Association of HER2DX with pathological complete response and survival outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The HER2DX genomic test predicts pathological complete response (pCR) and survival outcome in early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Here, we evaluated the association of HER2DX scores with (i) pCR according to hormone receptor status and various treatment regimens, and (ii) survival outcome according to pCR status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven neoadjuvant cohorts with HER2DX and clinical individual patient data were evaluated (DAPHNe, GOM-HGUGM-2018-05, CALGB-40601, ISPY-2, BiOnHER, NEOHER and PAMELA). All patients were treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab (n = 765) in combination with pertuzumab (n = 328), lapatinib (n = 187) or without a second anti-HER2 drug (n = 250). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were available in a combined series of 268 patients (i.e. NEOHER and PAMELA) with a pCR (n = 118) and without a pCR (n = 150). Cox models were adjusted to evaluate whether HER2DX can identify patients with low or high risk beyond pCR status. RESULTS: HER2DX pCR score was significantly associated with pCR in all patients [odds ratio (OR) per 10-unit increase = 1.59, 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.77; area under the ROC curve = 0.75], with or without dual HER2 blockade. A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to dual HER2 blockade over trastuzumab-only was observed in HER2DX pCR-high tumors treated with chemotherapy (OR = 2.36 (1.09-5.42). A statistically significant increase in pCR rate due to multi-agent chemotherapy over a single taxane was observed in HER2DX pCR-medium tumors treated with dual HER2 blockade (OR = 3.11, 1.54-6.49). The pCR rates in HER2DX pCR-low tumors were ≤30.0% regardless of treatment administered. After adjusting by pCR status, patients identified as HER2DX low-risk had better EFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.006) compared with patients with HER2DX high-risk. CONCLUSIONS: HER2DX pCR score and risk score might help identify ideal candidates to receive neoadjuvant dual HER2 blockade in combination with a single taxane in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer.

Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In hormone receptor-positive (HoR+) breast cancer (BC), gene expression analysis identifies luminal A (LumA), luminal B (LumB), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched (HER2-E), basal-like (BL) intrinsic subtypes and a normal-like group. This classification has an established prognostic value in early-stage HoR+ BC. Here, we carried out a trial-level meta-analysis to determine the prognostic ability of subtypes in metastatic BC (MBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically reviewed all the available prospective phase II/III trials in HoR+ MBC where subtype was assessed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS)/time to progression (TTP) of the LumA subtype compared to non-LumA. Secondary endpoints were PFS/TTP of each individual subtype, according to treatment, menopausal and HER2 status and overall survival (OS). The random-effect model was applied, and heterogeneity assessed through Cochran's Q and I2. Threshold for significance was set at P < 0.05. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021255769). RESULTS: Seven studies were included (2536 patients). Non-LumA represented 55.2% and was associated with worse PFS/TTP than LumA [hazard ratio (HR) 1.77, P < 0.001, I2 = 61%], independently of clinical HER2 status [Psubgroup difference (Psub) = 0.16], systemic treatment (Psub = 0.96) and menopausal status (Psub = 0.12). Non-LumA tumors also showed worse OS (HR 2.00, P < 0.001, I2 = 65%), with significantly different outcomes for LumB (PFS/TTP HR 1.46; OS HR 1.41), HER2-E (PFS/TTP HR 2.39; OS HR 2.08) and BL (PFS/TTP HR 2.67; OS HR 3.26), separately (PFS/TTP Psub = 0.01; OS Psub = 0.005). Sensitivity analyses supported the main result. No publication bias was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In HoR+ MBC, non-LumA disease is associated with poorer PFS/TTP and OS than LumA, independently of HER2, treatment and menopausal status. Future trials in HoR+ MBC should consider this clinically relevant biological classification.

Association between PD1 mRNA and response to anti-PD1 monotherapy across multiple cancer types.

Background: We hypothesized that the abundance of PD1 mRNA in tumor samples might explain the differences in overall response rates (ORR) observed following anti-PD1 monotherapy across cancer types. Patients and methods: RNASeqv2 data from 10 078 tumor samples representing 34 different cancer types was analyzed from TCGA. Eighteen immune-related gene signatures and 547 immune-related genes, including PD1, were explored. Correlations between each gene/signature and ORRs reported in the literature following anti-PD1 monotherapy were calculated. To translate the in silico findings to the clinical setting, we analyzed the expression of PD1 mRNA using the nCounter platform in 773 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples across 17 cancer types. To test the direct relationship between PD1 mRNA, PDL1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and ORR, we evaluated an independent FFPE-based dataset of 117 patients with advanced disease treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy. Results: In pan-cancer TCGA, PD1 mRNA expression was found strongly correlated (r > 0.80) with CD8 T-cell genes and signatures and the proportion of PD1 mRNA-high tumors (80th percentile) within a given cancer type was variable (0%-84%). Strikingly, the PD1-high proportions across cancer types were found strongly correlated (r = 0.91) with the ORR following anti-PD1 monotherapy reported in the literature. Lower correlations were found with other immune-related genes/signatures, including PDL1. Using the same population-based cutoff (80th percentile), similar proportions of PD1-high disease in a given cancer type were identified in our in-house 773 tumor dataset as compared with TCGA. Finally, the pre-established PD1 mRNA FFPE-based cutoff was found significantly associated with anti-PD1 response in 117 patients with advanced disease (PD1-high 51.5%, PD1-intermediate 26.6% and PD1-low 15.0%; odds ratio between PD1-high and PD1-intermediate/low = 8.31; P < 0.001). In this same dataset, PDL1 tumor expression by IHC or percentage of sTILs was not found associated with response. Conclusions: Our study provides a clinically applicable assay that links PD1 mRNA abundance, activated CD8 T-cells and anti-PD1 efficacy.

Phase I/IIa study evaluating the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of lucitanib in advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Lucitanib is a potent, oral inhibitor fibroblast growth factor receptor types 1 and 2 (FGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor types 1, 2, and 3 (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor types α and ß (PGFRα/ß), which are essential kinases for tumor growth, survival, migration, and angiogenesis. Several tumor types, including breast carcinoma, demonstrate amplification of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-related genes. There are no approved drugs for molecularly defined FGF-aberrant (FGFR1- or FGF3/4/19-amplified) tumors. METHODS: This open-label phase I/IIa study involved a dose-escalation phase to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), and pharmacokinetics of lucitanib in patients with advanced solid tumors, followed by a dose-expansion phase to obtain preliminary evidence of efficacy in patients who could potentially benefit from treatment (i.e. with tumors harboring FGF-aberrant pathway or considered angiogenesis-sensitive). RESULTS: Doses from 5 to 30 mg were evaluated with dose-limiting toxic effects dominated by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition-related toxic effects at the 30 mg dose level (one case of grade 4 depressed level of consciousness and two cases of grade 3 thrombotic microangiopathy). The most common adverse events (all grades, all cohorts) were hypertension (91%), asthenia (42%), and proteinuria (57%). Exposure increased with dose and t½ was 31-40 h, suitable for once daily administration. Seventy-six patients were included. All but one had stage IV; 42% had >3 lines of previous chemotherapy. Sixty-four patients were assessable for response; 58 had measurable disease. Clinical activity was observed at all doses tested with durable Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) partial responses in a variety of tumor types. In the angiogenesis-sensitive group, objective RECIST response rate (complete response + partial response) was 26% (7 of 27) and progression-free survival (PFS) was 25 weeks. In assessable FGF-aberrant breast cancer patients, 50% (6 of 12) achieved RECIST partial response with a median PFS of 40.4 weeks for all treated patients. CONCLUSION: Lucitanib has promising efficacy and a manageable side-effect profile. The spectrum of activity observed demonstrates clinical benefit in both FGF-aberrant and angiogenesis-sensitive populations. A comprehensive phase II program is planned.

Predicting response and survival in chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we evaluated the ability of gene expression profiles to predict chemotherapy response and survival in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). METHODS: Gene expression and clinical-pathological data were evaluated in five independent cohorts, including three randomised clinical trials for a total of 1055 patients with TNBC, basal-like disease (BLBC) or both. Previously defined intrinsic molecular subtype and a proliferation signature were determined and tested. Each signature was tested using multivariable logistic regression models (for pCR (pathological complete response)) and Cox models (for survival). Within TNBC, interactions between each signature and the basal-like subtype (vs other subtypes) for predicting either pCR or survival were investigated. RESULTS: Within TNBC, all intrinsic subtypes were identified but BLBC predominated (55-81%). Significant associations between genomic signatures and response and survival after chemotherapy were only identified within BLBC and not within TNBC as a whole. In particular, high expression of a previously identified proliferation signature, or low expression of the luminal A signature, was found independently associated with pCR and improved survival following chemotherapy across different cohorts. Significant interaction tests were only obtained between each signature and the BLBC subtype for prediction of chemotherapy response or survival. CONCLUSIONS: The proliferation signature predicts response and improved survival after chemotherapy, but only within BLBC. This highlights the clinical implications of TNBC heterogeneity, and suggests that future clinical trials focused on this phenotypic subtype should consider stratifying patients as having BLBC or not.

Genomic aberrations in the FGFR pathway: opportunities for targeted therapies in solid tumors.

The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) cascade plays crucial roles in tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, migration and survival. Accumulating evidence suggests that in some tumor types, FGFRs are bona fide oncogenes to which cancer cells are addicted. Because FGFR inhibition can reduce proliferation and induce cell death in a variety of in vitro and in vivo tumor models harboring FGFR aberrations, a growing number of research groups have selected FGFRs as targets for anticancer drug development. Multikinase FGFR/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors have shown promising activity in breast cancer patients with FGFR1 and/or FGF3 amplification. Early clinical trials with selective FGFR inhibitors, which may overcome the toxicity constraints raised by multitarget kinase inhibition, are recruiting patients with known FGFR(1-4) status based on genomic screens. Preliminary signs of antitumor activity have been demonstrated in some tumor types, including squamous cell lung carcinomas. Rational combination of targeted therapies is expected to further increase the efficacy of selective FGFR inhibitors. Herein, we discuss unsolved questions in the clinical development of these agents and suggest guidelines for management of hyperphosphatemia, a class-specific mechanism-based toxicity. In addition, we propose standardized definitions for FGFR1 and FGFR2 gene amplification based on in situ hybridization methods. Extended access to next-generation sequencing platforms will facilitate the identification of diseases in which somatic FGFR(1-4) mutations, amplifications and fusions are potentially driving cancer cell viability, further strengthening the role of FGFR signaling in cancer biology and providing more possibilities for the therapeutic application of FGFR inhibitors.

Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) in node-negative invasive breast carcinomas: Immunohistochemical analysis and clinico-pathological correlations.

Using immunohistochemistry, we investigated 603 negative lymph nodes from 51 patients affected by invasive breast cancer (BC) to recognize bone marrow-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). HPC aggregates, revealed by CD34, CD133, VEGFR1, and CD117 antisera, were determined by an intensity-distribution score (ID). Cases with an ID-score >3 at least for one marker were considered to strongly express HPCs. Twenty-five of 51 (49%) high expressor patients were identified by CD34 antiserum, while 24/51 (47.1%), 17/51 (33.3%), and 15/51 (29.4%) were identified by CD117, CD133, and VEGFR1, respectively. No significant relationships were found between HPCs status and histotype, tumor grade, stage, and hormone receptors, as determined at the moment of the first diagnosis. A significant correlation was recorded for Ki-67 values, as well as for death from invasive BC. No statistical significance was achieved regarding HER2 status, although a tendency toward a statistically significant P value was obtained. A significant relationship (P<0.001) was found between high expressors of HPC and progression of disease, documented by the development of distant metastases. An equivalent P value was ascertained for osseous localizations, with a lesser value in other metastatic sites. Regarding the appearance of distant metastases, the greatest efficiency value was obtained by CD133 (85.7%). Overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) revealed a high statistical significance for HPC expression, Ki-67 values, and HER2 status. By multivariate analysis, HPC expression and Ki-67 values emerged as the higher independent prognostic variables in the analysis of DMFS and OS, respectively.

Risk of recurrence during follow-up for optimally treated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) with a low-level increase of serum CA-125 levels.

