Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
In Vivo ; 38(2): 864-872, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recent lung cancer treatments include an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab, platinum-based agents, plus an additional cytotoxic anticancer agent. Nutritional indices, such as the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), are known to correlate with the prognosis of cancer chemotherapy. Several previous studies have investigated the relationship between PNI and treatment response in non-small cell lung cancer patients, reporting significantly increased OS and PFS in the high PNI group before treatment. However, the relationship between the three-drug combination and GNRI/PNI is unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the association of nutritional indices with duration of treatment success and occurrence of side effects in triple therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients with non-small cell lung cancer, treated with combination of carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab from November 2019 to September 30, 2022, were classified into two groups (High and Low) for GNRI and PNI, and a retrospective study was performed. RESULTS: In terms of time-to-treatment-failure (TTF), univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed the Low-PNI group to have significantly shorter TTF than the High-PNI group (p=0.006); multivariate analysis results also showed PNI as a factor affecting TTF (HR=2.791, 95%CI=1.362-5.721, p=0.005). On the other hand, GNRI was not shown to be a factor affecting TTF. CONCLUSION: PNI at the start of treatment was an independent prognostic factor affecting treatment success time (TTF) in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving triple therapy. However, PNI was not shown to be a prognostic predictor of irAE development.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Nutrition Assessment , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
2.
In Vivo ; 38(1): 418-424, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Compared to conventional cytotoxic anticancer agent-based therapy, treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) significantly prolongs overall survival. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) has been used as a new prognostic indicator in cancer. As nutritional status is associated with prognosis and indicates treatment response, we investigated the effect of the pretreatment GNRI on the (1) occurrence of ICI-induced immune-related adverse events (ir-AE) and (2) association with time to treatment failure (TTF) in ICI monotherapy for lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 127 patients with lung cancer who were treated with ICI monotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Based on a cutoff value of 92 for the GNRI, we investigated intergroup differences in the occurrence of adverse events and their association with TTF in the High-GNRI (≥92) and Low-GNRI (<92) groups. For intergroup comparisons, we used the Student's t-test, Welch's t-test, Fisher's direct probability test, and Mann-Whitney's U-test, and factors with p<0.05 in the intergroup comparison were extracted as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Based on the pretreatment GNRI, the median TTF was 5.1 months (95%CI=2.4-7.9 months) in the High-GNRI group and 2.3 months (95%CI=1.6-3.1 months) in the Low-GNRI group, with the High-GNRI group having a significantly longer TTF (p<0.01). The incidence of skin rash (p=0.0129) and pruritus (p<0.01) was significantly higher in the High-GNRI group. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment GNRI influences the continuation of ICI monotherapy. The High-GNRI group demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of skin lesions, which may have influenced the prolongation of TTF.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Nutrition Assessment , Retrospective Studies , Duration of Therapy , Risk Factors , Geriatric Assessment , Prognosis
3.
In Vivo ; 37(6): 2669-2677, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37905656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Osimertinib blood levels and their impact on treatment continuation in patients with EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer is not known. This study investigated the drug blood levels and risk factors affecting treatment continuation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with recurrent and inoperable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer who received Osimertinib (80 mg once daily, daily dose) between October 1, 2016, and August 31, 2021, were included. Patients were classified into two groups using a cutoff blood level of 155 ng/ml. The primary endpoint was the relationship between Osimertinib exposure and efficacy, and secondary endpoints were the relationship between Osimertinib exposure and side effects, and the effect of covariates on efficacy and blood levels. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival (PFS) for evaluable patients in the steady-state trough concentration (Cmin ss) ≥155 ng/ml and Cmin ss <155 ng/ml groups was 18.7 months and 31.2 months. Serum albumin (Alb) levels were 3.73±0.40 g/dl and 3.93±0.28 g/dl (p=0.030), respectively, and in multivariate analysis, Alb <3.7 g/dl was associated with a hazard ratio of 5.304 (95%CI=1.431-19.66; p=0.013), indicating that Alb <3.7 g/dl significantly shortened PFS. CONCLUSION: Free blood concentration of Osimertinib may have been increased by a combination of factors, including decreased hepatic metabolic function and decreased albumin production caused by systemic inflammation in patients with cancer. However, there was no effect of Osimertinib Cmin ss on PFS.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
4.
In Vivo ; 37(5): 2260-2267, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Alectinib is recommended for anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer. We have experienced early alectinib discontinuation due to disease progression and adverse effects in real world. Because alectinib has a high protein-binding rate of >99%, low serum albumin may increase the concentration of free drug and affect efficacy and adverse events. However, no association between serum albumin and the clinical impact of alectinib has been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of serum albumin on time-to-treatment failure (TTF) in alectinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients who were admitted to four hospitals (National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo Minami-Sanjo Hospital, KKR Sapporo Medical Center, Otaru General Hospital) between October 2014 and September 2020 were retrospectively evaluated to identify those treated with alectinib. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis showed that the risk of discontinuation was significantly higher with serum albumin <3.6 g/dl compared to ≥3.6 g/dl at the start of alectinib administration (hazard ratio=3.00; 95% confidence interval=1.36-6.66; p<0.01). On Kaplan-Meier curves, TTF for serum albumin <3.6 was significantly shorter than that for ≥3.6. (median TTF: 12.1 months vs. not reach, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report that serum albumin <3.6 g/dl at alectinib induction is associated with poor TTF. Low serum albumin is a poor prognostic factor in cancer patients. Thus, serum albumin levels must be measured before treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Crizotinib/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Serum Albumin , Time-to-Treatment , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase
5.
In Vivo ; 37(5): 2197-2202, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652497

