The impact of gender on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation between self-expanding valve and balloon-expandable valve.

BACKGROUND: While females have been found to have a higher rate of procedural complications with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) than males, the effect of valve choice has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to investigate the impact of gender and choice of balloon or self-expanding valve on TAVI complications. METHODS: Data from patients who received a TAVI in our institution from January 2016 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 971 patients were included and divided into self-expanding valve (n = 315) and balloon-expandable valve (n = 656) groups. The endpoints were 30-day mortality, need for a new pacemaker, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which is defined as cardiac arrest, stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleeding, and unplanned vascular surgery/intervention. RESULTS: There were more females in the self-expanding valve group than in the balloon-expandable valve group (64.1 % vs. 43.6 %: p < 0.0001). There is no significant difference in the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, current smoker, hemodialysis, and the STS risk score between the 2 groups. Females had a higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (3.7 % in men vs. 6.8 % in women; p = 0.043), which was driven mostly by vascular complications. This difference was particularly observed in the self-expanding valve group (2.7 % in men vs. 9.4 % in women; p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI complications were more common in females than males, driven mostly by vascular complications. This difference was particularly observed in woman treated with a self-expanding valve. Particular attention should be given to access choices in females undergoing TAVI.

A system approach to improving guideline-directed therapy for cardio-renal-metabolic conditions: The "beyond diabetes" initiative.

Objective: Despite demonstrating improvements in cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, and survival outcomes, guideline-directed antihyperglycemic medications such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), are underutilized. Many obstacles constrain their use including lack of systematic provider and patient education, concern for medication side effects, and patient affordability. Methods: We designed a multimodality, systems-based approach to address these challenges with the goal of increasing medication utilization across the largest healthcare system in New York State. This multispecialty collaborative included provider and patient education, an electronic health record-enabled platform to identify eligible patients, and access to pharmacists for medication guidance and addressing insurance coverage barriers. Surveys were administered following grand rounds lectures and knowledge-based questionnaires were given before and after case-based sessions for housestaff, with results analyzed using a two-sided Student's t-test. Rates of first prescriptions of SGLT2i/GLP1-RA in combined and individual analyses were compared between the pre- and post-education periods (6 months prior to 3/31/2021 and 6 months post 8/19/2021), and the change in prescriptions per 100 eligible-visits was assessed using the incidence density approach. Results: Among grand rounds participants, 69.3% of respondents said they would make changes to their clinical practice. Knowledge increased by 14.7% (p-value <0.001) among housestaff following case-based sessions. An increase in SGLT2i/GLP1-RA prescribing was noted for eligible patients among internal medicine, cardiology, nephrology, and endocrinology providers, from 11.9 per 100 eligible visits in the pre-education period to 14.8 in the post-education period (absolute increase 2.9 [24.4%], incidence risk ratio 1.24 [95% CI 1.18-1.31]; p-value <0.001). Increases in prescribing rates were also seen among individual medical specialties. Conclusions: Our "Beyond Diabetes" initiative showed an improvement in provider knowledge-base and was associated with a modest, but statistically significant increase in the use of SGLT2i and GLP1-RA throughout our healthcare system.

Impact of Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Complications During Hospitalization on Long-Term Prognosis in Patients With COVID-19.

The impact of cardiac and cerebrovascular events during COVID-19 hospitalization on long-term prognosis remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the effect of myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and pulmonary embolism (PE) during hospitalization on the long-term prognosis in patients who survived COVID-19 hospitalization. A retrospective observational analysis was performed on a cohort of 2,389 patients who survived COVID-19 hospitalization in our institution between January and June 2020. The patients were divided into MI (n = 111) and non-MI (n = 2,278) groups according to the presence of MI during hospitalization. As a subanalysis, the patients were assigned to CVA (n = 97) and non-CVA (n = 2,292) and PE (n = 54) and non-PE (n = 2,335) groups. The primary outcome was long-term survival after discharge. During a median follow-up period of 2.4 years after discharge, 30 patients (27.0%) in the MI group and 140 patients (6.2%) in the non-MI group died (p <0.001). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis demonstrated that the MI group was significantly associated with an increased incidence of all-cause death after discharge (log-rank p <0.001), as supported by the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61 to 3.74, p <0.001). However, the presence of CVA (HR 1.46, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.34, p = 0.113) or PE (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.84, p = 0.937) were not associated with an increased incidence of all-cause death after discharge. In conclusion, among the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications associated with COVID-19 hospitalization, the presence of MI during hospitalization was proved to be a significant independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients who survived COVID-19 hospitalization.

Aortic valve endocarditis by Actinomyces odontolyticus and Gemella morbillorum oral pathogens.

A 56-year-old female with a history of poor dental hygiene and aortic insufficiency status post aortic valve replacement in 2015 presented with chest pain and fevers. She was found to have portal vein thrombosis, colitis, and infective endocarditis with aortic valve thickening. Blood cultures were positive for Actinomyces odontolyticus and Gemella morbillorum. Transesophageal echocardiogram was positive for aortic root thickening. Patient was treated with ceftriaxone and apixaban with full recovery.

Closure of mid-bore venotomies with VASCADE VCD after right and left heart catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: This single-center, retrospective analysis investigated the clinical outcomes of a novel vascular closure device (VASCADE, Cardiva Medical, Santa Clara, CA) for closure of 7F femoral venotomies. BACKGROUND: The VASCADE closure device has been widely used to close arteriotomy sites following femoral procedures; however, little data have been published regarding the device's utility in closure of venotomy sites after procedures such as right-heart catheterization. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of outcomes in 102 consecutive patients who underwent venous closure using the VASCADE device following diagnostic right and left-heart catheterization between April 2016 to May 2018. Patients' age, gender, valvular disease status, comorbidities, and periprocedural use of antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: Closure was successful in 99% (101/102) of patients with respect to achieving the primary outcome of rapid hemostasis in ≤3 min. There was one device failure requiring manual compression, with no further complications. There were no other related adverse events or complications through 30 days of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The VASCADE device achieved venous hemostasis in nearly all our patients. We believe devices for venous closure can aid in improving patient experience, safety, and efficiency during these procedures.