BACKGROUND: Our group evaluated the risk of recurrence for optimally treated advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (adEOC) in patients with a low-level rising serum CA-125 concentration within the normal range (0-35 kU/l). In addition, we tested the new proposed early CA-125 signal of progressive disease (EPD) criterion in the same study population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated from 1998 to 2006 for adEOC were identified at our institution. Inclusion criteria were as follows: CA-125 at time of diagnosis (>35 kU/l); International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages III-IV treated with optimal primary treatment; and complete response (CR) to primary treatment with normalization of CA-125. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival and overall survival for the recurrence group (n = 60) were 17.7 and 38.2 months, respectively. The median follow-up time from CR to last contact was 40.2 months for patients in the nonrecurrence group (n = 36). An absolute increase in serum CA-125 levels of >or=5 kU/l compared with baseline CA-125 nadir values was significantly predictive of recurrence (odds ratio for recurrence = 402.98, P < 0.0001). The progression date was predated by the EPD criterion in 77% of patients with known progressive disease (median, 58 days early) with a sensitivity of 90%, a positive predictive value of 96.4%, and a false-positive rate of 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with optimally treated adEOC in complete remission, a low-level increase in serum CA-125 concentration within the normal range is a strong independent predictive factor for disease recurrence. In this patient population, future prospective randomized trials should consider the evaluation of the EPD criterion.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and gemcitabine in the front-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre phase II study.

This multicentre phase II study was aimed at investigating the activity and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine (GEM) as front-line therapy in a large series of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients. From June 2003 to December 2006, a total of 71 recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled. Median age was 63 years (range=37-79), and 31 patients (43.7%) were > or =65 years old. Patients received PLD, 25 mg m(-2), day 1, followed by GEM, 800 mg m(-2), days 1 and 8, q21. Response was evaluable in 64 cases. Eight complete (12.5%) and 17 partial responses (26.6%) were registered, with an overall response rate of 39.1%. Thirty patients (46.9%) experienced stable disease, with an overall clinical benefit of 85.9%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 11 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The rate of 1- and 2-year OS was 79 and 61%, respectively. A total of 443 courses were evaluable for toxicity: grade 3 and 4 neutropaenia affected 14 patients (20.3%) and 3 patients (4.3%), respectively. Grade 3 and 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome was documented in five cases (7.2%) and one case (1.4%), whereas grade 3 and 4 mucositis occurred in six cases (8.7%) and two cases (2.9%), respectively. Grade 2 cardiac toxicity was observed in only one case. Interestingly enough, there was no difference in the percentage and severity of either haematological or non-haematological toxicity according to the age of the patients (<65 vs > or =65 years). We confirmed in a large, very homogenous study sample of chemotherapy-naïve recurrent/metastatic breast cancer patients the efficacy and safety of PLD/GEM combination, providing response rates, median TTP and OS values comparable with those achieved with more toxic combinations.

Safety and activity of trastuzumab-containing therapies for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: our long-term clinical experience (GOIM study).

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab is widely used as the treatment of choice for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients, median age 57 years and range 31-81 years, were included in our retrospective analysis with the aim to evaluate safety and activity of trastuzumab-containing therapies. RESULTS: We observed for first-line treatment response rate (RR) 41%, stable disease (SD) 47% and time to progression (TTP) 8 months (range 1-44). Corresponding numbers for second line were RR 23%, SD 62% and (TTP) 9 months (range 3-23) and beyond second line RR 22%, SD 78% and (TTP) 9 months (range 4-19). Overall survival was 19.2 months (3-62 months). The median cumulative dose of trastuzumab administrated was 5286 mg (464-17 940 mg). Trastuzumab was well tolerated. Median left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) at baseline was 62% and at the end of treatment was 59%. The more relevant adverse events consisted of an asymptomatic decrease in LVEF to 40% (baseline 60%) and a grade 3 symptomatic increase in bilirubin. CONCLUSION: Trastuzumab-containing therapies in MBC show a good safety and toxicity profile and a remarkable activity even in heavily pretreated women. Patients should benefit from continued trastuzumab therapy, as shown by the maintenance of (TTP) even beyond second-line treatment.

