Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 359
Filter
1.
J Hand Surg Am ; 2024 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39352346

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although metacarpal fractures are typically managed nonoperatively, when surgical management is indicated, metacarpal fractures are commonly treated with crossed Kirschner wires (K-wires), which may limit early range of motion. Intramedullary implants are increasing in use with the potential advantage of early range of motion; however, stability in oblique metacarpal neck fractures remains a theoretical concern. The purpose of this study was to determine the biomechanical stability of noncompressive intramedullary fixation for oblique metacarpal neck fractures compared with crossed K-wire fixation. METHODS: The index, long, and small metacarpals were harvested from three matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadavers. Oblique fractures at the metadiaphyseal region were created in each metacarpal. Each metacarpal was randomized to noncompressive, threaded intramedullary nail fixation or fixation with two crossed K-wires. Specimens were mounted in a Materials Testing System load frame and axially loaded until failure. Load to failure (LTF), stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement were calculated from load-displacement curves. Differences in peak LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm displacement between noncompressive intramedullary fixation and crossed K-wire fixation were evaluated. RESULTS: The noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort had a significantly higher LTF (1,190.9 ± 534.7 N vs 297.0 ± 156.0 N) and stiffness (551.3 ± 164.6 N/mm vs 283.0 ± 194.5 N/mm) when compared with the crossed K-wire fixation cohort. Load at 2 mm displacement was greater in the noncompressive intramedullary fixation cohort compared with crossed K-wire fixation (820.5 ± 203.9 vs 514.1 ± 259.6). CONCLUSIONS: For oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures, noncompressive intramedullary fixation provides a biomechanically superior construct under axial loading in terms of LTF, stiffness, and load to 2 mm of displacement compared with crossed K-wire fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Noncompressive intramedullary nails may be an alternative to K-wire fixation for the treatment of oblique metadiaphyseal metacarpal fractures.

2.
Popul Health Metr ; 22(1): 27, 2024 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39375666

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regional variations in SARS-CoV-2 infection were observed in Canada and other countries. Studies have used multilevel analyses to examine how a context, such as a neighbourhood, can affect the SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of the people within it. However, few multilevel studies have quantified the magnitude of the general contextual effect (GCE) in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates and assessed how it may be associated with individual- and area-level characteristics. To address this gap, we will illustrate the application of the median rate ratio (MRR) in a multilevel Poisson analysis for quantifying the GCE in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, two-level multilevel observational study where individuals were nested into regions (i.e., forward sortation areas [FSAs]). The study population included community-dwelling adults in Ontario, Canada, between March 1, 2020, and May 1, 2021. The model included seven individual-level variables (age, sex, asthma, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and four FSA census-based variables (household size, household income, employment, and driving to work). The MRR is a median value of the rate ratios comparing two patients with identical characteristics randomly selected from two different regions ordered by rate. We examined the attenuation of the MRR after including individual-level and FSA census-based variables to assess their role in explaining the variation in rates between regions. RESULTS: Of the 11 789 128 Ontario adult community-dwelling residents, 343 787 had at least one SARS-CoV-2 infection during the study period. After adjusting for individual-level and FSA census-based variables, the MRR was attenuated to 1.67 (39% reduction from unadjusted MRR). The strongest FSA census-based associations were household size (RR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.71-1.97) and driving to work (RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.65-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The individual- and area-level characteristics in our study accounted for approximately 40% of the between-region variation in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates measured by MRR in Ontario, Canada. These findings suggest that population-based policies to address social determinants of health that attenuate the MRR may reduce the observed between-region heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multilevel Analysis , Population Health , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Ontario/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Residence Characteristics , Young Adult , Socioeconomic Factors
3.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 13(9)2024 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39334991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are difficult to treat and represent a significant burden to the healthcare system. Two-stage revision surgery with placement of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer is currently the gold standard for treatment in the United States for late-onset infections. We evaluate the efficacy of varying doses of vancomycin added to antibiotic-containing acrylic cement spacers and discuss the biomechanical and antimicrobial properties of using high versus low doses of vancomycin in cement spacers in the hip and knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Commercially available Copal cement containing either gentamicin and clindamycin (G + C) or gentamicin and vancomycin (G + V) was prepared with the manual addition of low (2 g) and high (6 g) doses of vancomycin. In vitro mechanical testing was then carried out according to ISO 5833 and DIN 53435, as well as inhibition zone assays against common PJI pathogens. Additionally, inhibition zone assays were conducted on two commercially available prefabricated spacers containing gentamicin: Copal Exchange G and Cemex Spacer-K. RESULTS: In biomechanical testing, Copal G + V with the addition of 6 g of vancomycin failed to meet the ISO standard. Copal G + C and Copal G + V with low and high dosages of vancomycin were all effective against the tested pathogens and displayed constant efficacy for a duration of 42 days. High doses of vancomycin showed significantly lower mechanical stability. Moreover, Copal Exchange G showed significantly larger inhibition zones across 42 days. DISCUSSION: While higher concentrations of vancomycin appear to improve the antimicrobial efficacy of cement, they also reduce its mechanical stability. Despite its smoother surface, the Copal Exchange G spacer exhibits large inhibition zones after 1 day and maintains consistently large inhibition zones over 6 weeks. Thus, it may be preferred for use in two-stage revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Copal Exchange G is more effective than Cemex Spacer K against S. aureus and E. coli. The manual addition of vancomycin to cement containing double antibiotics is very effective. The influence on ISO compression is low, the ISO bending modulus is increased, and ISO bending, DIN bending, and DIN impact, are reduced.

