Barriers encountered with clinical data warehouses: Recommendations from a focus group.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The increasing implementation and use of electronic health records over the last few decades has made a significant volume of clinical data being available. Over the past 20 years, hospitals have also adopted and implemented data warehouse technology to facilitate the reuse of administrative and clinical data for research. However, the implementation of clinical data warehouses encounters a set of barriers: ethical, legislative, technical, human and organizational. This paper proposes an overview of difficulties and barriers encountered during a clinical data warehouse (CDW) development and implementation project. METHODS: We conducted a focus group at the 2023 Medical Informatics Europe Conference and invited professionals involved in the implementation of CDW. These experts described their CDW and the difficulties and barriers they encountered at each phase: (i) launching of the data warehouse project, (ii) implementing the data warehouse and (iii) using a data warehouse in routine operations. They were also asked to propose solutions they were able to implement to address the barriers previously reported. RESULTS: After synthesis and consensus, a total of 26 barriers were identified, 10 pertained to tasks, 5 to tools and technologies, 4 to persons, 4 to organization, and 3 to the external environment. To address these challenges, a set of 15 practical recommendations was offered, covering essential aspects such as governance, stakeholder engagement, interdisciplinary collaboration, and external expertise utilization. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations serve as a valuable resource for healthcare institutions seeking to establish and optimize CDWs, offering a roadmap for leveraging clinical data for research, quality enhancement, and improved patient care.

Key Research Areas for Building and Deploying a Common Data Model for an Intensive Medicine Data Space in Europe and Beyond.

Key Research Areas (KRAs) were identified to establish a semantic interoperability framework for intensive medicine data in Europe. These include assessing common data model value, ensuring smooth data interoperability, supporting data standardization for efficient dataset use, and defining anonymization requirements to balance data protection and innovation.

How to Accurately Detect Renal Replacement Therapy Weaning in Intensive Care: Data Quality and Standardization Considerations for the OMOP Common Data Model.

This study assesses the effectiveness of the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership common data model (OMOP CDM) in standardising Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) data from intensive care units (ICU) of two French university hospitals. Our objective was to extract and standardise data from various sources, enabling the development of predictive models for CRRT weaning that are agnostic to the data's origin. Data for 1,696 ICU stays from the two data sources were extracted, transformed, and loaded into the OMOP format after semantic alignment of 46 CRRT standard concepts. Although the OMOP CDM demonstrated potential in harmonising CRRT data, we encountered challenges related to data variability and the lack of standard concepts. Despite these challenges, our study supports the promise of the OMOP CDM for ICU data standardization, suggesting that further refinement and adaptation could significantly improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes in critical care settings.

Intensive Care Quality Indicators Dashboard Using Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model.

This paper presents the development of a visualization dashboard for quality indicators in intensive care units (ICUs), using the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM). The dashboard enables the user to visualize quality indicator data using histograms, pie charts and tables. Our project uses the OMOP CDM, ensuring a seamless implementation of our dashboard across various hospitals. Future directions for our research include expanding the dashboard to incorporate additional quality indicators and evaluating clinicians' feedback on its effectiveness.

Applying Machine Learning for Prescriptive Support: A Use Case with Unfractionated Heparin in Intensive Care Units.

Continuous unfractionated heparin is widely used in intensive care, yet its complex pharmacokinetic properties complicate the determination of appropriate doses. To address this challenge, we developed machine learning models to predict over- and under-dosing, based on anti-Xa results, using a monocentric retrospective dataset. The random forest model achieved a mean AUROC of 0.80 [0.77-0.83], while the XGB model reached a mean AUROC of 0.80 [0.76-0.83]. Feature importance was employed to enhance the interpretability of the model, a critical factor for clinician acceptance. After prospective validation, machine learning models such as those developed in this study could be implemented within a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) as a clinical decision support system (CDSS).

Impact on ICU mortality of moderate alcohol consumption in patients admitted with infection.

PURPOSE: Alcohol dependence is associated with poor prognosis in the intensive care unit (ICU), but it remains uncertain whether moderate alcohol consumption negatively affects the prognosis of critically ill patients admitted with infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study performed in 478 patients admitted with documented infection, mortality at day 28 in the group of abstainers and nontrauma patients with estimated alcohol consumption lower than 100 g/week was compared with that in non-alcohol-dependent patients with estimated alcohol consumption between 100 and 350 g/week. RESULTS: In 97 patients (20%), alcohol consumption was estimated to be over 100 g/week, and in 391 patients (80%), alcohol consumption was estimated to be 100 g/week or less. The pathogens identified did not significantly differ between the two groups of patients. After adjusted analysis, alcohol consumption between 100 and 350 g/week remained significantly associated with mortality at day 28 (hazard ratio (HR): 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-2.77; p = .04). CONCLUSION: Alcohol consumption between 100 and 350 g/week was independently associated with mortality at day 28. Our results suggest that in critically ill patients admitted with infection, moderate alcohol consumption is associated with a poorer prognosis.