Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Environ Int ; 181: 108294, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37935082

ABSTRACT

Phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA) are compounds widely used as raw materials in the production of plastics, making them ubiquitous in our daily lives. This results in widespread human exposure and human health hazards. Although efforts have been conducted to evaluate the risk of these compounds in diverse regions around the world, data scattering may mask important trends that could be useful for updating current guidelines and regulations. This study offers a comprehensive global assessment of human exposure levels to these chemicals, considering dietary and nondietary ingestion, and evaluates the associated risk. Overall, the exposure daily intake (EDI) values of phthalates and BPA reported worldwide ranged from 1.11 × 10-7 to 3 700 µg kg bw-1 d-1 and from 3.00 × 10-5 to 6.56 µg kg bw-1 d-1, respectively. Nevertheless, the dose-additive effect of phthalates has been shown to increase the EDI up to 5 100 µg kg bw-1 d-1, representing a high risk in terms of noncarcinogenic (HQ) and carcinogenic (CR) effects. The worldwide HQ values of phthalates and BPA ranged from 2.25 × 10-7 to 3.66 and from 2.74 × 10-7 to 9.72 × 10-2, respectively. Meanwhile, a significant number of studies exhibit high CR values for benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). Moreover, DEHP has shown the highest maximum mean CR values for humans in numerous studies, up to 179-fold higher than BBP. Despite mounting evidence of the harmful effects of these chemicals at low-dose exposure on animals and humans, most regulations have not been updated. Thus, this article emphasizes the need for updating guidelines and public policies considering compelling evidence for the adverse effects of low-dose exposure, and it cautions against the use of alternative plasticizers as substitutes for phthalates and BPA because of the significant gaps in their safety.


Subject(s)
Diethylhexyl Phthalate , Phthalic Acids , Animals , Humans , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Risk Assessment
2.
Int Braz J Urol ; 41(4): 690-6, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26401861

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical value of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in reducing the risk of hemorrhage associated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients with renal or ureter stones who had undergone mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy were retrospectively enrolled into this study from May of 2011 to April of 2014. Group 1 (65 patients) underwent computed tomography angiography, and Group 2 (93 patients) underwent non-contrast CT. The clinical characteristics of the patients and hemorrhagic complications were recorded. The hematologic complications (transfusion rate, and preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values) were assessed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index(BMI), stone diameter, operative time, stone-free rate, and hospital stay between the 2 groups. In group 2, 1 patient (1.1%) developed a renal arteriovenous fistula and was treated with embolus therapy. In addition, Group 2 showed significantly drop in hemoglobin (3.6 g/dL vs. 2.4 g/dL, respectively; P < 0.001) and more transfusions (9.7% vs. 1.5%, respectively; P < 0.05) compared with Group 1. CONCLUSION: The study showed that patients who underwent computed tomography angiography prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy had lower drop of hemoglobin and needed less transfusions. These findings may suggest that the use of computed tomography angiography may reduce the risk of bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Kidney/blood supply , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Angiography/methods , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Contrast Media , Female , Hemoglobins/analysis , Hemoglobins/therapeutic use , Humans , Kidney Calculi/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 41(4): 690-696, July-Aug. 2015. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-763057

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACTPurpose:To evaluate the clinical value of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in reducing the risk of hemorrhage associated with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).Materials and Methods:A total of 158 patients with renal or ureter stones who had undergone mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy were retrospectively enrolled into this study from May of 2011 to April of 2014. Group 1 (65 patients) underwent computed tomography angiography, and Group 2 (93 patients) underwent non-contrast CT. The clinical characteristics of the patients and hemorrhagic complications were recorded. The hematologic complications (transfusion rate, and preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values) were assessed.Results:There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index(BMI), stone diameter, operative time, stone-free rate, and hospital stay between the 2 groups. In group 2, 1 patient (1.1%) developed a renal arteriovenous fistula and was treated with embolus therapy. In addition, Group 2 showed significantly drop in hemoglobin (3.6 g/dL vs. 2.4 g/dL, respectively; P <0.001) and more transfusions (9.7% vs. 1.5%, respectively; P <0.05) compared with Group 1.Conclusion:The study showed that patients who underwent computed tomography angiography prior to percutaneous nephrolithotomy had lower drop of hemoglobin and needed less transfusions. These findings may suggest that the use of computed tomography angiography may reduce the risk of bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/therapy , Kidney/blood supply , Nephrostomy, Percutaneous/adverse effects , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Angiography/methods , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , Contrast Media , Hemoglobins/analysis , Hemoglobins/therapeutic use , Kidney Calculi/therapy , Operative Time , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
J Virol Methods ; 197: 63-6, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24361873

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the ability of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and an in-house fluorescent microbead immunoassay (FMIA) to detect IgG antibodies against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) types 1 and 2 in serum and oral fluids from boars infected experimentally. Samples from uninfected control pigs and PRRSV-negative field samples were also used. Serum samples were tested by ELISAs (IDEXX Se, HIPRA Se) and an in-house FMIA-Se for detection of PRRSV types 1 and 2. Oral fluids were tested by ELISAs (IDEXX-SO, IDEXX-OF, HIPRA-OF) for detection of PRRSV types 1 and 2. Among the sera, IDEXX-Se and HIPRA-Se had similar sensitivity and specificity (p>0.05); however, IDEXX-Se detected positive animals earlier than HIPRA-Se (p<0.05). FMIA-Se had the highest false-positive rates in known negative field samples (1/205 for IDEXX-Se, 5/205 for HIPRA-Se, and 37/205 for FMIA-Se; p<0.01). Serum and oral fluid samples had similar detection rates and antibody kinetics using the IDEXX tests. There was a higher detection rate in serum than oral fluid using the HIPRA assays. In this study, the nucleocapsid protein utilized as antigen in the FMIAs yielded a low specificity. IDEXX-Se had the earliest detection and similar sensitivity and specificity to the HIPRA-Se.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/analysis , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/diagnosis , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/immunology , Veterinary Medicine/methods , Animals , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Immunoassay/methods , Saliva/immunology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serum/immunology , Sus scrofa , Swine
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL