Management of patients with hemophilia A (HA) requires the knowledge and experience of specialized health care professionals. However, these patients may need to be attended in emergencies, outside the referral hospital, where health care professionals do not know about hemophilia and/or new innovative treatments. This study aimed to develop a simple and practical algorithm that could be used in emergency situations by nonspecialized treaters in HA and bleeding with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors under emicizumab prophylaxis. A group of experts agreed on a simple algorithm, easy to operate, adapted from previous international guidelines, and based on their clinical experience. The proposed algorithm starts with identifying the patient, confirming the diagnosis of HA, prophylaxis with emicizumab, and/or use of other treatments. After stabilizing the patient and stratifying the bleeding risk, the patient is managed according to the presence/absence of FVIII inhibitors. Patients without FVIII inhibitors should receive FVIII concentrate. Dose and follow-up depend on bleeding localization and severity. Patients with FVIII inhibitors should preferably receive recombinant activated factor VII as bypass agent. A basic coagulation assay, FVIII assessment, and FVIII inhibitors detection assays are necessary in an emergency. However, these tests should be interpreted with caution and appropriately chosen, as emicizumab may alter the results. The management of patients with HA is challenging in emergency situations, especially if they are treated with new agents. Nonspecialized in coagulopathies health care professionals have limited understanding of the disease, highlighting the need for an algorithm to assist them in making informed decisions.
Background: Polypharmacy is a growing phenomenon among elderly individuals. However, there is little information about the frequency of polypharmacy among the elderly population treated in emergency departments (EDs) and its prognostic effect. This study aims to determine the prevalence and short-term prognostic effect of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in EDs. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Emergency Department Elderly in Needs (EDEN) project's cohort was performed. This registry included all elderly patients who attended 52 Spanish EDs for any condition. Mild and severe polypharmacy was defined as the use of 5-9 drugs and ⩾10 drugs, respectively. The assessed outcomes were ED revisits, hospital readmissions, and mortality 30 days after discharge. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses, including the patient's comorbidities, were performed. Results: A total of 25,557 patients were evaluated [mean age: 78 (IQR: 71-84) years]; 10,534 (41.2%) and 5678 (22.2%) patients presented with mild and severe polypharmacy, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, mild polypharmacy and severe polypharmacy were associated with an increase in ED revisits [odds ratio (OR) 1.13 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.23) and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.24-1.51)] and hospital readmissions [OR 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04-1.35) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.60)], respectively, compared to non-polypharmacy. Mild and severe polypharmacy were not associated with increased 30-day mortality [OR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.89-2.26) and OR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.72-1.12)], respectively. Conclusion: Polypharmacy was common among the elderly treated in EDs and associated with increased risks of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days but not with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients with polypharmacy had a higher risk of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days after discharge.
Short-term prognosis of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in emergency departments: results from the EDEN project Management elderly patients with polypharmacy is becoming a major challenge to the emergency services. The progressive aging of the population is producing a progressive increase in the number of patients treated with multiple comorbidities and chronic medications. It's well known that polypharmacy is associated with an increase in hospital admissions and health care system costs. However, the impact of polypharmacy over the risk of new visits to the emergency rooms is not well defined. Understanding the impact of polypharmacy on the frequency of new visits to the emergency room and on patient mortality is the first step to establish prevention measures for new visits, proposing improvements in chronic treatment at discharge. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and effect on short-term prognosis of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in Emergency departments. The authors used a retrospective multipurpose registry in 52 hospitals in Spain. This study includes 25,557 patients with a mean age of 78 years. On admission, the median number of drugs was 6 (IQR: 39), with 10,534 (41.2%) patients taking 59 drugs and 5,678 (22.2%) taking ⩾10 drugs. In these patients comorbidities were associated with an increase in the number of drugs. In the patients with severe polypharmacy (⩾10 drugs), diuretics were the most frequently drugs prescribed, followed by antihypertensives and statins. The results obtained indicate that polypharmacy is a frequent phenomenon among the elderly population treated in Emergency departments, being antihypertensives the most frequently used drugs in this population. Those patients who takes ⩾10 drugs have a higher risk of new visits to the emergency room and hospital readmissions in short term period.
OBJECTIVES: To study baseline factors associated with hypo- and hypernatremia in older patients attended in emergency departments (EDs) and explore the association between these dysnatremias and indicators of severity in an emergency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients attended in 52 Spanish hospital EDs aged 65 years or older during a designated week. All included patients had to have a plasma sodium concentration on record. Patients were distributed in 3 groups according to sodium levels: normal, 135-145 mmol/L; hyponatremia, 135 mmol/L; or hypernatremia > 145 mmol/L. We analyzed associations between sodium concentration and 24 variables (sociodemographic information, measures of comorbidity and baseline functional status, and ongoing treatment for hypo- or hypernatremia). Indicators of the severity in emergencies were need for hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, prolonged ED stay (> 12 hours) in discharged patients, and prolonged hospital stay (> 7 days) in admitted patients. We used restricted cubic spline curves to analyze the associations between sodium concentration and severity indicators, using 140 mmol/L as the reference. RESULTS: A total of 13 368 patients were included. Hyponatremia was diagnosed in 13.5% and hypernatremia in 2.9%. Hyponatremia was associated with age ($ 80 years), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, an active neoplasm, chronic liver disease, dementia, chemotherapy, and needing help to walk. Hypernatremia was associated with needing help to walk and dementia. The percentages of cases with severity indicators were as follows: hospital admission, 40.8%; in-hospital mortality, 4.3%; prolonged ED stay, 15.9%; and prolonged hospital stay, 49.8%. Odds ratios revealed associations between lower sodium concentration cut points in patients with hyponatremia and increasing need for hospitalization (130 mmol/L, 2.24 [IC 95%, 2.00-2.52]; 120 mmol/L, 4.13 [3.08-5.56]; and 110 mmol/L, 7.61 [4.53-12.8]); risk for in-hospital death (130 mmol/L, 3.07 [2.40-3.92]; 120 mmol/L, 6.34 [4.22- 9.53]; and 110 mmol/L, 13.1 [6.53-26.3]); and risk for prolonged ED stay (130 mmol/L, 1.59 [1.30-1.95]; 120 mmol/L, 2.77 [1.69-4.56]; and 110 mmol/L, 4.83 [2.03-11.5]). Higher sodium levels in patients with hypernatremia were associated with increasing need for hospitalization (150 mmol/L, 1.94 [1.61-2.34]; 160 mmol/L, 4.45 [2.88-6.87]; 170 mmol/L, 10.2 [5.1-20.3]; and 180 mmol/L, 23.3 [9.03-60.3]); risk for in-hospital death (150 mmol/L, 2.77 [2.16-3.55]; 160 mmol/L, 6.33 [4.11-9.75]; 170 mmol/L, 14.5 [7.45-28.1]; and 180 mmol/L, 33.1 [13.3-82.3]); and risk for prolonged ED stay (150 mmol/L, 2.03 [1.48-2.79]; 160 mmol/L, 4.23 [2.03-8.84]; 170 mmol/L, 8.83 [2.74-28.4]; and 180 mmol/L, 18.4 [3.69-91.7]). We found no association between either type of dysnatremia and prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Measurement of sodium plasma concentration in older patients in the ED can identify hypo- and hypernatremia, which are associated with higher risk for hospitalization, death, and prolonged ED stays regardless of the condition that gave rise to the dysnatremia.
OBJETIVO: Estudiar los factores basales asociados a hiponatremia e hipernatremia en pacientes mayores atendidos en urgencias y la relación de estas disnatremias con eventos indicadores de gravedad. METODO: Se incluyeron durante una semana a todos los pacientes atendidos en 52 servicios de urgencias hospitalarios españoles de edad $ 65 años con determinación de sodio plasmático. Se formaron tres grupos: sodio normal (135-145 mmol/L), hiponatremia ( 135 mmol/L) e hipernatremia (> 145 mmol/L). Se investigó la relación de 24 factores sociodemográficos, de comorbilidad, estado funcional basal y tratamiento crónico con hipo e hipernatremia. Como eventos de gravedad se recogieron necesidad de hospitalización, mortalidad intrahospitalaria, estancia prolongada en urgencias (> 12 horas) en dados de alta y hospitalización prolongada (> 7 días) en hospitalizados, y se analizó su relación con la concentración de sodio mediante curvas spline cúbicas restringidas ajustadas, tomando el valor 140 mmol/L como referencia. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 13.368 pacientes (13,5% hiponatremia, 2,9% hipernatremia). La hiponatremia se asoció a edad $ 80 años, hipertensión arterial, diabetes mellitus, neoplasia activa, hepatopatía crónica, demencia, tratamiento con quimioterápicos y ayuda para la deambulación, y la hipernatremia a dependencia, necesidad de ayuda para deambular y demencia. La hospitalización fue del 40,8%, la mortalidad intrahospitalaria del 4,3%, la estancia prolongada en urgencias del 15,9% y la hospitalización prolongada del 49,8%. A mayor hiponatremia, mayor necesidad de hospitalización (sodio 130 mmol/L: OR:2,24; IC 95%: 2,00-2,52; 120 mmol/L: 4,13, 3,08-5,56; 110 mmol/L: 7,61, 4,53-12,8), mortalidad intrahospitalaria (130 mmol/L: 3,07, 2,40-3,92; 120 mmol/L: 6,34, 4,22-9,53; 110 mmol/L: 13,1, 6,53-26,3) y estancia prolongada en urgencias (130 mmol/L: 1,59, 1,30-1,95; 120 mmol/L: 2,77, 1,69-4,56; 110 mmol/L: 4,83, 2,03-11,5), y a mayor hipernatremia mayor necesidad de hospitalización (150 mmol/L: 1,94, 1,61-2,34; 160 mmol/L: 4,45, 2,88-6,87; 170 mmol/L: 10,2, 5,1-20,3; 180 mmol/L: 23,3, 9,03-60,3), mortalidad intrahospitalaria (150 mmol/L: 2,77, 2,16-3,55; 160 mmol/L: 6,33, 4,11-9,75; 170 mmol/L: 14,5, 7,45-28,1; 180 mmol/L: 33,1, 13,3-82,3) y estancia prolongada en urgencias (150 mmol/L: 2,03, 1,48-2,79; 160 mmol/L: 4,23, 2,03-8,84; 170 mmol/L: 8,83, 2,74-28,4; 180 mmol/L: 18,4, 3,69-91,7). No hubo asociación entre estas disnatremias y hospitalización prolongada. CONCLUSIONES: El sodio plasmático determinado en urgencias en pacientes mayores permite identificar hiponatremias e hipernatremias, las cuales se asocian a un riesgo incrementado de hospitalización, mortalidad y estancia prolongada en urgencias independientemente de la causa que haya generado la disnatremia.
Dementia , Hypernatremia , Hyponatremia , Humans , Aged , Sodium , Hypernatremia/diagnosis , Hypernatremia/epidemiology , Hyponatremia/diagnosis , Hyponatremia/epidemiology , Emergencies , Hospital Mortality , Emergency Service, Hospital
OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the incidence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGB) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), who were attending the emergency department (ED), before hospitalization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all COVID-19 patients diagnosed with UGB in 62 Spanish EDs (20% of Spanish EDs, case group) during the first 2 months of the COVID-19 outbreak. We formed 2 control groups: COVID-19 patients without UGB (control group A) and non-COVID-19 patients with UGB (control group B). Fifty-three independent variables and 4 outcomes were compared between cases and controls. RESULTS: We identified 83 UGB in 74,814 patients with COVID-19 who were attending EDs (1.11%, 95% CI=0.88-1.38). This incidence was lower compared with non-COVID-19 patients [2474/1,388,879, 1.78%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.71-1.85; odds ratio (OR)=0.62; 95% CI=0.50-0.77]. Clinical characteristics associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 patients presenting with UGB were abdominal pain, vomiting, hematemesis, dyspnea, expectoration, melena, fever, cough, chest pain, and dysgeusia. Compared with non-COVID-19 patients with UGB, COVID-19 patients with UGB more frequently had fever, cough, expectoration, dyspnea, abdominal pain, diarrhea, interstitial lung infiltrates, and ground-glass lung opacities. They underwent fewer endoscopies in the ED (although diagnoses did not differ between cases and control group B) and less endoscopic treatment. After adjustment for age and sex, cases showed a higher in-hospital all-cause mortality than control group B (OR=2.05, 95% CI=1.09-3.86) but not control group A (OR=1.14, 95% CI=0.59-2.19) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of UGB in COVID-19 patients attending EDs was lower compared with non-COVID-19 patients. Digestive symptoms predominated over respiratory symptoms, and COVID-19 patients with UGB underwent fewer gastroscopies and endoscopic treatments than the general population with UGB. In-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients with UGB was increased compared with non-COVID patients with UGB, but not compared with the remaining COVID-19 patients.
COVID-19 , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastroscopy , Humans , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
