ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To investigate the condition of confidential unit exclusion(CUE) in Guangzhou, so as to ensure blood safety. 【Methods】 The number of CUE donors, demographic characteristics of CUE donors, reasons for CUE, and response time of CUE after blood donation in Guangzhou from 2009 to 2022 were statistically analyzed. 【Results】 From 2009 to 2022, the response ratios of CUE was 0.006 2% (260/4 170 984) and the ratios had statistically significant difference between different years(P0.05), but statistically significant differences were found in age, number of blood donations, education background, and marital status (P<0.05). Blood donors aged 18~30 (0.007 3%, P<0.05) and first-time blood donors (0.010 8%, P<0.05) were the main groups of CUE. High risk sexual behavior (28.46%, 74/260) was the primary reason for CUE. The CUE response peak was within 72 hours after blood donation, and the response ratios within 24-72 hours after blood donation was the highest (68.46%, 178/260). 【Conclusion】 CUE is a crucial measure to ensure blood safety. Detailed pre-donation health consultations are suggested for blood donors aged 18-30 and first-time blood donors so as to better excluding high-risk blood donors. Strengthening the publicity of CUE response and process, registering and classifying the reasons for CUE are also important.
ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To retrospectively analyze the reasons of insufficient blood collected, to provide evidences for further taking targeted measures, to reduce the discard of insufficient whole blood and prevent the loss of blood donors. 【Methods】 Calculate the total number of whole blood donors and the number of whole blood donors donating insufficient blood during 2018~2020 annually in Guangzhou Blood Center Information System, and the data was analyzed in SPSS (22.0) software for χ2test and linear trend test. 【Results】 During 2018~2020, the incidence of insufficient blood collected was 0.066 4%(531/799 439), and the incidence of insufficient blood collected because of poor blood flow, needle-sickness and other reasons were 0.048 7%(389/799 439), 0.010 6%(85/799 439) and 0.007 1%(57/799 439). Furthermore, the incidence of insufficient blood collected of the three above reasons had statistically significant difference between the years respectively (P<0.05), meanwhile the incidence of insufficient blood collected because of poor blood flow was in a general rising trend significantly (0.036 3%<0.038 2%<0.072 7%, P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 The incidence of insufficient blood collected because of poor blood flow was in the rising trend and further precautions should be considered. Under the normalization of the novel corona-virus pneumonia (COVID-19), the professional knowledge of epidemic prevention and control should be learned and trained, in addition the puncture technique, the ability of offering psychological care and dealing with adverse events during blood collection should be also improved among nurses continually, so as to provide high quality services for blood donors.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To explore the correlation between special A/O genotype and the O phenotype.@*METHODS@#Group O samples with partially reduced or lack of isoagglutinins were collected to determinate the ABO genotype with a PCR-sequence specific primer (PCR-SSP) assay. Seven samples with A/O genotype were selected for further study. Serological tests including forward and reverse typing, H antigen determination and adsorption/elution were carried out with a tube method. Genomic DNA was genotyped by amplifying and sequencing of the coding regions of exons 1 to 7 of the ABO gene.@*RESULTS@#Seven samples were serotyped as group O by the forward typing test. However, reduced anti-A activity was found in 5 samples by the reverse typing test, reduced anti-A and anti-B activities were found in 1 sample, and no anti-A isoagglutinin activity was found with 1 sample. H antigen was determined in all samples by routine serologic method. Neither anti-A nor anti-B was eluted from red cells derived from all samples. Three samples were genotyped as Ael02/O02, whilst the remainders were Ael02/O13, Ael02/O65, Am04/O75, Ael06/O02, respectively.@*CONCLUSION@#Special A/O genotype may not express the A antigen, leading to the generation of group O red cells. Reduced or missed anti-A activity is the typical serological feature of this special group of O phenotype, for which ABO*Ael02 and ABO*O02 are the major alleles. Group O individuals with isoagglutinin detection problem should be grouped by serological tests and genomic DNA analysis.