Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 49.924
1.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 7(5): e2003, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703000

BACKGROUND: Mid-rectal cancer treatment traditionally involves conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection (CLAR). This study aimed to assess the clinical and therapeutic advantages of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) over CLAR. AIMS: To compare the clinical outcomes, intraoperative metrics, postoperative recovery, complications, and long-term prognosis between NOSES and CLAR groups. MATERIALS & METHODS: A total of 136 patients were analyzed, with 92 undergoing CLAR and 44 undergoing NOSES. Clinical outcomes were evaluated, and propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to control potential biases. RESULTS: The NOSES group exhibited significant improvements in postoperative recovery, including lower pain scores on days 1, 3, and 5 (p < .001), reduced need for additional analgesics (p = .02), shorter hospital stays (10.8 ± 2.3 vs. 14.2 ± 5.3 days; p < .001), and decreased intraoperative blood loss (48.1 ± 52.7 mL vs. 71.0 ± 55.0 mL; p = .03). Patients undergoing NOSES also reported enhanced satisfaction with postoperative abdominal appearance and better quality of life. Additionally, the NOSES approach resulted in fewer postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: While long-term outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence rates) were comparable between the two methods, NOSES demonstrated superior postoperative outcomes compared to CLAR in mid-rectal cancer treatment, while maintaining similar long-term oncological safety. These findings suggest that NOSES could serve as an effective alternative to CLAR without compromising long-term results.


Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Middle Aged , Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Quality of Life , Propensity Score
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 69, 2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717476

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of tumor size on survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer. METHODS: Early-onset colon and rectal cancer patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015. Tumor size was analyzed as both continuous and categorical variables. Several statistical techniques, including restricted cubic spline (RCS), Cox proportional hazard model, subgroup analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were employed to demonstrate the association between tumor size and overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of early-onset colon and rectal cancer. RESULTS: Seventeen thousand five hundred fifty-one (76.7%) early-onset colon and 5323 (23.3%) rectal cancer patients were included. RCS analysis confirmed a linear association between tumor size and survival. Patients with a tumor size > 5 cm had worse OS and CSS, compared to those with a tumor size ≤ 5 cm for both early-onset colon and rectal cancer. Notably, subgroup analysis showed that a smaller tumor size (≤ 50 mm) was associated with worse survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer, although not statistically significant. After PSM, Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that the survival of patients with tumor size ≤ 50 mm was better than that of patients with tumor size > 50 mm. CONCLUSION: Patients with tumors larger than 5 cm were associated with worse survival in early-onset colon and rectal cancer. However, smaller tumor size may indicate a more biologically aggressive phenotype, correlating with poorer survival in stage II early-onset colon cancer.


Age of Onset , Colonic Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Tumor Burden , Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , SEER Program , Neoplasm Staging , Proportional Hazards Models , Aged
3.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 141, 2024 May 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720315

BACKGROUND: The optimal approach for ensuring both complete resection and preservation of anal function in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to clarify short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST. METHODS: A total of 13 patients who underwent robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST between December 2011 and April 2022 were included. All robotic procedures were performed using a systematic approach. A supplemental video of robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST is attached. The short-term outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications during the first 30 days after surgery. Surgical outcomes were retrieved from a prospective database. Long-term outcomes, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, were determined in all patients. RESULTS: Median distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 4.0 cm. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. Two patients underwent neoadjuvant imatinib therapy. All patients underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. None underwent conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. The incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II and grade ≥ III complications was 7.7% and 0%, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. Twelve patients (92.3%) underwent stoma closure within 5 months of the initial surgery. Median follow-up time was 76 months. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were both 100%. None of the patients had recurrence. CONCLUSION: Short-term and long-term outcomes after radical robotic surgery for rectal GIST were favorable. Robotic surgery might be a useful surgical approach for rectal GIST.


Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Follow-Up Studies
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 68, 2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714581

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is a serious complication of colorectal cancer surgery, prolonging hospital stays and impacting patient prognosis. Preventive colostomy is required in patients at risk of anastomotic fistulas. However, it remains unclear whether the commonly used loop colostomy(LC) or loop ileostomy(LI) can reduce the complications of colorectal surgery. This study aims to compare perioperative morbidities associated with LC and LI following anterior rectal cancer resection, including LC and LI reversal. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, the Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on perioperative morbidity during stoma development and reversal up to July 2023, The meta-analysis included 10 trials with 2036 individuals (2 RCTs and 8 cohorts). RESULTS: No significant differences in morbidity, mortality, or stoma-related issues were found between the LI and LC groups after anterior resection surgery. However, patients in the LC group exhibited higher rates of stoma prolapse (RR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.19-0.82; P = 0.01), retraction (RR: 0.45; 95%CI: 0.29-0.71; P < 0.01), surgical site infection (RR: 0.52; 95%CI: 0.27-1.00; P = 0.05) and incisional hernias (RR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.32-0.89; P = 0.02) after stoma closure compared to those in the LI group. Conversely, the LI group showed higher rates of dehydration or electrolyte imbalances(RR: 2.98; 95%CI: 1.51-5.89; P < 0.01), high-output(RR: 6.17; 95%CI: 1.24-30.64; P = 0.03), and renal insufficiency post-surgery(RR: 2.51; 95%CI: 1.01-6.27; P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study strongly recommends a preventive LI for anterior resection due to rectal cancer. However, ileostomy is more likely to result in dehydration, renal insufficiency, and intestinal obstruction. More multicenter RCTs are needed to corroborate this.


Colostomy , Ileostomy , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Ileostomy/adverse effects , Colostomy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Male , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Female , Middle Aged
5.
World J Surg Oncol ; 22(1): 124, 2024 May 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715036

BACKGROUND: The primary treatment for non-metastatic rectal cancer is curative resection. However, sphincter-preserving surgery may lead to complications. This study aims to develop a predictive model for stoma non-closure in rectal cancer patients who underwent curative-intent low anterior resection. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with non-metastatic rectal cancer between January 2005 and December 2017, who underwent low anterior resection, were retrospectively included in the Chang Gung Memorial Foundation Institutional Review Board. A comprehensive evaluation and analysis of potential risk factors linked to stoma non-closure were performed. RESULTS: Out of 956 patients with temporary stomas, 10.3% (n = 103) experienced non-closure primarily due to cancer recurrence and anastomosis-related issues. Through multivariate analysis, several preoperative risk factors significantly associated with stoma non-closure were identified, including advanced age, anastomotic leakage, positive nodal status, high preoperative CEA levels, lower rectal cancer presence, margin involvement, and an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73m2. A risk assessment model achieved an AUC of 0.724, with a cutoff of 2.5, 84.5% sensitivity, and 51.4% specificity. Importantly, the non-closure rate could rise to 16.6% when more than two risk factors were present, starkly contrasting the 3.7% non-closure rate observed in cases with a risk score of 2 or below (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prognostic risk factors associated with the non-closure of a temporary stoma include advanced age, symptomatic anastomotic leakage, nodal status, high CEA levels, margin involvement, and an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Hence, it is crucial for surgeons to evaluate these factors and provide patients with a comprehensive prognosis before undergoing surgical intervention.


