[Overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants]. / Überdosierung von direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Incorrectly dosed DOAC treatment is associated with excess mortality. PURPOSE: This article aims at raising awareness of DOAC overdosing and its causes as well as presenting a diagnostic and therapeutic work-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a case presentation, a structured review of the current literature on DOAC overdosing was performed and treatment recommendations were extracted. RESULTS: In addition to wittingly or unwittingly increased DOAC intake, common causes of overdose are inadequate dose adjustment for concomitant medication or comorbidities. Global coagulation testing should be supplemented with DOAC-specific testing. Severe bleeding and the need for invasive diagnostics or urgent surgery represent indications for treating DOAC overdoses. Based on the cause of an DOAC overdose, active charcoal, endoscopic pill rescue, antagonization with idarucizumab or andexanet alfa and the targeted substitution of coagulation factors represent treatment options. CONCLUSION: The sensitization of clinicians is important to ensure a timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of DOAC overdosing. This report provides an overview of current knowledge on diagnostics and treatment; however, further studies are necessary to improve the existing algorithms.

Management of Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura without Therapeutic Plasma Exchange.

Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare, life-threatening autoimmune disorder caused by ADAMTS13 deficiency. Caplacizumab, an anti-VWF nanobody, is approved for iTTP treatment, reducing the need for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and improving platelet count recovery and survival. We conducted a retrospective study on 42 acute iTTP cases in Austria and Germany, treated with a modified regimen aimed at avoiding TPE if platelet count increased after the first caplacizumab dose. Baseline characteristics and patient outcomes were compared with a control group of 59 patients with iTTP, receiving frontline treatment with TPE, caplacizumab, and immunosuppression. The main outcome was the time to platelet count normalization. Secondary outcomes included clinical response, exacerbation, refractory iTTP, iTTP-related deaths, and the time to platelet count doubling. The median time to platelet count normalization was similar between the two cohorts (3 and 4 days; P = 0.31). There were no significant differences in clinical response, exacerbations, refractoriness, iTTP-related deaths, or time to platelet count doubling reflecting the short-term treatment response. Four patients did not respond to the first caplacizumab dose and TPE was subsequently initiated. Cytomegalovirus infection, HIV/hepatitis B co-infection, an ovarian teratoma with associated anti-platelet antibodies, and multiple platelet transfusion before the correct diagnosis may have impeded immediate treatment response in these patients. In conclusion, caplacizumab and immunosuppression alone, without TPE, rapidly controlled thrombotic microangiopathy and achieved a sustained clinical response in iTTP. Our study provides a basis for TPE-free iTTP management in experienced centers via shared decision-making between patients and treating physicians.

Marked hyperferritinemia in critically ill cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate characteristics and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with marked hyperferritinemia. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis comprising cancer patients with a ferritin level >10.000 µg/L treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 59 years (range: 15-86 years). Females accounted for 48% of cases. 90% of patients had a hematologic malignancy. The median maximum ferritin level was 27.349 µg/L (range: 10.300-426.073 µg/L). The diagnostic criteria of septic shock were fulfilled in 51% of cases; 31% of patients had hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) according to the HLH-2004 criteria. Mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and the use of vasopressors were necessary in 59%, 35% and 70% of cases, respectively. The ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year survival rates were 33.3%, 23.1%, 23.7% and 11.7%. Patients with septic shock had a worse survival than those without septic shock (p = .001); the survival of patients who fulfilled the HLH-2004 criteria did not differ from those who did not (p = .88). CONCLUSION: Critically ill cancer patients with marked hyperferritinemia have poor outcomes. The present data may help to make informed decisions for this patient group.

Involved-site Radiation Therapy is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Than Involved-field Radiation Therapy in Patients Receiving Combined Modality Treatment for Early-stage Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma-An Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 HD17 Trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group.

PURPOSE: Combined modality treatment with chemotherapy followed by consolidation radiation therapy (RT) provides excellent outcomes for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The international standard of care for consolidation RT, involved-site/involved-node radiation therapy (ISRT/INRT), has never been evaluated in a randomized phase 3 trial against the former standard involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the multicenter phase 3 GHSG (German Hodgkin Study Group) HD17 trial, patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized between the standard Combined modality treatment group and a positron-emission tomography (PET)-guided group. In the standard group, patients received 2 cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) and 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by 30 Gy IFRT. In the experimental group, patients received no further therapy if postchemotherapy PET was negative and 30 Gy GHSG INRT, comparable to and therefore termed here ISRT, if PET was positive. Here, we analyze the interim PET-positive patients in a post hoc analysis, and therefore the randomized comparison of IFRT versus INRT/ISRT. RESULTS: A total of 1100 patients were randomized, of which 311 had a positive PET after chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year progression-free survival were 96.8% (95% CI, 91.6%-98.8%) in the IFRT group and 95.4% (95% CI, 89.9%-97.9%; HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.44-4.42) in the ISRT group. The pattern of recurrence analyses indicated that none of the cases of disease progression or recurrence in the ISRT group would have been prevented by the use of IFRT. Acute grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 8.5% of IFRT patients and 2.6% of ISRT patients (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, consolidation INRT/ISRT was randomly compared with IFRT in a phase 3 trial. Regarding progression-free survival, no advantage of IFRT could be demonstrated. In summary, our data confirm the status of INRT/ISRT as the current standard of care.

Palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies in Germany: a nationwide survey on everyday practice and influencing factors from the perspective of treating physicians.

Integrating palliative care into the treatment of patients with advanced hematological malignancies (HM) remains challenging. To explore treating physicians' perspectives on current palliative care practice and to evaluate factors influencing integration, we conducted a nationwide online survey. Based on literature and expert review, the survey addressed the importance of palliative care, communication about life-threatening conditions, challenges in establishing goals of care, and factors influencing the integration of palliative care. 207 physicians treating patients with HM in Germany participated. We used standard descriptive statistics to analyze quantitative data and a content structuring approach. Most physicians considered palliative care in HM to be very important (60.6%) and discussed life-threatening conditions with more than half of their patients (52%), especially when goals of care were changed (87.0%) or when patients raised the topic (84.0%). Disease-related factors, different professional perspectives on prognosis, and patient hopes were the main barriers to changing goals of care, but collaboration with colleagues and multidisciplinary teams provided important support. Time constraints were identified as the main barrier to integrating palliative care. The majority worked well with palliative care teams. Referral processes and conditions were perceived as minor barriers. The study highlights the need to address barriers to integrating palliative care into the management of patients with advanced HM. Future research should aim at optimizing palliative care for patients with HM.

International Prognostic Score for Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare cancer, and large international cooperative efforts are needed to evaluate the significance of clinical risk factors and immunoarchitectural patterns (IAPs) for all stages of pediatric and adult patients with NLPHL. METHODS: Thirty-eight institutions participated in the Global nLPHL One Working Group retrospective study of NLPHL cases from 1992 to 2021. We measured progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), transformation rate, and lymphoma-specific death rate. We performed uni- and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression stratified by management to select factors for the lymphocyte-predominant international prognostic score (LP-IPS) validated by five-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: We identified 2,243 patients with a median age of 37 years (IQR, 23-51). The median follow-up was 6.3 years (IQR, 3.4-10.8). Most had stage I to II (72.9%) and few B symptoms (9.9%) or splenic involvement (5.4%). IAP was scored for 916 (40.8%). Frontline management included chemotherapy alone (32.4%), combined modality therapy (30.5%), radiotherapy alone (24.0%), observation after excision (4.6%), rituximab alone (4.0%), active surveillance (3.4%), and rituximab and radiotherapy (1.1%). The PFS, OS, transformation, and lymphoma-specific death rates at 10 years were 70.8%, 91.6%, 4.8%, and 3.3%, respectively. On MVA, IAPs were not associated with PFS or OS, but IAP E had higher risk of transformation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; P < .05). We developed the LP-IPS with 1 point each for age ≥45 years, stage III-IV, hemoglobin <10.5 g/dL, and splenic involvement. Increasing LP-IPS was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.52) and OS (HR, 2.31) and increased risk of lymphoma-specific death (HR, 2.63) and transformation (HR, 1.41). CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive study of all ages of patients with NLPHL, we develop the LP-IPS to identify high-risk patients and inform upcoming prospective clinical trials evaluating de-escalation of therapy for patients with low LP-IPS scores (<2).

Follow-up of the GHSG HD16 trial of PET-guided treatment in early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma.

The primary analysis of the GHSG HD16 trial indicated a significant loss of tumor control with PET-guided omission of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early-stage favorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). This analysis reports long-term outcomes. Overall, 1150 patients aged 18-75 years with newly diagnosed early-stage favorable HL were randomized between standard combined-modality treatment (CMT) (2x ABVD followed by PET/CT [PET-2] and 20 Gy involved-field RT) and PET-2-guided treatment omitting RT in case of PET-2 negativity (Deauville score [DS] < 3). The study aimed at excluding inferiority of PET-2-guided treatment and assessing the prognostic impact of PET-2 in patients receiving CMT. At a median follow-up of 64 months, PET-2-negative patients had a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 94.2% after CMT (n = 328) and 86.7% after ABVD alone (n = 300; HR = 2.05 [1.20-3.51]; p = 0.0072). 5-year OS was 98.3% and 98.8%, respectively (p = 0.14); 4/12 documented deaths were caused by second primary malignancies and only one by HL. Among patients assigned to CMT, 5-year PFS was better in PET-2-negative (n = 353; 94.0%) than in PET-2-positive patients (n = 340; 90.3%; p = 0.012). The difference was more pronounced when using DS4 as cut-off (DS 1-3: n = 571; 94.0% vs. DS ≥ 4: n = 122; 83.6%; p < 0.0001). Taken together, CMT should be considered standard treatment for early-stage favorable HL irrespective of the PET-2-result.

[Diagnostics and treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis]. / Diagnostik und Therapie der hämophagozytischen Lymphohistiozytose.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a hyperferritinemic hyperinflammatory syndrome. A primary hereditary form can be distinguished from a secondary acquired form. In adults the secondary form accounts for the vast majority of cases. Infections, malignancies and autoimmune disorders are common triggering factors of secondary HLH. Persistent fever, bicytopenia or pancytopenia and splenomegaly represent major symptoms in HLH and occur in virtually all patients. The diagnosis of HLH is made on the basis of the HLH-2004 criteria. The probability of the presence of HLH can be estimated using the HScore. Patients with HLH require immunosuppressive treatment. Hence, high doses of corticosteroids represent the cornerstone of treatment. Furthermore, immunoglobulins, anakinra, ruxolitinib or etoposide are given depending on the triggering factor. The course and prognosis of HLH are dependent on the early initiation of treatment, the triggering factor and the response to treatment.

[Treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in patients in the intensive care unit]. / Behandlung der hämophagozytischen Lymphohistiozytose bei Patienten auf der Intensivstation.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a hyperinflammatory syndrome characterized by hyperferritinemia. A differentiation is made between hereditary and acquired forms. In contrast to children, almost all cases in adult patients consist of acquired secondary HLH. Infections, malignancies and autoimmune diseases are frequent triggers of secondary HLH. More recently, cases of HLH have also been described in association with immunotherapy, e.g., when using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T­cell treatment. In critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), sepsis represents the major differential diagnosis of HLH due to the frequently similar clinical presentation. Sometimes both sepsis and HLH are present at the same time. An early diagnosis and timely initiation of immunosuppressive treatment are essential for the further course and prognosis of HLH. Therefore, HLH should be considered as a possible diagnosis in critically ill patients with persistent fever and additional compatible symptoms (e.g., splenomegaly, neurological symptoms) or laboratory parameters (e.g., hyperferritinemia, cytopenia of two or three cell lines, increased transaminases). The diagnosis of HLH is made on the basis of the HLH-2004 criteria. The HScore can be used to estimate the probability of the presence of HLH. Corticosteroids given at high doses are the cornerstone of HLH treatment. Furthermore, immunoglobulins, etoposide, anakinra or ruxolitinib can complement treatment depending on the HLH trigger. The course of HLH depends on the timely initiation of treatment, the underlying trigger and the response to treatment. Despite progress in terms of diagnostics and targeted treatment, the prognosis of critically ill HLH patients is still poor.

Hyperleukocytosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia admitted to the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective analysis.

A relevant proportion of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presenting with hyperleukocytosis are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, data on characteristics and outcomes of these patients are limited. We therefore conducted a single-center retrospective analysis including 69 consecutive AML patients with a white blood cell (WBC) count > 100.000/µl who had been treated on the ICU between 2011 and 2020. The median age was 63 years (range: 14-87 years). Males accounted for the majority of cases (n = 43; 62.3%). Mechanical ventilation (MV), renal replacement therapy and the use of vasopressors were necessary in 34.8%, 8.7% and 40.6% of patients, respectively. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in 15.9% of patients. The ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year survival rates were 53.6%, 43.5%, 42% and 30.4%, respectively. Age (p = 0.002), SOFA score (p < 0.001) and MV (p < 0.001) were independently associated with a reduced survival probability. A score comprising the factors age > 70 years, lactate dehydrogenase level > 1500 U/l, WBC count > 150.000/µl, elevated lactate level and SOFA score > 7 allowed the discrimination of 3 distinct risk groups (low-risk: 0-1 points, intermediate-risk: 2 points, high-risk: 3-5 points) with regard to survival (p < 0.0001). Taken together, the present analysis indicates that more than two-thirds of AML patients with hyperleukocytosis treated on the ICU die within 1 year. However, outcomes vary considerably depending on the presence of risk factors.

Treatment of Nodular Lymphocyte-Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma: Where Do We Stand? Where Do We Go?

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare B cell-derived lymphoma entity accounting for ≈5% of all Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cases. In recent decades, patients with newly diagnosed NLPHL have usually been treated very similarly to classical HL (cHL). The 10-year overall survival rates with HL-directed approaches are in excess of 90%. However, pathological and clinical characteristics of NLPHL resemble indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) in some aspects. Thus, nodular lymphocyte-predominant B-cell lymphoma has been proposed as an alternative name, and the use of B-NHL-directed treatment strategies has become more common in NLPHL despite limited data. Given the often indolent clinical course of NLPHL, even in the case of relapse, the majority of patients with disease recurrence do not require high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation but are treated sufficiently with low-intensity approaches such as single-agent anti-CD20 antibody treatment. The establishment of novel prognostic scores for NLPHL patients may optimize risk group and treatment allocation in newly diagnosed and relapsed disease.

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: current management strategies and evolving approaches to individualize treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare lymphoma entity accounting for roughly 5% of all Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cases. In contrast to classical HL, the malignant cells in NLPHL are positive for CD20 but lack CD30. The disease usually has an indolent clinical course resulting in high long-term survival rates. AREAS COVERED: In this review, treatment options for NLPHL are summarized and factors that may help to individualize treatment are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Stage IA NLPHL without clinical risk factors should be treated with limited-field radiotherapy alone. In all other stages, NLPHL patients have excellent outcomes after standard HL approaches. The question of whether the addition of an anti-CD20 antibody to standard HL chemotherapy protocols or the use of approaches typically applied in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma improve treatment results is unanswered until now. Different management strategies ranging from low-intensity treatment to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation have demonstrated activity in relapsed NLPHL. Second-line treatment is thus chosen individually. The major aim of NLPHL research is to spare toxicity and reduce the risk for treatment-related adverse events in low-risk patients while treating higher-risk patients with appropriate intensity. To this end, novel tools to guide treatment are required.

Interim PET-guided treatment for early-stage NLPHL: a subgroup analysis of the randomized GHSG HD16 and HD17 studies.

The optimal first-line treatment for nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) diagnosed in early stages is largely undefined. We, therefore, analyzed 100 NLPHL patients treated in the randomized HD16 (early-stage favorable; n = 85) and HD17 (early-stage unfavorable; n = 15) studies. These studies investigated the omission of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) in patients with a negative interim positron emission tomography (iPET) (ie, Deauville score <3) after chemotherapy (HD16: 2× doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine [ABVD]; HD17: 2× escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [BEACOPP] plus 2× ABVD). Patients with NLPHL treated in the HD16 and HD17 studies had 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 90.3% and 92.9%, respectively. Thus, the 5-year PFS did not differ significantly from that of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated within the same studies (HD16: P = .88; HD17: P = .50). Patients with early-stage favorable NLPHL who had a negative iPET after 2× ABVD and did not undergo consolidation RT tended to have a worse 5-year PFS than patients with a negative iPET who received consolidation RT (83% vs 100%; P = .05). There were 10 cases of NLPHL recurrence. However, no NLPHL patient died during follow-up. Hence, the 5-year overall survival rate was 100%. Taken together, contemporary Hodgkin lymphoma-directed treatment approaches result in excellent outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed early-stage NLPHL and, thus, represent valid treatment options. In early-stage favorable NLPHL, consolidation RT appears necessary after 2× ABVD to achieve the optimal disease control irrespective of the iPET result.

[Hemolytic anemia in emergency and intensive care medicine]. / Hämolytische Anämien in der Notfall- und Intensivmedizin.

Hemolytic anemia (HA) is caused by premature destruction or degradation of red blood cells (RBC). Low hemoglobin, suppressed haptoglobin, reticulocytosis as well as an elevation of lactate dehydrogenase and bilirubin are common laboratory findings in HA. Intracorpuscular HA due to defects of the RBC themselves are distinguished from extracorpuscular HA due to external factors. Severity of symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnea depend on the degree of anemia. For optimal treatment of HA, a detailed evaluation of the patient history (including hereditary RBC defects, B symptoms and travel history) is necessary. Additional diagnostics (hematological diagnostics, infectious disease diagnostics, immunological diagnostics, computed tomography [CT] scan) should be performed according to the patient's individual requirements. Treatment of HA depends on the etiology. If HA is immune-mediated, immunosuppressive therapy is indicated, whereas HA due to infections usually improves after adequate anti-infective therapy. Anti-infective therapy should also be considered in patients with sickle cell disease who present with severe HA. In general, HA can be treated effectively in most cases.

Impact of first-line use of caplacizumab on treatment outcomes in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

BACKGROUND: The von Willebrand factor-directed nanobody caplacizumab has greatly changed the treatment of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) in recent years. Data from randomized controlled trials established efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to address open questions regarding patient selection, tailoring of therapy duration, obstacles in prescribing caplacizumab in iTTP, effect on adjunct treatment, and outcomes in the real-world setting. METHODS: We report retrospective, observational cohorts of 113 iTTP episodes treated with caplacizumab and 119 historical control episodes treated without caplacizumab. We aggregated data from the caplacizumab phase II/III trials and real-world data from France, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Austria (846 episodes, 396 treated with caplacizumab, and 450 historical controls). RESULTS: Caplacizumab was efficacious in iTTP, independent of the timing of therapy initiation, but curtailed the time of active iTTP only when used in the first-line therapy within 72 hours after diagnosis and until at least partial ADAMTS13-activity remission. Aggregated data from multiple study populations showed that caplacizumab use resulted in significant absolute risk reduction of 2.87% for iTTP-related mortality (number needed to treat 35) and a relative risk reduction of 59%. CONCLUSION: Caplacizumab should be used in first line and until ADAMTS13-remission, lowers iTTP-related mortality and refractoriness, and decreases the number of daily plasma exchange and hospital stay. This trial is registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov as #NCT04985318.

Anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate therapy in lymphoma: current knowledge, remaining controversies, and future perspectives.

CD30 is overexpressed in several lymphoma types, including classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), some peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), and some cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. The antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin targets CD30-positive cells and has been evaluated for the treatment of various lymphoma entities. This narrative review summarizes 10 years of experience with brentuximab vedotin for the treatment of CD30-positive lymphomas, discusses novel therapies targeting CD30 in development, and highlights remaining controversies relating to CD30-targeted therapy across lymphoma types. The collective body of evidence for brentuximab vedotin demonstrates that exploitation of CD30 can provide sustained benefits across a range of different CD30-positive lymphomas, in both clinical trials and real-world settings. Preliminary experience with brentuximab vedotin in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for relapsed/refractory cHL is encouraging, but further exploration is required. The optimal use of brentuximab vedotin for first-line therapy of PTCL remains to be determined. Further research is required on brentuximab vedotin treatment in high-risk patient populations, and in rare lymphoma subtypes, for which no standard of care exists. Novel therapies targeting CD30 include chimeric antigen receptor therapies and bispecific antibody T-cell engagers, which may be expected to further improve outcomes for patients with CD30-positive lymphomas in the coming years.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation admitted to the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective analysis.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be associated with adverse events necessitating treatment on the intensive care unit (ICU). Data focusing on patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are scarce. We thus conducted a single-center retrospective analysis comprising 79 individuals who had high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 2014 and 2020 and were admitted to the ICU between the initiation of conditioning therapy and day 30 after ASCT. The median age was 57 years (range: 20-82 years); 38% of patients were female. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (34%) and plasma cell disorders (28%) were the most common indications for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Sepsis represented the major cause for ICU admission (68%). Twenty-nine percent of patients required mechanical ventilation (MV), 5% had renal replacement therapy, and 44% needed vasopressors. The ICU, hospital, 90-day, and 1-year survival rates were 77.2%, 77.2%, 72.2%, and 60.3%, respectively. Stable disease or disease progression prior to the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy (p = 0.0028) and MV (p < 0.0001) were associated with an impaired survival. A total of 36 patients died during observation. The most frequent causes of death were the underlying malignancy (44%) and sepsis (39%). Taken together, the present analysis indicates a favorable overall outcome for patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Thus, this patient group should not be denied admission and treatment on the ICU.

[Team-specific impacts of the corona pandemic on intensive care medicine personnel of a maximum care hospital]. / Teamspezifische Auswirkungen der Corona-Pandemie auf Mitarbeiter:innen der Internistischen Intensivmedizin eines Krankenhauses der Maximalversorgung.

The ongoing strain on personnel in the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic is considerable and poses major emotional and psychological challenges for the personnel. In a team evaluation (physicians and nurses), team-specific stress, possible relief strategies, positive and negative experiences, and wishes for improvement of the situation in an intensive care unit were collected. While both occupational groups perceived equally high emotional stress intensities, nursing additionally perceived high stress intensities in the organizational and physical areas. Thus, the occupational group of nurses proves to be the most stressed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings presented here can be used to derive instructions for future actions.

JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: Final results of a phase II, open label, multicentre clinical trial (JeRiCHO).

OBJECTIVES: Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) relapsing after second-line therapy have a dismal prognosis and novel approaches are required for this patient group. Based on promising (pre-)clinical data and the favourable toxicity profile, we performed a phase II clinical trial with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL (r/r cHL). METHODS: Patients ≥18 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL who failed second-line treatment were included. Ruxolitinib was given orally at a dose of 25 mg twice daily in continuous 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the PET/CT-based overall response rate (ORR; complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) after 2 cycles; secondary endpoints included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as feasibility. The Jericho Trial adopted a 2-stage phase 2 design (Simon 1989). RESULTS: Among the 12 included patients in stage 1, 2 had a PR, 3 had a stable disease (SD) and 6 had progressive disease (PD) after two treatment cycles (ORR: 2/12 evaluable patients, 16.7%). Median PFS was 3.6 months, the 1-year OS estimate was 50.6% (median not reached). The toxicity profile was favourable with only one grade IV adverse event (7.1%) reported. CONCLUSION: Ruxolitinib exhibited a favourable side effect profile but modest activity in r/r cHL. Although the formal stopping criterion after stage 1 was not met, the trial did not continue to stage 2 due to the low response and PFS rates observed in stage 1.