ABSTRACT
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) exhibits clinical, genetic, and immunohistochemical heterogeneity. However, the differences between primary extranodal or nodal DLBCL and double-expressor lymphoma (DEL), which is characterized by high MYC and BCL2 expression, remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the clinicopathological features, response to therapy, and clinical outcomes of primary extranodal (n=61) and nodal (n=128) DLBCL. Patients with primary nodal DLBCL had higher BCL2 expression than those with extranodal DLBCL (p=0.048), with high MYC expression and DEL as poor prognostic factors. Conversely, in patients with primary extranodal DLBCL, high BCL2 expression, low BCL6 expression, non-germinal center B-cell-like type, and DEL indicated poor prognosis. DEL was significantly associated with progression free survival and overall survival in patients with primary extranodal DLBCL (p=0.014 and p=0.021, respectively) but not in patients with primary nodal DLBCL (p=0.37 and p=0.084, respectively). Our findings highlight primary extranodal DEL as a strong adverse prognostic factor in DLBCL.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is a novel diagnostic tool used to evaluate lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. EPSIS allows the measurement of intragastric pressure (IGP) during gastric insufflation through esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and records its pressure waveform. This study aimed to assess the usefulness and applicability of EPSIS as an adjunct diagnostic modality for achalasia. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted using a database of patients who underwent EGD, barium swallow (BS), high-resolution manometry (HRM), and EPSIS between January 2022 and December 2022. The achalasia (experimental) group (n = 35) consisted of patients with a definitive diagnosis of achalasia. The control group (n = 34) consisted of patients with no abnormalities in EGD, BS, or HRM and no abnormal acid reflux confirmed with 24-h pH-impedance monitoring. EPSIS findings were compared between the two groups and characterized by the waveform pattern (uphill or flat), maximum IGP (IGP-Max), pressure difference, and the gradient of the waveform. RESULTS: All patients in the achalasia group showed an uphill pattern, in contrast to 21 patients (61.8%) in the control group. IGP-Max demonstrated the best diagnostic accuracy for achalasia, with a cut-off value of 15.8 mmHg (100% sensitivity, 58.8% specificity, and area under the curve [AUC] 0.78). The pressure gradient also demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy, with a cut-off value of 0.40 mmHg/s (80% sensitivity, 61.8% specificity, and AUC 0.76). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that EPSIS can be applied as a diagnostic modality in patients with achalasia.