5.
BMJ ; 386: e078243, 2024 09 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260880

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the real world effectiveness of modified vaccinia Ankara-Bavarian Nordic (MVA-BN) vaccine against mpox infection. DESIGN: Emulation of a target trial. SETTING: Linked databases in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 9803 men aged ≥18 years with a history of being tested for syphilis and a laboratory confirmed bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the previous year, or who filled a prescription for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in the previous year. On each day between 12 June 2022 and 27 October 2022, those who had been vaccinated 15 days previously were matched 1:1 with unvaccinated men by age, geographical region, past HIV diagnosis, number of bacterial STI diagnoses in the previous three years, and receipt of any non-MVA-BN vaccine in the previous year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The main outcome measure was vaccine effectiveness ((1-hazard ratio)×100) of one dose of subcutaneously administered MVA-BN against laboratory confirmed mpox infection. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios to compare the rate of laboratory confirmed mpox between the two groups. RESULTS: 3204 men who received the vaccine were matched to 3204 unvaccinated controls. A total of 71 mpox infections were diagnosed, with 0.09 per 1000 person days (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.13) in the vaccinated group and 0.20 per 1000 person days (0.15 to 0.27) in the unvaccinated group over the study period of 153 days. Estimated vaccine effectiveness of one dose of MVA-BN against mpox infection was 58% (95% CI 31% to 75%). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study, conducted in the context of a targeted vaccination programme and evolving outbreak of mpox, suggest that one dose of MVA-BN is moderately effective in preventing mpox infection.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Vaccine Efficacy , Adolescent , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Ontario/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control
6.
Hand (N Y) ; : 15589447241279458, 2024 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39324747

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The concordance between patient and physician goals has been associated with improved outcomes in many chronic diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between goal concordant care, patient satisfaction, and patient experience and to analyze factors associated with goal concordant care in hand and upper extremity surgery. METHODS: New patients who were 18 years or older were invited to participate. Goal concordant care was defined as the patient's previsit treatment goal matching the primary treatment received. The χ2 tests were used to evaluate the association between goal concordant care and patient satisfaction and patient experience. We conducted univariable logistic regression to evaluate variables for their association with concordance and multivariable logistic regression for variables that were significantly associated in the initial analyses to evaluate their aggregate influence on concordance. RESULTS: In total, 169 patients enrolled. The rate of goal concordant care was 62%; concordance was not associated with patient satisfaction or experience. Age, sex, English proficiency, health literacy, education level, employment and relationship status, pain self-efficacy, symptom duration, functional disability, and patient-centered decision-making were not associated with concordant care. Patients with annual income less than $50,000 had significantly higher odds of goal discordant care. CONCLUSION: Patients with lower income had more than 3 times the odds of receiving discordant care. However, discordant care was not associated with patient satisfaction or experience. Further studies on other pertinent outcomes are needed in orthopedic surgery (eg, treatment adherence). Known care disparities based on socioeconomic status may be mediated through care discordance and should be investigated.

