Could Digital PCR Be an Alternative as a Non-Invasive Prenatal Test for Trisomy 21: A Proof of Concept Study.

OBJECTIVE: NIPT for fetal aneuploidy by digital PCR has been hampered by the large number of PCR reactions needed to meet statistical requirements, preventing clinical application. Here, we designed an octoplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay which allows increasing the number of available targets and thus overcomes statistical obstacles. METHOD: After technical optimization of the multiplex PCR on mixtures of trisomic and euploid DNA, we performed a validation study on samples of plasma DNA from 213 pregnant women. Molecular counting of circulating cell-free DNA was performed using a mix of hydrolysis probes targeting chromosome 21 and a reference chromosome. RESULTS: The results of our validation experiments showed that ddPCR detected trisomy 21 even when the sample's trisomic DNA content is as low as 5%. In a validation study of plasma samples from 213 pregnant women, ddPCR discriminated clearly between the trisomy 21 and the euploidy groups. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that digital PCR can meet the requirements for non-invasive prenatal testing of trisomy 21. This approach is technically simple, relatively cheap, easy to implement in a diagnostic setting and compatible with ethical concerns regarding access to nucleotide sequence information. These advantages make it a potential technique of choice for population-wide screening for trisomy 21 in pregnant women.

3D-FISH analysis reveals chromatid cohesion defect during interphase in Roberts syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Roberts syndrome (RBS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder mainly characterized by growth retardation, limb defects and craniofacial anomalies. Characteristic cytogenetic findings are "railroad track" appearance of chromatids and premature centromere separation in metaphase spreads. Mutations in the ESCO2 (establishment of cohesion 1 homolog 2) gene located in 8p21.1 have been found in several families. ESCO2, a member of the cohesion establishing complex, has a role in the effective cohesion between sister chromatids. In order to analyze sister chromatids topography during interphase, we performed 3D-FISH using pericentromeric heterochromatin probes of chromosomes 1, 4, 9 and 16, on preserved nuclei from a fetus with RBS carrying compound heterozygous null mutations in the ESCO2 gene. RESULTS: Along with the first observation of an abnormal separation between sister chromatids in heterochromatic regions, we observed a statistically significant change in the intranuclear localization of pericentromeric heterochromatin of chromosome 1 in cells of the fetus compared to normal cells, demonstrating for the first time a modification in the spatial arrangement of chromosome domains during interphase. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that the disorganization of nuclear architecture may result in multiple gene deregulations, either through disruption of DNA cis interaction -such as modification of chromatin loop formation and gene insulation - mediated by cohesin complex, or by relocation of chromosome territories. These changes may modify interactions between the chromatin and the proteins associated with the inner nuclear membrane or the pore complexes. This model offers a link between the molecular defect in cohesion and the complex phenotypic anomalies observed in RBS.

First reported case of interstitial 15 q15.3-q21.3 deletion diagnosed prenatally and characterized with array CGH in a fetus with an isolated short femur.

We report on a fetus with an isolated short femur detected by ultrasound and a de novo interstitial deletion of chromosome 15. The deletion was diagnosed prenatally by karyotype and further mapped by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) to bands 15q15.3 to 15q21.3 with a size of 11.11 Mb. Fetal autopsy showed characteristic minor anomalies, urinary abnormalities, and delayed bone maturation, but neither craniosynostosis, nor congenital heart defects as observed in previously reported cases. Despite the existence of ultrasound abnormalities, all five cases reported so far were diagnosed after birth. This is the first case of an interstitial deletion involving chromosomal band 15q15.3-q21.3 diagnosed prenatally and characterized at the molecular level. Our observation suggests the absence of imprinted genes in the area of 15q15-q22 and strengthens the hypothesis that a critical region for craniosynostosis may be mapped outside the deleted region in the present patient.

Sperm FISH analysis in two healthy infertile brothers with t(15;18) unbalanced translocation: Implications for genetic counselling and reproductive management.

Numerous studies have shown that balanced reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations and inversions are associated with reduced or absent sperm production. In contrast, a similar association has been rarely reported for unbalanced translocations. An unbalanced translocation, 45,XY,-15,der(18)t(15;18)(q11.2;q23), was found in two healthy infertile brothers who were referred to our hospital together with their partners for infertility. At least two routine semen analyses and karyotyping were done for each of the brothers. Sperm meiotic segregation was studied for both with a three-color FISH assay using locus-specific probes. Semen analyses showed a severe oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia with remarkably similar profiles in the two brothers. The unbalanced translocation had a deletion of 15pter-15q11.2 as well as a deletion of 18q23-18qter. The meiotic segregation was similar in the two brothers with a prevalence of alternate segregation mode. However, no phenotypic effect in the offspring can be expected only if the normal chromosomes 15 and 18 are transmitted to progeny. According to the sperm FISH results, the theoretical probability of this happening is about 25%. Based on the overall results, genetic and reproductive counselling was offered to both couples. Finally, both couples chose the alternative of donor insemination rather than preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The present study helps delineating a phenotypically silent CNV at the distal part of chromosome 18 long arm and illustrates the advantages of an integrated multidisciplinary genetic, reproductive and psychological approach to give the best possible assistance to couples who are faced with a complex and distressing genetic cause of infertility.

Two cases of mosaicism for complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRM) associated with secondary infertility.

Structural chromosomal abnormalities can be associated with infertility through meiosis impairment or the formation of unbalanced gametes. Among these structural abnormalities, complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCR) relate to situations with more than two breakpoints and/or more than two chromosomes involved. Mosaic balanced chromosomal rearrangements are very rare events usually ascertained through infertility, recurrent miscarriages or liveborn abnormal children. Mosaicism for complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRM) has never been described to date. Here we report on two patients with secondary infertility whose karyotype revealed mosaic partially cryptic CCRs, revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). To our knowledge, this is the first report of mosaicism for complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRM). We discuss the importance of molecular cytogenetic characterization of structural rearrangements to assist in genetic counseling related to the possible use of assisted reproductive technology.

Optimized criteria for using fluorescence in situ hybridization in the prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the medical and economic performance of three strategies for selecting patients eligible for interphase FISH in the prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies. METHODS: We evaluated three protocols on the same population that was referred for prenatal diagnosis between June 2001 and December 2006. The number of aneuploidies detected by FISH and the relative cost (reagent and technical staff cost) are reported for each strategy. RESULTS: 2707 women were referred for prenatal diagnosis either because of advanced maternal age over 38 (48%), abnormal maternal serum screening (35%) or prenatal ultrasound anomalies (17%). A total of 4.8% chromosomal anomalies (balanced and unbalanced) were diagnosed after karyotyping. Theoretically, interphase FISH should have detected 79.4% of the unbalanced anomalies. We observed a significant improvement in the trisomy 21 detection by selecting the probes according to the reason for referral. The last protocol adopted, which offers a rapid test to 57% of women undergoing amniocentesis, presents the best aneuploidy detection rate (68% of total aneuploidies, 87% of trisomy 21). CONCLUSION: Selecting probes according to medical criteria patients combined with a technical procedure modification allows medico-economic improvement of interphase FISH in routine diagnosis.

First reported case of intrachromosomal cryptic inv dup del Xp in a boy with developmental retardation.

We report here on a 6-year-old boy referred to the laboratory for karyotyping and SHOX microdeletion testing. The most significant clinical findings in this boy were small stature, Madelung deformity, facial dysmorphism, mild mental retardation and behavioral problems. R-, G- and RTBG-banding chromosome analysis showed a normal male karyotype. Fine molecular characterization, by FISH, of terminal Xp microdeletion revealed an associated partial duplication. Further refinement of the molecular analysis indicated an inverted duplication of the Xp22.31-Xp22.32 (13.7 Mb) region including the STS, VCX-A and KAL1 genes, associated with a terminal Xp deletion Xp22.33-Xpter (3.6 Mb) encompassing the SHOX and ARSE genes. Such rearrangements have been characterized for other chromosomal pairs, but this is the first reported male patient involving the short arm of the X chromosome. Molecular analysis of the maternal and patient's microsatellite markers showed interchromatid mispairing leading to non-allelic homologous recombination to be the most likely mechanism underlying this rearrangement. This case highlights the importance of clinically driven FISH investigations in order to uncover cryptic micro-rearrangements.

Loss-of-function mutations in FGFR1 cause autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome.

We took advantage of overlapping interstitial deletions at chromosome 8p11-p12 in two individuals with contiguous gene syndromes and defined an interval of roughly 540 kb associated with a dominant form of Kallmann syndrome, KAL2. We establish here that loss-of-function mutations in FGFR1 underlie KAL2 whereas a gain-of-function mutation in FGFR1 has been shown to cause a form of craniosynostosis. Moreover, we suggest that the KAL1 gene product, the extracellular matrix protein anosmin-1, is involved in FGF signaling and propose that the gender difference in anosmin-1 dosage (because KAL1 partially escapes X inactivation) explains the higher prevalence of the disease in males.

Familial reciprocal translocation t(7;16) associated with maternal uniparental disomy 7 in a Silver-Russell patient.

We present the case of a maternal heterodisomy for chromosome 7 in the daughter of a t(7;16)(q21;q24) reciprocal translocation carrier. The proband was referred to the hospital for growth retardation and minor facial dysmorphism without mental retardation. A diagnosis of Silver-Russell syndrome was suspected. Chromosomal analysis documented a 46,XX,t(7;16)(q21;q24)mat chromosome pattern. Microsatellite analysis showed a normal biparental inheritance of chromosome 16 but a maternal heterodisomy of chromosome 7. Occurrence of uniparental disomy (UPD) is a well-recognized consequence of chromosomal abnormalities that increase the rate of meiotic nondisjunction, mainly Robertsonian translocations and supernumerary chromosomes. Although reciprocal translocations should, theoretically, be also at increased risk of UPD, only three cases have been reported so far. However, because the association between uniparental disomy and reciprocal translocation may exist with an underestimated frequency, prenatal diagnosis is recommended when clinically relevant chromosomes for UPD are involved.