Oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is extremely rare and usually has a poor prognosis. Early diagnosis is very important and can improve survival but it is usually difficult due to a lack of symptomatology. We present the first case of a 39-year-old East European woman with oral amelanotic melanoma, who underwent surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy; however, after six months, she developed local recurrence. The patient continued immunotherapy with external radiotherapy targeting the oral tumor recurrence. During therapy, imagistic reevaluation brought evidence of bones, lungs, liver, endotracheal, and brain metastases. Histological differential diagnosis between amelanotic OMM and leiomyosarcoma was necessary to establish the right course of treatment. A series of complications further delayed chemotherapy administration, making the treatment in this case very challenging. The patient had a significant, although late response to immunotherapy, and maintained a good performance status during disease progression with a survival of 15 months until present.
INTRODUCTION: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) presents significant clinical challenges due to its heterogeneous nature and variable treatment responses. The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-Score) has emerged as a potential biomarker for prognostication and prediction in mCRC, although its precise role remains under investigation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that included 173 patients diagnosed with mCRC. The patients were treated in the first line with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy (CHT) and a molecular agent based on their eligibility. We assessed the overall survival (OS) time, progression-free survival (PFS) time, and the overall response rate (ORR), utilizing the GRIm-score measured at baseline (referred to as GRImT0) and the variance between GRImT0 and the GRIm score measured three months after treatment initiation (referred to as GRIm∆). We also performed a subgroup analysis based on the type of treatment received. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed that the GRIm-Score holds promise as a prognostic marker in mCRC, with high scores correlating with poorer survival outcomes. However, in the subgroup analysis, this prognostic value remained relevant only for patients treated with CHT and anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) agents, such as cetuximab and panitumumab. GRIm-Score exhibited no predictive value irrespective of the treatment received. CONCLUSION: The GRIm-Score shows potential as a prognostic mCRC, although we believe that this potential is limited. Integration of the GRIm-Score into clinical practice should be done with caution and is not recommended at this time. However, further research is needed to fully elucidate its clinical utility and optimize its incorporation into routine clinical care.
The management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been revolutionized over the past two decades with several practice-changing treatments. Treatment for RCC often requires a multimodal approach: Local treatment, such as surgery or ablation, is typically recommended for patients with localized tumors, while stage IV cancers often require both local and systemic therapy. The treatment of advanced RCC heavily relies on immunotherapy and targeted therapy, which are highly contingent upon histological subtypes. Despite years of research on biomarkers for RCC, the standard of care is to choose systemic therapy based on the risk profile according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre models. However, many questions still need to be answered. Should we consider metastatic sites when deciding on treatment options for metastatic RCC? How do we choose between dual immunotherapy and combinations of immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors? This review article aims to answer these unresolved questions surrounding the concept of personalized medicine.
The human physiological response "to stress" includes all metabolic and hormonal changes produced by a traumatic event at the micro or macro cellular levels. The main goal of the body's first response to trauma is to keep physiological homeostasis. The perioperative non-specific adaptation response can sometimes be detrimental and can produce systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), characterized by hypermetabolism and hyper catabolism. We performed a narrative review consisting of a description of the surgical stress response's categories of changes (neurohormonal and immunological response) followed by reviewing methods found in published studies to modulate the surgical stress response perioperatively. We described various preoperative measures cited in the literature as lowering the burden of surgical trauma. This article revises the anesthetic drugs and techniques that have an impact on the surgical stress response and proven immune-modulatory effects. We also tried to name present knowledge gaps requiring future research. Our review concludes that proper preoperative measures, adequate general anesthetics, multimodal analgesia, early postoperative mobilization, and early enteral nutrition can decrease the stress response to surgery and ease patient recovery. Anesthetics and analgesics used during the perioperative period may modulate the innate and adaptive immune system and inflammatory system, with a consecutive impact on cancer recurrence and long-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Surgical stress response in colorectal surgery consists of a neurohormonal and an immunological response and influences oncological outcomes. The intensity of surgical trauma influences mortality, morbidity, and metastasis' occurrence in colorectal neoplasia. Energy expenditure (EE) stands for the body's energy consumed to keep its homeostasis and can be either calculated or measured by direct or indirect calorimetry. AIM: The present study attempted to evaluate surgical stress response using EE measurement and compare it to the postoperative cortisol dynamic. METHODS: A prospective, monocentric study was conducted over a period of one year in the Anesthesiology Department including 21 patients from whom serum cortisol values were collected in the preoperative period and on the first postoperative day, and EE was measured and recorded every 15 minutes throughout surgery using the indirect calorimetry method. The study compared EE values' dynamic registered 30 minutes after intubation and 30 minutes before extubating (after abdominal closure) to cortisol perioperative dynamic. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 patients and 84 measurements were recorded, 42 probes of serum cortisol and 42 measurements of EE. The mean value of the first measurement of serum cortisol was 13.60±3.6 µg and the second was 16.21±6.52 µg. The average value of the first EE recording was 1273.9±278 kcal and 1463.4±398.2 kcal of the second recording. The bivariate analysis performed showed a good correlation between cortisol variation and EE's variation (Spearman coefficient=0.666, p<0.001, CI=0.285, 0.865). In nine cases (42.85%), cortisol value at 24 hours reached the baseline or below the baselines preoperative value. In eight cases (38.09%), patients' EE at the end of the surgery was lower than that recorded at the beginning of the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative EE variation correlated well with cortisol perioperative dynamic and stood out in this study as a valuable and accessible predictor of surgical stress in colorectal surgery.
Tumor-to-tumor metastasis (TTM) is a rare phenomenon documented in patients with multiple primary cancers. This condition is defined as a metastasis between two true primary tumors. The most frequently reported recipient tumor is renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the lung carcinomas are the most common metastatic tumor donors. Therefore, this paper attempts to address the current gap in knowledge about this rare phenomenon. The first part of this review outlines the recently proposed models and mechanisms involved in the TTM process. The second part then summarizes and analyzes previous case reports in the literature. We also present our experience with the case of lung cancer that metastasized into RCC. Given the sporadic incidence of TTM, no specific management guidelines exist. Therefore, considering TTM in patients with multiple primary tumors is important as it could potentially modify the oncological management offered.
Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are common in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and represent a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification is paramount in deciding the initiation of thromboprophylaxis and is calculated using scores that include tumor location, laboratory values, patient clinical characteristics, and tumor burden. Commonly used risk scores do not include the presence of molecular aberrations as a variable. This retrospective study aims to confirm the link between KRAS-activating mutations and the development of VTE in CRC. A total of 166 patients were included in this study. They were split into two cohorts based on KRAS mutational status. We evaluated the frequency and mean time to VTE development stratified by the presence of KRAS mutations. Patients with mutant KRAS had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.758 for VTE compared to KRAS wild-type patients, with an increased risk of thrombosis being maintained in KRAS mutant patients even after adjusting for other known VTE risk factors. Taking into account the results of this study, KRAS mutation represents an independent risk factor for VTE.
Colorectal Neoplasms , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Venous Thromboembolism/genetics , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Thrombosis/genetics , Mutation
Background In the field of precision oncology, comprehensive genomic profiling tests play a very important role by providing a complex understanding of the molecular characteristics of malignant tumors. Therefore, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become a valuable tool in various aspects of cancer care from diagnosis and monitoring to treatment selection and personalized cancer treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the role of tumor molecular profiling in tailored treatment selection. Methods In our study, we conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the practicality of utilizing NGS testing in patients with metastatic solid tumors. The genomic testing was performed on blood or tissue samples from a fresh biopsy, less than six months old, and the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Results A total of 75 tests were performed on 66 patients between 2019 and 2022, with a success rate of 80%. The most common pathologies were gastro-intestinal tract cancer (26%), breast cancer (14%), non-small cell lung cancer (11%), and pancreatic cancer (11%). There were 9% liquid biopsies and 91% tissue biopsies. From all 66 patients tested, 55 had at least one genetic alteration. The most frequent genetic alteration found was TP53 (n=32) followed by KRAS (n=15) and BRCA1/2 (n=12) mutations. There were nine patients tested (14%) that presented a high tumor mutational burden, and only one patient presented high microsatellite instability. There were 37 patients (56%) with actionable alterations found from which 14 received matched therapy and four patients were enrolled in clinical trials. The NGS testing played a significant role in determining the next therapeutic strategy in 20 out of 66 patients (30.3%). Conclusion From all the patients included in our analysis, 83% had at least one mutation that is known to be of pathogenic significance but only 23% received treatment selected by the analysis of the tumor's genome, and only 6% were included in a clinical trial. This moderate success of personalized medicine using NGS testing highlights the importance of evaluating the factors that could lead to further improvement.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) have transformed the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer over the last decade. These inhibitors are currently established as first- and second-line systemic treatment choices for both endocrine-sensitive and -resistant breast cancer populations alongside endocrine therapy (ET) or monotherapy. Data on targeted therapy continue to mature, and the number of publications has been constantly rising. Although these drugs have been demonstrated to prolong overall survival (as well as progression-free survival (PFS) in breast cancer patients), changing the paradigm of all current knowledge, they also cause important adverse events (AEs). This review provides the latest summary and update on the safety profile of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors, as it appears from all major phase II and III randomized clinical trials regarding palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, including the most relevant 15 clinical trials.
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Progression-Free Survival , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Patients diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) present a number of challenges for physicians, due to the vast array of subtypes and aggressive tumor biology. There is currently no agreed-upon management strategy for these tumors, which has led to the ongoing debate surrounding how frequently surveillance scans should be performed following surgery. However, advances in multidisciplinary care have improved patient outcomes over recent years. The early detection of local recurrence reflects a more aggressive tumor, even in association with the same histopathologic entity. Treating the local recurrence of extremity STS is a difficult clinical challenge. The goal should be to salvage limbs when possible, with treatments such as resection and irradiation, although amputation may be necessary in some cases. Regional therapies such as high-intensity, low-dose or interleukin-1 receptor antagonist treatment are appealing options for either definitive or adjuvant therapy, depending on the location of the disease's recurrence. The higher survival rate following late recurrence may be explained by variations in tumor biology. Since long-term survival is, in fact, inferior in patients with high-grade STS, this necessitates the implementation of an active surveillance approach.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Prior research linked a high preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) to a worse prognosis in individuals with a variety of malignancies. This study aimed to establish the prognostic and predictive usefulness of preoperative NLR in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and to identify an appropriate cut-off value for the NLR. We enrolled a total of 195 patients that underwent surgery for stage II and III colorectal cancer that required adjuvant chemotherapy as well as stage IV colorectal cancer patients treated with palliative intent. The mean NLR value was 3.42 +- 2.27. We used a receiver operating characteristic curve to estimate the optimum NLR cut-off value at 3. Patients with a NLR value above 3 were classified as high-NLR, while patients with a NLR below 3 were classified as low-NLR; Results Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly reduced in high-NLR patients. The overall response rate (ORR) was also lower in high-NLR patients. Conclusions Preoperative NLR is an accessible measurement that seems to have prognostic and predictive value in patients with colorectal cancer.