7.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e45513, 2024 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190434

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) emerged and rapidly replaced the original strain worldwide. The increased transmissibility of these new variants led to increases in infections, hospitalizations, and mortality. However, there is a scarcity of retrospective investigations examining the severity of all the main VOCs in presence of key public health measures and within various social determinants of health (SDOHs). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide a retrospective assessment of the clinical severity of COVID-19 VOCs in the context of heterogenous SDOHs and vaccination rollout. METHODS: We used a population-based retrospective cohort design with data from the British Columbia COVID-19 Cohort, a linked provincial surveillance platform. To assess the relative severity (hospitalizations, intensive care unit [ICU] admissions, and deaths) of Gamma, Delta, and Omicron infections during 2021 relative to Alpha, we used inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazard modeling. We also conducted a subanalysis among unvaccinated individuals, as assessed severity differed across VOCs and SDOHs. RESULTS: We included 91,964 individuals infected with a SARS-CoV-2 VOC (Alpha: n=20,487, 22.28%; Gamma: n=15,223, 16.55%; Delta: n=49,161, 53.46%; and Omicron: n=7093, 7.71%). Delta was associated with the most severe disease in terms of hospitalization, ICU admissions, and deaths (hospitalization: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.00, 95% CI 1.92-2.08; ICU: aHR 2.05, 95% CI 1.91-2.20; death: aHR 3.70, 95% CI 3.23-4.25 relative to Alpha), followed generally by Gamma and then Omicron and Alpha. The relative severity by VOC remained similar in the unvaccinated individual subanalysis, although the proportion of individuals infected with Delta and Omicron who were hospitalized was 2 times higher in those unvaccinated than in those fully vaccinated. Regarding SDOHs, the proportion of hospitalized individuals was higher in areas with lower income across all VOCs, whereas among Alpha and Gamma infections, 2 VOCs that cocirculated, differential distributions of hospitalizations were found among racially minoritized groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides robust severity estimates for all VOCs during the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada. Relative to Alpha, we found Delta to be the most severe, followed by Gamma and Omicron. This study highlights the importance of targeted testing and sequencing to ensure timely detection and accurate estimation of severity in emerging variants. It further sheds light on the importance of vaccination coverage and SDOHs in the context of pandemic preparedness to support the prioritization of allocation for resource-constrained or minoritized groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , British Columbia/epidemiology , Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Adolescent , Social Determinants of Health , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data
8.
Viruses ; 16(8)2024 Jul 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39205198

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) has set hepatitis C (HCV) elimination targets for 2030. Understanding existing gaps in the "HCV care-cascade" is essential for meeting these targets. We aimed to identify the level of service scale-up needed along the "HCV care-cascade" to achieve the WHO's HCV elimination targets in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: By employing a decision analytic model, we projected the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and healthcare costs for individuals with HCV in Ontario. We increased RNA testing and treatment rates to 98%, followed by increasing antibody testing uptake until we achieved the WHO's mortality target (i.e., a 65% reduction in liver-related mortality by 2030 vs. 2015). RESULTS: Without scaling up by 2030, the expected QALYs and costs per person were 9.156 and CAD 48,996, respectively. Improved RNA testing and treatment rates reduced liver-related deaths to 3.3/100,000, a 57% reduction from 2015. Further doubling the antibody testing rates can achieve the WHO's mortality target in 2035, but not in 2030. Compared to the status quo, such program would be cost-effective considering a 50,000 CAD/QALY gained threshold if annual implementation costs stayed under 2.3 M CAD/100,000 people. CONCLUSIONS: Doubling the antibody testing rates, along with increased RNA testing and treatment rates, showed promise in meeting the WHO's goals by 2035.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C , World Health Organization , Humans , Ontario/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Health Care Costs , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hepacivirus/genetics , Female , Male , Disease Eradication/methods , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Adult
9.
Can J Public Health ; 2024 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39168962

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Characterizing the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in children is needed to optimize the COVID-19 public health response. We quantified the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection-acquired antibodies and vaccine-acquired antibodies among children receiving primary care in Toronto, Canada. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal cohort study between January 2021 and November 2022 in healthy children aged 0-16 years receiving primary care in Toronto. The primary and secondary outcomes were seroprevalence of SARS-COV-2 infection-acquired antibodies and vaccine-acquired antibodies ascertained from finger-prick dried blood spots. Samples were tested using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies to full-length spike trimer and nucleocapsid. We explored sociodemographic differences with Firth's penalized generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Of the 475 participants, 50.1% were girls and mean age was 6.4 years (SD = 3.2). We identified 103 children seropositive for infection-acquired antibodies, with a crude seroprevalence that rose from 2.6% (95%CI 1.39-4.92) from January to July 2021 to 50.7% (95%CI 39.5-61.8) by July to November 2022. Seroprevalence of vaccine-acquired antibodies was 45.2% by July to November 2022 (95%CI 34.3-56.58). No differences in sociodemographic factors (age, sex, income, or ethnicity) were identified for infection-acquired antibodies; however, children with vaccine-acquired antibodies were more likely to be older, have mothers with university education, and have mothers who had also been vaccinated. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a benchmark for seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in children in Toronto. Ongoing monitoring of the serological status of children is important, particularly with the emergence of new variants of concern, low vaccine coverage, and discontinuation of PCR testing.


RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Caractériser la séroprévalence des anticorps du SRAS-CoV-2 chez les enfants est nécessaire pour optimiser la réponse de santé publique à COVID-19. Nous avons quantifié la séroprévalence des anticorps acquis par l'infection au SRAS-CoV-2 et des anticorps acquis par le vaccin chez les enfants recevant des soins primaires à Toronto, au Canada. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte longitudinale entre janvier 2021 et novembre 2022 auprès d'enfants en bonne santé âgés de 0 à 16 ans recevant des soins primaires à Toronto. Les résultats principaux et secondaires étaient la séroprévalence des anticorps acquis par l'infection du SRAS-CoV-2 et des anticorps acquis par le vaccin déterminés à partir de taches de sang séché par piqûre au doigt. Les échantillons ont été testés à l'aide d'un test immuno-enzymatique pour détecter les anticorps dirigés contre le trimère de pointe complet et la nucléocapside. Nous avons exploré les différences sociodémographiques à l'aide des équations d'estimation généralisées pénalisées de Firth. RéSULTATS: Sur les 475 participants, 50,1 % étaient des filles et l'âge moyen était de 6,4 ans (ET = 3,2). Nous avons identifié 103 enfants séropositifs aux anticorps acquis lors d'une infection, avec une séroprévalence non ajusté qui est passée de 2,6 % (IC 95% : 1,39­4,92) de janvier à juillet 2021 à 50,7 % (IC 95% : 39,5­61,8) de juillet à novembre 2022. La séroprévalence des anticorps acquis par le vaccin était de 45,2 % de juillet à novembre 2022 (IC à 95% : 34,3­56,58). Aucune différence dans les facteurs sociodémographiques (âge, sexe, revenu ou appartenance ethnique) n'a été identifiée pour les anticorps acquis lors d'une infection; cependant, les enfants avec des anticorps acquis par le vaccin étaient plus susceptibles d'être plus âgés, d'avoir des mères ayant fait des études universitaires et d'avoir des mères également vaccinées. CONCLUSION: Nos résultats fournissent une référence pour la séroprévalence des anticorps du SRAS-CoV-2 chez les enfants de Toronto. La surveillance continue du statut sérologique des enfants est importante, en particulier avec l'émergence de nouveaux variants préoccupants, la faible couverture vaccinale et l'arrêt des tests PCR.

