Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 4 de 4
1.
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods ; 105: 106883, 2020 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32461084

INTRODUCTION: Pre-clinically, safety risk assessment of a drug is primarily tested in vivo using functional evaluation of adult animals while the mechanistic etiology of drug-induced CNS adverse effects is often uncharacterized. In vitro electrophysiology may provide a better understanding of drug effects without additional animal use. However, in vitro protocols are typically designed for using embryonic or juvenile animals. METHODS: We examined whether brain tissue isolated from adult rats (3-5 months old) and adult non-human primates (NHPs) (2-8 years old) can generate qualitatively equivalent readouts for electrophysiology to characterize AMPAR synaptic and single channel currents. We used a known positive AMPAR allosteric modulator (LY451395) to template a response profile and provide proof-of-concept data to assess responses of these native AMPARs in a drug context. RESULTS: Brain slices from adult animals provided a support to measure AMPAR-driven excitatory post-synaptic currents (EPSCs), and can be dissociated into primary neuronal cultures for AMPAR single channel characterization. Additionally, similarities and differences in AMPAR basal kinetics and responses to LY451395 were seen between the two animal species. DISCUSSION: Glutamatergic synaptic activity and AMPAR biophysical properties in adult animals may be used to characterize test-article-mediated alterations in CNS responses. The use of older animals opens the possibility for in vivo test-article administration, either acutely or repeatedly, before in vitro electrophysiological assessment in order to reveal cumulative or delayed-onset effects, adding versatility to safety pharmacology assessment of the CNS.


Central Nervous System/metabolism , Central Nervous System/physiology , Neurons/metabolism , Neurons/physiology , Primates/metabolism , Primates/physiology , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Electrophysiology/methods , Female , Male , Patch-Clamp Techniques/methods , Rats , Receptors, AMPA
2.
Pharmacol Ther ; 145: 43-57, 2015 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25016186

Vortioxetine, a novel antidepressant for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), is a 5-HT3, 5-HT7 and 5-HT1D receptor antagonist, 5-HT1B receptor partial agonist, 5-HT1A receptor agonist and serotonin (5-HT) transporter (SERT) inhibitor. Here we review its preclinical and clinical properties and discuss translational aspects. Vortioxetine increases serotonergic, noradrenergic, dopaminergic, cholinergic, histaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission in brain structures associated with MDD. These multiple effects likely derive from its interaction with 5-HT-receptor-mediated negative feedback mechanisms controlling neuronal activity. In particular, 5-HT3 receptors may play a prominent role, since their blockade i) increases pyramidal neuron activity by removing 5-HT3 receptor-mediated excitation of GABA interneurons, and ii) augments SSRI effects on extracellular 5-HT. However, modulation of the other 5-HT receptor subtypes also likely contributes to vortioxetine's pharmacological effects. Preclinical animal models reveal differences from SSRIs and SNRIs, including antidepressant-like activity, increased synaptic plasticity and improved cognitive function. Vortioxetine had clinical efficacy in patients with MDD: 11 placebo-controlled studies (including one in elderly) with efficacy in 8 (7 positive, 1 supportive), 1 positive active comparator study plus a positive relapse prevention study. In two positive studies, vortioxetine was superior to placebo in pre-defined cognitive outcome measures. The clinically effective dose range (5-20mg/day) spans ~50 to >80% SERT occupancy. SERT and 5-HT3 receptors are primarily occupied at 5mg, while at 20mg, all targets are likely occupied at functionally relevant levels. The side-effect profile is similar to that of SSRIs, with gastrointestinal symptoms being most common, and a low incidence of sexual dysfunction and sleep disruption possibly ascribed to vortioxetine's receptor modulation.


Antidepressive Agents , Piperazines , Serotonin Agents , Sulfides , Animals , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/metabolism , Humans , Piperazines/pharmacology , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Receptors, Serotonin/metabolism , Serotonin Agents/pharmacology , Serotonin Agents/therapeutic use , Serotonin Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Sulfides/pharmacology , Sulfides/therapeutic use , Vortioxetine
3.
Curr Opin Pharmacol ; 14: 81-9, 2014 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24565016

TOMMORROW is a Phase III delay of onset clinical trial to determine whether low doses of pioglitazone, a molecule that induces mitochondrial doubling, delays the onset of MCI-AD in normal subjects treated with low dose compared to placebo. BOLD imaging studies in rodents and man were used to find the dose that increases oxygen consumption at central regions of the brain in higher proportion than activation of large corticol regions. The trial is made practical by the use of a pharmacogenetic algorithm based on TOMM40 and APOE genotypes and age to identify normal subjects at high risk of MCI-AD between the ages of 65-83 years within a five year follow-up period.


Alzheimer Disease/prevention & control , Drug Design , Pharmacogenetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Alzheimer Disease/genetics , Animals , Brain/pathology , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic/methods , Cognitive Dysfunction/genetics , Cognitive Dysfunction/prevention & control , Genotype , Humans , Pioglitazone , Thiazolidinediones/administration & dosage , Thiazolidinediones/pharmacology
4.
Neuroreport ; 14(18): 2429-32, 2003 Dec 19.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14663205

In cynomolgus monkeys, the typical neuroleptic haloperidol induced strong expression of the immediate early gene product Fos in both the nucleus accumbens shell and the dorsal striatum. In the caudate nucleus, haloperidol induced staining was more marked in the striosomes than the matrix. The atypical neuroleptic clozapine also induced Fos expression in the nucleus accumbens, but, in contrast to haloperidol, had only a small effect in the dorsal striatum. Additionally, clozapine was more potent than haloperidol at inducing Fos-like immunoreactivity in the islands of Calleja. These results are similar to those typically obtained in rodents, and suggest that the basic mechanisms underlying the regional specificity of the effects of atypical neuroleptics are likely be conserved between these two mammalian orders.


Clozapine/pharmacology , Corpus Striatum/drug effects , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Genes, fos/drug effects , Haloperidol/pharmacology , Animals , Corpus Striatum/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation/physiology , Genes, fos/physiology , Macaca fascicularis , Male
...