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Neutrophils/pathology , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphocytes/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers , Retrospective Studies
BACKGROUND: Over the past few years, significant advancements have been achieved in the front-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinomas (mRCCs). However, most patients will eventually encounter disease progression during this front-line treatment and require further therapeutic options. While treatment choices for mRCCs patients are determined by established risk classification models, knowledge of prognostic factors in subsequent line therapy is essential in patient care. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study, patients diagnosed with mRCCs who experienced progression after first-line therapy were enrolled. Fifteen factors were analyzed for their prognostic impact on survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Poor International Metastatic RCCs Database Consortium (IMDC) and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk scores, NLR value > 3, clinical benefit < 3 months from a therapeutic line, and the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation were found to be poor independent prognostic factors for shortened overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided new insights into the identification of potential prognostic parameters for late-line treatment in mRCCs. The results indicated that good IMDC and MSKCC prognostic scores are effective in second-line therapy. Moreover, patients with NLR < 3, no sarcomatoid differentiation, and clinical benefit > 3 months experienced significantly longer overall survival.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and endocrine therapy are the gold standards for systemic therapy for patients with hormone-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. Following progression, no prospective randomized data exist to help guide second-line treatment. Moreover, there is a scarcity of data on rechallenge treatment strategies with another CDK4/6 inhibitor after prior limiting toxicity. We report a real-world experience of rechallenging with abemaciclib after the prior reaction of grade 4 liver toxicity to ribociclib, with high transaminases values of more than 27 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and unexpected grade 3 neutropenia and diarrhea after a few months of abemaciclib. After two years of treatment, the patient had stable oncological disease, with normal complete blood count, hepatic enzymes, and a very good performance status. We believe that our clinical case, along with others gathered from all around the world, will help with the consolidation of an unmet clinical need to readjust the treatment after experiencing toxicity to CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects
The latest and newest discoveries for advanced and metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer are the three cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in association with endocrine therapy (ET). However, even if this treatment revolutionized the world and continued to be the first-line treatment choice for these patients, it also has its limitations, caused by de novo or acquired drug resistance which leads to inevitable progression after some time. Thus, an understanding of the overview of the targeted therapy which represents the gold therapy for this subtype of cancer is essential. The full potential of CDK4/6i is yet to be known, with many trials ongoing to expand their utility to other breast cancer subtypes, such as early breast cancer, and even to other cancers. Our research establishes the important idea that resistance to combined therapy (CDK4/6i + ET) can be due to resistance to endocrine therapy, to treatment with CDK4/6i, or to both. Individuals' responses to treatment are based mostly on genetic features and molecular markers, as well as the tumor's hallmarks; therefore, a future perspective is represented by personalized treatment based on the development of new biomarkers, and strategies to overcome drug resistance to combinations of ET and CDK4/6 inhibitors. The aim of our study was to centralize the mechanisms of resistance, and we believe that our work will have utility for everyone in the medical field who wants to deepen their knowledge about ET + CDK4/6 inhibitors resistance.
With recent advances in oncology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a milestone in immuno-oncology. Unfortunately, although ICIs have demonstrated improved clinical efficacy in a broad spectrum of cancers, many patients do not respond to this newer therapy. As a result, it is crucial to identify predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in patients with kidney cancer. This review discusses the research investigating potential biomarkers of response to ICIs in renal cell carcinoma.
Renal cell carcinoma metastasis of the parotid gland is extremely rare, and the present literature review found only 23 cases reported in the last two decades. We present a case of a 75-year-old woman with a colon cancer history who had parotid gland metastasis as the first manifestation of second primary kidney cancer. The presence of multiple comorbidities affected medical decision-making. Therefore the patient was treated primarily with immunotherapy. After four cycles of dual immune checkpoint blockade, this advanced patient still benefited and was changed to nivolumab monotherapy as maintenance therapy.
Lung neoplasm is the main cause of cancer-related mortality, and bone metastasis is among the most common secondary tumors. The vast majority of patients also present with multiple bone metastases, which makes systemic and adjuvant pain therapy preferable to surgery. The optimal approach for a resectable non-small-cell lung tumor that also presents a unique, resectable bone metastasis is not fully established. The number of papers addressing this subject is small, and most are case reports; nevertheless, survival rates seem to increase with radical surgery. The sequencing of local versus systemic treatment should always be discussed within the multidisciplinary team that will choose the best approach for each patient. As targeted systemic therapies become more accessible, radical surgery, together with existing reconstructive methods, will lead to an increase in life expectancy and a better quality of life.
Bone Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Quality of Life , Bone Neoplasms/therapy , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Survival Rate
Background The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline treatment is an important marker of systemic inflammation, which is correlated with survival benefits in lung, breast, ovarian, bladder, and colorectal cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a biomarker with discording results regarding survival benefits in lung cancer. In our research, we studied the relationship between these two markers in patients with lung cancer. Methods Patients with stage I, II, III, and IV lung cancer (n = 80) were included in this retrospective study. The NLR baseline was recorded before the initiation of treatment. The NLR cut-off value was 4. PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted to test their prognostic value. Results NLR proved to be a significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.002, Log Rank) with a mean PFS of 27.7 months for low NLR patients and 12.8 months for high NLR patients. It was also significant for overall survival (OS) (p=0.007, Log Rank) with a mean OS of 52 months for low NLR patients and 41.6 months for high NLR patients. The prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression on PFS and OS was not statistically significant with a mean PFS of 23.1 months for PD-L1-negative patients and 15.8 months for PD-L1-positive patients (p=0.422, Log Rank). Mean OS was 49 months for PD-L1-negative patients while for PD-L1-positive patients, it was 43.3 months (p=0.550 Log Rank). Regarding the correlation between PD-L1 expression and NLR value, PFS mean survival times were 13.1 months for PD-L1(+)/NLR>4, 15.1 months for PD-L1(-)/NLR>4, 16.4 months for PD-L1(+)/NLR<4 and 27.8 months for PD-L1(-)/NLR<4. This correlation between PFS and the combined PD-L1 and NLR prognostic factor was statistically relevant (p=0.04). For OS, the PD-L1/NLR combined prognostic factor was not statistically relevant (p=0.055). A mean PFS time of 27.8 months was reported for PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 group patients while for the other groups, the mean PFS was 14.9 months (p=0.045). In univariate analysis, the elevated NLR was significantly associated with a decreased PFS time (HR=2.31, 95% CI =1.323- 4.051, p=0.03) as well as OS (HR=3.555, 95% CI=1.310- 9.652, p=0.013). In multivariate analysis, NLR remained statistically significant for PFS (HR=2.160, 95% CI=1.148- 4.062, p=0.013) and OS (HR=4.364, 95% CI=1.474- 12.921, p=0.008) after adjusting for the factors of age, gender, tumor stage, lymph node stage, clinical stage, histology, and PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was not a valid prognostic factor for progression or death in either univariate or multivariate analysis. We also stratified the disease control rate (DCR) depending on PD-L1/NLR combined factor expression. In the PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 group, we had the highest number of partial responses (PRs) and only one complete response (CR) compared to the other groups (p=0.006). Conclusions As the number of patients is limited in the present analysis, it is hypothesized that these two markers can be useful in dividing patients into two prognostic groups: the good prognostic group reunites PD-L1(+)/NLR<4 and PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 and the poor prognostic group reunites PD-L1(+)/NLR>4 and PD-L1(-)/NLR>4.
Carboplatin is one of the most widely used chemotherapy agents for solid tumors. One of the most common major side effects is the hypersensitivity reaction, and the likelihood of it increases with the number of courses given. Permanent discontinuation of carboplatin is not required if this side effect occurs. Using an effective desensitization protocol, this type of event can be avoided so that the patient continues to benefit from the maximum antitumor effect. This technical report is meant to detail the desensitization protocol designed and followed in the Oncology Clinic of the University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest.
Background and aims: Our aim is to examine the relationship between the level of education, background, tumor size and lymph node status on the treatment outcome in a group of patients with early and locally advanced breast cancer (BC) by using the restricted mean survival time (RMST), which summarizes treatment effects in terms of event-free time over a fixed period of time. Methods: We evaluated the prognostic values in 143 patients treated for early BC at Elias University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania and followed up for a maximum of 36 months. The protocol was amended to include the levels of education (gymnasium, high school, or university), the background (urban or rural) and the clinical stage (primary tumor (T) and regional nodes (N)). The methodology consisted in using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and RMST for the entire sample and Cox regression, for the variables with statistical influence. The principal endpoints of the study were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Results: The level of education had impact both on RMST OS (35.30 vs. 26.70) and death HR (hazard ratio) in the group of patients with general school level, compared with those with graduated university. In this study, the urban or rural background did not impact the outcome, probably because in this study we included predominantly patients from urban areas (83%). Although clinical tumor size measurements did not impact the outcome, the clinical staged lymph node influenced both OS (p=0.0500) and PFS (p=0.0006) for the patients with palpable or imaging proof of lymph node involvement of station 2 or 3. Conclusions: RMST provides an intuitive and explicit way to express the effect of those risk factors on OS and PFS in a cohort of early breast cancer patients. Low level of education and high-grade clinical lymph node status negatively influences the outcome of this cohort of BC patients.