10.
J Infect Dis ; 230(1): e80-e92, 2024 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39052720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials conducted in low- and middle-income settings demonstrated efficacy of influenza vaccination during pregnancy against influenza infection among infants <6 months of age. However, vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimates from settings with different population characteristics and influenza seasonality remain limited. METHODS: We conducted a test-negative study in Ontario, Canada. All influenza virus tests among infants <6 months from 2010 to 2019 were identified and linked with health databases to ascertain information on maternal-infant dyads. VE was estimated from the odds ratio for influenza vaccination during pregnancy among cases versus controls, computed using logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 23 806 infants tested for influenza, 1783 (7.5%) were positive and 1708 (7.2%) were born to mothers vaccinated against influenza during pregnancy. VE against laboratory-confirmed infant influenza infection was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-74%). VE was similar by trimester of vaccination (first/second, 66% [95% CI, 40%-80%]; third, 63% [95% CI, 46%-74%]), infant age at testing (0 to <2 months, 63% [95% CI, 46%-75%]; 2 to <6 months, 64% [95% CI, 36%-79%]), and gestational age at birth (≥37 weeks, 64% [95% CI, 50%-75%]; < 37 weeks, 61% [95% CI, 4%-86%]). VE against influenza hospitalization was 67% (95% CI, 50%-78%). CONCLUSIONS: Influenza vaccination during pregnancy offers effective protection to infants <6 months, for whom vaccines are not currently available.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Vaccination , Vaccine Efficacy , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Female , Pregnancy , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Ontario/epidemiology , Infant , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Male , Adult , Seasons , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Young Adult
11.
Int J Epidemiol ; 53(4)2024 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38961644

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have linked fine particulate matter (PM2.5) to increased cardiovascular mortality. Less is known how the PM2.5-cardiovascular mortality association varies by use of cardiovascular medications. This study sought to quantify effect modification by statin use status on the associations between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and mortality from any cardiovascular cause, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke. METHODS: In this nested case-control study, we followed 1.2 million community-dwelling adults aged ≥66 years who lived in Ontario, Canada from 2000 through 2018. Cases were patients who died from the three causes. Each case was individually matched to up to 30 randomly selected controls using incidence density sampling. Conditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for the associations between PM2.5 and mortality. We evaluated the presence of effect modification considering both multiplicative (ratio of ORs) and additive scales (the relative excess risk due to interaction, RERI). RESULTS: Exposure to PM2.5 increased the risks for cardiovascular, CHD, and stroke mortality. For all three causes of death, compared with statin users, stronger PM2.5-mortality associations were observed among non-users [e.g. for cardiovascular mortality corresponding to each interquartile range increase in PM2.5, OR = 1.042 (95% CI, 1.032-1.053) vs OR = 1.009 (95% CI, 0.996-1.022) in users, ratio of ORs = 1.033 (95% CI, 1.019-1.047), RERI = 0.039 (95% CI, 0.025-0.050)]. Among users, partially adherent users exhibited a higher risk of PM2.5-associated mortality than fully adherent users. CONCLUSIONS: The associations of chronic exposure to PM2.5 with cardiovascular and CHD mortality were stronger among statin non-users compared to users.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Particulate Matter , Humans , Particulate Matter/adverse effects , Particulate Matter/analysis , Male , Aged , Female , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Ontario/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Aged, 80 and over , Coronary Disease/mortality , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Logistic Models , Risk Factors , Independent Living , Odds Ratio
12.
Vaccine ; 42(23): 126058, 2024 Oct 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879407

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical care shifted toward virtual and Emergency Department care. We explored the feasibility of mRNA vaccine effectiveness (VE) estimation against SARS-CoV-2-related Emergency Department visits and hospitalizations using prospectively collected Emergency Department data. METHODS: We estimated two-dose VE using a test-negative design and data from 10 participating sites of the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN). We included Emergency Department patients presenting with COVID-19 symptoms and nucleic acid amplification testing for SARS-CoV-2 between July 19 and December 31, 2021. We excluded patients with unclear vaccination and one or more than 2 vaccine doses by their Emergency Department visit. RESULTS: Among 3,405 eligible patients, adjusted two-dose mRNA VE against SARS-CoV-2-related Emergency Department visits was 93.3 % (95 % CI 87.9-96.3 %) between 7-55 days, sustained over 80 % through 139 days post-vaccination. In stratified analyses, VE was similar among patients with select immune-compromising conditions, chronic kidney disease, lung disease, unstable housing, and reported illicit substance use. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dose mRNA VE against SARS-CoV-2-related Emergency Department visit was high and sustained, including among vulnerable subgroups. Compared to administrative datasets, active Emergency Department enrolment enables standardization for testing access and indication and supports separate VE assessment among special population subgroups. Compared to other active enrolment settings, Emergency Departments more consistently function during crises when alternate healthcare sectors become variably closed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT0470294.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Emergency Service, Hospital , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccine Efficacy , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Aged , Young Adult , Adolescent , Vaccination/methods , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
13.
Pharmacotherapy ; 44(5): 354-359, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853605

ABSTRACT

Treatment options are currently limited for persons with HIV-1 (PWH) who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. Three agents have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2018, representing a significant advancement for this population: ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir. However, there is a paucity of recommendations endorsed by national and international guidelines describing the optimal use (e.g., selection and monitoring after initiation) of these novel antiretrovirals in this population. To address this gap, a modified Delphi technique was used to develop these consensus recommendations that establish a framework for initiating and managing ibalizumab, fostemsavir, or lenacapavir in PWH who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. In addition, future areas of research are also identified and discussed in the main document.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Humans , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Consensus , Delphi Technique , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Organophosphates , Piperazines , United States , Practice Guidelines as Topic
14.
Pharmacotherapy ; 44(5): 360-382, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38853601

ABSTRACT

Treatment options are currently limited for persons with HIV-1 (PWH) who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. Three agents have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2018, representing a significant advancement for this population: ibalizumab, fostemsavir, and lenacapavir. However, there is a paucity of recommendations endorsed by national and international guidelines describing the optimal use (e.g., selection and monitoring after initiation) of these novel antiretrovirals in this population. To address this gap, a modified Delphi technique was used to develop these consensus recommendations that establish a framework for initiating and managing ibalizumab, fostemsavir, or lenacapavir in PWH who are heavily treatment-experienced and/or have multidrug-resistant HIV-1. In addition, future areas of research are also identified and discussed.


Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Humans , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , United States , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Organophosphates , Piperazines
15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2416077, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861259

ABSTRACT

Importance: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) transmission was disrupted worldwide following the COVID-19 pandemic, and further study is required to better understand these changes. Objective: To compare observed and expected RSV hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates and characteristics of admitted children during the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 seasons. Design, Setting, and Participants: A population-based cohort study of all children aged younger than 5 years in Ontario, Canada, July 1, 2017, through March 31, 2023, was conducted. Exposures: Individual and neighborhood-level sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified from administrative data, including age, palivizumab eligibility, complex medical conditions, rurality, and living in a marginalized neighborhood. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was RSV-associated hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included ICU admissions, mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and in-hospital death. Poisson generalized estimating equations were used to model weekly age- and sex-specific hospitalization rates and estimate expected rates in the postpandemic era; adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs are reported. Results: This cohort study included approximately 700 000 children per study year. Compared with prepandemic years (2017-2018, 2018-2019, and 2019-2020), the 2021-2022 RSV season peaked slightly earlier, but overall admission rates were comparable (289.1 vs 281.4-334.6 per 100 000, or approximately 2000 admissions). The 2022-2023 season peaked a month earlier and resulted in more than twice as many hospitalizations (770.0 per 100 000; n = 4977 admissions). The proportion of children admitted to an ICU in 2022-2023 (13.9%) was slightly higher than prepandemic (9.6%-11.4%); however, the population-based rate was triple the prepandemic levels (106.9 vs 27.6-36.6 per 100 000 children in Ontario). With the exception of palivizumab-eligible children, all sociodemographic and health status characteristics were associated with lower-than-expected RSV hospitalization rates in 2021-2022. In contrast, older age of patients was associated with higher-than-expected rates in 2022-2023 (ie, 24-59 months: RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.35-2.66). Conclusions and Relevance: There were notable differences in RSV epidemiologic characteristics in Ontario following the COVID-19 pandemic. It is not yet clear whether and how long atypical RSV epidemics may persist. Clinicians and program planners should consider the potential for ongoing impacts to health care capacity and RSV immunization programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Humans , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Infant , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Ontario/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Infant, Newborn , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Palivizumab/therapeutic use
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 79(2): 375-381, 2024 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700036

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination has been associated with reduced outpatient antibiotic prescribing among older adults with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We assessed the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on outpatient antibiotic prescribing in the broader population of older adults, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection status. METHODS: We included adults aged ≥65 years who received their first, second, and/or third COVID-19 vaccine dose from December 2020 to December 2022. We used a self-controlled risk-interval design and included cases who received an antibiotic prescription 2-6 weeks before vaccination (pre-vaccination or control interval) or after vaccination (post-vaccination or risk interval). We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds of being prescribed (1) any antibiotic, (2) a typical "respiratory" infection antibiotic, or (3) a typical "urinary tract" infection antibiotic (negative control) in the post-vaccination interval versus the pre-vaccination interval. We accounted for temporal changes in antibiotic prescribing using background monthly antibiotic prescribing counts. RESULTS: 469 923 vaccine doses met inclusion criteria. The odds of receiving any antibiotic or a respiratory antibiotic prescription were lower in the post-vaccination versus pre-vaccination interval (aOR, .973; 95% CI, .968-.978; aOR, .961; 95% CI, .953-.968, respectively). There was no association between vaccination and urinary antibiotic prescriptions (aOR, .996; 95% CI, .987-1.006). Periods with high (>10%) versus low (<5%) SARS-CoV-2 test positivity demonstrated greater reductions in antibiotic prescribing (aOR, .875; 95% CI, .845-.905; aOR, .996; 95% CI, .989-1.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with reduced outpatient antibiotic prescribing in older adults, especially during periods of high SARS-CoV-2 circulation.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Aged , Male , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data
17.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 189, 2024 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38816836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is an incomplete understanding of the full safety profiles of repeated COVID-19 vaccinations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Among individuals with IBD, we assessed whether COVID-19 vaccines were associated with serious adverse events of special interest (AESI) and health care utilization [all-cause hospitalizations, Emergency Department (ED) visits, gastroenterology visits, IBD-related visits]. METHODS: Using comprehensive administrative health data from Ontario, Canada, adults with IBD who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine from December 2020-January 2022 were included. Self-controlled case series analyses were conducted to evaluate the relative incidence rates of AESI and health care utilization outcomes across post-vaccination risk and control periods. RESULTS: Among 88,407 IBD patients, 99.7% received mRNA vaccines and 75.9% received ≥ 3 doses. Relative to control periods, we did not detect an increase in AESI. IBD patients had fewer all-cause hospitalizations during post-vaccination risk periods. Patients experienced more all-cause ED visits after dose 2 [Relative Incidence (RI):1.08(95%CI:1.04-1.12)] but fewer visits after doses 3 [RI:0.85 (95%CI:0.81-0.90)] and 4 [RI:0.73 (95%CI:0.57-0.92)]. There was no increase in gastroenterologist visits or IBD-related health care utilization post-vaccination. There were fewer IBD-related hospitalizations after dose 1 [RI:0.84 (95%CI:0.72-0.98)] and 3 [RI:0.63 (95%CI:0.52-0.76)], fewer IBD-related ED visits after dose 3 [RI:0.81 (95%CI:0.71-0.91)] and 4 [RI:0.55 (95%CI:0.32-0.96)], and fewer outpatient visits after dose 2 [RI:0.91 (95%CI:0.90-0.93)] and 3 [RI:0.87 (95%CI:0.86-0.89)]. CONCLUSION: This population-based study did not detect increased AESI, all-cause or IBD-related health care utilization following COVID-19 vaccination, suggesting a lack of association between vaccination and increased disease activity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Ontario/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/adverse effects
18.
CMAJ ; 196(13): E432-E440, 2024 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38589026

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Variations in primary care practices may explain some differences in health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to evaluate the characteristics of primary care practices by the proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional cohort study using linked administrative data sets in Ontario, Canada. We calculated the percentage of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 enrolled with each comprehensive-care family physician, ranked physicians according to the proportion of patients unvaccinated, and identified physicians in the top 10% (v. the other 90%). We compared characteristics of family physicians and their patients in these 2 groups using standardized differences. RESULTS: We analyzed 9060 family physicians with 10 837 909 enrolled patients. Family physicians with the largest proportion (top 10%) of unvaccinated patients (n = 906) were more likely to be male, to have trained outside of Canada, to be older, and to work in an enhanced fee-for-service model than those in the remaining 90%. Vaccine coverage (≥ 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine) was 74% among patients of physicians with the largest proportion of unvaccinated patients, compared with 87% in the remaining patient population. Patients in the top 10% group tended to be younger and live in areas with higher levels of ethnic diversity and immigration and lower incomes. INTERPRETATION: Primary care practices with the largest proportion of patients unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 served marginalized communities and were less likely to use team-based care models. These findings can guide resource planning and help tailor interventions to integrate public health priorities within primary care practices.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Male , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Physicians, Family , Ontario/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Primary Health Care
19.
Heliyon ; 10(5): e26551, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38439866

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare myocarditis/pericarditis risk after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination versus SARS-CoV-2 infection, and to assess if myocarditis/pericarditis risk varies by vaccine dosing interval. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we used linked databases in Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia between January 26, 2020, and September 9, 2021. We included individuals aged 12 or above who received an mRNA vaccine as the second dose or were SARS-CoV-2-positive by RT-PCR. The outcome was hospitalization/emergency department visit for myocarditis/pericarditis within 21 days of exposure. We calculated age- and sex-stratified incidence ratios (IRs) of myocarditis/pericarditis following mRNA vaccination versus SARS-CoV-2 infection. We also calculated myocarditis/pericarditis incidence by vaccine type, homologous/heterologous schedule, and dosing interval. We pooled province-specific estimates using meta-analysis. Results: Following 18,860,817 mRNA vaccinations and 860,335 SARS-CoV-2 infections, we observed 686 and 160 myocarditis/pericarditis cases, respectively. Myocarditis/pericarditis incidence was lower after vaccination than infection (IR [BNT162b2/SARS-CoV-2], 0.14; 95%CI, 0.07-0.29; IR [mRNA-1273/SARS-CoV-2], 0.28; 95%CI, 0.20-0.39). Within the vaccinated cohort, myocarditis/pericarditis incidence was lower with longer dosing intervals; IR (56 or more days/15-30 days) was 0.28 (95%CI, 0.19-0.41) for BNT162b2 and 0.26 (95%CI, 0.18-0.38) for mRNA-1273. Conclusion: Myocarditis/pericarditis risk was lower after mRNA vaccination than SARS-CoV-2 infection, and with longer intervals between primary vaccine doses.

20.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 2024: 5573068, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38434933

ABSTRACT

Background: Data on the economic burden of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) among immigrants are limited. Our objective was to estimate the CHC-attributable mortality and healthcare costs among immigrants in Ontario, Canada. Methods: We conducted a population-based matched cohort study among immigrants diagnosed with CHC between May 31, 2003, and December 31, 2018, using linked health administrative data. Immigrants with CHC (exposed) were matched 1 : 1 to immigrants without CHC (unexposed) using a combination of hard (index date, sex, and age) and propensity-score matching. Net costs (2020 Canadian dollars) collected from the healthcare payer perspective were calculated using a phase-of-care approach and used to estimate long-term costs adjusted for survival. Results: We matched 5,575 exposed individuals with unexposed controls, achieving a balanced match. The mean age was 47 years, and 52% was male. On average, 10.5% of exposed and 3.5% of unexposed individuals died 15 years postindex (relative risk = 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.6-3.5). The net 30-day costs per person were $88 (95% CI: 55 to 122) for the prediagnosis, $324 (95% CI: 291 to 356) for the initial phase, $1,016 (95% CI: 900 to 1,132) for the late phase, and $975 (95% CI: -25 to 1,974) for the terminal phase. The mean net healthcare cost adjusted for survival at 15 years was $90,448. Conclusions: Compared to unexposed immigrants, immigrants infected with CHC have higher mortality rates and greater healthcare costs. These findings will support the planning of HCV elimination efforts among key risk groups in the province.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Hepatitis C , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Cohort Studies , Hepacivirus , Health Care Costs , Ontario/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL