Maternal and fetal outcomes after planned cesarean or vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy: a comparison between 2 third level birth centers.

BACKGROUND: Twin pregnancy is associated with higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes for both the mother and the babies. Among the many challenges in the follow-up of twin pregnancies, the mode of delivery is the last but not the least decision to be made, with the main influencing factors being amnionicity and fetal presentation. The aim of the study was to compare perinatal outcomes in two European centers using different protocols for twin birth in case of non-cephalic second twin; the Italian patients being delivered mainly by cesarean section with those in Belgium being routinely offered the choice of vaginal delivery (VD). METHODS: This was a dual center international retrospective observational study. The population included 843 women with a twin pregnancy ≥ 32 weeks (dichorionic or monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies) and a known pregnancy outcome. The population was stratified according to chorionicity. Demographic and pregnancy data were reported per pregnancy, whereas neonatal outcomes were reported per fetus. We used multiple logistic regression models to adjust for possible confounding variables and to compute the adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) for each maternal or neonatal outcome. RESULTS: The observed rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the Italian cohort: 85% for dichorionic pregnancies and 94.4% for the monochorionic vs 45.2% and 54.4% respectively in the Belgian center (p-value < 0.001). We found that Belgian cohort showed significantly higher rates of NICU admission, respiratory distress at birth and Apgar score of < 7 after 5 min. Despite these differences, the composite severe adverse outcome was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, neither the presentation of the second twin nor the chorionicity affected maternal and severe neonatal outcomes, regardless of the mode of delivery in two tertiary care centers, but VD was associated to a poorer short-term neonatal outcome.

Birthweights at term have increased globally: insights from a systematic review of 183 million births.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess global trends in mean birthweights at term, as reported in peer-reviewed literature. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to September 2023, using combinations of the search terms: "birth weight"; "birth-weight"; "birthweight"; "trend". There were no restrictions based on language or geographic area. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all ecological and observational studies reporting mean birthweight at term as a continuous numerical variable over time. METHODS: We assessed the quality of included studies using the Dufault and Klar checklist modified by Betran et al. Univariate and multivariate linear models were used to examine the effects of time (years) and geographical origins. Subgroup analyses focused on national data sources and on data collected from 1950 onward. RESULTS: Among 6447 reviewed articles, 29 met our criteria, reporting mean birthweight data from over 183 million infants worldwide. Most studies were hospital-based (48.3%), 44.8% used national data, and a minority used municipality, community, or regional data (6.9%). Geographically, North America (31.0%) had the highest representation, followed by Asia and Europe (27.6% each), and South America and Oceania (6.9% each). Our univariate linear regression model (Model 1) revealed a significant increase in mean birthweight at term over time (4.74 g/y; 95% confidence interval, 3.95-5.53; P<.001). Model 2, incorporating continental dummy variables into the first model, confirmed this trend (3.85 g/y; 95% confidence interval, 2.96-4.74; P<.001). Model 3, focusing on available national data, did not find a significant relationship. Model 4 narrowed its focus on records from 1950 onward, reporting a robust annual increase of 7.26 g/y (95% confidence interval, 6.19-8.33; P<.001). Model 5, adjusting for the number of participants included in each study, reported a conclusive mean term birthweight increase of 1.46 g/y (95% confidence interval, 0.74-2.18; P<.001). CONCLUSION: This systematic review of 29 studies shows an increase in term birthweights over time, particularly when considering data since 1950. Limitations include study quality variations, data source diversity, and data sparsity, underscoring the need for future research to use precise gestational age distinctions and predetermined time frames to gain a deeper understanding of this trend and its implications for maternal and child health.

Is the mental health of couples with twins more at risk? Results from an Italian cohort study.

Introduction: Our retrospective study aimed to investigate whether parents of twins encounter heightened psychological and emotional distress one year after childbirth, in comparison to parents of singletons within an Italian cohort. Methods: Exclusion criteria included multiparity, preterm birth, congenital anomalies, stillbirth, >2 fetus pregnancies, and pre-existing maternal mental health disorders. Out of the 300 couples (600 parents) invited to participate, 286 parents (158 mothers, 128 fathers) successfully completed a self-administered survey. We analyzed three scores separately for mothers and fathers, differentiating between singleton and twin pregnancies: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)-Y1 score, and the STAI-Y2 score. Results: Logistic models were used to assess the influence of age, BMI, marital status, education, and employment on the three binary scores (EPDS, STAI-Y1, and STAI-Y2), revealing no significant differences in absolute scores between parents of singletons and twins. Paired analysis revealed significantly higher EPDS (mean increase: 3.8, SD: 6.5), STAI-Y1 (mean increase: 5.4, SD: 12.5), and STAI-Y2 (mean increase: 4.5, SD: 12.4) scores for mothers (p < 0.0001). Approximately 10% of women and 8% of men reported suicidal thoughts. Discussion: Contrary to expectations, no substantial psychological differences emerged between parents of twins and singletons. Adjusting for confounders through univariate analysis maintained nonsignificant trends. Nevertheless, caution in interpretation is warranted due to strict inclusion criteria favoring twin pregnancies with better outcomes. Unintended bias could have resulted from routine psychological support offered to mothers of twins in our clinic. This presents an important framework for future research, including randomized controlled trials comparing parents of multiples with psychological support to those without.Finally, the elevated prevalence of depression symptoms and suicidal thoughts in our cohort underscores the importance of mental health during pregnancy and early parenting. We advocate for the screening of parents for postpartum depression and various psychological conditions, encompassing a spectrum of anxiety disorders. Those at elevated risk of mental distress should be proactively offered appropriate support.

The impact of placental anastomoses and umbilical cord insertions' sites on monochorionic twin pregnancy outcomes: Evidence from color-dye injection studies.

INTRODUCTION: Our knowledge of monochorionic pregnancies' complications is largely based on the extensive ongoing research on monochorionic placental structure. Previous studies on the concordance of umbilical cord insertions are limited. This study aimed to evaluate placental anastomoses and cord insertions as independent risk factors for neonatal adverse outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy from April 2021 to December 2022. Seventy-six women with a monochorionic pregnancy were enrolled at their first-trimester scan. After delivery, all placentas that were confirmed to be monochorionic were analyzed according to standard protocols, including those of complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies. The primary outcomes were a Composite Monochorionic Pregnancy Outcome (CMPO) and a Composite Neonatal Adverse Outcome (CNAO). The secondary outcome was the birth weight discordance between the neonates. RESULTS: The CMPO occurred in 15.8 % pregnancies, and the CNAO occurred in 67.1 % pregnancies. The analysis confirmed a significant association between velamentous cord insertions and neonatal adverse events (p = 0.003). Also, a significant positive association (p = 0.0326) between twin birth weight discordance and discordance in twins umbilical cord insertions' sites was found. No significant association between the number and type of the anastomoses and both the CMPO or CNAO was detected. DISCUSSION: Our data suggest that the routine sonographic assessment of umbilical cords' insertion sites during the first trimester could be helpful in predicting fetal and neonatal adverse events. We believe that this sonographic assessment should start to be implemented in our routine care of monochorionic pregnancies.

Pregnancy outcomes in breech presentation at term: a comparison between 2 third level birth center protocols.

BACKGROUND: Medical literature supports planned cesarean delivery for breech presentation at term because of observed reductions in neonatal morbidity and mortality compared with vaginal breech delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies with breech presentation at term according to the different delivery protocols of 2 teaching hospitals, where vaginal breech delivery (protocol 1) or cesarean delivery (protocol 2) is routinely offered, respectively. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted between January 2015 and May 2021. A total of 1079 women were eligible for analysis. After matching for possible confounding factors, the final analysis was performed on 257 patients in each group. The primary outcomes were a composite of adverse obstetrical outcomes and a composite of neonatal adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 1079 women were eligible for analysis. After matching for possible confounding factors, the final analysis was performed on 257 patients in each group. The composite of adverse obstetrical outcomes was similar in the 2 groups (24.1% vs 24.5%; P=1.000); however, the composite of neonatal adverse outcomes was significantly higher for protocol 1 (17.9% vs 1.2%; P<.001). No neonatal death or birth trauma was reported in either group. The rates of neonatal intensive care unit admission (4.3% vs 0.4%; P=.004), respiratory distress at birth (17.5% vs 1.2%; P<.001), and Apgar scores of <7 after 5 minutes (5.8% vs 0.4%; P<.001) were significantly higher for protocol 1. CONCLUSION: Short-term, nonsevere adverse neonatal outcomes were significantly increased in the protocol 1 group. These must be balanced against the possible negative effects of cesarean delivery on long-term infant and maternal health.

Case Report: Challenges of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Case Report of Confined Placental Mosaicism and Clinical Considerations.

Since the introduction of cell-free (cf) DNA analysis, Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) underwent a deep revolution. Pregnancies at high risk for common fetal aneuploidies can now be easily identified through the analysis of chromosome-derived components found in maternal circulation, with the highest sensitivity and specificity currently available. Consequently, the last decade has witnessed a widespread growth in cfDNA-based NIPT use, enough to be often considered an alternative method to other screening modalities. Nevertheless, the use of NIPT in clinical practice is still not devoid of discordant results. Hereby, we report a case of confined placental mosaicism (CPM) in which a NIPT false-positive result for trisomy 13 required not only amniocentesis but also cordocentesis, to rule out the fetal aneuploidy, with the additional support of molecular cytogenetics on placental DNA at delivery. Relevant aspects allowing for precision genetic diagnosis and counselling, including the number of analysed metaphases on the different fetal cells compartments and a repeated multidisciplinary evaluation, are discussed.