Improving Diagnosis and Care for Patients With Sarcoma: Do Real-World General Practitioners Data and Prospective Data Collections Have a Place Next to Clinical Trials?

There has been growing interest in the use of real-world data (RWD) to address clinically and policy-relevant (research) questions that cannot be answered with data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) alone. This is, for example, the case in rare malignancies such as sarcomas as limited patient numbers pose challenges in conducting RCTs within feasible timeliness, a manageable number of collaborators, and statistical power. This narrative review explores the potential of RWD to generate real-world evidence (RWE) in sarcoma research, elucidating its application across different phases of the patient journey, from prediagnosis to the follow-up/survivorship phase. For instance, examining electronic health records (EHRs) from general practitioners (GPs) enables the exploration of consultation frequency and presenting symptoms in primary care before a sarcoma diagnosis. In addition, alternative study designs that integrate RWD with well-designed observational RCTs may offer relevant information on the effectiveness of clinical treatments. As, especially in cases of ultrarare sarcomas, it can be an extreme challenge to perform well-powered randomized prospective studies. Therefore, it is crucial to support the adaptation of novel study designs. Regarding the follow-up/survivorship phase, examining EHR from primary and secondary care can provide valuable insights into identifying the short- and long-term effects of treatment over an extended follow-up period. The utilization of RWD also comes with several challenges, including issues related to data quality and privacy, as described in this study. Notwithstanding these challenges, this study underscores the potential of RWD to bridge, at least partially, gaps between evidence and practice and holds promise in contributing to the improvement of sarcoma care.

Biological and therapeutic insights from animal modeling of fusion-driven pediatric soft tissue sarcomas.

Survival for children with cancer has primarily improved over the past decades due to refinements in surgery, radiation and chemotherapy. Although these general therapies are sometimes curative, the cancer often recurs, resulting in poor outcomes for patients. Fusion-driven pediatric soft tissue sarcomas are genetically defined by chromosomal translocations that create a chimeric oncogene. This distinctive, almost 'monogenic', genetic feature supports the generation of animal models to study the respective diseases in vivo. This Review focuses on a subset of fusion-driven pediatric soft tissue sarcomas that have transgenic animal tumor models, which includes fusion-positive and infantile rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma and clear cell sarcoma. Studies using the animal models of these sarcomas have highlighted that pediatric cancers require a specific cellular state or developmental stage to drive tumorigenesis, as the fusion oncogenes cause different outcomes depending on their lineage and timing of expression. Therefore, understanding these context-specific activities could identify targetable activities and mechanisms critical for tumorigenesis. Broadly, these cancers show dependencies on chromatin regulators to support oncogenic gene expression and co-opting of developmental pathways. Comparative analyses across lineages and tumor models will further provide biological and therapeutic insights to improve outcomes for these children.

Leveraging Patient Engagement Through Collaboration for Improved Global Health Outcomes in Sarcoma.

In the dynamic landscape of oncology, collaborative efforts between the medical community and patient advocacy groups are pivotal in shaping standards of care and advancing research. Nowhere is this collaboration more evident than in sarcoma, a group of rare cancers posing unique challenges to diagnosis, management, and treatment, which profoundly affect patient outcomes. Here, we explore the vital role of patient-centric collaboration in improving global health outcomes in sarcoma, emphasizing the transformative power of collective action and shared expertise. Challenges in sarcoma care, including diagnostic complexities, disparities in access to care, and genomic tumor heterogeneity, underscore the urgent need for collaborative solutions. Initiatives like the Sarcoma European and Latin American Network (SELNET) and The Life Raft Group (LRG) exemplify successful models of collaborative research and patient advocacy, driving advancements in diagnosis, treatment, and disease understanding. Stakeholders across disciplines are uniting to improve sarcoma care and outcomes through the development of clinical practice guidelines, continuous medical education, patient registries, virtual tumor boards, and consortium-driven research endeavors, all of which foster the growth of global collaborative groups. The success of these collaborative efforts serves as a model for other rare diseases, highlighting the potential of collective action to drive progress and innovation in health care.

Studies on "Ascites sarcoma".

This review seeks to highlight and celebrate Professor Tomizo Yoshida's famous work on "Establishment and characterization of a rat ascites sarcoma, later named "Yoshida ascites sarcoma". Considering the tremendous contribution of this ascites tumor system to the subsequent promotion of research on cancer biology and cancer chemotherapy, his paper should be regarded as a monumental one in the cancer field. The research was carried out during 1943 and the results were submitted to this Journal in October 1944, when Japan was approaching a debilitating defeat in World War II in August 1945. In 1947, when "Research on Ascites sarcoma" was first comprehensively introduced to researchers in a special lecture at the Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Pathology, the whole audience was deeply impressed and was encouraged to resume scientific activity in Japan.

Pathology, Diagnosis, and Management of Sarcoma.

Due to the rarity and heterogeneity of sarcoma, investigation into molecular targets and new treatments has been particularly challenging [...].

Promise and Perils of Precision Oncology for Patients With Pediatric and Young Adult Sarcomas.

The completion of multiple national pediatric precision oncology platform trials and the incorporation of standardized molecular profiling into the diagnostic care of pediatric and young adult patients with sarcomas have proven the feasibility and potential of the approach. In this work, we explore the current state of the art of precision oncology for pediatric and young adults with sarcoma. We highlight important lessons learned and the challenges that should be addressed in the next generation of trials. The chapter outlines current efforts to improve standardization of molecular assays, harmonization of data collection, and novel molecular tools such as cell-free DNA analyses. Finally, we discuss the impacts and psychosocial outcomes experienced by patients and communication strategies for providers.

Clinical features and outcomes of young patients with low-grade non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas treated with a risk-based strategy: A report from Children's Oncology Group study ARST0332.

BACKGROUND: In retrospective analyses, the Pediatric Oncology Group [POG) and the Federation National des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) histologic grade predict outcome in pediatric non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS), but prospective data on grading, clinical features, and outcomes of low-grade NRSTS are limited. METHODS: We analyzed patients less than 30 years of age enrolled on Children's Oncology Group (COG) study ARST0332 (NCT00346164) with POG grade 1 or 2 NRSTS. Low-risk patients were treated with surgery alone. Intermediate-/high-risk patients received ifosfamide/doxorubicin and radiotherapy, with definitive resection either before or after 12 weeks of chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Estimated 5-year event-free and overall survival were 90% and 100% low risk (n = 80), 55% and 78% intermediate risk (n = 15), and 25% and 25% high risk (n = 4). In low-risk patients, only local recurrence was seen in 10%; none with margins greater than 1 mm recurred locally. Sixteen of 17 intermediate-/high-risk patients who completed neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy underwent gross total tumor resection, 80% with negative margins. Intermediate-/high-risk group events included one local and seven metastatic recurrences. Had the FNCLCC grading system been used to direct treatment, 29% of low-risk (surgery alone) patients would have received radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Most low-risk patients with completely resected POG low-grade NRSTS are successfully treated with surgery alone, and surgical margins greater than 1 mm may be sufficient to prevent local recurrence. Patients with intermediate- and high-risk low-grade NRSTS have outcomes similar to patients with high-grade histology, and require more effective therapies. Use of the current FNCLCC grading system may result in overtreatment of low-risk NRSTS curable with surgery alone.

Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney (DICER1-sarcoma of the kidney): A report from the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma/DICER1 Registry.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic sarcoma of the kidney (ASK) is a DICER1-related neoplasm first identified as a distinctive tumor type through the evaluation of unusual cases of putative anaplastic Wilms tumors. Subsequent case reports identified the presence of biallelic DICER1 variants as well as progression from cystic nephroma, a benign DICER1-related neoplasm. Despite increasing recognition of ASK as a distinct entity, the optimal treatment remains unclear. METHODS: Individuals with known or suspected DICER1-related tumors including ASK were enrolled in the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma/DICER1 Registry. Additionally, a comprehensive review of reported cases of ASK was undertaken, and data were aggregated for analysis with the aim to identify prognostic factors and clinical characteristics to guide decisions regarding genetic testing, treatment, and surveillance. RESULTS: Ten cases of ASK were identified in the Registry along with 37 previously published cases. Staging data, per Children's Oncology Group guidelines, was available for 40 patients: 13 were stage I, 12 were stage II, 10 were stage III, and five were stage IV. Outcome data were available for 37 patients. Most (38 of 46) patients received upfront chemotherapy and 14 patients received upfront radiation. Two-year event-free survival (EFS) for stage I-II ASK was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.2%-99.6%), compared with 46.6% EFS (95% CI: 24.7%-87.8%) for stage III-IV (p = .07). Two-year overall survival (OS) for stage I-II ASK was 88.9% (95% CI: 75.5%-100.0%), compared with 70.0% (95% CI: 46.7%-100.0%) for stage III-IV (p = .20). Chemotherapy was associated with improved EFS and OS with hazard ratios of 0.09 (95% CI: 0.02-0.31) and 0.08 (95% CI: 0.02-0.42), respectively. CONCLUSION: ASK is a rare DICER1-related renal neoplasm. In the current report, we identify clinical and treatment-related factors associated with outcome including the importance of chemotherapy in treating ASK. Ongoing data collection and genomic analysis are indicated to optimize outcomes for children and adults with these rare tumors.

Genetic Predisposition to Sarcoma: What Should Clinicians Know?

OPINION STATEMENT: Pathogenic germline variants in the setting of several associated cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) may lead to the development of sarcoma. We would consider testing for a CPS in patients with a strong family history of cancer, multiple primary malignancies, and/or pediatric/adolescent/young adult patients diagnosed with other malignancies strongly associated with CPS. When a CPS is diagnosed in a patient with sarcoma, additional treatment considerations and imaging options for those patients are required. This applies particularly to the use of radiation therapy, ionizing radiation with diagnostic imaging, and the use of alkylating chemotherapy. As data and guidelines are currently lacking for many of these scenarios, we have adopted a shared decision-making process with patients and their families. If the best chance for cure in a patient with CPS requires utilization of radiation therapy or alkylating chemotherapy, we discuss the risks with the patient but do not omit these modalities. However, if there are treatment options that yield equivalent survival rates, yet avoid these modalities, we elect for those options. Considering staging imaging and post-therapy evaluation for sarcoma recurrence, we avoid surveillance techniques that utilize ionizing radiation when possible but do not completely omit them when their use is indicated.

What is the Optimal Treatment Strategy after Sarcoma R2 Surgery?

OPINION STATEMENT: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin, most commonly occurring in the extremity but also in the retroperitoneum. The curative treatment for STS is radical surgery with wide margins, in some cases in combination with perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Nonradical resection (R2) of STS has been an emerging issue in recent decades, as optimal subsequent management remains debatable. Similarly, there is still no consensus on optimal surgical margins. Combining multiple treatment modalities in adjuvant therapy can achieve local and distant control in patients following surgery with positive margins. Patients who have undergone nonradical resection therefore require additional surgical interventions, and adjuvant radiotherapy resulting in a better prognosis but a higher number of complications. Following non-radical treatment, patients with limb and trunk wall sarcomas and retroperitoneal sarcomas should also undergo increased oncological surveillance. Given the potential issues that may emerge in such clinical situations, it is crucial to up-date the current guidelines to enhance the long-term prognosis of these patients.

Promoting psychological support services for parents of children with sarcoma through health-social partnership: A quality improvement project.

PURPOSE: A significant portion of parents of children diagnosed with sarcoma experience excessive stress and anxiety disorder. This quality improvement project aimed to implement a psychological support service program tailored for parents of children with sarcoma and evaluate its effects. DESIGN AND METHODS: An interprofessional team was formed through a health-social partnership to deliver comprehensive psychological support service program involving multiple cognitive-behavioral components to parents of children with sarcoma. Parents who were identified as having excessive stress and/or anxiety disorder and voluntarily agreed to participate were enrolled. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted, and previously recorded data from parents of children hospitalized in the year prior to this quality improvement project were included as historical controls. RESULTS: A total of 48 parents, including 35 mothers and 13 fathers, participated in the quality improvement project. Results showed that participants achieved greater reduction in emotional, somatic, and behavioral stress when compared with historical controls (all p < .001). Significantly lower prevalence of moderate to severe anxiety disorder was also found (4.2% vs. 85.4%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a psychological support service program, informed by cognitive-behavioral theory and delivered through a health-social partnership, effectively alleviated multiple facets of stress and anxiety disorder in parents of children newly diagnosed with sarcoma. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Nurses can facilitate and coordinate the collaboration among interprofessional team to deliver specialized psychological support services and ensure that parents of children with sarcoma have access to these services, ultimately enhancing their psychological well-being.

A novel nomogram and prognostic factor for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma survival.

