Ross procedure with personalized external aortic root support.

The Ross-Personalized External Aortic Root Support procedure is a surgical aortic valve replacement technique in which the autologous pulmonary valve is transposed in the aortic position to replace the malfunctioning aortic valve and a homograft is implanted in the pulmonary position. To prevent autograft dilatation, a Personalized External Aortic Root Support prosthesis is included in the proximal autograft anastomosis and wrapped around the ascending aorta. The aorta is transected transversely, the aortic valve is resected, and the coronary arteries are mobilized and cut out of the sinuses, leaving a rim. The pulmonary autograft is harvested by transecting the pulmonary artery and part of the right ventricular outflow tract. The autograft is approximated to the aortic root and inverted inside the ventricle. The proximal anastomosis is performed including the prosthesis between the aortic root and the autograft. The coronary buttons are threaded through appropriately positioned and sized holes in the prosthesis and reimplanted into the autograft. The ascending aorta is appropriately adapted and anastomosed with the distal autograft. When the patient is off cardiopulmonary bypass, the prosthesis can be closed longitudinally and is anchored to the distal aortic adventitia.

On-Support and Postweaning Mortality in Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) is characterized by discrepancies between weaning and survival-to-discharge rates. This study analyzes the differences between postcardiotomy VA ECMO patients who survived, died on ECMO, or died after ECMO weaning. Causes of death and variables associated with mortality at different time points are investigated. METHODS: The retrospective, multicenter, observational Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support Study (PELS) includes adults requiring postcardiotomy VA ECMO between 2000 and 2020. Variables associated with on-ECMO mortality and postweaning mortality were modeled using mixed Cox proportional hazards, including random effects for center and year. RESULTS: In 2058 patients (men, 59%; median age, 65 years; interquartile range [IQR], 55-72 years), weaning rate was 62.7%, and survival to discharge was 39.6%. Patients who died (n = 1244) included 754 on-ECMO deaths (36.6%; median support time, 79 hours; IQR, 24-192 hours), and 476 postweaning deaths (23.1%; median support time, 146 hours; IQR, 96-235.5 hours). Multiorgan (n = 431 of 1158 [37.2%]) and persistent heart failure (n = 423 of 1158 [36.5%]) were the main causes of death, followed by bleeding (n = 56 of 754 [7.4%]) for on-ECMO mortality and sepsis (n = 61 of 401 [15.4%]) for postweaning mortality. On-ECMO death was associated with emergency surgery, preoperative cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, right ventricular failure, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and ECMO implantation timing. Diabetes, postoperative bleeding, cardiac arrest, bowel ischemia, acute kidney injury, and septic shock were associated with postweaning mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy exists between weaning and discharge rate in postcardiotomy ECMO. Deaths occurred during ECMO support in 36.6% of patients, mostly associated with unstable preoperative hemodynamics. Another 23.1% of patients died after weaning in association with severe complications. This underscores the importance of postweaning care for postcardiotomy VA ECMO patients.