analysis between the theoretical situation and the real one reveals a high number of consultations in primary care, a smaller decrease, than expected, in specialized care consultations and an inexplicable increase in high risk pregnancy consultations. Conclusions: It is precise reassessment once the implementation period has passed, redirect to primary care those low risk pregnancy controls that continue to be performed in the hospital, review the registry of visits in primary care, and evaluate the increase in high-risk pregnancy consultations