Dynamic Scapular Winging Caused by Long Thoracic Nerve Compression due to Scapular Osteochondroma: A Case Report.

CASE: We report a unique case of dynamic scapular winging due to compression of the long thoracic nerve by a ventral scapular osteochondroma, representing a combination of mechanical and neural causes. Arthroscopic resection of the lesion was performed, which led to complete resolution of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: By reporting this case, we aimed to increase awareness of the importance of a correct etiological diagnosis of dynamic scapular winging, so that targeted treatment can be addressed. Arthroscopic resection seems ideal for this indication because it reduces the risk of complications and patient recovery time.

Accuracy of thoracic nerves recognition for surgical support system using artificial intelligence.

We developed a surgical support system that visualises important microanatomies using artificial intelligence (AI). This study evaluated its accuracy in recognising the thoracic nerves during lung cancer surgery. Recognition models were created with deep learning using images precisely annotated for nerves. Computational evaluation was performed using the Dice index and the Jaccard index. Four general thoracic surgeons evaluated the accuracy of nerve recognition. Further, the differences in time lag, image quality and smoothness of movement between the AI system and surgical monitor were assessed. Ratings were made using a five-point scale. The computational evaluation was relatively favourable, with a Dice index of 0.56 and a Jaccard index of 0.39. The AI system was used for 10 thoracoscopic surgeries for lung cancer. The accuracy of thoracic nerve recognition was satisfactory, with a recall score of 4.5 ± 0.4 and a precision score of 4.0 ± 0.9. Though smoothness of motion (3.2 ± 0.4) differed slightly, nearly no difference in time lag (4.9 ± 0.3) and image quality (4.6 ± 0.5) between the AI system and the surgical monitor were observed. In conclusion, the AI surgical support system has a satisfactory accuracy in recognising the thoracic nerves.

Selective Dorsal Scapular Nerve and Long Thoracic Nerve Blocks for Rescue Analgesia in Scapulothoracic Arthrodesis Surgery: A Case Report.

Scapulothoracic arthrodesis (STA) surgery is performed to stabilize the scapula in patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). Postoperative pain could be a major problem even while using erector spinae plane block (ESPB). We performed a preoperative ESPB with an intraoperative ESPB catheter, but rescue analgesia was needed for pain in the periscapular area in the postoperative period. The patient's pain score was reduced by applying an ultrasound-guided dorsal scapular nerve (DSN) and long thoracic nerve (LTN) block. Selective DSN and LTN blocks can be effective in enhancing postoperative analgesia in STA surgery.

Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for post-breast surgery pain syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent pain following breast surgery is common and may be challenging to treat. In patients refractory to conservative treatments, ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of thoracic nerves can be a useful option. RESULTS: This type of neuro blockade technique provides advantages in terms of safety and efficacy that are convenient for physicians managing refractory and complex cases of post-breast surgery syndrome. CONCLUSION: This technical review aims to present an up-to-date summary of the most common ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for chronic pain in post-breast surgery patients, provide a detailed technical description of each intervention, and propose preferred injections based on the anatomical location of the pain.

Assessing the Efficacy of the S-PECS Block in Breast Augmentation Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative acute and chronic pain following breast surgery is a common complication that needs resolving to allow for improved patient outcomes. Previously, thoracic epidurals and paravertebral blocks have been the accepted standard administered intraoperatively. However, more recently the introduction of the pectoral nerve block (PECS and PECS-2 blocks) has appeared promising to control the pain more effectively, but further robust analysis is required to prove its efficacy. The authors aim to study the efficacy of a new block, S-PECS, that combines a serratus anterior and a PECS-2 block. METHODS: In this study, the authors performed a single-center, randomized, controlled, double-blind group trial in 30 female patients undergoing breast augmentation surgery with silicone breast implants and the S-PECS block. Divided into two groups of 15, the PECS group received local anesthetics and the no-PECS control group received a saline injection. All participants were followed up at recovery and at 4, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: The authors' results showed that the pain score in the PECS group was significantly less than in the no-PECS group across all time points: recovery, and at 4, 6, and 12 hours. Furthermore, the patients who received the S-PEC block were 74% less likely to request pain medications compared with the no-PECS group ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Overall, the modified S-PECS block is an effective, efficient, and safe method of controlling pain in patients undergoing breast augmentation surgery, with additional applications yet to be explored.

