[Overdosing of direct oral anticoagulants]. / Überdosierung von direkten oralen Antikoagulanzien.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are increasingly used for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic events. Incorrectly dosed DOAC treatment is associated with excess mortality. PURPOSE: This article aims at raising awareness of DOAC overdosing and its causes as well as presenting a diagnostic and therapeutic work-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a case presentation, a structured review of the current literature on DOAC overdosing was performed and treatment recommendations were extracted. RESULTS: In addition to wittingly or unwittingly increased DOAC intake, common causes of overdose are inadequate dose adjustment for concomitant medication or comorbidities. Global coagulation testing should be supplemented with DOAC-specific testing. Severe bleeding and the need for invasive diagnostics or urgent surgery represent indications for treating DOAC overdoses. Based on the cause of an DOAC overdose, active charcoal, endoscopic pill rescue, antagonization with idarucizumab or andexanet alfa and the targeted substitution of coagulation factors represent treatment options. CONCLUSION: The sensitization of clinicians is important to ensure a timely diagnosis and adequate treatment of DOAC overdosing. This report provides an overview of current knowledge on diagnostics and treatment; however, further studies are necessary to improve the existing algorithms.

Marked hyperferritinemia in critically ill cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate characteristics and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with marked hyperferritinemia. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis comprising cancer patients with a ferritin level >10.000 µg/L treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 59 years (range: 15-86 years). Females accounted for 48% of cases. 90% of patients had a hematologic malignancy. The median maximum ferritin level was 27.349 µg/L (range: 10.300-426.073 µg/L). The diagnostic criteria of septic shock were fulfilled in 51% of cases; 31% of patients had hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) according to the HLH-2004 criteria. Mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and the use of vasopressors were necessary in 59%, 35% and 70% of cases, respectively. The ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year survival rates were 33.3%, 23.1%, 23.7% and 11.7%. Patients with septic shock had a worse survival than those without septic shock (p = .001); the survival of patients who fulfilled the HLH-2004 criteria did not differ from those who did not (p = .88). CONCLUSION: Critically ill cancer patients with marked hyperferritinemia have poor outcomes. The present data may help to make informed decisions for this patient group.

[Handoffs in the intensive care unit]. / Übergaben auf der Intensivstation.

BACKGROUND: Effective handoffs in the intensive care unit (ICU) are key to patient safety. PURPOSE: This article aims to raise awareness of the significance of structured and thorough handoffs and highlights possible challenges as well as means for improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the available literature, the evidence regarding handoffs in ICUs is summarized and suggestions for practical implementation are derived. RESULTS: The quality of handoffs has an impact on patient safety. At the same time, communication in the intensive care setting is particularly challenging due to the complexity of cases, a disruptive work environment, and a multitude of inter- and intraprofessional interactions. Hierarchical team structures, deficiencies in feedback and error-management culture, (technical) language barriers in communication, as well as substantial physical and psychological stress may negatively influence the effectiveness of handoffs. Sets of interventions such as the implementation of checklists, mnemonics, and communication workshops contribute to a more structured and thorough handoff process and have the potential to significantly improve patient safety. CONCLUSION: Effective handoffs are the cornerstone of high-quality and safe patient care but face particular challenges in ICUs. Interventional measures such as structuring handoff concepts and periodic communication trainings can help to improve handoffs and thus increase patient safety.

[Sustainability in intensive and emergency care : A nationwide survey by the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine]. / Nachhaltigkeit in der Intensiv- und Notfallversorgung : Eine bundesweite Umfrage von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin.

BACKGROUND: The impact of climate change on humans is well known. However, the health care system is also a relevant contributor, accounting for up to 5-7% of global greenhouse gas emissions, and work should be adapted to be more sustainable. AIM: The survey investigated whether sustainability plays a role in hospitals and specifically in the field of emergency and intensive care. Concrete measures and which hurdles are already recognized were also inquired. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The "AG Nachhaltigkeit" (working group on sustainability) of the "Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin" (DGIIN) conducted an electronic survey among the staff of intensive care units, emergency rooms, and ambulance services in Germany. RESULTS: In all, 218 survey results were included in the analysis: 108 (50%) participants were from the nursing sector and 98 (45%) belonged to the medical staff. The majority of participants work in an intensive care unit (181 [83%]) followed by intermediate care unit (52 [24%]). A total of 104 (47%) participants indicated that their workplace had already implemented sustainability measures. However, when asked whether decision-makers in the workplaces incorporate sustainability into their decisions, management scored highest with only 20%. Potential for improvement is seen in energy and waste management, among others. CONCLUSION: The survey results show that (1) employees are highly motivated to address the issue of sustainability and to implement measures, (2) the potential to establish a resource-saving and environmentally friendly hospital is far from being exhausted, and (3) it must become a priority that decision-makers in the hospital propagate sustainability, make processes transparent, and support the motivation of employees on the subject of sustainability. In addition, this process must be supported by politicians and health insurance companies.

A diagnostic challenge-First case of chronic lymphatic leukemia-associated necrotizing sweet syndrome.

Sweet syndrome, also known as acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, is a rare disorder typically characterized by the clinical triad including a sudden onset of fever, painful skin lesions, and neutrophilia. The histopathological findings are a dense neutrophilic infiltrate and oedema of the dermis and epidermis without evidence of a vasculitis. Besides treatment of the underlying cause, sweet syndrome is typically treated with high-dose corticosteroids leading to a relapse-free response in 70% of patients. However, if left unrecognized or untreated, the condition may lead to serious complications. Here, we report on the case of a 38-year-old patient in whom, under the assumption of the presence of necrotizing fasciitis, exarticulation of the right arm was performed. In the absence of pathogen detection and insufficient response to anti-infective therapies, the diagnosis of a sweet syndrome was assumed and, later, confirmed by an excellent response to high-dose administration of systematic glucocorticoids. The case emphasizes the need to be aware of this rare syndrome, which can be easily misdiagnosed due to its close resemblance to infection and stresses the need of further research to define distinct diagnostic tools.

Communication strategies for expressing empathy during family-clinician conversations in the intensive care unit: A mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore communication strategies intensive care clinicians and patients' family members prefer for expressing empathy during family-clinician conversations. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN: Mixed-methods survey study. SETTING: Two medical ICUs of a German academic tertiary care hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Using a self-developed online survey with closed and open-ended questions with free-text options, the participants' preferences of communication strategies for expressing empathy were investigated. Quantifiable similarities and differences were determined by statistical analysis. Qualitative themes were derived at by directed content analysis. FINDINGS: The responses of 94 family members, 42 nurses, and 28 physicians were analysed (response rate: 45.3 %). Four communication strategies were deduced: (1) reassuring the families that the intensive care unit team will not abandon neither them nor the patient, (2) acknowledging emotions and offering support, (3) saying that the families are welcome and cared for in the intensive care unit, (4) providing understandable information. In comparison, the families considered an expression of nonabandonment as more empathic than the physicians did (p =.031,r = 0.240), and those expressions focussing solely on the family members' well-being (p =.012,r = 0.228) or comprising evaluative wording ("good", "normal") (p =.017,r = 0.242) as less empathic than the nurses did. Unanimously advocated nonverbal communication strategies included to listen attentively and to avoid interrupting as well as being approachable and honest. CONCLUSION: The participants' preferences supported expert recommendations and highlighted that it is not only important what the clinicians say but also how they say it. Further research is needed to elucidate ways of successfully expressing empathy during family-clinician conversations in the intensive care unit. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Intensive care unit clinicians are encouraged to practice active listening and to express their caring and nonabandonment. It is further suggested to reflect on and adjust pertinent nonverbal behaviours and relational aspects of their communication, as applicable.

Communication strategies for effective family-clinician conversations in the intensive care unit: A mixed methods study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perspectives of intensive care patients' family members and clinicians on conveying information during family-clinician conversations. SETTING: Two medical intensive care units of a German academic tertiary care hospital. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN: This study followed a mixed methods design using a digital survey on family-clinician conversations with open- and closed-ended questions, metric scales, and free-text options. Quantitative analysis was performed to determine similarities and differences. Qualitative directed content analysis was conducted to code all free-text responses into themes. FINDINGS: The responses of 100 family members, 42 nurses, and 28 physicians were analysed (response rate: 47%). All groups preferred face-to-face communication, the ask-tell-ask method, recipient design, and explaining medical terminology. The groups further commented on empathic communication by advocating the acknowledgement of the large amount of information. Qualitative themes highlighting the importance of bedside manners and written information were unique to the family members. Closed-ended questions were identified as potential trouble sources. Two communication strategies were rated as more suitable by the family members than by the physicians: being offered to choose between a summary or a detailed report at the beginning (p =.012;r = 0.288) and receiving a summary and having all questions answered at the end of a conversation (p =.023;r = 0.240). CONCLUSION: The shared preferences supported existing expert recommendations, the differing preferences corroborated the importance of relational aspects of communication and additional written information. More research is needed on empathic communication aspects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: To facilitate understanding, the clinicians may apply recipient design and the ask-tell-ask method, explain medical terminology, summarise important information, and proactively elicit questions. They may use empathic phrasing, demonstrate a respectful demeanour, and reflect on their current use of closed-ended questions and on the relational messages of their communication.

Hyperleukocytosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia admitted to the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective analysis.

A relevant proportion of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presenting with hyperleukocytosis are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, data on characteristics and outcomes of these patients are limited. We therefore conducted a single-center retrospective analysis including 69 consecutive AML patients with a white blood cell (WBC) count > 100.000/µl who had been treated on the ICU between 2011 and 2020. The median age was 63 years (range: 14-87 years). Males accounted for the majority of cases (n = 43; 62.3%). Mechanical ventilation (MV), renal replacement therapy and the use of vasopressors were necessary in 34.8%, 8.7% and 40.6% of patients, respectively. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed in 15.9% of patients. The ICU, hospital, 90-day and 1-year survival rates were 53.6%, 43.5%, 42% and 30.4%, respectively. Age (p = 0.002), SOFA score (p < 0.001) and MV (p < 0.001) were independently associated with a reduced survival probability. A score comprising the factors age > 70 years, lactate dehydrogenase level > 1500 U/l, WBC count > 150.000/µl, elevated lactate level and SOFA score > 7 allowed the discrimination of 3 distinct risk groups (low-risk: 0-1 points, intermediate-risk: 2 points, high-risk: 3-5 points) with regard to survival (p < 0.0001). Taken together, the present analysis indicates that more than two-thirds of AML patients with hyperleukocytosis treated on the ICU die within 1 year. However, outcomes vary considerably depending on the presence of risk factors.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation admitted to the intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective analysis.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be associated with adverse events necessitating treatment on the intensive care unit (ICU). Data focusing on patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT are scarce. We thus conducted a single-center retrospective analysis comprising 79 individuals who had high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT between 2014 and 2020 and were admitted to the ICU between the initiation of conditioning therapy and day 30 after ASCT. The median age was 57 years (range: 20-82 years); 38% of patients were female. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (34%) and plasma cell disorders (28%) were the most common indications for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Sepsis represented the major cause for ICU admission (68%). Twenty-nine percent of patients required mechanical ventilation (MV), 5% had renal replacement therapy, and 44% needed vasopressors. The ICU, hospital, 90-day, and 1-year survival rates were 77.2%, 77.2%, 72.2%, and 60.3%, respectively. Stable disease or disease progression prior to the initiation of high-dose chemotherapy (p = 0.0028) and MV (p < 0.0001) were associated with an impaired survival. A total of 36 patients died during observation. The most frequent causes of death were the underlying malignancy (44%) and sepsis (39%). Taken together, the present analysis indicates a favorable overall outcome for patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization for high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Thus, this patient group should not be denied admission and treatment on the ICU.

How to communicate with family members of the critically ill in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: To map the existing approaches to communication with family members of the critically ill in the intensive care unit and the corresponding implementation requirements and benefits. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in February 2022 by searching PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library for articles published between 2000 and 2022. We included records of all designs that met our inclusion criteria and applied frequency counts and qualitative coding. RESULTS: The search yielded 3749 records, 63 met inclusion criteria. The included records were of an interventional (43 %) or observational (14 %) study design or review articles (43 %), and provided information in three categories: communication platforms, strategies, and tools. For implementation in the intensive care unit, the approaches required investing time and resources. Their reported benefits were an increased quality of communication and satisfaction among all parties involved, improved psychological outcome among family members, and reduced intensive care unit length of stay and costs. CONCLUSION: The current approaches to communication with patients' family members offer insights for the development and implementation of communication pathways in the intensive care unit of which the benefits seem to outweigh the efforts. Structured interprofessional frameworks with standardised tools based on empathic communication strategies are encouraged.

COVID-19 and Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Case Series, Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). RESULTS: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85% and the mortality at 52.18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future.

Plasma exchange with COVID-19 convalescent plasma in a patient with severe ANCA-associated vasculitis and COVID-19 pneumonia after rituximab therapy.

The combination of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia and pulmonary-renal syndrome due to ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) poses diagnostic uncertainty and a therapeutic dilemma. According to current limited knowledge of COVID-19, the application of commonly used drugs in AAV, cyclophosphamide (CYC) and rituximab (RTX), must be weighed carefully in active COVID-19 infection. We report a case of a 52-year-old male patient with concurrent severe COVID-19 pneumonia and acute relapse of pulmonary-renal syndrome due to AAV after recent RTX maintenance dose. The patient presented with severe hypoxaemia, complete B-cell depletion and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viraemia. He was successfully treated with therapeutic plasma exchange employing COVID-19 convalescent plasma.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit during the peri-transplant period have unfavorable outcomes-results of a retrospective analysis from a German university hospital.

The prognosis of allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) has improved over the last decades. However, data focusing on patients treated in the ICU during the peri-transplant period are scarce. We therefore conducted an analysis comprising 70 patients who had allogeneic stem cell transplantation at the University Hospital Cologne between 2014 and 2020 and were admitted to the ICU between the initiation of conditioning therapy and day 30 after transplantation. The median age was 59 years (range: 18 - 72 years). 50% of patients were female. Sepsis was the most common cause for ICU admission (49%). Mechanical ventilation (MV) was required in 56% of patients, 27% had renal replacement therapy (RRT), and 64% needed vasopressors. The ICU, hospital, 90-day, and 1-year survival rates were 48.6%, 38.6%, 35.7%, and 16.2%, respectively. MV and/or RRT during the ICU stay were associated with an impaired survival (p < 0.0001). The same was true for the use of vasopressors (p < 0.0001). In contrast, baseline characteristics did not impact the outcome. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed in 17% of patients. None of the patients undergoing CPR was alive at 1 year. Among patients who died after discharge from the ICU (n = 23), sepsis and other infectious complications represented the major causes of death (48%). Taken together, the present analysis indicates unfavorable outcomes for allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients admitted to the ICU during the peri-transplant period. The data may help to make informed decisions with patients and their families.

Reactivation of EBV and CMV in Severe COVID-19-Epiphenomena or Trigger of Hyperinflammation in Need of Treatment? A Large Case Series of Critically ill Patients.

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of viruses such as Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are common in critically ill patients and have been described in patients with severe COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether these reactivations are associated with increased mortality and whether targeted treatments are beneficial. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center cohort study, patients with severe COVID-19 treated on our intensive care unit (ICU) were screened for EBV and CMV reactivation as detected by polymerase chain reaction. If present, patient characteristics, temporal connections to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 diagnosis and corticosteroid use, the use of targeted treatments as well as the course of disease and outcome were analyzed. As control group, non-COVID-19 patients with sepsis, treated within the same time period on our ICU, served as control group to compare incidences of viral reactivation. RESULTS: In 19 (16%) of 117 patients with severe COVID-19 treated on our ICU EBV reactivations were identified, comparable 18 (14%) of 126 in the non-COVID-19 control group (P = .672). Similarly, in 11 (9%) of 117 patients CMV reactivations were identified, comparable to the 16 (13%) of 126 in the non-COVID-19 sepsis patients (P = .296). The majority of EBV (58%) and CMV reactivations (55%) were detected in patients under systemic corticosteroid treatment. 7 (37%) of 19 patients with EBV reactivation survived the ICU stay, 2 (29%) of 7 patients with rituximab treatment and 5 (42%) of 12 patients without treatment (P = .568). Five (50%) of 10 patients with CMV reactivation survived the ICU stay, 5 (83%) of 6 patients with ganciclovir treatment and 0 of 4 patients without treatment (P = .048). Follow-up analysis in these patients showed that the initiation of treatment lead to decrease in viral load. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients with COVID-19 are at a high risk for EBV and CMV reactivations. Whether these reactivations are a cause of hyperinflammation and require targeted treatment remains uncertain. However, in patients with clinical deterioration or signs of hyperinflammation targeted treatment might be beneficial and warrants further studying.

Clinical Course and Outcome of Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Alpha Variant Infection Compared to Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Wild-Type Infection Admitted to the ICU.

The alpha variant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with higher transmissibility and possibly higher mortality compared with wild-type SARS-CoV-2. However, few data are available on the clinical course of infections with the alpha variant compared with wild-type SARS-CoV-2 in critically ill patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed patients admitted to our ICU due to SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant infection and compared characteristics and course to patients with SARS-CoV-2 wild-type infection. The median age of patients with Alpha variant infections was 57 years compared to 62 years in the wild-type group. ICU survival was 41/80 (51%) in the Alpha variant group and 35/80 (44%) in the wild-type group (p = 0.429). Results of a matched-pair analysis based on age and sex illustrated that 45/58 patients (77.6%) in the Alpha variant group and 38/58 (65.5%) patients in the wild-type group required mechanical ventilation (p = 0.217). ICU survival was documented for 28/58 patients (48.3%) in the Alpha variant group and 27/58 patients (46.6%) in the wild-type group (p = 1). Thus, ICU mortality among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections remains high. Although the Alpha variant group included younger patients requiring mechanical ventilation, no significant differences between patients with the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant and the SARS-CoV-2 wild-type, respectively, were detected with respect to clinical course and ICU mortality. For future VOCs, we believe it would be important to obtain valid and rapid data on the clinical course of critically ill patients who test positive for COVID-19 in order to perform appropriate epidemiological planning of intensive care capacity.