Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AMA J Ethics ; 26(7): E512-519, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958419

ABSTRACT

Severe opioid withdrawal, risk of patient-initiated discharge, and some inpatients' use of unregulated substances prompt clinical and ethical questions considered in this commentary on a case. Short-acting opioids can be used to manage inpatients' pain and opioid use disorder (OUD) withdrawal symptoms. Including evidence-based interventions-such as naloxone kits, substance use equipment, and supervised consumption-in some inpatients' care plans may make those patients safer and reduce their risk of death. These and other strategies align with clinicians' ethical duties to minimize harms and maximize benefits for inpatients with OUD.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Inpatients , Opioid-Related Disorders , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Humans , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Opioid-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Opioid-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Risk Assessment , Naloxone/therapeutic use , Naloxone/administration & dosage , Pain/drug therapy , Male , Narcotic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Narcotic Antagonists/administration & dosage
2.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 30(2): 131-6, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24773770

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify individuals with expertise in ethics analysis in Canada, who might contribute to health technology assessment (HTA); to gauge these individuals' familiarity with, and experience participating in, the production of HTA. METHODS: A contact list was developed using the Canadian Bioethics Society membership list and faculty listings of Canadian universities, bioethics centers, and health agencies. An eighteen-question email survey was distributed to potential respondents to collect data on demographic information, education and work experience in applied ethics, and involvement in HTA. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 52.8 percent (350/663). Respondents worked primarily in academic institutions (50.4 percent) or hospitals (15.4 percent). Many respondents (83.1 percent) had education, formal training, or work-related experience in practical ethics related to health care, with many having a doctorate (34.5 percent) or master's degree (19.0 percent). One quarter (24.5 percent; n = 87) of respondents indicated they had been involved in an analysis of ethical issues for HTA. Almost two-thirds (65.4 percent; n = 165) of those who had not previously participated in ethics analysis believed they might usefully contribute to an analysis of ethical issues in HTA. Experts who have conducted ethics analysis in HTA had more than twice the odds of having education and training in ethics and a PhD than those who might contribute to ethics analysis. CONCLUSION: Many people have contributed to ethics analysis in HTA in Canada, and more are willing to do so. Given the absence of a reliable credential for ethics expertise, HTA producers should exercise caution when enlisting ethics experts.


Subject(s)
Professional Competence , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/ethics , Canada , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...