The Effect of Pectoral Nerve Blocks on Opioid Use and Postoperative Pain in Masculinizing Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral masculinizing mastectomy is the most common gender-affirmation operation performed. Currently, there is lack of data regarding intraoperative and postoperative pain control for this population. It is the authors' aim to study the effects of the pectoral nerve (Pecs) I and II regional nerve blocks in patients undergoing masculinizing mastectomy. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed. Patients undergoing bilateral gender-affirmation mastectomy were randomized to receive either a Pecs block with ropivacaine or placebo injection. The patient, surgeon, and anesthesia team were blinded to the allocation. Intraoperative and postoperative opioid requirements were collected and recorded as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Participants recorded postoperative pain scores at specific time points on the day of surgery through postoperative day 7. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled between July of 2020 and February of 2022. Twenty-seven were randomized to the intervention group and 23 to the control group, with 43 patients undergoing analysis. There was no significant difference in intraoperative MME between the Pecs block group and the control group (9.8 versus 11.1; P = 0.29). In addition, there was no difference in postoperative MME between the groups (37.5 versus 40.0; P = 0.72). Postoperative pain scores were also similar between the groups at each specified time point. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant reduction in opioid consumption or postoperative pain scores in patients undergoing bilateral gender-affirmation mastectomy who received a regional anesthetic when compared with placebo. In addition, a postoperative opioid-sparing approach may be appropriate for patients undergoing bilateral masculinizing mastectomy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

The analgesic efficacy of pectoral nerve block for breast augmentation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: Many patients suffered from serious pain after breast augmentation, but the analgesic efficacy of pectoral nerve block for these patients was not well established. Thus, this meta-analysis was intended to study the analgesic efficacy of pectoral nerve block for breast augmentation. METHODS: Several databases including PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the analgesic efficacy of pectoral nerve block for breast augmentation. RESULTS: Six RCTs were ultimately included in this meta-analysis. Compared with control intervention for breast augmentation, pectoral nerve block could significantly reduce pain scores at 1 h (mean difference [MD] = -2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -3.71 to -0.85; P = 0.002), 2 h (MD = -3.08; 95% CI = -3.95 to -2.20; P < 0.00001), 4 h (MD = -2.95; 95% CI = -3.32 to -2.58; P < 0.00001), 6-8 h (MD = -2.68; 95% CI = -3.24 to -2.11; P < 0.00001), 24 h (MD = -2.04; 95% CI = -2.41 to -1.67; P < 0.00001), the number of analgesic requirement (odd ratio [OR] = 0.20; 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.45; P = 0.0001), and the incidence of nausea (OR = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.08 to 0.54; P = 0.001) and vomiting (OR = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.39; P = 0.0001).  Conclusions: Pectoral nerve block may be effective for pain relief after breast augmentation.

The clinical impact of pectoral nerve block in an 'enhanced recovery after surgery' program in breast surgery.

Background: Pectoral nerve block (PECS) is increasingly performed in breast surgery. Aim: The study evaluated the clinical impact of these blocks in the postoperative course. Patients & methods: In this case-control study, patients undergoing breast surgery with 'enhanced recovery after surgery' pathways were divided into group 1 (57 patients) in whom PECS was performed before general anesthesia, and group 2 (57 patients) in whom only general anesthesia was effected. Results: Postoperative opioid consumption (p < 0.002), pain at 32 h after surgery (p < 0.005) and the length of stay (p < 0.003) were significantly lower in group 1. Conclusion: Reducing opioid consumption and pain after surgery, PECS could favor a faster recovery with a reduction in length of stay, ensuring a higher turnover of patients undergoing breast surgery.

