ABSTRACT
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was the translation and validation of the ANCA-associated vasculitis patient-reported outcome (AAV-PRO) questionnaire into Italian, denoted as AAV-PRO_ita. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) on quality of life (QoL) and work impairment in a large cohort of Italian patients. Methods: The study design took a prospective cohort study approach. First, the AAV-PRO was translated into Italian following the step guidelines for translations. The new AAV-PRO_ita questionnaire covered three disease domains: organ-specific and systemic symptoms and signs; physical function; and social and emotional impact. Second, Italian-speaking AAV patients were recruited from 17 Italian centres belonging to the Italian Vasculitis Study Group. Participants completed the AAV-PRO_ita questionnaire at three time points. Participants were also requested to complete the work productivity and activity impairment: general health questionnaire. Results: A total of 276 AAV patients (56.5% women) completed the questionnaires. The AAV-PRO_ita questionnaire demonstrated a good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Female AAV patients scored higher (i.e. worse) in all thee domains, especially in the social and emotional impact domain (P < 0.001). Patients on glucocorticoid therapy (n = 199) had higher scores in all domains, especially in the physical function domain (P < 0.001), compared with patients not on glucocorticoid therapy (n = 77). Furthermore, patients who had at least one relapse of disease (n = 114) had higher scores compared with those who had never had one (n = 161) in any domain (P < 0.05). Finally, nearly 30% of the patients reported work impairment. Conclusion: The AAV-PRO_ita questionnaire is a new 29-item, disease-specific patient-reported outcome measuring tool that can be used in AAV research in the Italian language. Sex, glucocorticoids and relapsing disease showed the greatest impact on QoL.
ABSTRACT
Background: Intravenous iloprost has been widely used for the treatment of systemic sclerosis peripheral vasculopathy. No agreement has been found on the regimen and the dosage of intravenous iloprost in different scleroderma subset conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the modalities of intravenous iloprost administration within a large cohort of systemic sclerosis patients from the SPRING Registry and to identify any associated clinical-demographic, instrumental or therapeutic data. Patients and Methods: Data of systemic sclerosis patients treated with intravenous iloprost for at least 1 year (case group) were retrospectively analyzed, including different timing and duration of intravenous iloprost session, and compared with those of untreated patients (control group). Results: Out of 1895 analyzed patients, 937 (49%) received intravenous iloprost treatment, while 958 (51%) were assigned to the control group. Among cases, about 70% were treated every 4 weeks, 24% with an interval of more than 4 weeks, and only 6% of less than 4 weeks. Most patients receiving the treatment every 4 weeks, or less, underwent infusion cycle for 1 day only, while if it was scheduled with an interval of more than 4 weeks, a total number of 5 consecutive days of infusions was the preferred regimen. The comparison between the two groups revealed that patients treated with intravenous iloprost had a higher frequency of DUs (p < 0.001), pitting scars (p < 0.001), diffuse cutaneous involvement (p < 0.001), interstitial lung disease (p < 0.002), as well as higher rates of anti-topoisomerase I, "late" scleroderma pattern at nailfold videocapillaroscopy. These findings were confirmed by multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Our data provide a picture on the Italian use of intravenous iloprost among systemic sclerosis patients and showed that it was usually employed in patients with a more aggressive spectrum of the disease. The disparity of intravenous iloprost treatment strategies in the different centers suggests the need of a rational therapeutical approach based on the clinical characteristics of different patients' subsets.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of very low-dose (<5 mg daily) glucocorticoids (GCs) in patients with RA treated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs). METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we included all RA patients who started their first b/tsDMARDs at our institution between 2015 and 2020 and were monitored every 6 months for 3 years. Relationships between exposure to very low-dose GCs and disease activity were examined through multivariable logistic regression and repeated-measures analysis of variance. The impact of very low-dose GCs on safety was also evaluated. RESULTS: We enrolled 229 RA patients, of whom 68% were prescribed very low-dose GCs and 32% received no GCs. After three years on b/tsDMARDs, 32% had never abandoned, 20% had gone on and off, and 23% had permanently discontinued very low-dose GCs, while 25% had never taken GCs. Shorter disease duration at b/tsDMARD initiation was the single modifiable predictor of very low-dose GCs cessation (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.03-1.14 for any 1-year decrease; p= 0.001). A significant association existed between ongoing utilization of very low-dose GCs and persistent moderate disease activity. Use of very low-dose GCs was associated with hypertension (20% vs 11%) and myocardial infarction (2.3% vs 0%). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of RA patients treated with b/tsDMARDs continue to receive very low-dose GCs without significantly improving disease control. However, this appears to increase cardiovascular morbidity.