ABSTRACT
PLAG1 gene fusions were recently identified in a subset of uterine myxoid leiomyosarcomas (M-LMS). However, we have encountered cases of PLAG1-rearranged uterine sarcomas lacking M-LMS-like morphology and/or any expression of smooth muscle markers. To better characterize their clinicopathologic features, we performed a multiinstitutional search that yielded 11 cases. The patients ranged in age from 34 to 72 years (mean, 57 years). All tumors arose in the uterine corpus, ranging in size from 6.5 to 32 cm (mean, 15 cm). The most common stage at presentation was pT1b (n = 6), and 3 cases had stage pT1 (unspecified), and 1 case each presented in stages pT2a and pT3b. Most were treated only with hysterectomy and adnexectomy. The follow-up (range, 7-71 months; median, 39 months) was available for 7 patients. Three cases (7-21 months of follow-up) had no evidence of disease. Three of the 4 remaining patients died of disease within 55 to 71 months, while peritoneal spread developed in the last patient, and the patient was transferred for palliative care at 39 months. Morphologically, the tumors showed a high intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity. M-LMS-like and epithelioid leiomyosarcoma-like morphology were present in 3 and 5 primary tumors, respectively, the remaining mostly presented as nondescript ovoid or spindle cell sarcomas. Unusual morphologic findings included prominently hyalinized stroma (n = 3), adipocytic differentiation with areas mimicking myxoid liposarcoma (n = 2), osteosarcomatous differentiation (n = 1), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma-like areas (n = 1). The mitotic activity ranged from 3 to 24 mitoses per 10 high-power fields (mean, 9); 3 of 10 cases showed necrosis. In 3 of 11 cases, no expression of smooth muscle actin, h-caldesmon, or desmin was noted, whereas 5 of 5 cases expressed PLAG1. By RNA sequencing, the following fusion partners were identified: PUM1, CHCHD7 (each n = 2), C15orf29, CD44, MYOCD, FRMD6, PTK2, and TRPS1 (each n = 1). One case only showed PLAG1 gene break by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Our study documents a much broader morphologic spectrum of PLAG1-rearranged uterine sarcomas than previously reported, encompassing but not limited to M-LMS-like morphology with occasional heterologous (particularly adipocytic) differentiation. As it is currently difficult to precisely define their line of differentiation, for the time being, we suggest using a descriptive name "PLAG1-rearranged uterine sarcoma."
ABSTRACT
Uterine inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms of uncertain malignant potential. Aside from the recently described risk stratification score, which has not been validated by other studies, and rare reports of aberrant p16 expression in malignant tumors, there are no criteria to reliably predict behavior. Herein, we evaluated the clinicopathologic features and p16 expression patterns in 30 IMTs, with genomic profiling performed in a subset (13 malignant, 3 benign). Fifteen patients had malignant IMTs, defined by extrauterine disease at diagnosis (n=5) or recurrence (n=10; median: 24 mo). Patients ranged from 8 to 65 (median: 51) years and tumors from 6 to 22 (median: 12.5) cm. In primary tumors (n=13), infiltrative borders were noted in 10, moderate/severe cytologic atypia in 9, tumor cell necrosis in 7, and lymphovascular invasion in 6, while mitoses ranged from 0 to 21 (median: 7) per 10 high-power fields. In contrast, 15 patients with benign IMTs ranged from 28 to 65 (median: 44) years, with follow-up of 18 to 114 (median: 41) months. Tumors ranged from 1.9 to 8.5 (median: 5.5) cm, 2 demonstrated infiltrative borders, and 1 had moderate cytologic atypia. No other high-risk histologic features were observed. Application of the previously described clinicopathologic risk stratification score in all primary IMTs with complete data (n=18) classified 8 as high-risk (all malignant), 8 as intermediate-risk (3 malignant, 5 benign), and 2 as low-risk (benign). p16 was aberrant in all malignant IMTs, with <1% expression noted in 10, overexpression (>90%) in 4, and subclonal loss in 1; all benign tumors had patchy staining (20% to 80%; median 50%). Molecular analysis detected CDKN2A deletions in 8 of 9 tumors with <1% p16 expression, while the other harbored a TERT promoter mutation. TERT promoter mutations were also identified in 2 of 3 IMTs with p16 overexpression. Neither of these alterations was detected in the 3 sequenced benign IMTs. Thus, we recommend performing p16 on all uterine IMTs, which, combined with the risk stratification score, is a promising and cost-effective tool for predicting CDKN2A status and outcome in these patients. It may be particularly useful for tumors with incomplete information for risk stratification (ie, morcellated tumors) and for further stratifying intermediate-risk IMTs when sequencing is unavailable.