Transport Studies Using Blood-Brain Barrier In Vitro Models: A Critical Review and Guidelines.

Permeation is one of the most evaluated parameters using preclinical in vitro blood-brain barrier models, as it has long been considered to be one of the major factors influencing central nervous system drug delivery. Blood-brain barrier permeability can be defined as the speed at which a compound crosses the brain endothelial cell barrier and is employed to assess barrier tightness, which is a crucial feature of brain capillaries in vivo. In addition, it is used to assess brain drug penetration. We review traditionally used methods to assess blood-brain barrier permeability in vitro and summarize often neglected in vivo (e.g., plasma protein and brain tissue binding) or in vitro (e.g., culture insert materials or methodology) factors that influence this property. These factors are crucial to consider when performing BBB permeability assessments, and especially when comparing permeability data obtained from different models, since model diversification significantly complicates inter-study comparisons. Finally, measuring transendothelial electrical resistance can be used to describe blood-brain barrier tightness; however, several parameters should be considered while comparing these measurements to the blood-brain barrier permeability to paracellular markers.

Flow induces barrier and glycocalyx-related genes and negative surface charge in a lab-on-a-chip human blood-brain barrier model.

Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip (LOC) devices allow the study of blood-brain barrier (BBB) properties in dynamic conditions. We studied a BBB model, consisting of human endothelial cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells in co-culture with brain pericytes, in an LOC device to study fluid flow in the regulation of endothelial, BBB and glycocalyx-related genes and surface charge. The highly negatively charged endothelial surface glycocalyx functions as mechano-sensor detecting shear forces generated by blood flow on the luminal side of brain endothelial cells and contributes to the physical barrier of the BBB. Despite the importance of glycocalyx in the regulation of BBB permeability in physiological conditions and in diseases, the underlying mechanisms remained unclear. The MACE-seq gene expression profiling analysis showed differentially expressed endothelial, BBB and glycocalyx core protein genes after fluid flow, as well as enriched pathways for the extracellular matrix molecules. We observed increased barrier properties, a higher intensity glycocalyx staining and a more negative surface charge of human brain-like endothelial cells (BLECs) in dynamic conditions. Our work is the first study to provide data on BBB properties and glycocalyx of BLECs in an LOC device under dynamic conditions and confirms the importance of fluid flow for BBB culture models.

Contribution of brain pericytes in blood-brain barrier formation and maintenance: a transcriptomic study of cocultured human endothelial cells derived from hematopoietic stem cells.

Formation, maintenance, and repair of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) are critical for central nervous system homeostasis. The interaction of endothelial cells (ECs) with brain pericytes is known to induce BBB characteristics in brain ECs during embryogenesis and can be used to differentiate human ECs from stem cell source in in vitro BBB models. However, the molecular events involved in BBB maturation are not fully understood. To this end, human ECs derived from hematopoietic stem cells were cultivated with either primary bovine or cell line-derived human brain pericytes to induce BBB formation. Subsequently, the transcriptomic profiles of solocultured vs. cocultured ECs were analysed over time by Massive Analysis of cDNA Ends (MACE) technology. This RNA sequencing method is a 3'-end targeted, tag-based, reduced representation transcriptome profiling technique, that can reliably quantify all polyadenylated transcripts including those with low expression. By analysing the generated transcriptomic profiles, we can explore the molecular processes responsible for the functional changes observed in ECs in coculture with brain pericytes (e.g. barrier tightening, changes in the expression of transporters and receptors). Our results identified several up- and downregulated genes and signaling pathways that provide a valuable data source to further delineate complex molecular processes that are involved in BBB formation and BBB maintenance. In addition, this data provides a source to identify novel targets for central nervous system drug delivery strategies.

Mimicking brain tissue binding in an in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier illustrates differences between in vitro and in vivo methods for assessing the rate of brain penetration.

Assessing the rate of drug delivery to the central nervous system (CNS) in vitro has been used for decades to predict whether CNS drug candidates are likely to attain their pharmacological targets, located within the brain parenchyma, at an effective dose. The predictive value of in vitro blood-brain barrier (BBB) models is therefore frequently assessed by comparing in vitro BBB permeability, usually quoted as the endothelial permeability coefficient (Pe) or apparent permeability (Papp), to their rate of BBB permeation measured in vivo, the latter being commonly assessed in rodents. In collaboration with AstraZeneca (DMPK department, Södertälje, Sweden), the in vitro BBB permeability (Papp and Pe) of 27 marketed CNS drugs has been determined using a bovine in vitro BBB model and compared to their in vivo permeability (Pvivo), obtained by rat in-situ brain perfusion. The latter was taken from published data from Summerfield et al. (2007). This comparison confirmed previous reports, showing a strong in vitro/in vivo correlation for hydrophilic compounds, characterized by low brain tissue binding and a weak correlation for lipophilic compounds, characterized by high brain tissue binding. This observation can be explained by the influence of brain tissue binding on the uptake of drugs into the CNS in vivo and the absence of possible brain tissue binding in vitro. The use of glial cells (GC) in the in vitro BBB model to mimic brain tissue binding and the introduction of a new calculation method for in vitro BBB permeability (Pvitro) resulted in a strong correlation between the in vitro and in vivo rate of BBB permeation for the whole set of compounds. These findings might facilitate further in vitro to in vivo extrapolation for CNS drug candidates.