Trends in the incidence, mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with ventricular septal rupture following an ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in outcomes of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), ventricular septal rupture (VSR) remains a known complication, carrying high mortality. The contemporary incidence, mortality, and management of post-STEMI VSR remains unclear. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database (2009-2020) was used to study trends in admissions and outcomes of post-STEMI VSR over time. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates. RESULTS: There were 2 315 186 ±â€…22 888 visits for STEMI with 0.194 ±â€…0.01% experiencing VSR during 2009-2020 in the USA. Patients with VSR were more often older, white, female, and presented with an anterior STEMI; there was no difference in the rates of fibrinolysis. In-hospital mortality was 73.6 ±â€…1.8%, but only 29.2 ±â€…1.9 and 10 ±â€…1.2% received surgical repair and transcatheter repair (TCR), respectively. TCR was associated with higher and surgical repair with lower mortality. Days to surgery were longer for those who survived (5.9 ±â€…2.75) compared with those who died (2.44 ±â€…1). In a multivariable analysis, surgical repair at greater than or equal to day 4 was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.39, 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.88). CONCLUSION: Mortality in post-STEMI VSR remains high with no improvement over time. Most patients are managed conservatively, and the frequency of surgical repair has decreased, while TCR has increased over the study period. Despite design limitations and survival bias, surgical repair at greater than or equal to 4 days was associated with a lower mortality.

Effects of envelopes on cardiac implantable electronic device pocket healing: A head-to-head preclinical evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The healing response to cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation results in inflammation that can lead to fibrous pocket formation, which may disrupt pocket healing or complicate future interventions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess CIED pocket healing with use of the second-generation TYRX absorbable antibacterial envelope (T2), the next-generation (NG) TYRX absorbable antibacterial envelope under development, and the CanGaroo® extracellular matrix envelope (ECM) compared to no envelope. METHODS: A total of 110 CIEDs were implanted in an ovine model, either with (T2, NG, or ECM) or without envelopes. Histopathologic and morphometric analyses were completed at several timepoints after implant (3 days, 7 days, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks). An independent pathologist completed a blinded histopathology assessment of the pockets. RESULTS: TYRX (T2/NG) pockets showed similar inflammatory and healing profiles to controls with more rapid provisional matrix formation compared to controls and ECM. ECM pockets exhibited increased acute (3 and 7 days) and chronic (24 weeks) inflammation. T2/NG had almost complete (T2) or complete (NG) absorption by week 12. ECM remained present at week 24 and was associated with significantly thicker capsules (ECM 0.80 ± 0.14 mm; NG 0.37 ± 0.10 mm; control 0.56 ± 0.17 mm). CONCLUSION: Compared to ECM, pockets with TYRX showed less inflammation, more rapid provisional matrix formation, faster absorption, and thinner capsules. TYRX pockets had low inflammation comparable to controls with accelerated provisional matrix deposition and tissue adhesion. The healing response to CIEDs used with TYRX fosters the formation of a well-healed pocket, which may bring patient benefit beyond its proven infection reduction.

An Unusual Cause of AV Dyssynchrony: Dual AV Node Physiology With Retrograde Decremental Conduction.

A 71-year-old male with persistent atrial fibrillation and a dual chamber permanent pacemaker presented complaining of dyspnea on exertion, easy fatiguability, and intermittent cough. A 12-lead electrocardiogram revealed ventricular paced complexes, native QRS complexes, and irregular atrial activity. Herein we present an unusual mechanism of atrioventricular dyssynchrony. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

A Survey of Antibiotic Use During Insertion of Cardiovascular Implantable Devices Among United States Implanters.

