Multidrug resistant bacteremia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia become fearsome in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. AIM: Our purpose was to investigate the prevalence of MDR bacteremia in HSCT recipients at the Tunisian National Bone Marrow Transplant Center, associated factors and attributable mortality rate. METHODS: Our retrospective study (January 2010-December 2017) included all MDR bacteremia in the Hematology department. MDR rods were: extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii resistant to at least three families of antibiotics, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin resistant E. faecium (VRE). RESULTS: The prevalence of MDR bacteremia among HSCT recipients was 5.9% (48/816) with a stable trend over time (rs=0.18). Neutropenia, prior hospitalization, prior antibiotherapy and prior colonization with MDR pathogens were observed in 59%, 58%, 48% and 31% of cases, respectively. Imipenem was the most prescribed first-line antibiotic (50%). The attributable mortality rate was 13%. MDR bacteria (n=48) belonged to ESBL-E (60%), P. aeruginosa (19%), A. baumannii (13%), MRSA (4%) and VRE (4%). For ESBL-E and P. aeruginosa, the rates of antibiotic resistance were respectively, 17% and 44% to imipenem, 31% and 56% to amikacin and 15% and 0% to colistin. Strains of A. baumannii were susceptible only to colistin. The MRSA (n=2) were resistant to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin and susceptible to glycopeptides. The VRE (n=2) were susceptible to linezolid and tigecycline. CONCLUSION: Low prevalence of MDR bacteremia in HSCT recipients but high attributable mortality rate, requiring reinforcement of hygiene measures.

Prevalence of healthcare-associated infections at a Tunisian onco-hematology ward.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are with high rates of mortality and an additional cost, in onco-hematology patients. AIM: To assess the prevalence trends of HAIs in the onco-hematology ward of the Tunisian National Bone Marrow Transplant Center (NBMTC), and to determine the principal associated risk factors. METHODS: Six repeated point prevalence surveys were conducted, from May 2018 to March 2019, using a two months interval. All patients hospitalized in the day of the survey were included. Risk factors of HAIs were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). They were assessed using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Nineteen patients out of a total of 74 patients have been diagnosed with 19 HAIs, representing a prevalence of 25.7%. No significant downward or upward trend of prevalence was revealed over time (p=0.3). The most common HAI was respiratory tract infection (57.9%) with a prevalence of 14.9%. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that HAI was significantly associated with neutropenia (Adjusted OR: 14; 95% CI: 1.5-127; p=0.01) and duration of central venous catheter (Adjusted OR: 1.1; 95% CI: 1-1.2; p=0.005). CONCLUSION: High prevalence of HAIs in our center with a high rate of mortality, requiring identifying potential problems in infection control practices.

[Tunisian National Protocol for Adult Hodgkin's Lymphoma Treatment: Results of a therapeutic regimen adapted to the 2-cycle CT response, about 444 patients]. / Protocole national Tunisien prospectif de traitement du Lymphome de Hodgkin de l'adulte : résultats d'un schéma thérapeutique adapté à la réponse par tomodensitométrie à 2 cycles, à propos de 444 patients.

OBJECTIVE: In Tunisia, the management of Adult Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) has been standardized since 1999. We propose in this study to report the therapeutic results of the national protocol of adult HL treatment (MDH2008). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study is prospective multicenter interesting 444 patients followed for HL between July 2008 and June 2013 and treated according to the MDH2008 protocol. The median age of our patients was 30 years. B symptoms were present in 62.8 % of our patients. According to the Ann Arbor classification, our patients were in stages I, II, III and IV in 3 %, 42 %, 26 % and 29 %, respectively. The MDH2008 protocol is based on a strategy adapted to the therapeutic response to 2 cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Response≥75 % to 2 courses of chemotherapy was achieved in 43 % of patients and the response rate at the end of treatment was 92.1 %. Forty-eight patients (11.4 %) had primary failure. In the multi-variant study, bulky mediastinal mass (IMT≥0.35) was an independent predictive factor of primary failure (P: 0.000). Nineteen toxic deaths (4.35 %) were reported. The relapse rate was 7.8 %. Event free survival, relapse-free survival and overall survival at 5years were 75 %, 89 % and 90 %, respectively. Adaptation of the treatment to the 2 cycles response was effective in unfavorable early stages and advanced stages. CONCLUSION: Compared to MDH2002 (second version of Tunisian prospective protocol), the MDH2008 reduced the primary failure rate, the rate of toxic deaths with escalated BEACOPP and the rate of relapse in Tunisian patients.