'Enhanced recovery after surgery' (ERAS) protocols have been recently applied in breast cancer patients in order to improve the postoperative course. However, the incidence of moderate to severe pain after breast surgery is frequent, and a multimodal approach is recommended. In this view, the interfascial plane blocks are advocated as a valid alternative to both paravertebral and epidural blockade. In this study, we evaluated the effects of these blocks on the postoperative course in patients undergoing breast surgery with ERAS protocols. We compared two patient groups: in the first, pectoral blocks were performed before general anesthesia, while in the second no block was carried out. We found that in the patient group receiving the blocks, postoperative opioid consumption (with essentially the same pain after surgery) and length of stay were significantly lower. Therefore, although more robust studies are needed to confirm our findings, these emerging locoregional techniques could favor a faster recovery in the context of ERAS in breast surgery. These results could have important clinical implications in terms of not only reducing healthcare costs but also ensuring a higher turnover of patients undergoing breast surgery.

Winged Scapula: Clinical and Electrophysiological Features and Common Causes Based on 20 Years of Experience in a Referral Center in Turkey.

PURPOSE: Winged scapula (WS) is a functionally disabling problem and it occurs because of neurogenic causes frequently. The authors aimed to assess WS patients by physical and electrodiagnostic examinations as well as some further investigations and define the common causes of WS. METHODS: The authors reviewed clinical and neurophysiological findings of 52 patients who were referred for electrodiagnostic examination because of WS in the period of 20 years. RESULTS: The mean age was 39 (range, 11-73) years and 32 were male patients. Right side was involved in 60% of patients (n = 31). According to electrodiagnostic examinations, 44 patients (85%) had neurogenic causes; 29 spinal accessory nerve palsy (17 occurred after surgical procedure), nine long thoracic nerve palsy (four occurred after strenuous activity), two dorsal scapular nerve (both neuralgic amyotrophy), one long thoracic nerve and spinal accessory nerve (relevant with strenuous trauma), one spinal accessory nerve and dorsal scapular nerve palsies (after surgical procedure and radiotherapy), one C5-7 radiculopathy (avulsion), and one brachial plexopathy (obstetric trauma). Five patients (10%) had muscle-related findings (four facio-scapulo-humeral dystrophy and one Duchenne muscular dystrophia) and three patients (5%) had normal findings (bone-joint related). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a relatively large series of patients with WS because of several causes from a referral tertiary EMG laboratory. The authors found that spinal accessory nerve palsy after neck surgery is the most common cause and long thoracic nerve palsy is the second common cause of unilateral WS. Electrodiagnostic examinations should be performed in WS patients to establish exact diagnosis and reveal some coexistence of WS causes.

Modified pectoral nerve block versus bi-level erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Regional anesthesia techniques constitute an important part of successful analgesia strategies in the perioperative care of patients undergoing breast surgery. The advent of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has led to the development of fascial plane blocks. The large array of blocks available for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery has increased the accessibility of regional anesthesia but has also created a dilemma of choice. This study compared the analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided modified pectoral nerve (PECS) block and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing radical mastectomy. METHODS: Seventy women were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, randomized control trial. After exclusion, 67 female patients who underwent radical mastectomy were finally analyzed. Ultrasound-guided PECS blocks and ESPBs were performed with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine. Postoperative morphine and pain scores were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Postoperative total morphine consumption in the first 24 h was significantly higher in the PECS group (P < 0.001). The ESPB group exhibited significantly reduced morphine consumption at all postoperative time points. Numeric rating scale scores were lower in the ESPB group at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively at rest and when coughing. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided bi-level ESPBs provided better postoperative analgesia than PECS blocks after radical mastectomy surgery.

One year follow-up on a randomized study investigating serratus anterior muscle and pectoral nerves type I block to reduced neuropathic pain descriptors after mastectomy.

Breast cancer is the second most common diagnosed type of cancer in women. Chronic neuropathic pain after mastectomy occurs frequently and is a serious health problem. In our previous single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical study, we demonstrated that the combination of serratus anterior plane block (SAM) and pectoral nerve block type I (PECS I) with general anesthesia reduced acute postoperative pain. The present report describes a prospective follow-up study of this published study to investigate the development of chronic neuropathic pain 12 months after mastectomy by comparing the use of general anesthesia alone and general anesthesia with SAM + PECS I. Additionally, the use of analgesic medication, quality of life, depressive symptoms, and possible correlations between plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-10 collected before and 24 h after surgery as predictors of pain and depression were evaluated. The results showed that the use of SAM + PECS I with general anesthesia reduced numbness, hypoesthesia to touch, the incidence of patients with chronic pain in other body regions and depressive symptoms, however, did not significantly reduce the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain after mastectomy. Additionally, there was no difference in the consumption of analgesic medication and quality of life. Furthermore, no correlation was observed between IL-1 beta, IL-6, and IL-10 levels and pain and depression. The combination of general anesthesia with SAM + PECS I reduced the occurrence of specific neuropathic pain descriptors and depressive symptoms. These results could promote the use of SAM + PECS I blocks for the prevention of specific neuropathic pain symptoms after mastectomy.Registration of clinical trial: The Research Ethics Board of the Hospital Sirio-Libanes/Brazil approved the study (CAAE 48721715.0.0000.5461). This study is registered at Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clinicos (ReBEC), and ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02647385.

Comparison of Tumescent Anesthesia Versus Pectoral Nerve Block in Bilateral Reduction Mammaplasty.

INTRODUCTION: With an increasing focus on multimodal pain control to reduce opioid requirements, regional and local anesthesia techniques have been investigated in bilateral reduction mammaplasty with variable results. The purpose of this study is to compare tumescent anesthesia with pectoral nerve block II (PECS II) in patients undergoing bilateral reduction mammaplasty with respect to postoperative pain and nausea, opioid consumption, length of stay, and cost. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral reduction mammaplasty for macromastia between November 2020 and December 2021 was performed. Demographic information, operative and anesthesia times, antiemetic and morphine equivalent requirements, postoperative numeric pain rating scales, and time until hospital discharge were compared between groups. χ2 and Fisher exact tests examined subgroup differences in categorical variables. Two-sample t test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test evaluated differences in continuous parametric and nonparametric variables, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients underwent bilateral reduction mammaplasty by 3 surgeons, 71.7% (n = 38) with tumescent anesthesia infiltrated by the operating surgeon before the start of the procedure and 28.3% (n = 15) with bilateral PECS II blocks performed by anesthesia before the start of the procedure. There was no difference in age, body mass index, weight resected, intraoperative medication, or immediate postoperative complications. Postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements were similar between the 2 groups. Twenty-one percent (n = 8) of tumescent patients compared with 66.7% (n = 10) of block patients required 1 or more doses of postoperative antiemetics ( P = 0.002). Patients who received blocks spent longer in the postoperative recovery area (5.3 vs 7.1 hours, P < 0.01). However, this did not translate to a significant increase in overnight stays. The block group had significantly higher hospitalization cost by an average of $4000, driven by pharmacy and procedural cost ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of multimodal perioperative pain-controlled reduction mammaplasty patients, tumescent anesthesia was associated with decreased antiemetic requirements, less time in recovery before discharge, and lower cost compared with PECS II blocks. Therefore, tumescent anesthesia may be favored over PECS II blocks when considering multimodal pain control strategies in reduction mammaplasty patients.

The efficacy of pectoral nerve block for pain control after breast augmentation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pectoral nerve block for pain control remains unknown in patients undergoing breast augmentation. This meta-analysis aims to explore the analgesic efficacy of pectoral nerve block for breast augmentation. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases, and included randomized controlled trials reporting pectoral nerve block versus no block for breast augmentation. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with control group after breast augmentation, pectoral nerve block was associated with substantially reduced pain scores at 1 hour (standard mean difference [SMD] = -1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.81 to -0.44; P = .007), maximal pain scores at 1 to 6 hours (SMD = -1.72; 95% CI = -2.75 to -0.69; P = .001) and 6 to 24 hours (SMD = -2.06; 95% CI = -3.40 to -0.72; P = .003), rescue analgesic (odd ratio = 0.17; 95% CI = 0.05-0.57; P = .004), nausea (SMD = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.08-0.54; P = .001), and vomiting (odd ratio = 0.15; 95% CI = 0.05-0.39; P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Pectoral nerve block benefits to alleviate pain intensity after breast augmentation.