Antibiotic use for cardiovascular implantable devices (CIED) prophylaxis is well-accepted despite a paucity of data. Pre-procedural prophylaxis lowers the rate of CIED infections; however, data is lacking for intra- or post-procedural antibiotic use. Antibiotic-eluting envelopes (ENVELOPE) [TYRX®TM] have been shown to reduce post-procedural infections. Understanding implanter practices may provide insight as to the need for antibiotic stewardship. The purpose of this survey was to assess the practices of implanters nationally. A survey was completed by 150 implanters across the US. Participants were board certificated, implanters of CIEDs, with varying experience (1-25 years), in various hospital settings. Of the respondents, 97% reported routine use of systemic antibiotics pre-operatively. About two-thirds of implanters continue systemic antibiotics post-operatively, with half continuing antibiotics for >24 h; 83% of implanters add antibiotic to saline for the purpose of irrigating the wound; 55% routinely use ENVELOPE on approximately 38% of patients. Common reasons cited for ENVELOPE use were infection concerns, significant risk factors, prior device infection, and immunosuppressed status. Two-thirds of respondents use systemic antibiotics during generator changes, with >50% continuing antibiotics for >24 h. This study suggests wide variations in practice among implanters. Additional attention to existing guidelines and evidence regarding appropriate use of ENVELOPE is still needed.

Racial Disparity Among Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, racial disparities in the utilization of TAVR persist. This meta-analysis attempts to determine whether the prevalence of adverse outcomes (procedure-related complications) represent barriers to the use of TAVR among African Americans (AA). The TAVR cohort consisted of 89.6% Caucasian (C) and 4.7% AA, while the SAVR cohort included 86.9% C and 6.4% AA. The utilization rate (UR) of TAVR was 1.48 and .35 among C and AA, respectively, while the UR of SAVR was 1.44 and .48 among C and AA, respectively. Following TAVR, for AA the odds ratio (OR) was greater for stroke (OR = 1.22, P = .02) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) (OR = 1.57, P < .001) and lower for undergoing the insertion of a permanent pacemaker (OR = .81, P < .001). While there was a significant difference between C and AA in TAVR and SAVR utilization, outcomes between groups following TAVR are comparable; therefore, adverse outcomes do not appear to be a barrier to the use of TAVR among eligible AA.

Disparities in Drug-Eluting Stent Utilization in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

The superiority of drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) is well-established, but data regarding DES use in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) as a function of race is limited. Our goal was to examine stent utilization patterns and disparities based on race, sex, and insurance status in patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The National Inpatient Sample database was used to retrospectively compare DES vs BMS use in patients admitted with STEMI from 2009 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent predictors of DES use. DES utilization increased significantly from 62.8% in 2009 to 94.0% in 2018. However, African Americans were less likely to receive a DES (odds ratio [OR] .82, 95% confidence interval [CI] .77-.87) compared with Caucasians. Women were more likely to undergo DES implantation (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.10). Patients insured by Medicaid (OR .84, 95% CI .80-.89) and those classified as Self-pay (OR .63, 95% CI .61-.66) were less likely to undergo DES implantation compared to those with private insurance (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.29-1.38). Disparities based on race and insurance status continue to persist despite a significant increase in DES utilization in STEMI patients across the identified subgroups.

Sex Disparities in the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis and Related Outcomes: An Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on sex disparities has not been well established. This study sought to examine the impact of sex on outcomes following aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) in the era of routine TAVR. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2009-18) to study AS visits for all AVR and in-hospital outcomes as a function of sex. Survey estimation commands were used to provide national estimates. RESULTS: There were an estimated 431,344 surgical AVR (SAVR) and 189,137 TAVR inpatient visits. Mortality was higher in women after SAVR (3.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.7% ± 0.07, p < 0.001) and TAVR (2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.7% ± 0.1, p < 0.001) compared to men. Female patients undergoing SAVR had higher rates of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, stroke, and bleeding (5.9% ± 0.1 vs. 5% ± 0.1, 2.8% ± 0.1 vs. 2.3% ± 0.07, and 37.8% ± 0.8 vs. 29.8% ± 0.6; p < 0.001, respectively) but lower rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) (16.4% ± 0.3 vs. 20.3% ± 0.3, p < 0.001). Women undergoing TAVR had higher rates of stroke and bleeding (2.4% ± 0.1 vs. 1.6% ± 0.09 and 28.7% ± 0.6 vs. 22% ± 0.5; p < 0.001, respectively) but lower rates of PPM and AKI (9.5% ± 0.3 vs. 10.7% ± 0.2 and 11.3% ± 0.3 vs. 13.4% ± 0.3; p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with isolated SAVR, isolated TAVR was associated with lower mortality in women during 2016-18, both after multivariable adjustment (OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.60) and propensity matching (mean difference 0.66% ± 0.2); however, there was no difference in men. CONCLUSION: Although women continue to have higher in-hospital mortality following both TAVR and SAVR as compared to men, TAVR is associated with a lower in-hospital mortality in women compared to SAVR. Thus, TAVR may represent a potential intervention to narrow the sex-based disparities in the management of AS.

In-Hospital Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement at Transcatheter Valve Implantation Centers.

The availability of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has led to the development of a multidisciplinary team, the "heart team," at institutions offering both TAVI and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Whether this approach has improved in-hospital outcomes in patients who underwent SAVR at institutions offering TAVI versus those not offering TAVI is largely unknown. The National Inpatient Sample (2011 to 2018) was used to study trends in visits for SAVR and in-hospital outcomes at TAVI and non-TAVI centers. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates. There were 559,365 inpatient visits during 2011 to 2018 for aortic valve replacement, with 65.9 ± 0.8% and 34.0 ± 0.8% at TAVI and non-TAVI centers, respectively. Patients who underwent SAVR at TAVI hospitals had more co-morbidities and were less likely to receive mechanical prosthesis (24.7 ± 0.5% vs 35.5 ± 0.6%). Adjusted in-hospital mortality was lower among any SAVR (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.75 to 0.94) and isolated SAVR (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 0.98) recipients at TAVI centers. There was no difference in the incidence of stroke, permanent pacemaker placement, and acute kidney injury after SAVR in TAVI and non-TAVI centers. Although patients who underwent SAVR at TAVI centers had more co-morbidities, in-hospital mortality was lower at TAVI centers than non-TAVI centers. This may be attributable to several factors, including but not limited to experience, resource availability, and operative volumes and the use of the heart team.

Disparity in hospital admissions and length of stay based on income status for emergency department hypertensive crisis visits.

OBJECTIVE: Racial, gender, and socioeconomic status have been shown to impact the delivery of care. How this impacts the management of hypertensive crisis remains unclear. We aim to identify disparities on admission frequency and length of stay (LOS) among those presenting with hypertensive crisis, as a function of household income. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of 2016 emergency department visits and supplemental inpatient data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Median household income quartiles were established. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate odds of admission in each income quartile. A multivariable linear regression model was used to predict LOS. RESULTS: After applying sample weighting, the total number of emergency department visits was 33 727 with 6906, 25 443, and 1378 visits for hypertensive emergency, hypertensive urgency, and unspecified crisis, respectively. There were 13 191, 8889, 6400, 5247 visits in the (first) lowest, second, third , and fourth (highest) income quartiles, respectively. The median age for the study population was 60. The most common comorbidity was chronic kidney disease. Individuals with the highest income, had a lower likelihood of admission, compared with the lowest quartile (adjusted odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.74). There was a significant association between income quartile and LOS among hypertensive emergency patients (beta coefficient: 0.407, P value = 0.019). CONCLUSION: In this study, patients with lower income were more likely to be admitted, whereas those with higher income exhibited a longer LOS. Clinicians must be made aware these disparities to ensure equitable delivery of care.

Contemporary trends and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The choice between a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve in aortic valve replacement (AVR) is based on life expectancy, bleeding risk and comorbidities, since bioprosthetic AVR (bAVR) are associated with a more rapid structural deterioration compared to mechanical AVR (mAVR). The impact of widespread transcatheter valve replacements, on the decision to use bAVR versus mAVR, in the contemporary era and subsequent outcomes remain to be determined. METHODS: The National Inpatient database (2009-2018) was used to study trends in admissions for bAVR and mAVR and in-hospital mortality and outcomes over time. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates. RESULTS: There were 700,896 ± 18,285 inpatient visits for AVR with 70.1% (95% CI 69.2%-71.1%) and 29.9% (95% CI 28.9%-30.8%) visits for bAVR and mAVR, respectively. Those undergoing bAVR were significantly older (bAVR [69.8 years] vs. mAVR [62.7 years] p < .001]. The rates of mAVR decreased across all age groups during the study period (ptrend < .001), including patients ≤50 years (ptrend < .001). In-hospital mortality for mAVR recipients was higher, both after multivariable adjustment (OR 1.35 95% CI 1.26-1.45 p < .001) and propensity matching (mean difference 0.846% ± 0.19%). CONCLUSION: In the contemporary era, the utilization of mAVR has decreased across all age groups, including those younger than 50 years old. Although mAVR recipients were healthier with less comorbidities, inpatient mortality was higher after mAVR compared to bAVR. In addition to understanding causes for higher in-hospital mortality after mAVR, future research should focus on developing transcatheter valve replacement friendly bAVR.

Does One's Socioeconomic Status Predispose to the Development of Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy?

INTRODUCTION: Stress-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) has a higher incidence in Caucasians (CAUCs) compared to African-Americans (AAs). Whether this is due to racial predisposition, selection bias, or environmental factors remains unclear. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that people from lower socioeconomic strata (SES) have a lower incidence of SIC. It is possible that the incidence of SIC could be similar among CAUCs and AAs at the same SES. Stress preconditioning maybe protective in preventing SIC. METHODS: Data of patients with the discharge diagnosis of SIC were extracted from the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System spanning the period from 2006 through 2015. The incidence of SIC among CAUCs and AAs was compared per 100,000 New Jersey population and examined across income brackets. CAUCs and AAs data were compared using two-sample proportion tests. RESULTS: During the study period, CAUCs had an overall higher incidence of SIC compared to AAs, 0.017% versus 0.0084% per 100,000 population (p value <0.0001). This difference persisted after a logistic regression adjustment (p = 0.0064). CAUCs in the income brackets of 30-40k had lower incidence of SIC than those in the 60-80k income bracket (p = 0.0156). Those with an income of 60-80k had lower incidence of SIC compared to those with an income of 80-100k. AAs with income between 30 and 60k had a lower incidence of SIC than CAUCs (p = 0.0330). CONCLUSIONS: CAUCs exhibited a trend towards less SIC as a function of lower income. This was not observed among AAs. AAs had a lower incidence of SIC. Our study suggests that SES has a protective effect among CAUCs.

Utilizing ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring to reduce conduction related death after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the utility of ambulatory cardiac monitoring (ACM) in detecting delayed advanced conduction abnormalities (DACA) and associated 30-day mortality. BACKGROUND: DACA are well-known complications of TAVR and may be associated with post-discharge mortality within 30-days. METHODS: Between October 2019 and October 2020, TAVR patients who were discharged home without a permanent pacemaker (PPM) were monitored with an ACM device for 14-days. The incidence of DACA at follow up, mortality and readmission within 30-days were investigated. The risk of DACA was assessed in three patient categories based on a composite of their 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Group I: Normal pre-TAVR, periprocedural, and discharge ECGs. Group II: Normal pre-TAVR and abnormal subsequent ECGs. Group III. Abnormal baseline and abnormal subsequent ECGs. RESULTS: Among 340 TAVR patients, 248 were discharged home with an ACM device. The overall incidence of DACA was 7% (n = 17), of whom 4% (n = 10) required a PPM. Mortality and readmission between discharge and 30 days was 0% and 8.3%, respectively. Stratification of patients identified 96 (38.7%) patients in Group I: 50 (20%) in Group II, and 102 (41%) in Group III. The incidence of DACA requiring a PPM was 0% in Group I, 4% (n = 2) in Group II, and 8.5% (n = 8) in Group III (p < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In TAVR patients who were discharged home with ACM, none died between discharge and 30-days. For those with normal baseline, perioperative and discharge ECG, there were no events of DACA at 14-days.

Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring Following Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of delayed high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) or complete heart block (CHB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using a minimalist approach followed by ambulatory electrocardiographic (AECG) monitoring. BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the clinical impact of HAVB or CHB in the early period after discharge following TAVR. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted, including 459 consecutive TAVR patients without permanent pacemaker who underwent continuous AECG monitoring for 14 days (median length of hospital stay 2 days; IQR: 1-3 days), using 2 devices (CardioSTAT and Zio AT). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of HAVB or CHB. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 1) no right bundle branch block (RBBB) and no electrocardiographic (ECG) changes; 2) baseline RBBB with no further changes; and 3) new-onset ECG conduction disturbances. RESULTS: Delayed HAVB or CHB episodes occurred in 21 patients (4.6%) (median 5 days postprocedure; IQR: 4-6 days), leading to PPM in 17 (81.0%). HAVB or CHB events were rare in group 1 (7 of 315 [2.2%]), and the incidence increased in group 2 (5 of 38 [13.2%]; P < 0.001 vs group 1) and group 3 (9 of 106 [8.5%]; P = 0.007 vs group 1; P = 0.523 vs group 2). No episodes of sudden or all-cause death occurred at 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic 2-week AECG monitoring following minimalist TAVR detected HAVB and CHB episodes in about 5% of cases, with no mortality at 1 month. Whereas HAVB or CHB was rare in patients without ECG changes post-TAVR, baseline RBBB and new-onset conduction disturbances determined an increased risk. These results would support tailored management using AECG monitoring and the possibility of longer hospitalization periods in patients at higher risk for delayed HAVB or CHB.

Reversible complete heart block in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019.

Patients infected with novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) can present with a variety of arrhythmias. We report an unusual case of reversible complete heart block (CHB) in the setting of acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A 23-year-old male with a history of Hodgkin's Lymphoma presented with dizziness and syncope. He was found to be in CHB associated with hypotension requiring a transvenous pacemaker. Methylprednisolone and remdesivir were started with rapid resolution of the CHB. Further study is needed to determine the mechanism of CHB in COVID-19. This case underscores the importance of including COVID-19 in one's differential diagnosis for acute CHB.

Health and Healthcare Disparities: Impact on Resource Utilization and Costs After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated health and healthcare disparities in the treatment of aortic stenosis with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and how they affect resource utilization and costs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who were discharged alive after TAVR between 2012 and 2017 from the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were stratified by race and outcomes investigated were in-hospital complications, total procedural costs, and resource utilization. High resource utilization (HRU) was defined as length of stay (LOS) ≥7 days or discharge to a nonhome location. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of HRU. RESULTS: TAVR patients (N = 29,464) were stratified into Caucasians (n = 25,691), others (n = 1,274), Hispanics (n = 1,267), and African Americans (AA, n = 1,232). More AA and Hispanics had TAVR at urban teaching centers (P = 0.003) and were less likely to be Medicare beneficiaries (P < 0.001). Distribution of TAVR patients in the lowest income quartile showed AA (50%) versus Caucasian (20%) versus Hispanic (33%, P < 0.001). In-hospital complications were higher among Hispanics and AA than Caucasians with prolonged LOS, procedural costs, and HRU. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of HRU were TAVR year (P < 0.001), advanced age (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), non-Caucasian race (P = 0.038), history of coronary artery bypass grafting (P < 0.001), smoking (P < 0.001), chronic lung disease (P = 0.003), stroke (P < 0.001), and lowest income quartile (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: There exist significant healthcare and health disparities among patients undergoing TAVR in the United States. Consequently, this unequal access to care and determinants of heath translate into higher resource utilization and costs.

Change in Renal Function and Its Impact on Survival in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Bridged to Heart Transplantation With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

