ABSTRACT
Existen varias guías de práctica clínica tanto nacionales como internacionales para el tratamiento del lupus eritematoso sistémico. No obstante, la mayoría de las guías disponibles no están diseñadas para población mexicana o solamente son para el manejo de manifestaciones específicas como nefritis lúpica o para algún estado fisiológico como el embarazo. El Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología se propuso elaborar unas guías de práctica clínica que conjuntaran la mayor parte de las manifestaciones de la enfermedad y que incluyeran adicionalmente pautas en situaciones controversiales como lo son la vacunación y el periodo perioperatorio. En el presente documento se presenta la «Guía de práctica clínica para el manejo del lupus eritematoso sistémico» propuesta por el Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología, que puede ser de utilidad principalmente a médicos no reumatólogos que se ven en la necesidad de tratar a pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico sin tener la formación de especialistas en reumatología. En esta guía se presentan recomendaciones sobre el manejo de manifestaciones generales, articulares, renales, cardiovasculares, pulmonares, neurológicas, hematológicas, gastrointestinales, respecto a la vacunación y al manejo perioperatorio
There are national and international clinical practice guidelines for systemic lupus erythematosus treatment. Nonetheless, most of them are not designed for the Mexican population or are devoted only to the treatment of certain disease manifestations, like lupus nephritis, or are designed for some physiological state like pregnancy. The Mexican College of Rheumatology aimed to create clinical practice guidelines that included the majority of the manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus, and also incorporated guidelines in controversial situations like vaccination and the perioperative period. The present document introduces the «Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus» proposed by the Mexican College of Rheumatology, which could be useful mostly for non-rheumatologist physicians who need to treat patients with systemic lupus erythematosus without having the appropriate training in the field of rheumatology. In these guidelines, the reader will find recommendations on the management of general, articular, kidney, cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological, hematologic and gastrointestinal manifestations, and recommendations on vaccination and treatment management during the perioperative period
Subject(s)
Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Mexico/epidemiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'ABSTRACT
O estudo estimou a prevalência de cuidado domiciliar e identificou o perfil demográfico, socioeconômico, comportamental e de saúde dos idosos dependentes. O delineamento transversal e representativo das comunidades Restinga e Extremo Sul, de Porto Alegre (RS), incluiu 638 idosos. O cuidado domiciliar foi definido pela resposta positiva à questão: "O(a) Sr.(a) tem alguém aqui na sua casa para cuidar do(a) Sr(a)?". A prevalência de cuidado domiciliar encontrada foi de 25,4% (IC95%: 22,0; 28,8). Filhos(as) e esposos(as) foram responsáveis pela maioria do cuidado domiciliar prestado a idosos (40,7% e 37,0%, respectivamente). Homens, indivíduos sem companheiro(a), fisicamente inativos, com idade avançada, menor escolaridade e maior nível econômico, incapacidade funcional e que foram hospitalizados no último ano caracterizaram o perfil do idoso dependente. A alta prevalência de cuidado domiciliar serve de subsídio para políticas públicas destinadas a idosos. Dentre todas as características avaliadas, a incapacidade funcional, esteve mais fortemente associada ao cuidado domiciliar.
The scope of this study was to estimate the prevalence of home care and to identify the demographic, socioeconomic, behavioral and health profile of dependent elderly individuals. The cross-sectional and representative delineation of the communities of Restinga and Extremo Sul in Porto Alegre in the State of Rio Grande do Sul included 638 elderly individuals. Home care was defined as a positive answer to the following question: "Do you have someone here in your home to take care of you?" The prevalence of home care was 49.5% (95% CI: 44.5; 54.5). Children and spouses were responsible for the majority of home care (40.7% and 37%, respectively). Men, unaccompanied and physically inactive individuals, of advanced age, lower educational level, higher economic level, functionally disabled and who had been hospitalized in the last year characterized the profile of the dependent elderly individual. The high prevalence of home care can serve as input for health services for the elderly. Among all the characteristics, functional disability was the one most closely associated with home care.