Background: This study represented the inaugural effort to develop predictive survival nomograms for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Method: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database, we extracted 3078 eligible patients with mSTS between 2016 and 2022. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariable Cox analyses, and univariate and multivariable logistic analyses were conducted. Subsequently, predictive nomograms were constructed. Clinical effectiveness was validated using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) methods. Results: We used the SEER database to include 3078 eligible patients with mSTS between 2016 and 2022. All the eligible patients were randomly allocated in a ratio of 6:4 and stratified into a training group (n = 1846) and a validation group (n = 1232). In the multivariate Cox analysis, age, race, marital status, pathological grade, histologic subtype, surgery, and chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors. These factors were used to construct the nomogram to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of mSTS patients. The C-index for the training cohort and the validation cohort was 0.722(95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.708-0.736), and 0.716(95% CI: 0.698-0.734), respectively. The calibration curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probability demonstrated excellent calibration between the predicted and the actual survival. The AUC values of the nomogram at 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 0.785, 0.767, and 0.757 in the training cohort, 0.773, 0.754, and 0.751 in the validation cohort, respectively. Furthermore, DCA indicated the favorable clinical utility of the nomogram in both cohorts. The risk stratification system was constructed using the established nomogram, which enhanced prediction accuracy, aided clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and informing treatment decisions. Conclusion: This study marked the inaugural effort in constructing predictive survival nomograms mSTS patients in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors. The robustly constructed nomograms, alongside actual outcomes, offered valuable insights to inform follow-up management strategies.

68Ga-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT Improves Detection of Intermediate and Low-Grade Sarcomas and Identifies Candidates for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.

Fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) is often highly expressed by sarcoma cells and by sarcoma-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. This makes it a promising target for imaging and therapy. The level of FAP expression and the diagnostic value of 68Ga-FAP inhibitor (FAPI) PET for sarcoma subtypes are unknown. We assessed the diagnostic performance and accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI PET in various bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Potential eligibility for FAP-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (FAP-RPT) was evaluated. Methods: This prospective observational trial enrolled 200 patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT (186/200, or 93%) for staging or restaging. The number of lesions detected and the uptake (SUVmax) of the primary tumor, lymph nodes, and visceral and bone metastases were analyzed. The Wilcoxon test was used for semiquantitative assessment. The association of 68Ga-FAPI uptake intensity, histopathologic grade, and FAP expression in sarcoma biopsy samples was analyzed using Spearman r correlation. The impact of 68Ga-FAPI PET on clinical management was investigated using questionnaires before and after PET/CT. Eligibility for FAP-RPT was defined by an SUVmax greater than 10 for all tumor regions. Results: 68Ga-FAPI uptake was heterogeneous among sarcoma subtypes. The 3 sarcoma entities with the highest uptake (mean SUVmax ± SD) were solitary fibrous tumor (24.7 ± 11.9), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (18.8 ± 13.1), and leiomyosarcoma (15.2 ± 10.2). Uptake of 68Ga-FAPI versus 18F-FDG was significantly higher in low-grade sarcomas (10.4 ± 8.5 vs. 7.0 ± 4.5, P = 0.01) and in potentially malignant intermediate or unpredictable sarcomas without a World Health Organization grade (not applicable [NA]; 22.3 ± 12.5 vs. 8.5 ± 10.0, P = 0.0004), including solitary fibrous tumor. The accuracy, as well as the detection rates, of 68Ga-FAPI was higher than that of 18F-FDG in low-grade sarcomas (accuracy, 92.2 vs. 80.0) and NA sarcomas (accuracy, 96.9 vs. 81.9). 68Ga-FAPI uptake and the histopathologic FAP expression score (n = 89) were moderately correlated (Spearman r = 0.43, P < 0.0002). Of 138 patients, 62 (45%) with metastatic sarcoma were eligible for FAP-RPT. Conclusion: In patients with low-grade and NA sarcomas, 68Ga-FAPI PET demonstrates uptake, detection rates, and accuracy superior to those of 18F-FDG PET. 68Ga-FAPI PET criteria identified eligibility for FAP-RPT in about half of sarcoma patients.

Correlations between the modification patterns mediated by pyroptosis-related genes, tumor microenvironment, and immunotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) incidence, progression, and metastasis are tightly linked to the tumor microenvironment (TME). The modification patterns mediated by pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) in STS are unknown regarding the immune cell infiltration landscape of TME, immunotherapy effect, and prognostic value. First, we downloaded STS samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and gene-expression omnibus (GEO) databases. Based on 52 PRGs, 2 pyroptosis modification patterns were analyzed, and the associations of pyroptosis modification patterns with immune cell infiltration in the TME were elucidated systematically. To quantify PRG modification patterns in STS patients, we generated a pyroptosis scoring system using principal component analysis (PCA). We identified 2 distinct pyroptosis modification patterns in STS. Compared to PRG cluster A, the prognosis of cluster B was better. These 2 pyroptosis modification patterns corresponded to different characteristics of immune cell infiltration in the TME and biological behaviors. In the pyroptosis scoring system, a high pyroptosis score was connected to higher immune cell infiltration, stronger immune surveillance, immune-killing effects on tumor cells, and better clinical benefits. The results from 3 anti-PD1/PD-L1-treated immune cohorts demonstrated that higher pyroptosis scores are also closely connected to better immunotherapy results. We demonstrated that pyroptosis modification is essential to the STS microenvironment. Moreover, the pyroptosis score is a reliable and independent prognostic factor in STS patients, enabling a richer understanding of the STS microenvironment and the screening of immunotherapy candidates, predicting the immunotherapeutic effects for individual STS patients, and guiding the use of chemotherapy drugs.

Identifying specific TLS-associated genes as potential biomarkers for predicting prognosis and evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma.

Background: The tertiary lymphatic structure (TLS) is an important component of the tumor immune microenvironment and has important significance in patient prognosis and response to immune therapy. However, the underlying mechanism of TLS in soft tissue sarcoma remains unclear. Methods: A total of 256 RNAseq and 7 single-cell sequencing samples were collected from TCGA-SARC and GSE212527 cohorts. Based on published TLS-related gene sets, four TLS scores were established by GSVA algorithm. The immune cell infiltration was calculated via TIMER2.0 and "MCPcounter" algorithms. In addition, the univariate, LASSO, and multivariate-Cox analyses were used to select TLS-related and prognosis-significant hub genes. Single-cell sequencing dataset, clinical immunohistochemical, and cell experiments were utilized to validate the hub genes. Results: In this study, four TLS-related scores were identified, and the total-gene TLS score more accurately reflected the infiltration level of TLS in STS. We further established two hub genes (DUSP9 and TNFSF14) prognosis markers and risk scores associated with soft tissue sarcoma prognosis and immune therapy response. Flow cytometry analysis showed that the amount of CD3, CD8, CD19, and CD11c positive immune cell infiltration in the tumor tissue dedifferentiated liposarcoma patients was significantly higher than that of liposarcoma patients. Cytological experiments showed that soft tissue sarcoma cell lines overexpressing TNFSF14 could inhibit the proliferation and migration of sarcoma cells. Conclusion: This study systematically explored the TLS and related genes from the perspectives of bioinformatics, clinical features and cytology experiments. The total-gene TLS score, risk score and TNFSF14 hub gene may be useful biomarkers for predicting the prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy of soft tissue sarcoma.

Immunotherapy in Sarcoma: Current Data and Promising Strategies.

Traditionally sarcomas have been considered immunologically quiet tumours, with low tumour mutational burden (TMB) and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), consisting of decreased T-cell infiltration and elevated levels of H1F1α, macrophages and neutrophils.1,2 However, research has shown that a subset of sarcomas are immunologically 'hot' with either high TMB, PDL-1 expression, CD8+ T cells or presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) demonstrating sensitivity to immunotherapy.3,4 Here, we review the current evidence for immunotherapy use in bone sarcomas (BS) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS), with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and adoptive cellular therapies including engineered T-cell therapies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cancer vaccines and biomarkers of response.

Epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of primary renal sarcomas in adult patients.

To assess epidemiology, clinical presentation, treatment and overall survival of adult patients with renal sarcomas, the 2004-2016 SEER and NCDB databases were queried for adult patients diagnosed with renal sarcoma, calculating average annual age-adjusted incidence rates (AAIR) and average annual percentage change (AAPC) as well as overall survival (OS). In n = 1279 included renal sarcoma patients, AAIR remained constant over the study period (average 0.53 cases/1million; AAPC = 0.7, p = 0.6). Leiomyosarcoma (AAIR 0.14 cases/1 million) and malignant rhabdoid tumors (0.06 cases/1 million) were most common. Sarcoma histiotypes demonstrated considerable heterogeneity regarding demographic and cancer-related variables. Patients presented with advanced local extent (T3 33.3%; T4 14.2%) or distant metastases (29.1%) and commonly underwent surgical resection (81.6%). Longer OS was independently associated with younger age, female sex, lower comorbidity index, low T stage, negative surgical margins, absence of tumor necrosis or distant metastases and leiomyosarcoma histiotype (multivariable p < 0.05 each). Treatment efficacy varied according to sarcoma histiotype (interaction p < 0.001). Accounting for 0.25% of renal malignancies, renal sarcomas include 43 histiotypes with distinct epidemiology, clinical presentation, outcomes and sensitivity to systemic therapy, thereby reflecting soft-tissue sarcoma behavior. Renal sarcoma treatment patterns follow recommendations by renal cancer guidelines with surgical resection as the cornerstone of therapy.