Lower Hounsfield Units at the Planned Lowest Instrumented Vertebra is an Independent Risk Factor for Complications Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The association of Hounsfield units (HU) and junctional pathologies in adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: Assess if the bone mineral density of the LIV, as assessed by HUs, is prognostic for the risk of complications after ACD surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: HUs were measured on preoperative CT scans. Means comparison test assessed differences in HUs based on the occurrence of complications, linear regression assessed the correlation of HUs with risk factors, and multivariable logistic regression followed by a conditional inference tree derived a threshold for HUs based on the increased likelihood of developing a complication. RESULTS: In all, 107 ACD patients were included. Thirty-one patients (29.0%) developed a complication (18.7% perioperative), with 20.6% developing DJK and 11.2% developing DJF. There was a significant correlation between lower LIVs and lower HUs (r=0.351, P=0.01), as well as age and HUs at the LIV. Age did not correlate with change in the DJK angle (P>0.2). HUs were lower at the LIV for patients who developed a complication and an LIV threshold of 190 HUs was predictive of complications (OR: 4.2, [1.2-7.6]; P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Low bone mineral density at the lowest instrumented vertebra, as assessed by a threshold lower than 190 Hounsfield units, may be a crucial risk factor for the development of complications after cervical deformity surgery. Preoperative CT scans should be routinely considered in at-risk patients to mitigate this modifiable risk factor during surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level-III.

Navigating the complexity of spinal cord injuries with retained foreign bodies and the diagnostic challenge of lead toxicity-a case reportaaa.

INTRODUCTION: Retained shrapnel from gunshots is a common occurrence; however, retained shrapnel within the spinal canal is exceedingly uncommon. Guidelines for removal and treatment of these cases are a difficult topic, as surgical removal is not necessarily without consequence, and retention can lead to possible further injury or a secondary disease process of plumbism, which can be difficult to diagnose in this population. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report provides a unique example of a young patient with retained shrapnel from a gunshot. This patient suffered an initial spinal cord injury due to a gunshot and secondarily presented with abdominal pain, fatigue, elevated blood lead levels, and was diagnosed with plumbism. This was addressed with operative removal of shrapnel and posterior instrumented spinal fusion, resulting in decreased lead levels and symptom resolution postoperatively. DISCUSSION: Lead toxicity risk in patients with retained shrapnel, particularly in the spine, warrants vigilant monitoring. While management guidelines lack consensus, symptomatic lead toxicity may necessitate intervention. Residual neurological deficits complicate evaluation, emphasizing individualized management decisions.

Angioembolization Has Similar Efficacy and Lower Total Charges than Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing in Patients With Pelvic Ring or Acetabulum Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To compare cost, hospital-related outcomes, and mortality between angioembolization (AE) and preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) in the setting of pelvic ring or acetabulum fractures. METHODS: . DESIGN: Retrospective database review. SETTING: National Inpatient Sample, years 2016-2020. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Hospitalized adult patients who underwent AE or PPP in the setting of a pelvic ring or acetabulum fracture. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Mortality and hospital-associated outcomes, including total charges, following AE versus PPP in the setting of pelvic ring or acetabulum fractures. RESULTS: A total of 3780 patients, 3620 undergoing AE and 160 undergoing PPP, were included. No significant differences in mortality, length of stay, time to procedure, or discharge disposition were found ( P > 0.05); however, PPP was associated with significantly greater charges than AE ( P = 0.04). Patients who underwent AE had a mean total charge of $250,062.88 while those undergoing PPP had a mean total charge of $369,137.16. CONCLUSIONS: Despite equivalent clinical efficacy in terms of mortality and hospital-related outcomes, PPP was associated with significantly greater charges than AE in the setting of pelvic ring or acetabulum fractures. This data information can inform clinical management of these patients and assist trauma centers in resource allocation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Geometrical Explanation for Change in Pelvic Tilt (or Lack of Change) Following Long Spinal Fusions.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: Examine the relationship between compensatory pelvic retroversion, positive sagittal imbalance (measured by C2 tilt), and the C2 pelvic angle (C2PA) in patients prior to long spinal fusions; and to determine the association between changes in C2PA and pelvic tilt (PT) following long spinal fusions. BACKGROUND: Adult spinal deformity surgical goals often include a PT target, yet patients frequently demonstrate persistent compensatory pelvic retroversion following surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults>18y undergoing long spinal fusions (>4 levels) with standing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were included. To examine drivers of preoperative sagittal balance, regression models were fit to estimate the association between preoperative C2PA and pelvic incidence, with preoperative PT and C2 tilt. To predict postoperative change in PT, multivariable regression was used to estimate change in PT, adjusting for change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt. RESULTS: Among 80 patients identified, median age was 61 (IQR, 45 to 72) and 46 (58%) were female. Median number of levels fused was 10 (IQR, 8 to 13) and 55 (69%) were instrumented to the sacrum/pelvis. Preoperative C2PA had a significant nonlinear association with preoperative PT (r2=0.81, P<0.001), and preoperative C2 tilt (r2=0.41, P=0.002). Postoperative change in PT was strongly associated with change in C2PA (ß=0.81; P<0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt (ß=0.55; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following long spinal fusions, change in PT (or lack thereof) can be reliably predicted based on change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt. In patients with normal preoperative C2 tilt, the change in C2PA is nearly equivalent to the change in PT, but in patients with more positive C2 tilt (sagittal imbalance), a greater change in C2PA will be required to achieve equivalent change in PT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Stress fractures of the hand and wrist in athletes.

Stress fractures of the upper extremity are reported less often than their lower extremity counterpart. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of an important and often missed diagnosis in pediatric athletes: hand and wrist stress fractures.

Marijuana in Orthopaedics: Effects on Bone Health, Wound-Healing, Surgical Complications, and Pain Management.

¼: Marijuana use is on the rise in the United States, and there is a paucity of information on the effects of cannabis and its chemical constituents on bone health, wound-healing, surgical complications, and pain management. ¼: Current evidence suggests that cannabidiol (CBD) may enhance bone health and metabolism, while Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the major psychoactive component in marijuana, has an inhibitory effect. ¼: Marijuana users are at higher risk for delayed bone-healing, demonstrate lower bone mineral density, are at increased risk for fracture, and may experience postoperative complications such as increased opioid use and hyperemesis.

Guidelines on How to Perform a Systematic Review in Spine Surgery.

Primary literature can be contradictory due to a multitude of factors, including poorly designed studies, error types, and confounding factors, and thus literature reviews can be difficult and time-consuming. Systematic reviews are designed to provide unbiased and comprehensive comparisons of relevant primary studies. This method is considered superior to traditional literature reviews due to the unbiased consideration of a broad number of sources rather than a limited literature review. This article will provide guidance for performing a systematic review, including framing a question, selecting studies with inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluating primary literature, and explaining analysis types.