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 , Uterine Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Uterine Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Neoplasms/chemistry , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/analysis , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/genetics , Middle Aged , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Child , Gene Deletion , Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue/genetics , Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue/pathology , Neoplasms, Muscle Tissue/chemistry , Immunohistochemistry , Predictive Value of Tests , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Tumor Burden , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
A close relationship has been demonstrated between genomic complexity and clinical outcome in uterine smooth muscle tumors. We studied the genomic profiles by array-CGH of 28 fumarate hydratase deficient leiomyomas and 37 leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (LMBN) from 64 patients. Follow-up was available for 46 patients (from three to 249 months, mean 87.3 months). All patients were alive without evidence of disease. For 51 array-CGH interpretable tumors the mean Genomic Index (GI) was 16.4 (median: 9.8; from 1 to 57.8), significantly lower than the mean GI in LMS (mean GI 51.8, p < 0.001). We described three groups: (1) a group with FH deletion (24/58) with low GI (mean GI: 11 vs. 22,4, p = 0.02), (2) a group with TP53 deletion (17/58) with higher GI (22.4 vs. 11 p = 0.02), and (3) a group without genomic events on FH or TP53 genes (17/58) (mean GI:18.3; from 1 to 57.8). Because none of these tumors recurred and none showed morphological features of LMS we concluded that GI at the cut-off of 10 was not applicable in these subtypes of LM. By integration of all those findings, a GI <10 in LMBN remains a valuable argument for benignity. Conversely, in LMBN a GI >10 or alteration in tumor suppressor genes, should not alone warrant a diagnosis of malignancy. Nine tumors were tested with Nanocind CINSARC® signature and all were classified in low risk of recurrence. We propose, based on our observations, a diagnostic approach of these challenging lesions.
Subject(s)
Leiomyoma , Uterine Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Uterine Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Neoplasms/pathology , Fumarate Hydratase/genetics , Leiomyoma/genetics , Leiomyoma/pathology , Genes, p53 , GenomicsABSTRACT
Pathogenic variants (mutations) and other molecular events involving subunits of the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable chromatin remodelling complex are common in a wide variety of malignancies. Many of these neoplasms are characterized by undifferentiated morphology. They arise at a variety of sites in the female genital tract but have rarely been reported in the uterine cervix. We report 2 primary cervical neoplasms arising in young women (ages 28 and 29 yr) exhibiting loss of nuclear immunoreactivity with SMARCB1 (INI1). In one case, which had a mixture of epithelioid and spindle cells, molecular studies revealed no SMARCB1 pathogenic variant, but showed a SPECCL1::NTRK 3 fusion, in keeping with an NTRK fusion sarcoma. The second case exhibited rhabdoid morphology and molecular testing confirmed a SMARCB1 pathogenic variant (c.425 T>G:p.(Leu142Ter) which, interpreted in conjunction with the morphology and immunohistochemistry, resulted in classification as a proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported cervical neoplasm exhibiting a SMARCB1 pathogenic variant and the first NTRK fusion sarcoma showing SMARCB1 protein loss. We discuss the diagnostic challenges and complexities of the molecular findings.