MEMS Technology in Cardiology: Advancements and Applications in Heart Failure Management Focusing on the CardioMEMS Device.

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. It is characterized by various structural and/or functional abnormalities of the heart, resulting in elevated intracardiac pressure and/or inadequate cardiac output at rest and/or during exercise. These dysfunctions can originate from a variety of conditions, including coronary artery disease, hypertension, cardiomyopathies, heart valve disorders, arrhythmias, and other lifestyle or systemic factors. Identifying the underlying cause is crucial for detecting reversible or treatable forms of HF. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that there has not been an increase in the incidence of the disease. Instead, patients seem to experience a chronic trajectory marked by frequent hospitalizations and stagnant mortality rates. Managing these patients requires a multidisciplinary approach that focuses on preventing disease progression, controlling symptoms, and preventing acute decompensations. In the outpatient setting, patient self-care plays a vital role in achieving these goals. This involves implementing necessary lifestyle changes and promptly recognizing symptoms/signs such as dyspnea, lower limb edema, or unexpected weight gain over a few days, to alert the healthcare team for evaluation of medication adjustments. Traditional methods of HF monitoring, such as symptom assessment and periodic clinic visits, may not capture subtle changes in hemodynamics. Sensor-based technologies offer a promising solution for remote monitoring of HF patients, enabling early detection of fluid overload and optimization of medical therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of the CardioMEMS device, a novel sensor-based system for pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in HF patients. We discuss the technical aspects, clinical evidence, and future directions of CardioMEMS in HF management.

Fusion Imaging of Non-Invasive and Invasive Cardiac Electroanatomic Mapping in Patients with Ventricular Ectopic Beats: A Feasibility Analysis in a Case Series.

In patients with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), non-invasive mapping could locate the PVCs' origin on a personalized 3-dimensional (3D) heart model and, thus, facilitate catheter ablation therapy planning. The aim of our report is to evaluate its accuracy compared to invasive mapping in terms of assessing the PVCs' early activation zone (EAZ). For this purpose, non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) was performed using the Amycard 01C system (EP Solutions SA, Switzerland) in three cases. In the first step, a multichannel ECG (up to 224 electrodes) was recorded, and the dominant PVCs were registered. Afterward, a cardiac computed tomography (in two cases) or magnetic resonance imaging (in one case) investigation was carried out acquiring non-contrast torso scans for 8-electrode strip visualization and contrast heart acquisition. For the reconstructed epi/endocardial meshes of the heart, non-invasive isochronal maps were generated for the selected multichannel ECG fragments. Then, the patients underwent an invasive electrophysiological study, and the PVCs' activation was evaluated by a 3D mapping system (EnSite NavX Precision, Abbott). Finally, using custom-written software, we performed 3D fusion of the non-invasive and invasive models and compared the resulting isochronal maps. A qualitative analysis in each case showed the same early localization of the dominant PVC on the endocardial surface when comparing the non-invasive and invasive isochronal maps. The distance from the EAZ to the mitral or tricuspid annulus was comparable in the invasive/non-invasive data (36/41 mm in case N1, 73/75 mm in case N2, 9/12 mm in case N3). The area of EAZ was also similar between the invasive/non-invasive maps (4.3/4.5 cm2 in case N1, 7.1/7.0 cm2 in case N2, 0.4/0.6 cm2 in case N3). The distances from the non-invasive to invasive earliest activation site were 4 mm in case N1, 7 mm in case N2, and 4 mm in case N3. Such results were appropriate to trust the clinical value of the preoperative data in these cases. In conclusion, the non-invasive identification of PVCs before an invasive electrophysiological study can guide clinical and interventional decisions, demonstrating appropriate accuracy in the estimation of focus origin.

Expanded application of wearable cardioverter defibrillators beyond current guidelines: proposal for a European register explained through single clinical scenarios.

The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is becoming a more and more widely used instrument for the prevention of sudden cardiac death of patients either with a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator indication or with a transient high risk of sudden cardiac death. Although clinical practice has demonstrated a benefit of protecting patients for a period as long as 3-6 months with such devices, the current European guidelines concerning ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death are still extremely restrictive in the patient selection in part because of the costs derived from such a prevention device, in part because of the lack of robust randomised trials.To illustrate expanded use cases for the WCD, four real-life clinical cases are presented where patients received the device slightly outside the established guidelines. These cases demonstrate the broader utility of WCDs in situations involving acute myocarditis, thyrotoxicosis, pre-excited atrial fibrillation and awaiting staging/prognosis of a lung tumour. The findings prompt expansion of the existing guidelines for WCD use to efficiently protect more patients whose risk of arrhythmic cardiac death is transient or uncertain. This could be achieved by establishing a European register of the patients who receive a WCD for further analysis.

His bundle pacing guided by automated intrinsic morphology matching is feasible in patients with narrow QRS complexes.

Pace mapping and visual comparison of the local pacing response with the intrinsic QRS morphology form the mainstay of His bundle pacing (HBP). We evaluated the performance of a surface lead morphology match algorithm for automated classification of the pacing response in patients with narrow intrinsic QRS undergoing electroanatomic mapping (EAM)-guided HBP. HBP was attempted in 43 patients. In 28 cases with narrow QRS, the EnSite AutoMap Module was used for automated assessment of the QRS morphology resulting from pace mapping in the His cloud area with either a diagnostic catheter or the His lead. An intrinsic morphology match score (IMS) was calculated for 1.546 QRS complexes and assessed regarding its accuracy and performance in classifying the individual pacing response as either selective HBP (S-HBP), nonselective HBP (NS-HBP) or right ventricular stimulation. Automated morphology comparison of 354 intrinsic beats with the individual reference determined a test accuracy of 99% (95% CI 98.96-99.04) and a precision of 97.99-99.5%. For His-lead stimulation, an IMS ≥ 89% identified S-HBP with a sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) and a negative predictive value of 0.99 (0.98, 1.00). An IMS between 78 and < 89% indicated NS-HBP with a sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 (0.99, 1.00) and 0.99 (0.98, 1.00), respectively. IMS represents a new automated measure for standardized individual morphology classification in patients with normal QRS undergoing EAM-guided HBP.Clinical trial registration: NCT04416958.

Perioperative Sensor and Algorithm Programming in Patients with Implanted ICDs and Pacemakers for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

BACKGROUND: ICDs and pacemakers for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are complex devices with different sensors and automatic algorithms implanted in patients with advanced cardiac diseases. Data on the perioperative management and outcome of CRT carriers undergoing surgery unrelated to the device are scarce. METHODS: Data from 198 CRT device carriers (100 with active rate responsive sensor) were evaluated regarding perioperative adverse (device-related) events (A(D)E) and lead parameter changes. RESULTS: Thirty-nine adverse observations were documented in 180 patients during preoperative interrogation, which were most often related to the left-ventricular lead and requiring intervention/reprogramming in 22 cases (12%). Anesthesia-related events occurred in 69 patients. There was no ADE for non-cardiac surgery and in pacemaker-dependent patients not programmed to an asynchronous pacing mode. Post-operative device interrogation showed significant lead parameter changes in 64/179 patients (36%) requiring reprogramming in 29 cases (16%). CONCLUSION: The left-ventricular pacing lead represents the most vulnerable system component. Comprehensive pre and post-interventional device interrogation is mandatory to ensure proper system function. The type of ICD function suspension has no impact on each patient's outcome. Precautionary activity sensor deactivation is not required for non-cardiac interventions. Routine prophylactic device reprogramming to asynchronous pacing appears inessential. Most of the CRT pacemakers do not require surgery-related reprogramming.

Minielectrode catheter technology for near zero-fluoroscopy substrate-guided ablation of typical atrial flutter.

BACKGROUND: MicroFidelity catheter technology may facilitate voltage-guided ablation by high-resolution electroanatomic mapping (HR-EAM) and precisely targeted energy application. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of minielectrode (ME) technology for zero-fluoroscopy substrate-guided cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. METHODS: Eighty-two patients underwent near zero-fluoroscopy substrate-guided CTI ablation using a nonirrigated large-tip catheter with 3 MEs. The CTI was subdivided into 15 electroanatomic segments. Bipolar voltage maps were compared with ME signals. The outcome was compared with a historic cohort of 92 patients who underwent linear ablation. RESULTS: Compared with linear ablation, the substrate-guided approach was associated with an almost halved ablation duration (336 ± 228 vs 649 ± 409 seconds, P < .001), halved radiofrequency energy applied (14.2 ± 10.6 vs 28.6 ± 19.6 kJ, P < .001), and shorter procedure duration (60.8 ± 33.8 vs 76.3 ± 40.9 minutes, P = .008) limiting the extent of energy delivery to 22.7% of the CTI area. HR-EAM visualized 2.03 ± 0.88 conductive pathways with a diameter of 5.35 ± 1.98 mm. A higher number of ME-detected bundles and a larger channel diameter correlated with increased ablation requirements. In 97.6% of the voltage-guided and 88.0% of the linear procedures, fluoroscopy was not used. CONCLUSION: HR-EAM-based substrate-guided CTI ablation may improve procedural outcome compared with the linear approach. Enhanced identification of discrete conductive pathways correlates with ablation efficacy. The electroanatomic subdivision of the CTI into 15 segments was feasible and may improve the understanding and comparability of anatomic variants and ablation results. Independent of the ablation strategy, modern EAM technology enables safe zero-fluoroscopy procedures in the majority of cases.

High-density mapping-guided corrective HIS bundle pacing after failed CRT upgrade for persistent left superior vena cava.

In patients with persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC), transvenous device implantation for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be challenging. We present a complex case with successful, high-density electroanatomic mapping (EAM) guided corrective His bundle pacing (CHBP) following failed CRT upgrade in a patient with PLSVC, congenital heart disease, and pacing-associated heart failure. CHBP restored physiological conduction in left bundle branch block with complete conduction block leading to clinical improvement and cardiac remodeling. The presented case supports the growing evidence that EAM-guided CHBP may be considered a feasible alternative to conventional CRT when venous anatomy is not favorable for left ventricular lead implantation.

Effect of different drug classes on reverse remodeling of intramural coronary arterioles in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

BACKGROUND: Symptoms and signs of myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary disease are common in hypertensive patients. This can be explained by CMD due to adverse remodeling of coronary arterioles which have also been reported in the SHR. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of ramipril, perindopril, candesartan, atenolol, amlodipine, indapamide, and HMR1766 on CMD in the SHR. METHODS: Eight groups of 24-wk-old SHR were treated for 8 wk. BP was measured invasively at the end of the treatment. After sacrifice, hearts were mounted on a Langendorff apparatus for the measurement of hyperemic CF. Hearts were then processed for histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: All compounds, except HMR1766, induced a significant reduction in BP. Perindopril and candesartan increased hyperemic CF, whereas the other compounds had no significant effect. Perindopril, ramipril, atenolol, indapamide, and HMR1766 induced significant reverse arteriolar remodeling, whereas candesartan and amlodipine did not. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of antihypertensive treatment on CMD is not exclusively dependent on BP reduction. Compounds with comparable antihypertensive efficacy may exert different effects on CF and induce different degrees of reverse arteriolar remodeling.