ABSTRACT
Introduction: Catheter ablation (CA) initiates a proinflammatory process responsible for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence (25-40%) and pericarditis (0.8%). Due to its anti-inflammatory properties, colchicine, a microtubule inhibitor, is explored for the prevention of early AF recurrence and pericarditis after pulmonary vein isolation. We performed a pooled analysis to determine the rates of AF recurrence and pericarditis after CA in patients receiving colchicine. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted on PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to December 2023 using medical subject headings and keywords, followed by a citation and reference search. We identified prospective studies reporting recurrent AF and pericarditis outcomes after catheter ablation in patients taking colchicine versus placebo. A binary random effects model was used to estimate pooled odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using the leave-one-out method, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Results: Of the 958 identified studies, 4 met our inclusion criteria. A total of 1,619 patients were analyzed; 743 received colchicine, and 875 were in the placebo group. Recurrent AF after CA occurred in 192 (29.0 %) of the colchicine group and 318 (39.5 %) of the placebo group. Post-ablation pericarditis occurred in 34 (5.3 %) of the colchicine group and 128 (16.5 %) of the placebo group. Pooled analysis of prospective studies showed that colchicine decreased the odds of recurrent AF [OR: 0.63 (95 % CI: 0.50-0.78), p < 0.01, I2 = 8 %] and post-ablation pericarditis [OR: 0.34 (95 % CI: 0.16-0.75), p < 0.01, I2 = 57 %]. Odds of GI disturbance were increased with colchicine use in our analysis [OR: 2.77 (95 % CI: 1.17-6.56), p = 0.02, I2 = 84 %]. Conclusion: Colchicine use is associated with decreased odds of recurrent AF and pericarditis post-CA from the analysis of prospective studies. These results underscore the potential for colchicine therapy for future exploration with randomized and controlled research with different dosages.
ABSTRACT
Background: There is limited evidence of association of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) and incidence of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the association of NMV-r in nonhospitalized, vaccinated patients with pre-existing CVD and occurrence of PASC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the TriNetX research network, including vaccinated patients with pre-existing CVD who developed COVID-19 between December 2021 and December 2022. Two cohorts were created based on NMV-r administration within 5 days of diagnosis: NMV-r and non-NMV-r cohort. The main outcome was presence of PASC, assessed between 30 to 90 days and 90 to 180 days after index COVID-19 infection. After propensity score matching, both cohorts were compared using t-test and chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Results: A total of 26,953 patients remained in each cohort after propensity score matching. Broadly defined PASC occurred in 6,925 patients (26%) in the NMV-r cohort vs 8,150 patients (30.6%) in the non-NMV-r cohort (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.76-0.82; P < 0.001) from 30 to 90 days and in 6,692 patients (25.1%) as compared to 8,910 patients (33.5%) (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.23-0.29; P < 0.001) from 90 to 180 days. Similarly, narrowly defined PASC occurred in 5,335 patients (20%) in the NMV-r cohort vs 6,271 patients (23.6%) in the non-NMV-r cohort between 30 and 90 days (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.78-0.84, P < 0.001) and in 5,121 patients (19.2%) as compared to 6,964 patients (26.1%) (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.64-0.70, P < 0.001) between 90 and 180 days. Conclusions: NMV-r in nonhospitalized vaccinated patients with pre-existing CVD with COVID-19 was associated with a reduction in PASC and health care utilization.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While the impacts of social and environmental exposure on cardiovascular risks are often reported individually, the combined effect is poorly understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the 2022 Environmental Justice Index, socio-environmental justice index and environmental burden module ranks of census tracts were divided into quartiles (quartile 1, the least vulnerable census tracts; quartile 4, the most vulnerable census tracts). Age-adjusted rate ratios (RRs) of coronary artery disease, strokes, and various health measures reported in the Prevention Population-Level Analysis and Community Estimates data were compared between quartiles using multivariable Poisson regression. The quartile 4 Environmental Justice Index was associated with a higher rate of coronary artery disease (RR, 1.684 [95% CI, 1.660-1.708]) and stroke (RR, 2.112 [95% CI, 2.078-2.147]) compared with the quartile 1 Environmental Justice Index. Similarly, coronary artery disease 1.057 [95% CI,1.043-1.0716] and stroke (RR, 1.118 [95% CI, 1.102-1.135]) were significantly higher in the quartile 4 than in the quartile 1 environmental burden module. Similar results were observed for chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, high cholesterol, lack of health insurance, sleep <7 hours per night, no leisure time physical activity, and impaired mental and physical health >14 days. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of CVD and its risk factors is highly associated with increased social and environmental adversities, and environmental exposure plays an important role independent of social factors.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Coronary Artery Disease , Hypertension , Stroke , United States/epidemiology , Humans , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Stroke/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) on recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients undergoing catheter ablation is not well described. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of SGLT2-Is on the recurrence of AF among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) after catheter ablation. METHODS: Using the TriNetX research network, we identified, by means of Current Procedural Terminology codes, patients ≥18 years of age with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) who had undergone AF ablation from April 1, 2014, to November 30, 2021. Patients were stratified based on the baseline SGLT2-I use. Propensity-score matching resulted in 2,225 patients in each cohort. The primary outcome was a composite of cardioversion, new antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, or re-do AF ablation after a blanking period after the index ablation. Additional outcomes included heart failure exacerbations, ischemic stroke, all-cause hospitalization, and death during 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: SGLT2-I use in patients with type 2 DM undergoing AF ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardioversion, new AAD therapy, and re-do AF ablation (adjusted OR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.602-0.776; P < 0.0001). At 12 months, patients on SGLT2-Is had a higher probability of event-free survival (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.95; log-rank test chi-square = 8.7; P = 0.003). All secondary outcomes were lower in the SGLT2I group; however, the ischemic stroke did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of SGLT2-Is in patients with type 2 DM is associated with a lower risk of arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation and thence a reduced need for cardioversion, AAD therapy, or re-do AF ablation.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Ischemic Stroke , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Catheter Ablation/methods , Ischemic Stroke/drug therapy , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Ischemic Stroke/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Sacubitril/valsartan reduces all-cause mortality in heart failure (HF) patients compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). ACEIs/ARBs have been shown to decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized sacubitril-valsartan decreases the incidence of AF compared to ACEis/ARBs. METHODS: Clinicaltrials.gov was searched for trials by terms sacubitril/valsartan, entresto, sacubitril, valsartan. Randomized controlled human trials of sacubitril/valsartan reporting AF were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Data was pooled using a random effect model. Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots. RESULTS: A total of 11 trials including 11,458 patients on sacubitril/valsartan and 10,128 patients on ACEI/ARBs were identified. A total of 284 AF events were reported in the sacubitril/valsartan group compared to 256 AF events in ACEIs/ARBs. Patients on sacubitril/valsartan were as likely as patients on ACEIs/ARBs to develop AF (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 1.091, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.917-1.298, p = .324). Six atrial flutter (AFl) events were reported in six trials; 48 out of 9165 patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group developed AFl compared to 46 out of 8759 in ACEi/ARBs group. There was no difference in AFl risk between the two groups (pooled OR = 1.028, 95% CI = 0.681-1.553, p = .894). Finally, sacubitril/valsartan did not reduce the risk of atrial arrhythmias (AF + AFl) compared to ACEi/ARBs (pooled OR = 1.081, 95% CI = 0.922-1.269, p = .337). CONCLUSION: Although sacubitril/valsartan reduces mortality compared to ACEIs/ARBs in HF patients, they do not reduce AF risk compared to these drugs.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Incidence , ValsartanABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (NMV-r) in high-risk nonhospitalized unvaccinated patients reduced the risk of progression to severe disease. However, the potential benefits of NMV-r among vaccinated patients are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a comparative retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX research network. Patients ≥18 years of age who were vaccinated and subsequently developed COVID-19 between 1 December 2021 and 18 April 2022 were included. Cohorts were developed based on the use of NMV-r within 5 days of diagnosis. The primary composite outcome was all-cause emergency room (ER) visit, hospitalization, or death at a 30-day follow-up. Secondary outcomes included individual components of primary outcomes, multisystem symptoms, COVID-19-associated complications, and diagnostic test utilization. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1130 patients remained in each cohort. A primary composite outcome of all-cause ER visits, hospitalization, or death in 30 days occurred in 89 (7.87%) patients in the NMV-r cohort compared with 163 (14.4%) patients in the non-NMV-r cohort (odds ratio: .5; 95% confidence interval: .39-.67; P < .005) consistent with 45% relative risk reduction. A significant reduction in multisystem symptom burden and subsequent complications, such as lower respiratory tract infection, cardiac arrhythmia, and diagnostic radiology testing, were noted in NMV-r-treated patients. There was no apparent increase in serious complications between days 10 and 30. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with NMV-r in nonhospitalized vaccinated patients with COVID-19 was associated with a reduced likelihood of ER visits, hospitalization, or death. Complications and overall resource utilization were also decreased.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ritonavir , Humans , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implant are the same across both sexes however women have been traditionally underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aimed to identify if the number of women included in CRT trials is representative of the real-world burden of heart failure (HF) in women. METHODS: RCTs evaluating the benefit of CRT in HF patients referenced in the 2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on CRT in HF were included. Studies were evaluated for gender representation, baseline variables, and gender-based analysis of outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 10 CRT trials including 8107 patients were studied. Of the total patient population in these RCTs, only 23% were women. Analysis of outcomes based on sex was reported only in 5 out of 10 trials. Of these five trials reporting sex-based outcomes, multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT-CRT) and resynchronization-defibrillation for ambulatory heart failure trial (RAFT) showed a greater benefit in women compared to men. Both MADIT and RAFT trials had a lower ejection fraction (EF) cut-off in the inclusion criteria (EF ≤ 30%) compared to the studies that did not find gender-based differences in the outcome (inclusion criteria: EF ≤ 35% or 40%). Additionally, women had less ischemic cardiomyopathy and more left bundle branch block (LBBB) compared to men in these two trials. CONCLUSION: Women are underrepresented in CRT trials; however, they have been shown to derive a greater benefit from CRT compared to men. Appropriate measures should be taken in future studies to enhance the participation of women in clinical trials for more generalizable evidence.