Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Cardiol Rev ; 2023 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37158999

ABSTRACT

Influenza vaccination has shown great promise in terms of its cardioprotective effects. The aim of our analysis is to provide evidence regarding the protective effects of influenza vaccination in patients with cardiovascular disease. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify trials assessing the cardiovascular outcomes of influenza vaccination. Summary effects were calculated using a DerSimonian and Laird fixed effects and random effects model as odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all the clinical endpoints. Fifteen studies with a total of 745,001 patients were included in our analysis. There was lower rates of all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.86], cardiovascular death (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.92), and stroke (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89) in patients who received the influenza vaccine compared to placebo. There was no significant statistical difference in rates of myocardial infarction (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.69-1.21) or heart failure hospitalizations (OR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.85-1.31) in the 2 cohorts. In patients with cardiovascular disease, influenza vaccination is associated with lower all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and stroke.

2.
Cardiol Rev ; 2023 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37071117

ABSTRACT

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has a high mortality rate. Unlike ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the results of performing early coronary angiography (CAG) in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients are controversial. This study aimed to compare early and nonearly CAG in this population, in addition to the identification of differences between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies conducted in this regard. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library was performed to identify the relevant studies. Random-effect meta-analysis was done to calculate the pooled effect size of early versus nonearly CAG outcomes in all studies in addition to each of the RCT and observational subgroups of the studies. The relative risk ratio (RR), along with its 95% confidence interval (CI), was used as a measure of difference. A total of 16 studies including 5234 cases were included in our analyses. Compared with observational cohorts, RCT studies had patients with higher baseline comorbidities (older age, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary artery disease). Random-effect analysis revealed a lower rate of in-hospital mortality in the early-CAG group (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65-0.97; P = 0.02); however, RCT studies did not find a statistical difference in this outcome (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.83-1.23; P = 0.91). Moreover, mid-term mortality rates were lower in the early-CAG group (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98; P = 0.02), mostly due to observational studies. There was no significant difference between the groups in other efficacy and safety outcomes. Although early CAG was associated with lower in-hospital and mid-term mortality in overall analyses, no such difference was confirmed by the results obtained from RCTs. Current evidence from RCTs may not be representative of real-world patients and should be interpreted within its limitation.

3.
J. Transcatheter Interv ; 31: eA20230004, 2023. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1426326

ABSTRACT

Vários fatores, incluindo intervenções terapêuticas aprimoradas e tecnologias avançadas, levaram a melhores desfechos clínicos nas intervenções coronárias percutâneas complexas. No entanto, ainda podem ocorrer complicações capazes de impactar negativamente na sobrevida do paciente e nos custos de saúde. O risco dessas complicações pode ser reduzido, por meio de operadores experientes e procedimentos preventivos. Este artigo discute uma série de casos de cinco pacientes com problemas específicos relacionados aos procedimentos, como perfuração coronária, dissecções, fechamento abrupto das coronárias e fenômeno de no-reflow.


Various factors, including improved therapeutic interventions and advanced technologies, have led to better clinical outcomes for complex percutaneous coronary interventions. However, complications can still occur and have a negative impact on patient survival and healthcare costs. The risk of these complications can be reduced through experienced operators and preventative procedures. This article discusses a case series of five patients with specific periprocedural issues, such as coronary perforation, dissections, abrupt closure of the coronaries, and no-reflow phenomenon.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL