Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
1.
J Crit Care ; 83: 154848, 2024 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901070
2.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 42(3): 101193, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36621622

ABSTRACT

Early initiation of a multimodal treatment strategy in the management of vasopressors during septic shock has been advocated to reduce delays in restoring adequate organ perfusion and to mitigate side effects associated with the administration of high-dose catecholamines. We provide a review that summarises the pathophysiology of vasodilation, the physiologic response to the vascular response, and the different drugs used in this situation, focusing on the need to combine early different vasopressors. Fluid loading being insufficient for counteracting vasoplegia, norepinephrine is usually the first-line vasopressor used to restore hemodynamics. Norepinephrine sparing is discussed in further detail through the concomitant use of adrenergic, vasopressinergic, and renin-angiotensin systems and the optimisation of endothelial reactivity with methylene blue. A blueprint for the construction of new studies is outlined to address the question of vasopressor selection and timing in septic shock.


Subject(s)
Hypotension , Shock, Septic , Shock , Humans , Shock, Septic/drug therapy , Vasodilation , Norepinephrine/therapeutic use , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use , Catecholamines/therapeutic use , Hypotension/chemically induced
3.
J Crit Care ; 75: 154258, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36706554

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We reviewed the different studies using the terms "refractory septic shock" and/or "catecholamine resistance" and/or "high dose norepinephrine" so as to highlight the heterogeneity of the definitions used by authors addressing such concepts. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted assessing the papers reporting data on refractory septic shock. We used keywords as exact phrases and subject headings according to database syntax. RESULTS: Of 276 papers initially reviewed, we included 8 studies - 3 randomized controlled trials, 3 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies, representing a total of 562 patients with septic shock. Catecholamine resistance was generally defined as "a decreased vascular responsiveness to catecholamine independently of the administered norepinephrine dose". Refractory septic shock was broadly defined as "a clinical condition characterized by persistent hyperdynamic shock even though adequate fluid resuscitation (individualized doses) and high doses of norepinephrine (≥ 1 µg/kg/min)". Reported "high doses" of norepinephrine were often ≥1 µg/kg/min. However, wide variability was found throughout the literature on the use of these terms. DISCUSSION: Marked inconsistencies were identified in the usage of the terms for refractory septic shock. There is a pressing need to determine consensus definitions so as to establish a common language in the medical literature and to harmonize future studies.


Subject(s)
Shock, Septic , Humans , Shock, Septic/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Norepinephrine/therapeutic use , Fluid Therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
4.
Shock ; 57(6): 172-179, 2022 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35759300

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Sepsis and septic shock usually show a high mortality rate and frequently need of intensive care unit admissions. After fluid resuscitation, norepinephrine (NE) is the first-choice vasopressor in septic shock patients. However, high-NE doses are associated with increased rates of adverse effects and mortality. In this perspective, many authors have proposed the administration of non-adrenergic vasopressors (NAV). Selepressin is a selective vasopressin type 1A (V1A) receptor agonist and may be a valid option in this field, because it can decrease NE requirements and also limit the deleterious effects induced by high doses of catecholamines. Only few clinical data actually support selepressin administration in this setting. Here, we review the current literature on this topic analyzing some pathophysiological aspects, the rationale about the use of NAV, the possible use of selepressin differentiating animal, and human studies. Various issues remain unresolved and future trials should be focused on early interventions based on a multimodal activation of the vasopressive pathways using both alpha and V1A receptors pathways.


Subject(s)
Sepsis , Shock, Septic , Catecholamines/therapeutic use , Humans , Norepinephrine/therapeutic use , Sepsis/complications , Shock, Septic/complications , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
5.
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med ; 9(4): 003269, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35520370

ABSTRACT

Spontaneous renal haemorrhage is a rare but severe condition known as Wunderlich syndrome (WS). The classic presentation includes sudden-onset flank pain, a palpable flank mass and hypovolaemic shock (Lenk's triad). WS can be due to neoplasms, vascular diseases, cystic rupture, coagulopathies and infections. A contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen is mandatory for diagnosis. Surgery is reserved for haemodynamically unstable patients and those with neoplastic disease. We describe a case of WS in an anticoagulated patient with chronic atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus type 2 and hypertension, who developed acute renal failure and severe anaemia, that completely resolved with conservative treatment and discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. LEARNING POINTS: Wunderlich syndrome refers to spontaneous renal or perinephric haemorrhage.Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen is the gold standard for diagnosis.Surgery should be reserved for haemodynamically unstable patients or those with neoplastic disease.

6.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg ; 212: 107092, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34923197

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hyperammonemia (HA) is a potential side-effect of valproate (VPA) treatment, which has been described during long-term administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, the impact and the risk factors of HA in critically ill patients. METHODS: We reviewed the data of all adult patients treated in our mixed 35-bed Department of Intensive Care over a 12-year period (2004-2015) who: a) were treated with VPA for more than 72 h and b) had at least one measurement of ammonium and VPA levels during the ICU stay; patients with Child-Pugh C liver cirrhosis were excluded. HA was defined as ammonium levels above 60 µg/dl. RESULTS: Of a total of 2640 patients treated with VPA, 319 patients met the inclusion criteria (median age 64 years; male gender 55%); 78% of them were admitted for neurological reasons and ICU mortality was 30%. Median ammonium levels were 88 [63-118] µg/dl. HA was found in 245 (77%) patients. For those patients with HA, median time from start of VPA therapy to HA was 3 [2-5] days. In a multivariable analysis, high VPA serum levels, mechanical ventilation and sepsis were independently associated with HA during VPA therapy. In 98/243 (40%) of HA patients, VPA was interrupted; VPA interruption was more frequent in patients with ammonium levels > 100 µg/dl than others (p = 0.001). HA was not an independent predictor of ICU mortality or poor neurological outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, HA was a common finding during treatment with VPA in acutely ill patients. VPA levels, sepsis and mechanical ventilation were risk factors for HA. Hyperammonemia did not influence patients' outcome.


Subject(s)
Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Hyperammonemia/chemically induced , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Valproic Acid/adverse effects , Aged , Critical Care , Critical Illness , Enzyme Inhibitors/blood , Female , Humans , Hyperammonemia/blood , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/blood , Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , Sepsis/complications , Valproic Acid/blood
7.
Am J Transplant ; 21(7): 2489-2497, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33880877

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic underdosing in prophylactic antibiotic regimes after lung transplantation (LTx) can increase the risk of infection. We aimed to study whether ß-lactam concentrations achieved desirable pharmacodynamic targets in the early phase after LTx and the association between drug concentrations and the development of early infections or the acquisition of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. We reviewed patients in whom broad-spectrum ß-lactam levels were measured after LTx during antibiotic prophylaxis. ß-Lactam concentrations were considered "insufficient" if drug levels remained below four times the clinical breakpoint of the minimal inhibitory concentration for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an infection and/or acquisition of MDR pathogens in the first 14 days after transplantation. A total of 70 patients were included. "Insufficient" drug concentrations were found in 40% of patients. In 27% of patients, an early MDR pathogen was identified and 49% patients were diagnosed with an early posttransplant infection. Patients with "insufficient" drug concentrations acquired more frequently MDR bacteria and/or developed an infection than others (22/28, 79% vs. 20/42, 48% - p = .01). ß-Lactam levels were often found to be below the desired drug targets in the early phase after transplantation and may be associated with the occurrence of early infectious complications.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , beta-Lactams , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Humans , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
8.
J Crit Care ; 61: 39-44, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33075608

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A case series of five patients, representing the clinical spectrum of COVID-19 associated PTE. Patients were admitted to four hospitals in Germany, Italy, and France. Infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was confirmed using a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test. RESULTS: The onset of PTE varied from 2 to 4 weeks after the occurrence of the initial symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and led to deterioration of the clinical picture in all cases. PTE was the primary reason for hospital admission after a 2-week period of self-isolation at home (1 patient) and hospital readmission after initial uncomplicated hospital discharge (2 patients). Three of the patients had no past history of clinically relevant risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Severe disease progression was associated with concomitant increases in IL-6, ferritin, and D-Dimer levels. The outcome from PTE was related to the extent of vascular involvement, and associated complications. CONCLUSION: PTE is a potential life-threatening complication, which occurs frequently in patients with COVID-19. Intermediate therapeutic dose of anticoagulants and extend thromboprophylaxis are necessary after meticulous risk-benefit assessment.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Disease Progression , Ferritins/blood , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , France , Germany , Hospitalization , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Embolism/complications , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
10.
Ann Intensive Care ; 10: 124, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32953201

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preliminary reports have described significant procoagulant events in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), including life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). MAIN TEXT: We review the current data on the epidemiology, the possible underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, and the therapeutic implications of PE in relation to COVID-19. The incidence of PE is reported to be around 2.6-8.9% of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients and up to one-third of those requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, despite standard prophylactic anticoagulation. This may be explained by direct and indirect pathologic consequences of COVID-19, complement activation, cytokine release, endothelial dysfunction, and interactions between different types of blood cells. CONCLUSION: Thromboprophylaxis should be started in all patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the hospital. The use of an intermediate therapeutic dose of low molecular weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin can be considered on an individual basis in patients with multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism, including critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. Decisions about extending prophylaxis with LMWH after hospital discharge should be made after balancing the reduced risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with the risk of increased bleeding events and should be continued for 7-14 days after hospital discharge or in the pre-hospital phase in case of pre-existing or persisting VTE risk factors. Therapeutic anticoagulation is the cornerstone in the management of patients with PE. Selection of an appropriate agent and correct dosing requires consideration of underlying comorbidities.

14.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 78: 126-132, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739002

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Few randomized trials have evaluated the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for early acute respiratory failure (ARF) in non-intensive care unit (ICU) wards. The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that early NIV for mild-moderate ARF in non-ICU wards can prevent development of severe ARF. DESIGN: Pragmatic, parallel group, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial. SETTING: Non-intensive care wards of tertiary centers. PATIENTS: Non-ICU ward patients with mild to moderate ARF without an established indication for NIV. INTERVENTIONS: Patients will be randomized to receive or not receive NIV in addition to best available care. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We will enroll 520 patients, 260 in each group. The primary endpoint of the study will be the development of severe ARF. Secondary endpoints will be 28-day mortality, length of hospital stay, safety of NIV in non-ICU environments, and a composite endpoint of all in-hospital respiratory complications. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will help determine whether the early use of NIV in non-ICU wards can prevent progression from mild-moderate ARF to severe ARF.


Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Comorbidity , Disease Progression , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Research Design , Sex Factors , Tertiary Care Centers , Young Adult
15.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 84(8): 896-897, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29774734

Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy , Sepsis , Humans
16.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 84(7): 785-786, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29648416

Subject(s)
Hemodynamics , Humans
17.
N Engl J Med ; 377(26): 2601, 2017 12 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29281569
18.
19.
Shock ; 47(5): 560-566, 2017 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27879559

ABSTRACT

Refractory septic shock is defined as persistently low mean arterial blood pressure despite volume resuscitation and titrated vasopressors/inotropes in patients with a proven or suspected infection and concomitant organ dysfunction. Its management typically requires high doses of catecholamines, which can induce significant adverse effects such as ischemia and arrhythmias. Angiotensin II (Ang II), a key product of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, is a vasopressor agent that could be used in conjunction with other vasopressors to stabilize critically ill patients during refractory septic shock, and reduce catecholamine requirements. However, very few clinical data are available to support Ang II administration in this setting. Here, we review the current literature on this topic to better understand the role of Ang II administration during refractory septic shock, differentiating experimental from clinical studies. We also consider the potential role of exogenous Ang II administration in specific organ dysfunction and possible pitfalls with Ang II in sepsis. Various issues remain unresolved and future studies should investigate important topics such as: the optimal dose and timing of Ang II administration, a comparison between Ang II and the other vasopressors (epinephrine; vasopressin), and Ang II effects on microcirculation.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin II/therapeutic use , Shock, Septic/drug therapy , Shock, Septic/metabolism , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Humans , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
20.
Minerva Anestesiol ; 83(3): 255 - 265, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27858410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple organ dysfunction can occur in patients undergoing Veno-arterial Extra Corporal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO); however, liver function has not been well studied in this setting. METHODS: In a review of our institutional ECMO database (n=162), we collected aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) transaminases, total bilirubin and international normalized ratio (INR) at time of ECMO initiation (baseline) and once daily during therapy in patients who survived for at least 24 hours. Elevated liver enzymes (ELE) were defined if AST and/or ALT were > 200 UI/L, and acute liver failure (ALF) as the presence of an INR ≥ 1.5, new onset encephalopathy and an elevated total bilirubin concentrations. RESULTS: On a total of 80 patients undergoing VA-ECMO, 69 patients met the inclusion criteria (cardiogenic shock, n=52; refractory cardiac arrest, n=15; cardiac failure following severe ARDS, n=2). Of them, 45 (65%) had early ELE after ECMO initiation (median highest AST and ALT were 528 [251-2606] UI/L and 513 [130-1031] UI/L, respectively). Two thirds of patients with ELE (N = 30) had a progressive reduction in AST and ALT, but the levels were normalized only after 5 [5-6] days. Among patients with ELE, 21/45 (47%) had AST and/or ALT levels above > 1000 UI/L. A total of 14/69 (20%) patients developed ALF. However, mortality rate was not significantly higher in patients with ELE or ALF when compared to others. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients needing VA-ECMO have early ELE, which usually improves over days. The prognostic implications are not evident.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...