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Failure , Male , Female , Humans , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Bundle-Branch Block/therapy , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA) remains common and studies have shown about 5%-9% annual recurrence rate after CA. We sought to assess the echocardiogram derived left atrial appendage (LAA) emptying velocity as a predictor of AF recurrence after CA. OBJECTIVE: To determine if LAA emptying is a marker of recurrence of AF post-CA METHODS: A total of 303 consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF between 2014 and 2020 were included. Baseline clinical characteristics and echocardiographic data of the patients were obtained by chart review. LAA emptying velocities were obtained from transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). LA voltage was obtained during the mapping for CA. Chi-square test and nominal logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. An receiver operator characteristic curve was used to determine LAA velocity cut-off. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 61.7 ± 10.5; 32% were female. Mean LAA emptying velocity was 47.5 ± 20.2. A total of 103 (40%) patients had recurrence after CA. In the multivariable model, after adjusting for potential confounders, LAA emptying velocity of ≥52.3 was associated with decreased AF recurrence postablation (odds ratio [OR]: 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.97; p = .03*). There were 190 (73%) patients in normal sinus rhythm during TEE and CA, and sensitivity analysis of these patients showed that LAA velocity ≥52.3 remained associated with decreased AF recurrence (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15-0.82; p = .01*). CONCLUSION: LAA emptying velocity measured during preprocedural TEE can serve as a predictor of AF recurrence in patients undergoing CA.
Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Echocardiography , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of available data on health disparities and the interconnected social determinants of health (SDOH) in cardio-oncology. We identify the gaps in the literature and suggest areas for future research. In addition, we propose strategies to address these disparities at various levels. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been increasing recognition of health disparities and the role of SODH on an individual's access to health care, quality of care, and outcomes of the illness. There is growing evidence of sex and race-based differences in cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity. Recent studies have shown how access and quality of health care are affected by financial stability and rurality. Our recent study utilizing the social vulnerability index (SVI) and county-level patient data found graded increase in county-level cardio-oncology mortality with greater social vulnerability. The incremental impact of social vulnerability was higher for cardio-oncology mortality than for mortality related to either cancer or CVD alone. The mortality rates in these patients were higher in rural areas compared to urban areas regardless of social vulnerability. Additionally, for those within the counties within highest social vulnerability, Black individuals had significantly higher cardio-oncology mortality compared with White individuals. Disparities in the cardio-oncology population are deep-rooted and widespread, leading to poor quality of life and increased mortality. It is crucial to integrate SDOH, not only in clinical care delivery but also in future research, and registry data to improve our understanding and the outcomes in our unique subset of cardio-oncology patients.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rural Population , White PeopleABSTRACT
Background: Several anti-cancer drugs have been linked to new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) but the true association of these drugs with AF is unknown. The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), a publicly available pharmacovigilance mechanism provided by the FDA, collects adverse event reports from the United States and other countries, thus providing real-world data. Objectives: To identify anti-cancer drugs associated with AF using the FAERS database. Methods: The FAERS database was searched for all drugs reporting AF as an adverse event (AE). The top 30 anti-cancer drugs reporting AF cases were shortlisted and analyzed. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was used to measure disproportionality in reporting of adverse events for these drugs. Results: When analyzed for AF as a percentage of all reported AE for a particular drug, Ibrutinib had the highest percentage (5.3%) followed distantly by venetoclax (1.6%), bortezomib (1.6%), carfilzomib (1.5%), and nilotinib (1.4%). The percentage of cardiac AE attributable to AF was also highest for ibrutinib (41.5%), followed by venetoclax (28.4%), pomalidomide (23.9%), bortezomib (18.2%), and lenalidomide (18.2%). Drugs with the highest PRR for AF included ibrutinib (5.96, 95% CI= 5.70-6.23), bortezomib (1.65, 95% CI = 1.52-1.79), venetoclax (1.65, 95% CI = 1.46-1.85), carfilzomib (1.53, 95% CI = 1.33-1.77), and nilotinib (1.46, 95% CI = 1.31-1.63). Conclusions: While newer anti-cancer drugs have improved the prognosis in cancer patients, it is important to identify any arrhythmias they may cause early on to prevent increased morbidity and mortality. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the true incidence of new onset AF associated with anti-cancer drugs.
ABSTRACT
Nonmedical use of prescription and nonprescription drugs is a worldwide epidemic, rapidly growing in magnitude with deaths because of overdose and chronic use. A vast majority of these drugs are stimulants that have various effects on the cardiovascular system including the cardiac rhythm. Drugs, like cocaine and methamphetamine, have measured effects on the conduction system and through several direct and indirect pathways, utilizing multiple second messenger systems, change the structural and electrical substrate of the heart, thereby promoting cardiac dysrhythmias. Substituted amphetamines and cocaine affect the expression and activation kinetics of multiple ion channels and calcium signaling proteins resulting in EKG changes, and atrial and ventricular brady and tachyarrhythmias. Preexisting conditions cause substrate changes in the heart, which decrease the threshold for such drug-induced cardiac arrhythmias. The treatment of cardiac arrhythmias in patients who take drugs of abuse may be specialized and will require an understanding of the unique underlying mechanisms and necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. The use of primary or secondary prevention defibrillators in drug abusers with chronic systolic heart failure is both sensitive and controversial. This review provides a broad overview of cardiac arrhythmias associated with stimulant substance abuse and their management.
Subject(s)
Amphetamine-Related Disorders/complications , Amphetamines/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Cocaine-Related Disorders/complications , Cocaine/adverse effects , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Calcium Signaling/drug effects , Cardiotoxicity , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Humans , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Over the last few years, improved outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been credited to the introduction of novel agents for its treatment. However, the overall cardiovascular safety profile of these agents has not been studied adequately. METHODS: We searched the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for adverse events reported for several of these novel agents: ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and idelalisib. RESULTS: A total of 6074 cardiac adverse events were identified; ibrutinib (4832/36581; 13.2%) was found to have the highest risk of cardiac adverse events. The frequency of atrial fibrillation was highest (41.5%) in the ibrutinib group, while the idelalisib and acalabrutinib groups had the highest reported frequencies of heart failure (25.1%) and myocardial infarction (13.6%), respectively. Hypertension was noted to be relatively higher in the acalabrutinib (25.6%) and venetoclax (11.8%) groups. Overall reported mortality associated with cardiac events was highest in the venetoclax (29.4%) and idelalisib (27.1%) groups. CONCLUSION: Novel agents in the CLL armamentarium have been associated with several cardiovascular adverse events. Further studies are needed to identify high-risk groups that would benefit from robust cardiovascular surveillance after initiation of treatment with these novel agents.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Heart Diseases , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/drug therapy , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/epidemiology , Pharmacovigilance , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrimidines/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Hyperparathyroidism and malignancy are both causes of hypercalcemia. Breast cancer patients usually have hypercalcemia due to metastases or paraneoplastic syndrome resulting from ectopic PTHrP production. Occasionally, other causes such as primary hyperparathyroidism may co-exist and contribute to the hypercalcemia as well. We present the case of a 61 year old with a history of breast cancer with bony metastasis who presented with a corrected calcium level of 17.9 mg/dl. Bloodwork and imaging was suggestive of primary hyperparathyroidism. This case highlights the rare co-existence of dual etiologies of hypercalcemia and provides an overview of the presentation, diagnostic approach and management in such scenarios.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is involved in a global outbreak affecting millions of people who manifest a variety of symptoms. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 is increasingly associated with cardiovascular complications requiring hospitalizations; however, the mechanisms underlying these complications remain unknown. Nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are gasotransmitters that regulate key cardiovascular functions. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained from 68 COVID-19 patients and 33 controls and NO and H2S metabolites were assessed. H2S and NO levels were compared between cases and controls in the entire study population and subgroups based on race. The availability of gasotransmitters was examined based on severity and outcome of COVID-19 infection. The performance of H2S and NO levels in predicting COVID-19 infection was also analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify the effects of traditional determinants of gasotransmitters on NO and H2S levels in the patients with COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Significantly reduced NO and H2S levels were observed in both Caucasian and African American COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls. COVID-19 patients who died had significantly higher NO and H2S levels compared to COVID-19 patients who survived. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of NO and H2S metabolites in the study population showed free sulfide levels to be highly predictive of COVID-19 infection based on reduced availability. Traditional determinants of gasotransmitters, namely age, race, sex, diabetes, and hypertension had no effect on NO and H2S levels in COVID-19 patients. CONCLUSION: These observations provide the first insight into the role of NO and H2S in COVID-19 infection, where their low availability may be a result of reduced synthesis secondary to endotheliitis, or increased consumption from scavenging of reactive oxygen species.