Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dent Educ ; 68(9): 932-7, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15342653

ABSTRACT

In June 2003 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of using race as a factor in higher education admissions decisions. This article considers the impact of the Supreme Court decisions on admissions procedures at selected academic dental institutions (ADI) and their parent institutions. We interviewed fifty-eight leaders considered to be individual stakeholders at seven ADI and their related parent institutions, state dental associations, and state legislatures using a common set of questions about the Supreme Court decisions. Educators from the ADI and their parent institutions were consistent in their responses that the rulings upheld affirmative action as necessary to achieve diversity. State organized dentistry officials did not appear to be as aware as others of the rulings, whereas legislators were mixed in their responses. Except for the University of Michigan undergraduate admissions procedures, it remains to be seen what the impact will be for other higher education institutions and for academic dental institutions. Although the rulings have provided guidelines for achieving diversity using race/ ethnicity as one of several factors, the rulings will possibly be challenged, thus requiring vigilance on the part of parent institutions and their ADI to ensure compliance with the spirit of the rulings and to avoid attack from opponents of affirmative action.


Subject(s)
Minority Groups/legislation & jurisprudence , Prejudice , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Dental/legislation & jurisprudence , Supreme Court Decisions , Attitude , Civil Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Cultural Diversity , Ethnicity/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Michigan , Racial Groups/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , Universities/legislation & jurisprudence
2.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 13(3): 146-53; quiz 171-2, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11936170

ABSTRACT

The effects of stimulus rate and gender on the auditory middle latency response (AMLR) waveforms were examined in 20 young adult male and female subjects. Four different repetition rates were presented to subjects (1.1/sec, 4.1/sec, 7.7/ sec, and 11.3/sec). Stimulus repetition rate had a significant effect on Pa latency, Pa amplitude, and Pb amplitude. Pa and Pb amplitudes decreased with increasing the stimulus rate, and Pa latency significantly increased with increasing the stimulus rate. No significant differences were seen on Pb latency or site of recording. Gender had a significant effect on Pa latency and Pa amplitude. Pa latencies were longer in male subjects, and Pa amplitudes were larger in female subjects. Gender did not have a significant effect on the Pb waveform.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL