Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Kidney Int ; 105(3): 437-439, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388143

ABSTRACT

APOL1-mediated kidney diseases have forever changed nephrology and kidney transplantation. Neves et al. extend this field with analyses in admixed Brazilians with the most severe type of APOL1-mediated kidney disease, idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy. Causative gene variants were detected in 58.6% of patients; 80.5% had APOL1 high-risk genotypes, and 19.5% had causative Mendelian variants. Their work identifies the cause of previous idiopathic collapsing glomerulopathy and provides opportunities to identify novel modifiers in severe APOL1-mediated kidney diseases that are relevant beyond Brazil.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , South American People , Humans , Apolipoprotein L1/genetics , Brazil
2.
J Rheumatol ; 47(8): 1209-1217, 2020 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31732553

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) G1 and G2 renal risk alleles (RRA) are associated with endstage renal disease in blacks with lupus nephritis (LN). The present study determined frequencies of APOL1 RRA in nonwhite Brazilian patients with LN and controls to assess association with renal outcomes. METHODS: APOL1 RRA were genotyped in 222 healthy blood donors (controls) and 201 cases with LN from 3 outpatient clinics. Two single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the G1 (rs73885319 and rs60910145) and an indel for the G2 (rs71785313) variant were genotyped. RESULTS: The frequency of APOL1 RRA in nonwhite Brazilian LN cases did not differ significantly from healthy controls, and few participants had 2 RRA. In the sample, 84.6% of LN cases and 84.2% of controls had 0 RRA, 13.4% and 15.3% had 1 RRA, and 2.0% and 0.4% had 2 RRA, respectively. LN cases with ≥ 1 APOL1 RRA had similar baseline characteristics and renal responses to treatment, yet faced higher risk for progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) to an estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 compared to those with 0 RRA (11.2% with 0, 29.6% with 1; 50% with 2 RRA, p = 0.005). Although glomerular lesions and activity scores on initial kidney biopsy did not differ significantly between individuals based on APOL1 genotype, chronicity scores, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis were more severe in those with ≥ 1 RRA (p = 0.011, p = 0.002, p = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although initial kidney lesions and treatment responses were similar, a single APOL1 RRA in nonwhite Brazilians with LN was associated with increased risk of advanced CKD and possibly more tubulointerstitial damage.


Subject(s)
Apolipoprotein L1 , Lupus Nephritis , Apolipoprotein L1/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Humans , Lupus Nephritis/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
3.
Circulation ; 137(2): 134-143, 2018 01 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29021322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In individuals with a low diastolic blood pressure (DBP), the potential benefits or risks of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering are unclear. METHODS: SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) was a randomized controlled trial that compared the effects of intensive (target <120 mm Hg) and standard (target <140 mm Hg) SBP control in 9361 older adults with high blood pressure at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular disease events. All-cause death and incident chronic kidney disease were secondary outcomes. This post hoc analysis examined whether the effects of the SBP intervention differed by baseline DBP. RESULTS: Mean baseline SBP and DBP were 139.7±15.6 and 78.1±11.9 mm Hg, respectively. Regardless of the randomized treatment, baseline DBP had a U-shaped association with the hazard of the primary cardiovascular disease outcome. However, the effects of the intensive SBP intervention on the primary outcome were not influenced by baseline DBP level (P for interaction=0.83). The primary outcome hazard ratio for intensive versus standard treatment was 0.78 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.07) in the lowest DBP quintile (mean baseline DBP, 61±5 mm Hg) and 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.90) in the upper 4 DBP quintiles (mean baseline DBP, 82±9 mm Hg), with an interaction P value of 0.78. Results were similar for all-cause death and kidney events. CONCLUSIONS: Low baseline DBP was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease events, but there was no evidence that the benefit of the intensive SBP lowering differed by baseline DBP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01206062.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypertension/drug therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Diastole/drug effects , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/mortality , Hypertension/physiopathology , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Puerto Rico , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL