Extracranial Vertebral Artery Injuries.

Paired vertebral arteries (VAs) travel from the subclavian artery through the cervical spine and into the intracranial space where they contribute to posterior cerebral circulation. Blunt and penetrating injuries to the cervical spine risk injury to the VA. Among the most feared complications of vertebral artery injury (VAI) is posterior circulation stroke. Appropriate screening and treatment of these injuries in the trauma setting remain vitally important to aid in the prevention of devastating neurologic sequelae. A robust knowledge of the VA anatomy is required for spine surgeons to avoid VAI during cervical spine approaches and instrumentation. Both anterior and posterior cervical spine surgeries can place the VA at risk. Careful preoperative assessment with the appropriate advanced imaging studies is necessary to verify the course of the VA in the cervical spine and thus prevent iatrogenic injury because anatomic variations along the course of the artery can prove hazardous if not properly anticipated. Iatrogenic VAI can be treated successfully with tamponade. However, in some cases, ligation, repair, or endovascular procedures may be indicated.

Rates of Future Lumbar Fusion in Patients with Cauda Equina Syndrome Treated With Decompression.

INTRODUCTION: The long-term risk of conversion to lumbar fusion is ill-defined for patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) treated with decompression. This study aimed to identify the rates of fusion in patients with CES and compare those rates with a matched lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) group. METHODS: Patients with CES who underwent decompression were identified in a national database and matched to control patients with LSS. The rates of conversion to fusion were identified and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified independently associated risk factors. A subanalysis was conducted after stratifying by timing between CES diagnosis and decompression. RESULTS: The rate of lumbar fusion in the CES cohort was 3.6% after 1 year, 6.7% after 3 years, and 7.8% after 5 years, significantly higher than the LSS control group at all time points (1 year: 1.6%, P = 0.001; 3 years: 3.0%, P < 0.001; 5 years: 3.8%, P < 0.001). CES was independently associated with increased risk of conversion to fusion (odds ratio: 2.13; 95% confidence interval: 1.56 to 2.97; P < 0.001). Surgical timing was not associated with risk of conversion to fusion. CONCLUSIONS: After 5 years, 7.8% of patients with CES underwent fusion, a markedly higher rate compared with patients with LSS. Counseling patients with CES on this increased risk of future surgery is important for patient education and satisfaction.

Comprehensive classification system for multirod constructs across three-column osteotomies: a reliability study.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the authors' goal was to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of a new classification system that allows the description of all possible constructs used across three-column osteotomies (3COs) in terms of rod configuration and density. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with multirod constructs (MRCs) across a 3CO were classified by two spinal surgery fellows according to the new system, and then were reclassified 2 weeks later. Constructs were classified as follows: the number of rods across the osteotomy site followed by a letter corresponding to the type of rod configuration: "M" is for a main rod configuration, defined as a single rod spanning the osteotomy. "L" is for linked rod configurations, defined as 2 rods directly connected to each other at the osteotomy site. "S" is for satellite rod configurations, which were defined as a short rod independent of the main rod with anchors above and below the 3CO. "A" is for accessory rods, defined as an additional rod across the 3CO attached to main rods but not attached to any anchors across the osteotomy site. "I" is for intercalary rod configurations, defined as a rod connecting 2 separate constructs across the 3CO, without the intercalary rod itself attached to any anchors across the osteotomy site. The intra- and interobserver reliability of this classification system was determined. RESULTS: A sample estimation for validation assuming two readers and 35 subjects results in a two-sided 95% confidence interval with a width of 0.19 and a kappa value of 0.8 (SD 0.3). The Fleiss kappa coefficient (κ) was used to calculate the degree of agreement between interrater and intraobserver reliability. The interrater kappa coefficient was 0.3, and the intrarater kappa coefficient was 0.63 (good reliability). This scenario represents a high degree of agreement despite a low kappa coefficient. Correct observations by both observers were 34 of 35 and 33 of 35 at both time points. Misclassification was related to difficulty in determining connectors versus anchors. CONCLUSIONS: MRCs across 3COs have variable rod configurations. Currently, no classification system or agreement on nomenclature exists to define the configuration of rods across 3COs. The authors present a new, comprehensive MRC classification system with good inter- and intraobserver reliability and a high degree of agreement that allows for a standardized description of MRCs across 3COs.

Preoperative patient expectations and pain improvement after adult spinal deformity surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Patients' expectations for pain relief are associated with patient-reported outcomes after treatment, although this has not been examined in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). The aim of this study was to identify associations between patients' preoperative expectations for pain relief after ASD surgery and patient-reported pain at the 2-year follow-up. METHODS: The authors analyzed surgically treated ASD patients at a single institution who completed a survey question about expectations for back pain relief. Five ordinal answer choices to "I expect my back pain to improve" were used to categorize patients as having low or high expectations. Back pain was measured using the 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) patient survey. Preoperative and postoperative pain were compared using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Of 140 ASD patients eligible for 2-year follow-up, 105 patients (77 women) had pre- and postoperative data on patient expectations, 85 of whom had high expectations. The mean patient age was 59 ± 12 years, and 46 patients (44%) had undergone previous spine surgery. The high-expectations and low-expectations groups had similar baseline demographic and clinical characteristics (p > 0.05), except for lower SRS-22r mental health scores in those with low expectations. After controlling for baseline characteristics and mental health, the mean postoperative NRS score was significantly better (lower) in the high-expectations group (3.5 ± 3.5) than in the low-expectations group (5.4 ± 3.7) (p = 0.049). The mean postoperative SRS-22r pain score was significantly better (higher) in the high-expectations group (3.3 ± 1.1) than in the low-expectations group (2.6 ± 0.94) (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar baseline characteristics, patients with high preoperative expectations for back pain relief reported less pain 2 years after ASD surgery than patients with low preoperative expectations.

The Times, They Are A-Changing: Women Entering Academic Orthopedics Today Are Choosing Nonpediatric Fellowships at a Growing Rate.

OBJECTIVE: Pediatrics and hand surgery have historically been the orthopaedic subspecialties with the highest female representations. We sought to identify the gender distribution of orthopedic surgical faculty by subspecialty, geography, and educational background. We hypothesized that the proportion of women entering pediatric orthopaedics has decreased since 1980. DESIGN: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education was used to generate a list of U.S. orthopedic residencies. Program websites were used to collect data regarding each faculty member's gender, residencies, fellowships, and graduation year. t tests were used to compare quantitative data and Fisher's exact tests to compare categorical data. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. SETTING: Publicly available data from official websites of U.S. orthopedic residencies. PARTICIPANTS: Of 153 residencies, 142 (93%) had accessible faculty lists. RESULTS: Of 3596 orthopedic surgeons, 7.9% were women. Among fellowship-trained faculty, 22% of pediatric orthopedists were women compared with 7.6% of faculty in other orthopedic subspecialties (p < 0.00001). There was a significantly higher percentage of female faculty in the West (13%) than in any other U.S. census region (p < 0.001 vs. Midwest, vs. South, and vs. Northeast). A strong correlation with time was found in number of women completing fellowships other than hand or pediatrics from 1980 to 2014 (R2 = 0.95); a strong inverse correlation with time was found for pediatrics as a percentage of fellowships completed by women during the same period (R2 = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Although pediatrics remains the most popular fellowship for female orthopedists, women who enter academic orthopedics are increasingly choosing nonpediatric subspecialties.

Minimally Invasive Fixation for Spinopelvic Dissociation: Percutaneous Triangular Osteosynthesis with S2 Alar-Iliac and Iliosacral Screws: A Case Report.

CASE: Traumatic U- and H-type sacral fractures are often unstable, causing spinopelvic dissociation. We describe a minimally invasive approach that allows percutaneous spinopelvic fixation of unstable H-type sacral fractures using a triangular osteosynthesis construct with S2 alar-iliac screws. We present the case of a patient with traumatic lumbopelvic dissociation who underwent percutaneous S2 alar-iliac and iliosacral screw fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined percutaneous S2 alar-iliac and iliosacral screw fixation is a safe option for spinopelvic fixation and avoids the soft-tissue compromise of open approaches. The triangular osteosynthesis construct provides adequate pelvic anchor points to allow immediate weight-bearing.

Difficulties in Treating Postirradiation Kyphosis in Adults: A Series of Five Cases.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical case series. OBJECTIVE: To assess objective outcomes of surgical correction of post-external beam radiation therapy (ERBT) kyphosis in a series of five adults. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: EBRT is a well-established treatment for many cancers in children and adults. One complication associated with EBRT is postirradiation spine deformity. Scoliosis is the most common deformity, but kyphosis also occurs frequently. Differences in deformity patterns are likely related to the location and intensity of radiation. To our knowledge, no studies have addressed treatment of these deformities in adults, and the most recent case series (of children) was published in 2005. METHODS: We present a series of five adults who underwent surgery for postirradiation kyphosis, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range, 2.5-6.2 years). RESULTS: Surgery improved the kyphotic deformity in all patients. Overall mean kyphotic deformity correction was 56° and was larger for cervical/cervicothoracic deformities (mean, 76°) than for lumbar deformities (mean, 42°) at midterm follow-up. Patients reported significant improvements in pain and self-image. Consistent with prior case series of children, we observed a high rate of complications (mean, 1.4 complications per patient) in adults. Three patients each underwent an unplanned surgical procedure because of a complication. CONCLUSION: The surgical treatment of postirradiation kyphotic spinal deformity is challenging, with common postoperative complications such as infection, instrumentation failure, and pseudarthrosis. However, with modern surgical techniques and spinal instrumentation, excellent deformity correction can be achieved and maintained. We recommend performing a two-stage procedure for cervicothoracic deformity, with anterior release followed by posterior fusion and instrumentation. In thoracolumbar deformities, correction can be achieved through single-stage posterior fusion. Rigid spinopelvic fixation with sacral-alar-iliac screws and second-stage anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5-S1 is recommended to reduce nonunion risk. Cement augmentation of proximal and distal anchors can help prevent junctional failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

The learning curve for performing three-column osteotomies in adult spinal deformity patients: one surgeon's experience with 197 cases.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Three-column osteotomy (3CO) is used to correct rigid adult spinal deformity. It presents risk of complications because it involves extensive osseous resection and spinal destabilization. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to characterize the learning curve for performing 3CO in adult spinal deformity patients. DESIGN: Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: A surgical registry at a tertiary care center was used to identify 238 cases of 3CO for correction of adult spinal deformity by 1 surgeon between 2005 and 2014. Patients with at least 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up were included (n=197; mean duration of follow-up, 43 months; range, 12-121). OUTCOME MEASURES: We quantified associations between surgeon experience and (1) estimated blood loss per vertebral level fused (EBL/VLF), (2) incidence of new neurologic deficits, (3) incidence of reoperation for instrumentation failure, (4) operative time in minutes, and (5) magnitude of correction at the level of the osteotomy. METHODS: The learning curve for binary outcomes was demonstrated using a LOWESS smoother plot of the probability of occurrence. Change in risk was calculated using a generalized linear model with link identity and binomial family. The learning curve for continuous variables was demonstrated using a scatter plot and a line of best fit based on linear regression analysis. Alpha=0.05. RESULTS: EBL/VLF decreased by a mean of 19.7 mL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.3-28.1) with each 10 cases (decrease of 388 mL/level fused by the end of the study period). The risk of a neurologic deficit declined by 7.98% (95% CI: 7.98%, 7.99%) with every 100 cases. The risk of reoperation declined by 1.99% (95% CI: 0.83%, 3.17%) with every 10 cases until the 100th case. After that point, there was no significant change in the probability of reoperation (p>.05). The magnitude of correction and operative time did not change with increasing surgeon experience (p>.05). CONCLUSION: Incidence of reoperation for instrumentation failure, incidence of new neurologic deficits, and estimated blood loss improved with increasing surgeon experience at performing 3CO. Most outcomes, except the risk of reoperation, improved through the last case.

Sacropelvic Fixation: A Comprehensive Review.