The study investigates the incidence of change in renal function and its impact on survival in renal dysfunction patients who were bridged to heart transplantation with a left ventricular assist device (BTT-LVAD). BTT-LVAD patients with greater than or equal to moderately reduced renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) at the time of listing between 2008 and 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained database of the United Network for Organ Sharing. Patients with a baseline eGFR less than or equal to 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 or on dialysis were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups based on percent change ([Pretransplant eGFR - listing eGFR/listing glomerular filtration rate (GFR)] × 100) in eGFR: Improvement greater than or equal to 10%, no change, decline greater than or equal to 10%, and their operative outcomes were compared. Posttransplant survival was estimated and compared among the three groups with the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to identify predictors of posttransplant survival. Out of 14,395 LVAD patients, 1,622 (11%) met the inclusion criteria. At the time of transplant, 900 (55%) had reported an improvement in eGFR greater than or equal to 10%, 436 (27%) had no change, and 286 (18%) experienced a decline greater than or equal to 10%. Postoperatively, the incidence of dialysis was higher in the decline than in the unchanged or improved groups (22% vs. 12% vs. 12%; p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 5 years, there was no difference in posttransplant survival among the stratified groups (improved eGFR: 24.8%, unchanged eGFR: 23.2%, declined eGFR: 20.3%; p = 0.680). On Cox proportional hazard modeling, independent predictors of worse survival were: [hazard ratio: 95% CI; p] history of diabetes (1.43 [1.13-1.81]; p = 0.002) or tobacco use (1.40 [1.11-1.79]; p = 0.005) and ischemic time greater than 4 hours (1.36 [1.03-1.76]; p = 0.027). More than half of the patients with compromised renal function who undergo BTT-LVAD demonstrate an improvement in renal function at the time of transplant. A 10% change in GFR while listed was not associated with worse posttransplant survival.

Racial disparities in the treatment of aortic stenosis: Has transcatheter aortic valve replacement bridged the gap?

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in outcomes and utilization of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) is well known. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become more widespread, its impact on racial disparities remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to assess the utilization of SAVR and TAVR and their clinical outcomes among various racial groups. METHODS: The National Inpatient database (2009-2015) was used to study the racial distribution of admissions for SAVR and TAVR, and their impact on inpatient outcomes. Survey estimation commands were used to determine weighted national estimates. RESULTS: There were 3,445,267; 294,108; and 52,913 inpatient visits for AS, SAVR, and TAVR, respectively. SAVR visits were 86% White, 3.8% Black, 5.5% Hispanic, 1.2% Asian/Pacific Islander (A/PI), 0.4% Native American (NA), and 2.9%; TAVR were 87.7% White, 3.7% Black, 3.8% Hispanic, 1.0% A/PI, 0.2% NA, and 3.5% Other while AS visits were 83.7% White, 6.7% Black, 5.3% Hispanic, 1.7% A/PI, 0.4% NA, and 2.2% Other. Racial minorities generally had more co-morbidities compared with Whites. After SAVR, Black patients had a higher unadjusted inpatient mortality than Whites, however, there was no difference after adjustment for other variables. A/PI were more likely to require a permanent pacemaker after SAVR. Need for blood transfusion was significantly higher among the minorities compared with Whites, except for NA, but there were no racial differences in stroke rates. There was no difference in inpatient mortality, pacemaker implantation, stroke, and bleeding after TAVR, but acute kidney injury occurred more often in Hispanics, A/PI, and "others" compared with Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in the treatment of AS continues in the contemporary era; however it was found that TAVR resulted in comparable inpatient outcomes, despite higher comorbidities, and adverse socioeconomic factors in minorities.

Ultrathin biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus contemporary durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

INTRODUCTION: Improvements in coronary drug-eluting stent technology has focused on reducing the long-term complications associated with the effects of the residual footprint on the vessel wall. Although many of the newer stents have exhibited noninferiority to the durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES), they have yet to exhibit clear superiority. We compared the performance of the latest ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SES) to DP-EES. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases for randomized controlled trials comparing BP-SES to DP-EES. A random effect meta-analysis was performed using the Poisson regression model. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF), a composite of target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI), cardiac death and target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: There was no difference between the stents in stent thrombosis [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.06), TLR (IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.57-1.38), TVMI (IRR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.61-1.01), cardiac death (IRR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.76-1.29) and target vessel failure (IRR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.64-1.06). In addition, there was no difference in TLF (IRR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.64-1.06). There was evidence of reduced TLF in small vessels with BP-SES based on definition used (defined as ≤2.75 mm; IRR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.91 versus ≤3 mm; IRR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90-1.36). CONCLUSION: In our study, the performance of the latest generation BP-SES was comparable to DP-EES but failed to show superiority. The possible benefit in patients with small vessels should be explored future trials.