Rectal Neoplasms , Surgical Stomas , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Surgical Stomas/adverse effects , Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Follow-Up Studies , Anastomotic Leak/etiology , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Proctectomy/methods , Proctectomy/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over
6.
BJS Open ; 8(3)2024 May 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38805357

BACKGROUND: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard surgery for low/mid locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to compare three minimally invasive surgical approaches for TME with primary anastomosis (laparoscopic TME, robotic TME, and transanal TME). METHODS: Records of patients undergoing laparoscopic TME, robotic TME, or transanal TME between 2013 and 2022 according to standardized techniques in expert centres contributing to the European MRI and Rectal Cancer Surgery III (EuMaRCS-III) database were analysed. Propensity score matching was applied to compare the three groups with respect to the complication rate (primary outcome), conversion rate, postoperative recovery, and survival. RESULTS: A total of 468 patients (mean(s.d.) age of 64.1(11) years) were included; 190 (40.6%) patients underwent laparoscopic TME, 141 (30.1%) patients underwent robotic TME, and 137 (29.3%) patients underwent transanal TME. Comparative analyses after propensity score matching demonstrated a higher rate of postoperative complications for laparoscopic TME compared with both robotic TME (OR 1.80, 95% c.i. 1.11-2.91) and transanal TME (OR 2.87, 95% c.i. 1.72-4.80). Robotic TME was associated with a lower rate of grade A anastomotic leakage (2%) compared with both laparoscopic TME (8.8%) and transanal TME (8.1%) (P = 0.031). Robotic TME (1.4%) and transanal TME (0.7%) were both associated with a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic TME (8.8%) (P < 0.001). Time to flatus and duration of hospital stay were shorter for patients treated with transanal TME (P = 0.003 and 0.001 respectively). There were no differences in operating time, intraoperative complications, blood loss, mortality, readmission, R0 resection, or survival. CONCLUSION: In this multicentre, retrospective, propensity score-matched, cohort study of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, newer minimally invasive approaches (robotic TME and transanal TME) demonstrated improved outcomes compared with laparoscopic TME.


Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications , Propensity Score , Rectal Neoplasms , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Europe , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Transanal Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Transanal Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Rectum/surgery , Proctectomy/methods , Proctectomy/adverse effects
7.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 80, 2024 May 28.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806953

PURPOSE: Although lateral lymph node dissection has been performed to prevent lateral pelvic recurrence in locally advanced lower rectal cancer, the incidence of lateral pelvic recurrence after this procedure has not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, with a particular focus on recurrence patterns. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single high-volume cancer center in Japan. A total of 493 consecutive patients with stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent lateral lymph node dissection between January 2005 and August 2022 were included. The primary outcome measures included patterns of recurrence, overall survival, and relapse-free survival. Patterns of recurrence were categorized as lateral or central pelvic. RESULTS: Among patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection, 18.1% had pathologically positive lateral lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic recurrence occurred in 5.5% of patients after surgery. Multivariate analysis identified age > 75 years, lateral lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent risk factors for lateral pelvic recurrence. Evaluation of the recurrence rate by dissection area revealed approximately 1% of recurrences in each area after dissection. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the prognostic outcome and limitations of lateral lymph node dissection for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer, focusing on the incidence of recurrence in the lateral area after the dissection. Our study emphasizes the clinical importance of lateral lymph node dissection, which is an essential technique that surgeons should acquire.


Lymph Node Excision , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Pelvis , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Male , Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Middle Aged , Pelvis/surgery , Pelvis/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Multivariate Analysis
8.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1369190, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807589

Melanoma causes the majority of skin cancer-related deaths. Despite novel therapy options, metastatic melanoma still has a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy has been shown to prolong overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma, but mucosal melanomas respond less favorably compared to melanomas of cutaneous origin. We report on a patient with a mucosal melanoma of the rectum diagnosed in June 2020. Since a surgical intervention in order to achieve a tumor-free situation would have required an amputation of the rectum, a neo-adjuvant systemic immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was initiated. As restaging and colonoscopy after four doses of this combination immunotherapy showed a partial response, the patient decided against the pre-planned surgery and a maintenance therapy with nivolumab was started. Repeated colonoscopy showed a complete response after four doses of nivolumab. After ongoing ICI therapy with nivolumab and no evidence of tumor relapse, immunotherapy was stopped in July 2022 after nearly 2 years of continuous treatment. The patient remained tumor-free during further follow-up. Neo-adjuvant immunotherapy is getting more explored in advanced melanoma. By administering ICI therapy before surgical resection of an essentially operable tumor, a stronger and more diverse immunological response is supposed to be achieved. Our reported case demonstrates that this approach could also be effective in mucosal melanoma despite of its generally lower response to immunotherapy.


Ipilimumab , Melanoma , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Nivolumab , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Melanoma/therapy , Melanoma/drug therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/immunology , Male , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Immunotherapy/methods , Middle Aged
9.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 82, 2024 May 29.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809315

INTRODUCTION: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker in various cancer types, including locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), offering potential insights into disease progression, treatment response and recurrence. This review aims to comprehensively evaluate the utility of ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker in LARC. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched as part of our review. Studies investigating the utility of ctDNA in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) were assessed for eligibility. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) risk of bias tool. Outcomes extracted included basic participant characteristics, ctDNA details and survival data. A meta-analysis was performed on eligible studies to determine pooled recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Twenty-two studies involving 1676 participants were included in our analysis. Methodological quality categorised by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was generally satisfactory across included studies. ctDNA detected at various time intervals was generally associated with poor outcomes across included studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled hazard ratio of 8.87 (95% CI 4.91-16.03) and 15.15 (95% CI 8.21-27.95), indicating an increased risk of recurrence with ctDNA positivity in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods respectively. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review provides evidence supporting the prognostic utility of ctDNA in patients with LARC, particularly in identifying patients at higher risk of disease recurrence in the post-neoadjuvant and post-operative periods.


Biomarkers, Tumor , Circulating Tumor DNA , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/blood , Rectal Neoplasms/genetics , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Prognosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/blood , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Disease-Free Survival , Neoplasm Staging , Male
10.
J Robot Surg ; 18(1): 229, 2024 May 29.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38809383

The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive ability of MRI-based radiomics combined with tumor markers for TN staging in patients with rectal cancer and to develop a prediction model for TN staging. A total of 190 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total mesorectal excision at the First Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University between January 2016 and December 2020 were included in the study. An additional 54 patients from a prospective validation cohort were included between August 2022 and August 2023. Preoperative tumor markers and MRI imaging data were collected from all enrolled patients. The 190 patients were divided into a training cohort (n = 133) and a validation cohort (n = 57). Radiomics features were extracted by outlining the region of interest (ROI) on T2WI sequence images. Feature selection and radiomics score (Rad-score) construction were performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis (LASSO). The postoperative pathology TNM stage was used to differentiate locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/4 or N1/2) from locally early rectal cancer (T1/2, N0). Logistic regression was used to construct separate prediction models for T stage and N stage. The models' predictive performance was evaluated using DCA curves and calibration curves. The T staging model showed that Rad-score, based on 8 radiomics features, was an independent predictor of T staging. When combined with CEA, tumor diameter, mesoretal fascia (MRF), and extramural venous invasion (EMVI), it effectively differentiated between T1/2 and T3/4 stage rectal cancers in the training cohort (AUC 0.87 [95% CI: 0.81-0.93]). The N-staging model found that Rad-score, based on 10 radiomics features, was an independent predictor of N-staging. When combined with CA19.9, degree of differentiation, and EMVI, it effectively differentiated between N0 and N1/2 stage rectal cancers. The training cohort had an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.91). The calibration curves demonstrated good precision between the predicted and actual results. The DCA curves indicated that both sets of predictive models could provide net clinical benefits for diagnosis. MRI-based radiomics features are independent predictors of T staging and N staging. When combined with tumor markers, they have good predictive efficacy for TN staging of rectal cancer.


Biomarkers, Tumor , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Aged , Prospective Studies , Predictive Value of Tests , Adult , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Radiomics
11.
Dermatol Online J ; 30(1)2024 Mar 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762867

Osteonecrosis of the jaw is a recognized complication associated with bevacizumab. Here, we present a patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil who experienced minimal skin fibrosis following intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Subsequently, the patient developed rectal adenocarcinoma and encountered osteonecrosis of the jaw after receiving two cycles of bevacizumab. Close monitoring, accompanied by thorough examination to detect early signs of osteonecrosis of the jaw, should be considered for patients who have undergone radiation therapy in the head and neck region and are receiving bevacizumab or other medications known to be associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw.


Bevacizumab , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Tonsillar Neoplasms , Humans , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Tonsillar Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Tonsillar Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced
12.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 163, 2024 May 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769559

BACKGROUND: Abdominal perineal resection (APR) of rectal cancer, also known as Mile's procedure, is a classic procedure for the treatment of rectal cancer. Through the improvement of surgical skills and neoadjuvant therapy, the sphincter-preserving rate in rectal cancer patients has improved, even in patients with ultralow rectal cancer who underwent APR in the past. However, APR cannot be completely replaced by low anterior resection (LAR) in reality. APR still has its indications, when the tumor affects the external sphincter, etc. Good perineal exposure in APR is difficult and can seriously affect surgical safety and the long-term prognosis. METHODS: We reviewed the records of 16 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent APR at Anqing Municipal Hospital from January 2022 to April 2023, including 11 males and 5 females, with an average age of 64.8 ± 10.3 years. The perineal operation was completed with the Lone-Star® retractor-assisted (LSRA) exposure method. After incising the skin and subcutaneous tissue, a Lone-Star® retractor was placed, and the incision was retracted in surrounding directions with 8 small retractors, which facilitated the freeing of deep tissues. We dynamically adjusted the retractor according to the plane to fully expose the surgical field. RESULTS: All 16 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted APR successfully. Thirteen procedures were performed independently by a single person, and the others were completed by two persons due to intraoperative arterial hemostasis. All specimens were free of perforation and had a negative circumferential resection margin (CRM). Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients, including urinary retention in 1 patient, pulmonary infection in 1 patient, intestinal adhesion in 1 patient and peristomal dermatitis in 1 patient, and were graded as ClavienDindo grade 3 or lower and cured. No distant metastasis or local recurrence was found for any of the patients in the postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the LSRA exposure method might be helpful for perineal exposure during APR for rectal cancer, which could improve intraoperative safety and surgical efficiency, achieve one-person operation, and increase the comfort of operators.


Laparoscopy , Perineum , Proctectomy , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Perineum/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Aged , Proctectomy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
13.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303494, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771764

PURPOSE: To identify the predictive role of sarcopenia in long-term survival among rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery based on available evidence. METHODS: The Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched up to October 20, 2023, for relevant studies. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were the endpoints. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to evaluate the association between sarcopenia and survival. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 4283 patients were included. The pooled results demonstrated that preoperative sarcopenia significantly predicted poorer OS (HR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.67-2.57, P<0.001), DFS (HR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.39-2.48, P<0.001) and CSS (HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.31-2.56, P<0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis based on neoadjuvant therapy indicated that sarcopenia was a risk factor for worse OS and DFS in patients who received (OS: HR = 2.44, P<0.001; DFS: HR = 2.16, P<0.001) but not in those who did not receive (OS: HR = 2.44, P<0.001; DDFS: HR = 1.86, P = 0.002) neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In addition, subgroup analysis based on sample size and ethnicity showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Preoperative sarcopenia is significantly related to poor survival in surgical rectal cancer patients and could serve as a novel and valuable predictor of long-term prognosis in these patients.


Rectal Neoplasms , Sarcopenia , Sarcopenia/mortality , Sarcopenia/complications , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Disease-Free Survival , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prognosis , Preoperative Period , Risk Factors
15.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 189-193, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782384

OBJECTIVE: This study is aiming to compare the results of early and late removal of urinary catheters after rectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who undergone rectal cancer surgery in a single center were included in this prospective randomized study. The timing of the urinary catheter removal was randomized by a computer-assisted program and divided into 2 groups, which are early (first 48 h) and late (after 48 h). The primary outcome of this study was to compare the urinary retention and re-catheterization rates between patients with early and those with late catheter removal. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were included in this study. The median age was 60 (31-88 years), and the patient group was predominantly male (n: 40, 60.9%). Urinary retention after catheter removal developed in 8 (12%) of 66 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the need for re-catheterization (14% vs. 10%, p: 0.63). All the patients who required re-catheterization (n: 8) and were discharged with a urinary catheter (n: 4) were male. When the male and female patients were evaluated separately, there was no difference in urinary retention in the early or late groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early or late removal of the catheter does not play a role in the development of urinary retention in patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.


OBJETIVO: Comparar los resultados de la retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda urinaria tras la cirugía de cáncer rectal. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado que incluyó pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer rectal en un único centro. El momento de la retirada de la sonda urinaria se aleatorizó y se dividió en dos grupos: primeras 48 horas y después de 48 horas. Se compararon las tasas de retención urinaria y de nueva cateterización entre los pacientes con retirada precoz y tardía de la sonda. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 66 pacientes, con una mediana de edad de 60 años (31-88 años) y predominio del sexo masculino (n = 40, 60.9%). Se produjo retención urinaria tras la retirada de la sonda en 8 (12%). No hubo diferencias entre los dos grupos en cuanto a necesidad de nueva cateterización (14% frente a 10%, p = 0.63). Todos los pacientes que precisaron un nuevo cateterismo (n = 8) y fueron dados de alta con una sonda urinaria (n = 4) eran varones. CONCLUSIONES: La retirada precoz o tardía de la sonda no influye en la aparición de retención urinaria en pacientes intervenidos de cáncer de recto.


Device Removal , Postoperative Complications , Rectal Neoplasms , Urinary Catheterization , Urinary Catheters , Urinary Retention , Humans , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Aged , Urinary Retention/etiology , Prospective Studies , Adult , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Time Factors , Postoperative Care
16.
Cir Cir ; 92(2): 264-266, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782396

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a potentially life-threatening surgical emergency. It is a rapidly progressive infection of soft tissues, and mortality is related to the degree of sepsis and the general condition of the patient. It is a rare condition that requires a rapid diagnosis and surgical treatment is aggressive debridement. There are a small number of reported cases of perforation of a rectal malignancy leading to NF of the thigh. We present a case with rectal cancer in which the sciatic foramen had provided a channel for the spread of pelvic infection into the thigh.


La fascitis necrotizante es una emergencia quirúrgica potencialmente mortal. Es una infección de tejidos blandos rápidamente progresiva y la mortalidad está relacionada con el grado de sepsis y el estado general del paciente. Es una condición poco común que requiere un diagnóstico rápido, y el tratamiento quirúrgico consiste en un desbridamiento agresivo. Existe un pequeño número de casos notificados de perforación de neoplasia maligna de recto que conduce a fascitis necrotizante del muslo. Presentamos un caso de cáncer de recto en el cual el foramen ciático fue el canal para la propagación de la infección pélvica al muslo.


Fasciitis, Necrotizing , Intestinal Perforation , Rectal Neoplasms , Thigh , Humans , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/etiology , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/complications , Intestinal Perforation/etiology , Intestinal Perforation/surgery , Male , Debridement , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Middle Aged , Sciatic Nerve/injuries , Pelvic Infection/etiology
17.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 56, 2024 May 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772962

BACKGROUND: Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNET) are rare and challenging to manage. While most patients with small rNET can be definitively treated with local excision, the role of chemotherapy in general and neoadjuvant therapy particularly in managing advanced rNET has not been well established. Therefore, this study aimed to determine which patients with rNET may gain a survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection of rNET in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2019) was performed. First, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS) and define the high-risk groups. Afterward, stratified OS analyses were performed for each high-risk group to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a survival benefit in each group. RESULTS: A total of 1837 patients (49.8% female; mean age 56.6 ± 12.3 years) underwent radical resection of a rNET. Tumors > 20 mm in size, clinical T4 tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, and metastatic disease were independent predictors of worse OS and were defined as high-risk groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant survival benefit in any of the high-risk groups, except for patients with high-grade rNETs where neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved OS to a mean of 30.9 months compared with 15.9 months when neoadjuvant therapy was not given (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved the OS of patients with high-grade rNET by 15 months and may be indicated for this group.


Databases, Factual , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Retrospective Studies , Neuroendocrine Tumors/therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/mortality , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Aged , United States , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Treatment Outcome
18.
BMC Med Imaging ; 24(1): 116, 2024 May 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773384

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the predictive value of one-stop energy spectrum and perfusion CT parameters for microvessel density (MVD) in colorectal cancer cancer foci. METHODS: Clinical and CT data of 82 patients with colorectal cancer confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy or surgical pathology in our hospital from September 2019 to November 2022 were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Energy spectrum CT images were measured using the Protocols general module of the GSI Viewer software of the GE AW 4.7 post-processing workstation to measure the CT values of the arterial and venous phase lesions and the neighboring normal intestinal wall in a single energy range of 40 kev∼140 kev, and the slopes of the energy spectrum curves (λ) were calculated between 40 kev-90 kev; Iodine concentration (IC), Water concentration (WC), Effective-Z (Eff-Z) and Normalized iodine concentration (NIC) were measured by placing a region of interest (ROI) on the iodine concentration map and water concentration map at the lesion and adjacent to the normal intestinal wall.Perfusion CT images were scanned continuously and dynamically using GSI Perfusion software and analyzed by applying CT Perfusion 4.0 software.Blood volume (BV), blood flow (BF), surface permeability (PS), time to peak (TTP), and mean transit time (MTT) were measured respectively in the lesion and adjacent normal colorectal wall. Based on the pathological findings, the tumors were divided into a low MVD group (MVD < 35/field of view, n = 52 cases) and a high MVD group (MVD ≥ 35/field of view, n = 30 cases) using a median of 35/field of view as the MVD grouping criterion. The collected data were statistically analyzed, the subjects' operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted, and the area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Yoden index were calculated for the predicted efficacy of each parameter of the energy spectrum and perfusion CT and the combined parameters. RESULTS: The CT values, IC, NIC, λ, Eff-Z of 40kev∼140kev single energy in the arterial and venous phase of colorectal cancer in the high MVD group were higher than those in the low MVD group, and the differences were all statistically significant (p < 0.05). The AUC of each single-energy CT value in the arterial phase from 40 kev to 120 kev for determining the high or low MVD of colorectal cancer was greater than 0.8, indicating that arterial stage has a good predictive value for high or low MVD in colorectal cancer; AUC for arterial IC, NIC and IC + NIC were all greater than 0.9, indicating that in arterial colorectal cancer, both single and combined parameters of spectral CT are highly effective in predicting the level of MVD. The AUC of 40 kev to 90 kev single-energy CT values in the intravenous phase was greater than 0.9, and its diagnostic efficacy was more representative; The AUC of IC and NIC in venous stage were greater than 0.8, which indicating that the IC and NIC energy spectrum parameters in venous stage colorectal cancer have a very good predictive value for the difference between high and low MVDs, with the greatest diagnostic efficacy in IC.The values of BV and BF in the high MVD group were higher than those in the low MVD group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the AUC of BF, BV, and BV + BF were 0.991, 0.733, and 0.997, respectively, with the highest diagnostic efficacy for determining the level of MVD in colorectal cancer by BV + BF. CONCLUSION: One-stop CT energy spectrum and perfusion imaging technology can accurately reflect the MVD in living tumor tissues, which in turn reflects the tumor angiogenesis, and to a certain extent helps to determine the malignancy, invasion and metastasis of living colorectal cancer tumor tissues based on CT energy spectrum and perfusion parameters.


Neovascularization, Pathologic , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Neovascularization, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/blood supply , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Microvascular Density , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood supply , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Neoplasms/blood supply , Angiogenesis
19.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 442, 2024 May 21.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773457

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (preCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer in older people who were classified as "fit" by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). METHODS: A single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial was designed. Patients were eligible for this study if they were aged 70 years or above and met the standards of "fit" (SIOG1) as evaluated by CGA and of the locally advanced risk category. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). Patients were scheduled to receive preCRT (50 Gy) with raltitrexed (3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 22). RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients were evaluated by CGA, of whom eighty-six, eleven and twelve were classified into the fit, intermediate and frail category. Sixty-eight fit patients with a median age of 74 years were enrolled. Sixty-four patients (94.1%) finished radiotherapy without dose reduction. Fifty-four (79.3%) patients finished the prescribed raltitrexed therapy as planned. Serious toxicity (grade 3 or above) was observed in twenty-four patients (35.3%), and fourteen patients (20.6%) experienced non-hematological side effects. Within a median follow-up time of 36.0 months (range: 5.9-63.1 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 89.6% (95% CI: 82.3-96.9), 92.4% (95% CI: 85.9-98.9) and 75.6% (95% CI: 65.2-86.0), respectively. Forty-eight patients (70.6%) underwent surgery (R0 resection 95.8%, R1 resection 4.2%), the corresponding R0 resection rate among the patients with positive mesorectal fascia status was 76.6% (36/47). CONCLUSION: This phase II trial suggests that preCRT is efficient with tolerable toxicities in older rectal cancer patients who were evaluated as fit based on CGA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registration number on ClinicalTrials.gov was NCT02992886 (14/12/2016).


Chemoradiotherapy , Geriatric Assessment , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Male , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Aged, 80 and over , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Preoperative Care/methods , Thiophenes/administration & dosage , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Patient Care Team , Quinazolines/administration & dosage , Quinazolines/therapeutic use
20.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(6): 371, 2024 May 22.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775966

PURPOSE: Many survivors of rectal cancer experience persistent bowel dysfunction. There are few evidence-based symptom management interventions to improve bowel control. The purpose of this study is to describe recruitment and pre-randomization baseline sociodemographic, health status, and clinical characteristics for SWOG S1820, a trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Symptoms in Rectal Cancer (AIMS-RC) intervention. METHODS: SWOG S1820 aimed to determine the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of AIMS-RC, a symptom management intervention for bowel health, comparing intervention to attention control. Survivors with a history of cancers of the rectosigmoid colon or rectum, within 6-24 months of primary treatment completion, with a post-surgical permanent ostomy or anastomosis, and over 18 years of age were enrolled. Outcomes included total bowel function, low anterior resection syndrome, quality of life, motivation for managing bowel health, self-efficacy for managing symptoms, positive and negative affect, and study feasibility and acceptability. RESULTS: The trial completed accrual over a 29-month period and enrolled 117 participants from 34 institutions across 17 states and one US Pacific territory. At baseline, most enrolled participants reported self-imposed diet adjustments after surgery, persistent dietary intolerances, and bowel discomfort post-treatment, with high levels of constipation and diarrhea (grades 1-4). CONCLUSIONS: SWOG S1820 was able to recruit, in a timely manner, a study cohort that is demographically representative of US survivors of rectal cancer. Baseline characteristics illustrate the connection between diet/eating and bowel symptoms post-treatment, with many participants reporting diet adjustments and persistent inability to be comfortable with dietary intake. GOV REGISTRATION DATE: 12/19/2019. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT#04205955.


Cancer Survivors , Quality of Life , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Aged , Adult , Patient Selection , Self Efficacy , Feasibility Studies
...