Y179C, F486L and N550H are BRCA1 variants that may be associated with breast cancer in a Sicilian family: results of a 5-year GOIM (Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale) prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Over 600 different pathogenic mutations have been identified in the BRCA1 gene. Nevertheless, numerous missense mutations of unknown biological function still exist. Understanding of biological significance of these mutations should help in genetic counselling to carriers and their families. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 patients with breast and/or ovarian cancer whose genetic counselling answered the criteria of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO 2003), were prospectively screened for mutations in all coding exons of the BRCA1 gene by automatic direct sequencing. RESULTS: During these mutational screening procedures one case presented three mutations classified in the Breast Cancer Information Core Database as unknown variants. These were 655A/G found in exon 8 of BRCA1, 1575T/C and 1767A/C found in exon 11 of the same gene. The identification of the three unknown variants in the proband (16SIRIO) and in her mother and sister indicates that such alterations exist in cis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the charge and stechiometry variations determined by the changes in the amino acids Y179C, F486L and N550H might produce an effect on the conformation of the protein and, consequently, on its function.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing in Italian breast and/or ovarian cancer families: mutation spectrum and prevalence and analysis of mutation prediction models.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is an extremely complex disease, characterized by a progressive multistep process caused by interactions of both genetic and non-genetic factors. A combination of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations appears responsible for about 20%-30% of the cases with breast cancer familial history. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations largely varies within different populations; in particular, the rate of mutations in Italian breast and/or ovarian cancer families is rather controversial and ranges from 8% to 37%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 152 breast/ovarian cancer families counseled in our centre, 99 were selected for BRCA1/2 mutation screening according to our minimal criteria. The entire coding sequences and each intron/exon boundary of BRCA1/2 genes were screened by direct sequencing (PTT limited to BRCA1 exon 11). For each proband, the a priori probability of carrying a pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutation was calculated by means of different mutation prediction models (BRCApro, IC and Myriad Table) in order to evaluate their performances. RESULTS: Our analysis resulted in the identification of 25 and 52 variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, respectively. Seventeen of them represent novel variants, including four deleterious truncating mutations in the BRCA2 gene (472insA, E33X, C1630X and IVS6+1G>C). Twenty-seven of the 99 probands harbored BRCA1 (n = 15) and BRCA2 (n = 12) pathogenic germline mutations, indicating an overall detection rate of 27.3% and increasing by more than 15% the spectrum of mutations in the Italian population. Furthermore, we found the lowest detection rate (19.4%) in pure hereditary breast cancer family subset. All of the prediction models showed praises and faults, with the IC software being extremely sensitive but poorly specific, compared to BRCApro. In particular all models accumulated most false-negative prediction in the HBC subset. Interestingly preliminary results of a study addressing the presence of genomic rearrangements in HBC probands with BRCApro or IC prediction scores >/=95%, provided evidence for additional mutations undetectable with our conventional screening for point mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Altogether our results suggest that HBC families, the largest pool in our series, represent an heterogeneous group where the apparently faulty performances of the prediction models might be at least partially explained by the presence of additional kinds of BRCA1/2 alteration (such as genomic rearrangements) or by mutations on different breast cancer related genes.

From adjuvant to preventive breast cancer treatment: bridging the gap over troubled waters.

Recently, chemoprevention trials have demonstrated the efficacy of preventive medical treatment (PMT) in reducing breast cancer (BC) detection rates in at-risk affected and unaffected women selected according to clinical and/or familial risk criteria, particularly with the use of tamoxifen (TAM). Major concerns limiting the routine use of TAM are the questionable benefit/risk ratio and poor patient compliance, which justify the studies undertaken to determine the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) with respect to TAM. Issues such as therapy duration, impact on survival, incidence of side-effects and which subsets benefit most from treatment, still remain unsolved. Therefore, only ER+ BC patients are routinely subjected to PMT, independently of their BRCA1/2 status, using adjuvant hormonal therapy. More attention must be focused towards BRCA1/2 carriers as they are probably the women at highest risk of developing BC, in which available data remain controversial and in which hormone-therapy might be important. Hence, at-risk women (affected patients or unaffected women) should be carefully evaluated for inclusion into highly selected preventive clinical trials aimed at evaluating PMT independently of, or according to, BC predisposition status (unknown, positive or negative BRCA1/BRCA2 status) and with respect to menopausal status. BC patients, harboring a BRCA1/2 predisposition, may represent the best subset for extended adjuvant treatment, useful as PMT, simultaneously. Only the evolving differentiation of categories of at-risk women will allow physicians to discriminate PMT in a highly selective manner.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: long-term follow-up of a 3-week regimen.

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is the fifth most common cancer among men and the seventh among women. At diagnosis, at least 25% of bladder cancer tumors are locally or systemically advanced. Systemic chemotherapy is the only current modality for advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Recently, a phase III randomized study has demonstrated that the regimen with gemcitabine (GMC) and cisplatin (CDDP) had a survival advantage similar to the standard M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin), with a better safety profile. AIM: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the tumor response rate, the median time to progression, the median survival and toxicity in a 21-day schedule with GMC and CDDP in patients with advanced/metastatic bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1998 to December 2000, 27 patients with advanced/metastatic transitional cell carcinoma were enrolled. All patients received 1,200 mg/m(2) GMC administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8, and 75 mg/m(2) CDDP as a 1-hour infusion on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. The patients had a median age of 59.8 years (range 39-75) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were valuable for toxic effects, length of survival and tumor response. The statistical analysis was performed in May 2004. Mean and median follow-up were 20.23 and 13.2 months (range 2-68), respectively. The overall remission rate (complete response + partial response) was 48% (95% CI 28.4-67.6%). The median time to progression was 9 months (range 2-56). The median duration of survival for all patients was 13.2 months (range 2-68+), with 1-year and 23-month survival rates of 60 and 20%, respectively. There was no grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. Grade 3 anemia was observed in 4 patients (16%) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 patients (24%). No grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting or neutropenia was observed. CONCLUSION: GMC and CDDP is an active schedule with a good safety profile in a 21-day regimen. It may be a valid alternative to the standard 28-day regimen due to its high tumor response and survival with a low incidence of toxicity, especially in pretreated and metastatic patients.

The role of vaccine in controlling hepatitis A epidemics.

We report the conduct and results of a review of recent literature to describe various types of epidemics and outbreaks in Italy or countries with similar epidemiological profiles and to assess vaccine use in outbreak situations. We identified three scenarios most likely to occur in Italy: outbreaks occurring in small closed communities (nursery or a primary school), outbreaks in communities of limited dimensions (small towns or villages) and open community settings in which epidemics occur at regular intervals (person-to-person transmission). In closed communities we recommend vaccination of family members and school personnel living or working in close proximity to the index case as well as classmates. We also recommend vaccination when there is a proof of secondary transmission within the community. In small open communities we recommend vaccination of more susceptible age groups such as children and adolescents. For large open communities the only practicable alternative strategy is vaccination of close family contacts of acute cases couple with non-immunity boosting control measures.

Influenza vaccination coverage in elderly people, Campania (Italy), 1999.

A study on the coverage of influenza vaccination among elderly people was carried out. Fity-six per cent of those interviewed had been vaccinated (weighted coverage 50%), compared with the target of 75%, but higher rates were reported in those older than 74 years and those with chronic diseases.

Effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccination in babies born to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive mothers in Italy.

This study examined 522 children born to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive mothers from 1985 through 1994 and evaluated the protection provided by anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization at birth. Babies were given hepatitis B immunoglobulin and hepatitis B vaccine at birth. At 5-14 years after immunization, 17 children (3.3%) were anti-HB core antigen positive, and 3 also were HBsAg positive. One carrier child had a double mutation, with substitution of proline-->serine at codons 120 (P120S) and 127 (P127S) within the a determinant of HBsAg. Of the 522 children, 400 (79.2%) of 505 still had protective anti-HBsAg titers > or =10 mIU/mL. Thus, HBV vaccination of children born to HBsAg-positive mothers is effective and confers long-term immunity. There is no evidence that the emergence of HBV escape mutants secondary to the immune pressure against wild-type HBV is of concern.

Efficacy of hepatitis A vaccine in prevention of secondary hepatitis A infection: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis A vaccination stops outbreaks of hepatitis A infection, but its efficacy against infection after exposure has not been proven. We investigated the use of hepatitis A vaccine to prevent secondary infections with hepatitis A virus (HAV). METHODS: We did a randomised controlled trial of hepatitis A vaccine in household contacts of people with sporadic HAV infection (index cases). Households (index cases and contacts) were randomly assigned to the vaccine group or unvaccinated group, according to the study week in which they were enrolled. All household contacts in the vaccine group received vaccination at the time of entry to the study. FINDINGS: During 45 days of follow-up, secondary infection had occurred in ten (13.3%) of 75 households (two families had two cases each) in the untreated group and in two (2.8%) of 71 households in the vaccine group. The protective efficacy of the vaccine was 79% (95% CI 7-95). The number of secondary infections among household contacts was 12 (5.8%) of 207 in the unvaccinated group and two (1.0%) of 197 in the vaccinated group. Therefore, 18 individuals needed to be vaccinated to prevent one secondary infection. INTERPRETATION: Hepatitis A vaccine is effective in the prevention of secondary infection of HAV and should be recommended for household contacts of primary cases of HAV infection.