Claudication due to adventitial cystic degeneration: A differential diagnosis of peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Cystic adventitial disease (CAD) is an important and rare non-atherosclerotic cause of intermittent claudication and critical limb ischemia. Since the first case of CAD involving the external iliac artery was described by Atkins and Key in 1947, approximately 300 additional cases have been reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this article is to report a rare vascular disorder, predominantly seen in young healthy men with minimal cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: We report a rare case of cystic adventitial disease of a young policeman. To confirm the diagnosis, an ultrasonography and a conventional angiography were performed. The therapeutic approach was surgical first. RESULTS: The procedure was successful without any complication, and the patient was discharged to home 4 days after procedure. CONCLUSION: While CAD is rare, the diagnosis should be suspected in a young patient who presents with arterial insufficiency and no risk factors for atherosclerosis. Catheter angiography is the investigation of choice in the absence of multislice CT and good MRA. It seems that the treatment that assures the best long-term results is reconstructive arterial bypass surgery.

Impairment of erectile function after elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The purpose of the present study was to compare the functional change of erectile dysfunction after endovascular repair (EVAR) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm.Between April 2009 and December 2011, male patients admitted for elective treatment of an asymptomatic infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included. The erectile function was evaluated by using a validated KEED questionnaire. All patients filled out the questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively after one year.The number of patients with an increase of erectile dysfunction was 8 (26.6%) to 16 (53.3%) in open repair group vs. 30 (42.6%) to 40 (58.8%) in endovascular aneurysm repair. There was no statistically significant difference between open repair and endovascular aneurysm repair groups in order of new incidence of erectile dysfunction (p = 0.412). The study showed an increase in the mean value of Erectile Dysfunction -Score postoperatively in both the groups as well.The present study showed an increase of erectile dysfunction postoperatively, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.

[Is there a role for risk-scoring methods in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA)?]. / Was leisten Risiko-Scores beim rupturierten abdominellen Aortenaneurysma (rAAA)?

BACKGROUND: Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is associated with a high mortality both before and after admission to hospital. In spite of the use of expensive intensive medical therapeutic interventions 30 - 50 % of the operated patients still die. The ASA score is one of the most used scores world-wide. Use of the Glasgow aneurysm score (GAS) and the Hardman index (HI) is frequently reported in the literature to predict survival after surgical management of rAAA. With regard to the comorbidity factor severity score (CSS) no evaluated data on the mortality in cases of rAAA are available. On the basis of our own patient collective we intended to assess to what extent the risk score could give an answer to the question of therapeutic options. METHODS: In a retrospective study (7/1998 - 8/2007), 94 patients (m : f = 78 : 16) were assessed after operative management of rAAA. The validity of preoperative risk assessments on the basis of the ASA score, the CSS, the GAS and the HI with regard to intra- or postoperative death in the initial hospitalisation period was examined. Sensitivity and specificity of the score systems were determined by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses. RESULTS: The age of the patients was 72.3 ±â€†9.5 years (mean ±â€†SD). Thirty-five (37.2 %) patients died in the immediate postoperative period. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves for ASA, GAS, HI and CSS were 0.598, 0.787, 0.742 and 0.614, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed clear differences in the prognostic predictions of the various scores. In accord with the literature, no score gave a 100 % positive result with regard to mortality. Thus, an individual decision or, respectively, a therapeutic option cannot be reached with the help of the investigated scores. Further parameters need to be evaluated in order to make decisions about postoperative therapy.