Developmental changes in mouse motor skill learning and cortical circuitry.

Learning motor skills requires plasticity in the primary motor cortex (M1), including changes in inhibitory circuitry. But how inhibitory synaptic connections change during skill acquisition and whether this varies over development is not fully understood. This study assesses the normal developmental trajectory of motor learning and then addresses inhibitory connectivity changes after motor learning. We trained mice of both sexes to run on a custom accelerating rotarod at ages from postnatal day (P) 20 to P120, tracking paw position and quantifying time to fall and changes in gait pattern. Performance improved most rapidly between P30-60, while paw position and gait patterns change with learning, though differently between age groups. To address circuit changes, we labeled task-active and task-inactive pyramidal cells with CaMPARI2, a genetically encoded activity marker. We then evoked inhibitory responses (IPSCs) from two major interneuron types: parvalbumin-expressing (PV+) interneurons and somatostatin-expressing (SOM+) interneurons. After one training day, PV-mediated inhibition is greater in task-active cells, while SOM-mediated inhibition is not different. These results suggest early changes in PV-mediated inhibition may support motor skill acquisition in mice. Whether PV-mediated inhibitory changes persist or changes in SOM+ interneuron connections arise later in training remains to be tested.

Symmetry in frontal but not motor and somatosensory corticocortical and corticostriatal circuitry.

Neocortex and striatum are topographically organized by cortical areas representing sensory and motor functions, where primary cortical areas are generally used as models for other cortical regions. But different cortical areas are specialized for distinct purposes, with sensory and motor areas lateralized for touch and motor control, respectively. Frontal areas are involved in decision making, where lateralization of function may be less important. This study contrasted the topographic precision of ipsilateral and contralateral projections from cortex based on the injection site location. While sensory cortical areas had strongly topographic outputs to ipsilateral cortex and striatum, they were weaker and not as topographically strong to contralateral targets. Motor cortex had somewhat stronger projections, but still relatively weak contralateral topography. In contrast, frontal cortical areas had high degrees of topographic similarity for both ipsilateral and contralateral projections to cortex and striatum. This contralateral connectivity reflects on the pathways in which corticostriatal computations might integrate input outside closed basal ganglia loops, enabling the two hemispheres to act as a single unit and converge on one result in motor planning and decision making.