International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024.

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

A comparison of quality-adjusted life years in older adults after heart transplantation versus long-term mechanical support: Findings from the SUSTAIN-IT study.

BACKGROUND: The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) measures disease burden and treatment, combining overall survival and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We estimated QALYs in 3 groups of older patients (60-80 years) with heart failure (HF) who underwent heart transplantation (HT, with pre-transplant mechanical circulatory support [HT MCS] or HT without pre-transplant MCS [HT Non-MCS]) or long-term MCS (destination therapy). We also identified factors associated with gains in QALYs through 24 months follow-up. METHODS: Of 393 eligible patients enrolled (10/1/15-12/31/18) at 13 U.S. sites, 161 underwent HT (n = 68 HT MCS, n = 93 HT Non-MCS) and 144 underwent long-term MCS. Survival and HRQOL data were collected through 24 months. QALY health utilities were based on patient self-report of EQ-5D-3L dimensions. Mean-restricted QALYs were compared among groups using generalized linear models. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, mean age in years closest to surgery was 67 (standard deviation, SD: 4.7), 78% were male, and 83% were White. By 18 months post-surgery, sustained significant differences in adjusted average ± SD QALYs emerged across groups, with the HT Non-MCS group having the highest average QALYs (24-month window: HT Non-MCS = 22.58 ± 1.1, HT MCS = 19.53 ± 1.33, Long-term MCS = 19.49 ± 1.3, p = 0.003). At 24 months post-operatively, a lower gain in QALYs was associated with HT MCS, long-term MCS, a lower pre-operative LVEF, NYHA class III or IV before surgery, and an ischemic or other etiology of HF. CONCLUSIONS: Determination of QALYs may provide important information for policy makers and clinicians to consider regarding benefits of HT and long-term MCS as treatment options for older patients with HF.

Early pandemic in-hospital outcomes and mortality risk factors in COVID-19 solid organ transplant patients.

Background: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of mortality than those without COVID-19. However, it is unclear how SOT patient outcomes compare to the general population without SOT who contract COVID-19. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample from January to December 2020 to investigate inpatient outcomes seen in SOT recipients after contracting COVID-19 compared to nontransplant patients. We identified our study sample using ICD-10 CM and excluded those <18 years of age and those with dual organ transplants. Inpatient outcomes were compared in SOT and non-SOT COVID cohorts, and we further evaluated predictors of mortality in the SOT with COVID population. Results: Out of the 1,416,445 COVID-19 admissions included in the study, 8315 (0.59%) were single SOT recipients. Our analysis that adjusted for multiple baseline characteristics and comorbidities demonstrated that COVID-19 in SOT patients was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-3.02, P < 0.01), lower rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.85, P < 0.01), and similar rates of cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, circulatory shock, cerebrovascular events, and in-hospital mortality. Age >65 was associated with mortality in SOT patients. Conclusion: In this nationally representative sample, SOT patients presenting with COVID-19 experienced similar rates of mortality compared to those without SOT. SOT patients were more likely to develop acute kidney injury. Further research is needed to understand the complex relationship between transplant patient outcomes and COVID-19.