Reversal and Resumption of Antithrombotic Therapy in LVAD-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Little data exist regarding reversal and resumption of antithrombotics after left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-associated intracranial hemorrhage. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of LVAD patients with intracranial hemorrhage were reviewed. Coagulopathy reversal agents, antithrombotic regimens, and thrombotic (venous thromboembolism, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic (recurrent intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleed, anemia requiring transfusion) complications were recorded. RESULTS: Of 405 patients, intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 39 (10%): 23 intracerebral hemorrhages, 10 subarachnoid hemorrhages, and 6 subdural hematomas. Of 27 patients who received antithrombotic reversal, 8 (30%) had inadequate coagulopathy reversal, and 3 of these patients had hemorrhage expansion or died before repeat imaging. One (4%) patient had a thrombotic complication (deep vein thrombosis). Antithrombotic therapy was resumed in 17 (100%) survivors in a median time 8 days for antiplatelet agents and 14 days for warfarin. Recurrent intracranial hemorrhage occurred within a median of 7 days of antithrombotic resumption, while ischemic stroke occurred in a median of 428 days. Patients who resumed antiplatelets alone (n = 4) had a trend toward more thrombotic events (1.37 versus 0.14 events/patient-year [EPPY]; p = 0.08), including more fatal thrombotic events (0.34 EPPY versus 0.08 EPPY; p = 0.89) compared with those resuming warfarin ± antiplatelet (n = 14). Nonfatal hemorrhage event rates were 0.34 EPPY in the warfarin ± antiplatelet versus 0 EPPY in the antiplatelet-alone group (p = 0.16). No fatal hemorrhagic events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of anticoagulation appears safe after LVAD-associated intracranial hemorrhage, though inadequate reversal was common. Resumption of warfarin ± antiplatelet was associated with fewer fatal and nonfatal thrombotic events compared with antiplatelets alone, though more nonfatal hemorrhage events occurred.

Clinical risk factors for Clostridium difficile-associated diseases.

Many factors appear to influence the chance of acquiring Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection, and an accurate identification of risk factors could be beneficial in many ways. Thus, in the present study, clinical risk factors for C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in Korea were identified. A total of 93 patients who met the inclusion criteria and 186 age/gender/ward/admission period-matched control patients were included in this study. Statistically significant associations were found with presence of chronic lung diseases (odds ratio [OR], 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-9.32; p = 0.017), presence of ileus (OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 2.42-41.80; p = 0.001), presence of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (OR, 9.79; 95% CI, 3.03-31.68; p < 0.001), use of cephalosphorins (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.13-9.62; p = 0.029), history of surgery (OR, 10.89; 95% CI, 3.96-29.92; p < 0.001), and history of long-term care facility stay (OR, 14.90; 95% CI, 4.02-55.26; p < 0.001). Awareness of CDAD is critical to provide appropriate clinical care. Surveillance of the national incidence rate and multicenter studies are needed, and the potential value of a C. difficile vaccine should be studied.

Clinical risk factors for Clostridium difficile-associated diseases

Many factors appear to influence the chance of acquiring Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection, and an accurate identification of risk factors could be beneficial in many ways. Thus, in the present study, clinical risk factors for C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in Korea were identified. A total of 93 patients who met the inclusion criteria and 186 age/gender/ward/admission period-matched control patients were included in this study. Statistically significant associations were found with presence of chronic lung diseases (odds ratio [OR], 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-9.32; p = 0.017), presence of ileus (OR, 10.05; 95% CI, 2.42-41.80; p = 0.001), presence of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (OR, 9.79; 95% CI, 3.03-31.68; p < 0.001), use of cephalosphorins (OR, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.13-9.62; p = 0.029), history of surgery (OR, 10.89; 95% CI, 3.96-29.92; p < 0.001), and history of long-term care facility stay (OR, 14.90; 95% CI, 4.02-55.26; p < 0.001). Awareness of CDAD is critical to provide appropriate clinical care. Surveillance of the national incidence rate and multicenter studies are needed, and the potential value of a C. difficile vaccine should be studied.