Risk factors for intramedullary nail breakage in proximal femoral fractures: a 10-year retrospective review.

INTRODUCTION Intramedullary nailing is a common treatment for proximal femoral fractures. Fracture of the nail is a rare but devastating complication that exposes often frail patients to complex revision surgery. We investigated which risk factors predict nail failure. METHODS We reviewed all cases of nail breakage seen over a 10-year period in a single busy trauma unit; 22 nail fractures were seen in 19 patients. Comparison was made with a group of 209 consecutive patients who underwent intramedullary fixation of a proximal femur fracture with no nail breakage over a 2-year period. RESULTS In the fractured nail group, mean age was 70.4 years (range 55-88 years).The mean time to fracture was 10 months (range 2.5-23 months). Logistical regression was used to show that low American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, subtrochanteric fracture and pathological fracture were independent risk factors for nail fracture. CONCLUSIONS Young patients with a low ASA score are at highest risk of nail breakage. We advise close follow-up of patients with these risk factors until bony union has been achieved. In addition, there may be merit in considering other treatment options, such as proximal femoral replacement, especially for those with pathological fracture with a good prognosis.

Distal femoral fractures: a review of fixation methods.

The treatment of distal femoral fractures has evolved; nevertheless, these fractures remain difficult to treat and carry an unpredictable prognosis. Over the years, many different strategies have been used with varying success. This review outlines the problems presented by distal femoral fractures and the results of current surgical techniques.

Patellar tendon ruptures in a pair of brothers.

The patellar tendon does not easily rupture due to its considerable high tensile strength. Therefore, in normal individuals, ruptures of the patellar tendon are uncommon. We report three episodes of patellar tendon ruptures in two normally fit and healthy brothers; postulating the possibility of inherent weakness. The treatment options for these injuries are discussed.

Clavicular fracture non-union surgical outcome and complications.

Symptomatic clavicular fracture non-union is rare. When it does occur, however, it may pose a difficult problem causing pain and functional impairment. The emphasis of this paper is on preopertive disabilities and the postoperative outcome and complications. Twenty patients with clavicular non-union treated operatively from 1989 to 1997 were reviewed, the average follow up was thirty-four months. Eleven fractures were midshaft, eight were lateral third and one medial third. A detailed proforma was completed with the patients documenting preoperative symptoms, outcome after surgery and complications. A literature search was carried out to find out the incidence of complications related to operating on post-traumatic clavicular non-union. All of the twenty fractures non-unions duly united after surgical intervention although three required early adjustment or change of metal work. The subjective and objective outcomes were good in 19 cases and poor in one. The postoperative complications included three implant failures, one stiff shoulder, two patients with numbness below the scar and one patient with an infected donor site wound. The literature search revealed that from 24 publications and 301 patients who had operations for clavicular non-union ther were 18 (6%) reported complications related to metal work, 45 (15%) reported complications related to soft tissues, seven (2%) complications related to the scar and 24 (8%) failures of union. Symptomatic clavicular non-union can cause severe disabilities. Good outcome, at low risk, can be expected from internal fixation and bone grafting of midshaft non-unions. Although there are only eight cases of lateral third clavicular non-unions, this is the largest series in the literature. Furthermore, the study clearly demonstrates both the difficulties treating this fracture surgically and a procedure to be avoided (acromio-clavicular bridging), which, again has not been previously addressed.

Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years.

We performed a prospective, randomised trial comparing three treatments for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip in 280 patients aged 65 to 79 years. The mean patient survival was significantly higher in the group undergoing reduction and internal fixation (79 months) compared with that with a cemented Thompson hemiarthroplasty or a cemented Monk bipolar hemiarthroplasty (61 months and 68 months, respectively). After three years, 32 of 93 patients (34.4%) who had undergone fixation had local complications, necessitating further intervention in 28 (30%). There were no significant differences in the functional outcome in survivors, who were reviewed annually to five years. Either reduction and internal fixation or cemented hemiarthroplasty may be offered as alternative treatments for a displaced intracapsular fracture in a mobile and mentally competent patient under the age of 80 years. The choice of procedure by the patient and the surgeon should be determined by the realisation that the use of internal fixation is associated with a 30% risk of failure requiring further surgery. If this is accepted, however, hemiarthroplasty is avoided, which, in our study has a significantly shorter mean survival time. The use of a bipolar prosthesis has no significant advantage.