ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Drug challenge is the gold standard for identifying causative agents of drug allergies. Although clinical guidelines have recently been published, they do not recommend neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) drug challenges. NMBA challenges are rendered difficult by the lack of homogeneity of routine allergy work-ups and the necessity of a specialised setting. Several scenarios support NMBA challenges, such as an ambiguous allergy work-up, a high suspicion of a false-positive skin test or identification of a well tolerated alternative NMBA strategy. Furthermore, routine allergy work-ups may not recognise non-IgE mechanisms, such as IgG or MRGPRX2, whereas drug challenges may reveal them. Finally, if the culprit NMBA is not identified, subsequent anaesthesia regimens will be challenging to implement, resulting in increased risk. OBJECTIVES: This literature review discusses the indications, strategies, doses, monitoring methods, limitations, and unresolved issues related to drug challenges for NMBAs. DESIGN: The literature review included randomised controlled trials, observational studies, reviews, case reports, series, and comments on humans. DATA SOURCES: Studies were retrieved from databases (PubMed) and electronic libraries (OVID, EMBASE, Scopus, etc.). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All studies that referred to the NMBA challenge were included without publication date limitations. RESULTS: NMBA challenge may be considered in NMBA anaphylaxis patients with inconclusive or ambivalent IgE diagnostic work-up under controlled conditions (presence of anaesthetists and allergists with continuous monitoring in a secured environment). To illustrate its utility, a case report of a double NMBA challenge in a patient with NMBA cross-reactivity is presented, along with biological explorations to detect subclinical cellular activation, a novel aspect of this procedure. CONCLUSION: Drug challenges could be implemented during the NMBA allergy work-up under strict safety conditions at specialised centres with close collaboration between anaesthetists and allergists. This could decrease uncertainty and contribute to defining a safer strategy for subsequent anaesthetic drug regimens.
ABSTRACT
INTRO: An increased prevalence of serum anti-MCV antibody is observed in the serum of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but the clinical relevance of these antibodies is unknown. METHODS: Patients from our center with a diagnosis of IPF according to the 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines and at least one anti-MCV assay available were selected. All patients were part of the prospective cohort European IPF registry and selected between 03/2010 and 03/2018. We constituted two groups of patients according to the anti-MCV status at baseline to compare their characteristics at baseline and the evolution of lung function, survival and/or transplantation status. RESULTS: Anti-MCV data were available for 101 patients, of whom 86 had complete clinical data available. Twenty-nine (34 %) patients had a positive anti-MCV assay (MCV+), at a low level in most patients (29 UI/mL [IQR 25-40]), and 57 (66 %) patients a negative assay (MCV-). MCV+ patients were 20 men and 9 women, with a median age of 73 years [IQR 67-78]. MCV- patients were 49 men and 8 women with a median age of 72 years [IQR 64-77]. Sixty-two (75 %) patients were ex-smokers and 5 (6 %) were active smokers. Median cumulative tobacco smoke exposure was 22.5 (15.0-38.6) and was similar in both groups. Lung function test results and HRCT pattern distribution was similar in both groups at baseline. The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years [IQR 2.1-5.0]. Lung function decline was similar in both groups. During the study period, 31 (36 %) patients died or have been transplanted with no difference in transplant-free survival status between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Low level anti-MCV autoimmunity was prevalent in IPF patients.