Sacropelvic fixation is indicated in various clinical settings, most notably long spinal arthrodesis, reduction of high-grade spondylolisthesis, and complex sacral fractures. The sacropelvis is characterized by complex regional anatomy and poor bone quality. These factors make achieving solid fusion across the lumbosacral junction challenging. However, a better understanding of spinal biomechanics at that level has led to much higher fusion rates than those of the past. The newer fixation techniques are biomechanically superior to previous methods mainly because they achieve bony purchase anterior to the pivot point-first described by McCord et al. in 1994. Today, the two most widely used fixation techniques are iliac screws and S2-alar-iliac screws. Although these techniques are associated with very high rates of fusion, instrumentation-related pain and reoperation remain problematic. This review provides an overview of the regional anatomy and biomechanics at the lumbosacral junction, as well as a summary of fixation techniques with an emphasis on the most widely used techniques today. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Postoperative changes in neurological function after 3-column osteotomy: risk factor analysis of 199 patients.

OBJECTIVEThe authors evaluated the neurological outcomes of adult spinal deformity patients after 3-column osteotomy (3CO), including severity and long-term improvement of neurological complications, as well as risk factors for neurological deficit at 1 year postoperatively. Although 3CO is effective for correcting rigid spinal deformity, it is associated with a high complication rate. Neurological deficits, in particular, cause disability and dissatisfaction.METHODSThe authors retrospectively queried a prospective database of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent vertebral column resection or pedicle subtraction osteotomy between 2004 and 2014 by one surgeon at a tertiary care center. The authors included 199 adults with at least 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure was change in lower-extremity motor scores (LEMSs), which were obtained preoperatively, within 2 weeks postoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. To identify risk factors for persistent neurological deficit, the authors compared patient and surgical characteristics with a declined LEMS at 12-month follow-up (n = 10) versus those with an improved/maintained LEMS at 12-month follow-up (n = 189).RESULTSAt the first postoperative assessment, the LEMS had improved in 15% and declined in 10% of patients compared with preoperative scores. At the 6-month follow-up, 6% of patients continued to have a decline in LEMS, and 16% had improvement. At 12 months, LEMS had improved in 17% and declined in 5% of patients compared with preoperative scores. The only factor significantly associated with a decline in 12-month LEMS was high-grade spondylolisthesis as an indication for surgery (OR 13, 95% CI 3.2-56).CONCLUSIONSAlthough the LEMS declined in 10% of patients immediately after 3CO, at 12 months postoperatively, only 5% of patients had neurological motor deficits. A surgical indication of high-grade spondylolisthesis was the only factor associated with neurological deficit at 12 months postoperatively.

US regional variations in rates, outcomes, and costs of spinal arthrodesis for lumbar spinal stenosis in working adults aged 40-65 years.

OBJECTIVEIt is important to identify differences in the treatment of common diseases over time and across geographic regions. Several studies have reported increased use of arthrodesis to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate geographic variations in the treatment of LSS by US region.METHODSThe authors reviewed inpatient and outpatient medical claims from 2010 to 2014 using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (Truven Health Analytics), which includes data on commercially insured members younger than 65 years. ICD-9 code 724.02 was used to identify patients aged ≥ 40 and < 65 years who underwent surgery for "spinal stenosis of the lumbar region" and for whom LSS was the only principal diagnosis. The primary outcome was the performance of spinal arthrodesis as part of the procedure. Geographic regions were based on patient residence and defined according to the US Census Bureau as the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West.RESULTSRates of arthrodesis, as opposed to decompression alone, varied significantly by region, from 48% in the South, to 42% in the Midwest, 36% in the Northeast, and 31% in the West. After controlling for patient age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index values, the differences remained significant. Compared with patients in the Northeast, those in the South (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.50-1.75) and Midwest (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.18-1.41) were significantly more likely to undergo spinal arthrodesis. On multivariate analysis, patients in the West were significantly less likely to have a prolonged hospital stay (> 3 days) than those in the Northeast (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94). Compared with the rate in the Northeast, the rates of discharge to a skilled nursing facility were lower in the South (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.31-0.55) and West (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.98). The 30-day readmission rate was significantly lower in the West (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65-0.98) than in the Northeast and similar between the other regions. Mean payments were significantly higher in the Midwest (mean difference $5503, 95% CI $4279-$6762), South (mean difference $6187, 95% CI $5041-$7332), and West (mean difference $7732, 95% CI $6384-$9080) than in the Northeast.CONCLUSIONSThe use of spinal arthrodesis, as well as surgical outcomes and payments for the treatment of LSS, varies significantly by US region. This highlights the importance of developing national recommendations for the treatment of LSS.

Trends in isolated lumbar spinal stenosis surgery among working US adults aged 40-64 years, 2010-2014.

OBJECTIVE Recommendations for the surgical treatment of isolated lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (i.e., in the absence of concomitant scoliosis or spondylolisthesis) are unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate trends in the surgical treatment of isolated LSS in US adults and determine implications for outcomes. METHODS The authors analyzed inpatient and outpatient claims from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database for 20,279 patients aged 40-64 years who underwent surgery for LSS between 2010 and 2014. Only patients with continuous 12-month insurance coverage after surgery were included. The rates of decompression with arthrodesis versus decompression only and of simple (1- or 2-level, single-approach) versus complex (> 2-level or combined-approach) arthrodesis were analyzed by year and geographic region. These trends were further analyzed with respect to complications, length of hospital stay, payments made to the hospital, and patient discharge status. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS The proportion of patients who underwent decompression with arthrodesis compared with decompression only increased significantly and linearly from 2010 to 2014 (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.06-1.10). Arthrodesis was more likely to be complex rather than simple with each subsequent year (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.33-1.49). This trend was accompanied by an increased likelihood of postoperative complications (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.02-1.21), higher costs (payments increased by a mean of US$1633 per year; 95% CI 1327-1939), and greater likelihood of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility as opposed to home (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.03-1.20). The South and Midwest regions of the US had the highest proportions of patients undergoing arthrodesis (48% and 42%, respectively). The mean length of hospital stay did not change significantly (p = 0.324). CONCLUSIONS From 2010 to 2014, the proportion of adults undergoing decompression with arthrodesis versus decompression only for the treatment of LSS increased, especially in the South and Midwest regions of the US. A greater proportion of these fusions were complex and were associated with more complications, higher costs, and a greater likelihood of being discharged to a skilled nursing facility.

Use of the S3 Corridor for Iliosacral Fixation in a Dysmorphic Sacrum: A Case Report.

CASE: The S1 and S2 corridors are the typical osseous pathways for iliosacral screw fixation of posterior pelvic ring fractures. In dysmorphic sacra, the S1 screw trajectory is often different from that in normal sacra. We present a case of iliosacral screw placement in the third sacral segment for fixation of a complex lateral compression type-3 pelvic fracture in a patient with a dysmorphic sacrum. CONCLUSION: In patients with dysmorphic sacra and unstable posterior pelvic ring fractures or dislocations, the S3 corridor may be a feasible osseous fixation pathway that can be used in a manner equivalent to the S2 corridor in a normal sacrum.

Post-Discharge Care Duration, Charges, and Outcomes Among Medicare Patients After Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In April 2016, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services initiated mandatory 90-day bundled payments for total hip and knee arthroplasty for much of the country. Our goal was to determine duration of care, 90-day charges, and readmission rates by discharge disposition and U.S. region after hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Using the 2008 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review database 100% sample, we identified patients who had undergone elective primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. We collected data on patient age, sex, comorbidities, U.S. Census region, discharge disposition, duration of care, 90-day charges, and readmission. Multivariate regression was used to assess factors associated with readmission (logistic) and charges (linear). Significance was set at p < 0.01. RESULTS: Patients undergoing 138,842 total hip arthroplasties were discharged to home (18%), home health care (34%), extended-care facilities (35%), and inpatient rehabilitation (13%); patients undergoing 329,233 total knee arthroplasties were discharged to home (21%), home health care (38%), extended-care facilities (31%), and inpatient rehabilitation (10%). Patients in the Northeast were more likely to be discharged to extended-care facilities or inpatient rehabilitation than patients in other regions. Patients in the West had the highest 90-day charges. Approximately 70% of patients were discharged home from extended-care facilities, whereas after inpatient rehabilitation, >50% of patients received home health care. Among those discharged to home, 90-day readmission rates were highest in the South (9.6%) for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and in the Midwest (8.7%) and the South (8.5%) for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Having ≥4 comorbidities, followed by discharge to inpatient rehabilitation or an extended-care facility, had the strongest associations with readmission, whereas the region of the West and the discharge disposition to inpatient rehabilitation had the strongest association with higher charges. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare patients, discharge disposition and number of comorbidities were most strongly associated with readmission. Inpatient rehabilitation and the West region had the strongest associations with higher charges. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Primary and Metastatic Spine Tumors.

This study reports the surgical and clinical outcomes of spinal tumors managed with total en bloc spondylectomy. The authors searched their prospectively maintained database for patients undergoing total en bloc spondylectomy between 2001 and 2013. Ten patients (9 men, 1 woman; average age, 50.7 years; range, 42-68 years) were identified. The authors obtained demographic information, surgical outcomes (estimated blood loss, complications), and clinical outcomes (recurrence, survival). All patients had pain and were classified as American Spinal Injury Association grade E. The lesions were located in the thoracic (8 patients) and lumbar (2 patients) spine. Anterior column reconstruction was performed with strut allograft (7 patients), mesh cage (2 patients), and polymethyl methacrylate (1 patient). An average of 2.3 (range, 2-4) of 6 portions of the vertebrae were involved, according to the Kostuik classification. Mean estimated blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay were 3.5 L, 500 minutes, and 7.8 days, respectively. Perioperative complications included pleural tear (2 patients) and aortic tear, vena cava tear, retained sponge, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, pneumothorax, anterior column support failure, and prominent instrumentation requiring removal (1 patient each). Postoperatively, all patients remained classified as American Spinal Injury Association grade E. Two patients had recurrence at distant spinal segments, and 1 had a new lesion in the thigh. Five patients had died (mean, 34.5 months after surgery), and 5 were alive a mean of 19.6 months after surgery (range, 6-48 months). Total en bloc spondylectomy is challenging, but in appropriately selected patients, it can be used to treat primary and metastatic spinal lesions.

Retrieval of broken iliosacral screws: the power of a push screw.

Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is a common technique that is widely used for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions. Complications of posterior percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation include implant malpositioning and hardware failure. Removal of iliosacral screws in broken or symptomatic hardware is sometimes necessary. To our knowledge, there are few reports addressing pelvic implant removal, and most of those report on anterior pelvic implants and symphyseal plates. There are no reports describing techniques for retrieval of broken iliosacral screws. We present two cases involving removal of broken sacroiliac screws, review the literature regarding iliosacral implant extraction, and identify important aspects of safe extraction of iliosacral screws and the potential complications associated with their retrieval. We further describe a novel and powerful technique to facilitate percutaneous removal of broken screw fragments, using a "push screw" to drive a broken screw fragment from a position buried in bone.

Surgical outcomes of long spinal fusions for scoliosis in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECT: In this study, the authors compared outcomes and complications in patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who underwent surgery for spinal deformity. METHODS: The authors searched the Johns Hopkins University database for patients with RA (Group RA) and without RA (Group NoRA) who underwent long spinal fusion for scoliosis by 3 surgeons at 1 institution from 2000 through 2012. Groups RA and NoRA each had 14 patients who were well matched with regard to sex (13 women/1 man and 12 women/2 men, respectively), age (mean 66.3 years [range 40.5-81.9 years] and 67.6 years [range 51-81 years]), follow-up duration (mean 35.4 months [range 1-87 months] and 44 months [range 24-51 months]), and number of primary (8 and 8) and revision (6 and 6) surgeries. Surgical outcomes, invasiveness scores, and complications were compared between the groups using the nonpaired Student t-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: For Groups RA and NoRA, there were no significant differences in the average number of levels fused (10.6 [range 9-17] vs 10.3 [range 7-17], respectively; p = 0.4), the average estimated blood loss (2892 ml [range 1300-5000 ml] vs 3100 ml [range 1700-5200 ml]; p = 0.73), or the average invasiveness score (35.5 [range 21-51] vs 34.5 [range 23-58]; p = 0.8). However, in Group RA, the number of major complications was significantly higher (23 vs 11; p < 0.001), the number of secondary procedures was significantly higher (14 vs 6; p < 0.001), and the number of minor complications was significantly lower (4 vs 12; p < 0.001) than those in Group NoRA. CONCLUSIONS: Long spinal fusion in patients with RA is associated with higher rates of major complications and secondary procedures than in patients without RA.

Percutaneous S2 alar iliac fixation for pelvic insufficiency fracture.

Pelvic insufficiency fractures are fairly common in elderly patients and can be a source of major functional impairment, particularly when they involve the ilium. Early rehabilitation with adequate pain relief has been the traditional method of treatment. The recently developed S2 alar iliac technique involves placing pelvic fixation into the ilium through a pathway from the sacral ala. The bony channel between the second dorsal sacral foramen and the anterior inferior iliac spine is used to provide rigid sacropelvic fixation for adult and pediatric spine deformities. The authors describe a new minimally invasive approach that allows percutaneous stabilization of an iliac fracture with 2 S2 alar iliac screws. A 65-year-old woman with a history of rectal carcinoma that was treated with pelvic radiation had an iliac stress fracture that progressed to nonunion. Extensive nonoperative treatment was unsuccessful, and the patient continued to have symptoms 5 years after the initial diagnosis. An open approach vs a minimally invasive technique was debated. The S2 alar iliac screws were used to stabilize the fracture through a minimally invasive approach. Most of the symptoms resolved in 2 months, with radiographic evidence of union at 6 months. To the authors' knowledge, this report is the first to describe a percutaneous approach for stabilizing iliac insufficiency fractures. This technique provides a safe surgical option for treating iliac stress fractures in some patients for whom nonoperative treatment fails while avoiding the complications and soft tissue compromise associated with open procedures. Longer follow-up and a larger series are needed to show the safety and efficacy of this technique.

Clinical results and functional outcomes of primary and revision spinal deformity surgery in adults.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the postsurgical functional outcomes of adults with spinal deformities, and even fewer have focused on the functional results and complications among older adults who have undergone primary or revision surgery for spinal deformity. Our goal was to compare patient characteristics, surgical characteristics, duration of hospitalization, radiographic results, complications, and functional outcomes between adults forty years of age or older who had undergone primary surgery for spinal deformity and those who had undergone revision surgery for spinal deformity. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 167 consecutive patients forty years of age or older who had undergone surgery for spinal deformity performed by the senior author (K.M.K.) from January 2005 through June 2009 and who were followed for a minimum of two years. We divided the patients into two groups: primary surgery (fifty-nine patients) and revision surgery (108 patients). We compared the patient characteristics (number of levels arthrodesed, type of procedure, estimated blood loss, and total operative time), duration of hospitalization, radiographic results (preoperative, six-week postoperative, and most recent follow-up Cobb angle measurements for thoracic and lumbar curves, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis), major and minor complications, and functional outcome scores (Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index). RESULTS: The groups were comparable with regard to most parameters. However, the revision group had more patients with sagittal plane imbalance and more frequently required pedicle subtraction osteotomies (p < 0.01). Patients in the primary group required more correction in the coronal plane than did patients in the revision group, whereas patients in the revision group required more correction in the sagittal plane. We found no significant difference between the two groups in the rate of major complications or in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire functional outcome scores. There were significant improvements in many functional outcome scores in both groups between the preoperative and early (six-week) postoperative periods and between the early postoperative period and the time of final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Revision surgery for spinal deformity in adults, although technically challenging and considered to present a higher risk than primary surgery, was shown to have a complication rate and outcomes that were comparable with those of primary spinal deformity surgery in adults. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.