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Vancomycin (VCM) is an antibiotic widely used in the treatment of resistant bacteria. In patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, the clinical outcome differs according to the VCM minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of isolates. However, the effect of VCM MIC on the clinical outcome is unclear for bacterial species other than MRSA. This study evaluated the relationship between the VCM MIC and clinical outcomes in patients with Enterococcus faecium bacteremia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients who had E. faecium detected in at least one set of blood cultures between April 2011 and March 2022. The study assessed the outcome according to the VCM MIC. The primary outcome was the 30-day mortality rate. Measures of interest included the initial serum concentration of VCM, MIC, the area under the curve (AUC), and the AUC over 24-48 hours (AUC24-48 h). RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were included in the study, of whom 5 died and 21 survived. The 30-day mortality was higher in patients with higher MICs and lower serum albumin levels. Patients with a serum albumin level <2.0 mg/dl and a MIC ≥1 µg/ml had significantly shorter survival than those who did not (p=0.013, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: The 30-day mortality rate of patients with E. faecium bacteremia is associated with the VCM MIC of E. faecium isolates and the patient's nutritional status. Patients with albumin <2 mg/dl and MIC ≥1 µg/ml may have a poor outcome and require careful clinical monitoring.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Enterococcus faecium , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections , Humans , Vancomycin/pharmacology , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/microbiology , Serum Albumin , Treatment Outcome
6.
Infect Dis Rep ; 16(1): 26-34, 2023 Dec 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38247975

ABSTRACT

Carbapenems are antimicrobial agents commonly used to treat extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. Although cefmetazole (CMZ) is considered effective for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) bacteremia, previous studies showed its limitations, including the influence of the initial antimicrobial agent. Here, we examined the effects of different approaches to antimicrobial therapy with CMZ and meropenem (MEPM) on the time to defervescence in ESBL-EC bacteremia. Notably, the influence of previous antimicrobial agents was excluded. Inpatients with ESBL-EC detected in blood cultures between April 2018 and March 2023 were included and assigned to CMZ (n = 14), MEPM (n = 8), de-escalation to CMZ (dCMZ; n = 9), or escalation to MEPM (eMEPM; n = 11) groups. The median time to defervescence was 3.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 days in the CMZ, MEPM, dCMZ, and eMEPM groups, respectively, with no significant differences. Cox proportional hazards analysis showed a significant difference in the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.378 (0.145-0.984) for the time to defervescence with CMZ versus MEPM (p = 0.046). The extent of a delayed time to defervescence is greater with early CMZ administration than with MEPM administration in patients with non-severe ESBL-EC bacteremia.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL