ABSTRACT
Higher education is an increasingly necessary achievement to attain employment. However, even in cases where a student has the academic skills to succeed, educational environments may not support students across all other domains necessary for education success, including social and communication needs. This is especially true for students with disabilities and autistic students, where the rate of completion of non-compulsory education is unknown. We used the Stockholm Youth Cohort (children aged 0-17 years from 2001 to 2011), a total population cohort (N = 736,180) including 3,918 autistic individuals, to investigate the association between autism without intellectual disability and completion of upper secondary education. We assessed the impact of sex and co-occurring Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) on this association. By age 20 years (the expected age of completion), 68% of autistic students and 91% of non-autistic students admitted to upper secondary education had completed. In logistic regression models adjusted for student demographics, autistic students had almost five-fold higher odds of not completing secondary school (OR 4.90, 95% CI 4.56 5.26) compared to their non-autistic peers. Autistic students with ADHD had particularly high odds of non-completion of upper secondary school. Autistic students without intellectual disability attending mainstream education are substantially less likely to complete upper secondary education as compared to their peers. These findings have implications for the appraisal of how inclusive school policies serve autistic students' academic and social needs, ultimately addressing population health and independent living.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Both suicide and self-harm are disproportionately common in autistic people. Sex differences in risk of self-harm and suicide are observed in the general population, but findings are mixed for autistic people. Self-cutting may be a particularly risky self-harm behaviour for suicide in autistic people. We aimed to explore sex differences and differences in method of self-harm in the association between self-harm and suicide in autistic and non-autistic adolescents and young adults. METHODS: We used a total population register of 2.8 million Swedish residents. Participants were followed from age 12 until December 2021 for medical treatment because of self-harm, and death from suicide. We used Cox proportional hazard regression models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of death from suicide following self-harm, and Relative Excessive Risk due to Interaction (RERI) to explore the interaction between self-harm and autism in females and males. RESULTS: We identified 85,143 autistic individuals (31,288 female; 53,855 male) and 2,628,382 non-autistic individuals (1,286,481 female; 1,341,901 male) aged 12-37 years. Incidence of suicide following self-harm was higher in autistic males (incidence per 100,000 risk-years = 169.0 [95% CI 135.1, 211.3]) than females (125.4 [99.4, 158.3]). The relative risk was higher for autistic females (HR 26.1 [95% CI 20.2, 33.7]) than autistic males (12.5 [9.9, 15.8]). An additive effect of both autism and self-harm was observed in both females (RERI = 9.8) and males (2.0). Autistic individuals who self-harmed through cutting were at greatest risk of death from suicide (HR 25.1 [17.9, 35.2]), compared to other methods. CONCLUSION: Autistic males and females are at increased risk of death from suicide following severe self-harm, particularly self-cutting.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Adversity during childhood can limit children's chances of achieving their optimal developmental and psychological outcomes. Well-designed observational studies might help identify adversities that are most implicated in this, thereby helping to identify potential targets for developing interventions. Objective: To compare the association between preventing childhood poverty, parental mental illness and parental separation, and the population rate of offspring common mental disorders (ages 16-21 years) or average school grades (age 16 years). Design, Setting, and Participants: A population-based, longitudinal cohort study using Swedish registries was conducted. A total of 163â¯529 children born in Sweden between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1997, were followed up until their 21st birthday. They were linked to registries using Sweden's national personal identification number. Children were linked to birth parents, hospital records, and school data. Parents were linked to registries containing health, income, sociodemographic, and obstetric data. Analyses were conducted between January 10, 2021, and August 26, 2022. Exposures: Childhood adversities of relative poverty (household disposable income <50% of the median), parental inpatient admission for a mental illness, or parental separation. Adversities were categorized into developmental periods: ages 0 to 3, 4 to 7, 8 to 11, and 12 to 16 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were children's hospital records with a diagnosis of anxiety or depression between ages 16 and 21 years and school grades at the end of compulsory education (age 16 years). The parametric g-formula modeled population changes in outcomes associated with the counterfactual, hypothetical preventing adversity exposures, accounting for fixed and time-varying confounders. Adjustments were made for parental demographic characteristics, obstetric variables, and socioeconomic data at birth. Results: A total of 163â¯529 children were included in the cohort (51.2% boys, 51.4% born in 1996). Preventing all adversities was associated with an estimated change in the prevalence of offspring common mental disorders from 10.2% to 7.6% and an improvement in school grades with an SD of 0.149 (95% CI, 0.147-0.149). Preventing parental separation provided for the greatest improvement, with an estimated 2.34% (95% CI, 2.23%-2.42%) fewer children with a common mental disorder and an improvement in school grades by 0.127 SDs (0.125-0.129). Greater improvements were shown by hypothetically targeting adolescents (age 12-16 years) and those whose parents had a mental illness when the child was born. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort modeling study suggest that preventing childhood adversity could provide notable improvements in the rates of common mental disorders and school grades. Many children might achieve better life outcomes if resources are properly allocated to the right adversities (parental separation), the right groups (children with parental mental illness), and at the right time (adolescence).
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Cohort Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/prevention & control , Mental Disorders/psychology , Parents/psychology , Schools , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between race, ethnicity, and parent-child nativity, and common mental health conditions among U.S. children and adolescents. METHODS: Data were from 2016 to 2019 National Survey of Children's Health, a US population-based, serial cross-sectional survey, and restricted to children who had access to health care. We used weighted multivariable logistic regression to examine the associations between race and ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, Other-race); mental health outcomes (depression, anxiety, and behavior/conduct problems) stratified by household generation; and between household generation and outcomes stratified by race and ethnicity, adjusting for demographics (age, sex, family income to poverty ratio, parental education), and an adverse childhood experience (ACE) score. RESULTS: When stratifying by household generation, racial and ethnic minority children generally had similar to lower odds of outcomes compared with White children, with the exception of higher odds of behavior/conduct problems among third + -generation Black children. When stratifying by race and ethnicity, third + generation children had increased odds of depression compared to their first-generation counterparts. Third + generation, racial and ethnic minority children had increased odds of anxiety and behavior/conduct problems compared with their first-generation counterparts. The associations generally remained significant after adjusting for the ACE score. CONCLUSIONS: Lower odds of common mental health conditions in racial and ethnic minority children could be due to factors such as differential reporting, and higher estimates, including those in third + generation children, could be due to factors including discrimination; systemic racism; and other factors that vary by generation and need further investigation to advance health equity.
Subject(s)
Ethnicity , Mental Health , Humans , Adolescent , United States/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Minority Groups , Parent-Child RelationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To explore how former patients in dialectical behaviour therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) experience their treatment, and specifically if there were aspects of the treatment that they retrospectively identify as particularly meaningful, helpful or unhelpful. DESIGN: From a larger sample of 75 former DBT-A patients 19 were selected for a qualitative semi-structured interview study. METHODS: Young adults (N = 19; 18 females, one male), who as adolescents had been enrolled in DBT-A due to self-harming behaviours and features of borderline personality disorder, were interviewed up to 8 years (median 6.0; min 1.3; max 8.2) after end of treatment, at mean age 23 years (SD 2.5). Reflexive thematic analysis was implemented. RESULTS: Six key themes were revealed; (1) The need to be seen, listened to and believed in, (2) the importance of teamwork between patient and therapist, (3) the value of group and structure, (4) therapy as lifesaving and life-changing, (5) the risks of feeling misplaced and (6) the risks of abrupt endings. CONCLUSION: A trusting relationship with the therapist promoted commitment and motivation for treatment. This relationship was facilitated by the therapist showing explicit care and belief in the patient's own competence in changing their destructive behaviours. Meeting peers in group skill training offered a salient form of validation and was reported to be of particular value. The format of meeting peers and the importance of the dialectical therapeutic stance need to be studied further. Not all youth experienced DBT-A as suitable and the need for sufficient treatment dose was emphasized.
Subject(s)
Borderline Personality Disorder , Dialectical Behavior Therapy , Self-Injurious Behavior , Female , Young Adult , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Adult , Behavior Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , Emotions , Borderline Personality Disorder/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The knowledge of how the separate Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) subdimensions (impulsivity, hyperactivity, and inattention) are associated with nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidal behavior (SB) is limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the associations of childhood ADHD subdimensions with NSSI and SB in children at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs; including ADHD). METHODS: The sample (N = 391) included twin pairs where at least one twin screened positive for at least one NDD or common comorbidity at age 9 or 12. Data on ADHD subdimensions was collected through a telephone interview with a caregiver/legal guardian at age 9 or 12, and data on NSSI and SB was collected through an in-person clinical assessment at age 15. The associations between the ADHD subdimensions and NSSI or SB were tested in three different models: (1) univariable, (2) together with the other ADHD subdimensions, and (3) in a confounder-adjusted model including other NDD symptoms in addition to ADHD subdimensions, for NSSI and SB separately. RESULTS: A total of 32 (8.2%) adolescents reported life-time engagement of NSSI, and 18 (4.6%) SB. Childhood impulsivity was associated with SB and childhood inattention with NSSI, in all models. Hyperactivity was not meaningfully associated with any of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Impulsivity and inattention, but not hyperactivity, may be of particular importance in understanding SB and NSSI. Brief screening for impulsivity and inattention in childhood could facilitate detection of children vulnerable to NSSI and SB and indicate valuable information for preventive and intervention strategies.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Self-Injurious Behavior , Adolescent , Child , Humans , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Impulsive Behavior , Longitudinal Studies , Suicidal IdeationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Childhood attention-deficit /hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is known to be associated with adult Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). We investigated if any of the subdimensions of childhood ADHD, that is, impulsivity, inattention, or hyperactivity was more prominent in this association. METHODS: In a nation-wide cohort (N = 13,330), we utilized parent reported symptoms of childhood ADHD and clinically ascertained adult BPD diagnoses. The summed total scores of ADHD symptoms and its three subdimensions were used and standardized for effect size comparison. Associations were analyzed using Cox regression with sex and birth-year adjustments. Secondary outcomes were BPD-associated traits (i.e., self-harm and substance use) analyzed using logistic- and linear regression respectively. RESULTS: ADHD symptom severity was positively associated with BPD with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.79) per standard deviation increase in total ADHD symptoms. Impulsivity was the most prominent subdimension with the only statistically significant association when analyzed in a model mutually adjusted for all ADHD subdimensions-HR for inattention: 1.15 (95% CI: 0.85-1.55), hyperactivity: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.69-1.26), impulsivity: 1.46 (95% CI: 1.12-1.91). In secondary analyses, weak positive associations were seen between total ADHD symptom score and self-harm and substance use. In analyses by subdimensions of ADHD, associations were weak and most prominent for inattention in the model with self-harm. CONCLUSION: Childhood ADHD symptoms were associated with subsequent development of BPD diagnosis and appeared to be driven primarily by impulsivity. Our findings are important for understanding the association between childhood symptoms of ADHD and subsequent BPD.
Subject(s)
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity , Borderline Personality Disorder , Adult , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/epidemiology , Borderline Personality Disorder/complications , Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis , Borderline Personality Disorder/epidemiology , Cognition , Humans , Impulsive BehaviorABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Self-harm among young autistic individuals is a clinical challenge, and the risk of premature death by suicide is strongly increased in this group. Using the advantage of total-population and family-based data, we investigated whether autism per se is a risk factor for self-harm independently of psychiatric comorbidities and how it differs from self-harm in non-autistic individuals. METHODS: We used The Stockholm Youth Cohort, a total-population register study, including all residents in Stockholm County aged 0-17 years between 2001 and 2011.Study participants were followed from age 10 to 27 for hospital admissions because of self-harm. We used modified Poisson regression to calculate relative risks (RR) using robust standard error to derive 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: In all, 410,732 individuals were included in the cohort (9,070 with a diagnosis of autism). Autistic individuals had a fivefold increased adjusted relative risk of self-harm (RR 5.0 [95% CI 4.4-5.6]). The risk increase was more pronounced for autism without intellectual disability and particularly high for self-cutting 10.2 [7.1-14.7] and more violent methods 8.9 [5.2-15.4]. The association between autism and self-harm was independent of, but clearly exacerbated by comorbid psychiatric conditions. It was of similar magnitude as risks linked to these conditions per se, and not explained by shared familial factors. CONCLUSION: Self-harm severe enough to present to medical services is as common in autistic youth as in those with depression or ADHD. Potentially more lethal methods are more likely to be used of autistic self-harmers.
Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder , Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicide , Adolescent , Autistic Disorder/epidemiology , Humans , Risk Factors , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , SiblingsABSTRACT
In the early 2000s, some children in asylum seeking families in Sweden showed severe reduction in function, including pervasive refusal to eat, drink, walk, talk or care for themselves. In 2014 this was to be named the resignation syndrome (ICD-10 F32.3A). The purpose of our study was to compare education and health-related outcomes over time between those with and without these symptoms, in a group of children from Central Asia who have been asylum seekers and received a residence permit in Sweden. We found that between the years 2005-2012, in the child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in the Stockholm Region, 103 children showed symptoms of resignation, of whom 43 (43%) showed the most severe symptoms. Children with resignation syndrome assessed and cared for by CAMHS had similar need of outpatient care as other children of the same origin who had been treated by CAMHS for other conditions. They did not have an increased need for inpatient care compared with other children of the same origin, and they passed upper secondary school and past-secondary education to the same extent as other children of the same origin.
Subject(s)
Refugees , Adolescent , Ambulatory Care , Child , Humans , Sweden/epidemiology , SyndromeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: More knowledge about risks of clinical outcomes associated with nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicide attempts (SAs) is needed to inform risk assessment and intervention. METHODS: Longitudinal cohort study based on 1,855 youths was clinically assessed for NSSI and SA, and followed up (from December, 2011 to December 2013) for the outcomes; diagnosed self-injury, alcohol/substance use disorder, and psychiatric inpatient care data derived from Swedish registers. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcomes were estimated with Cox regressions, and additionally adjusted for the potential effect of sex and the number of clinical assessments. NSSI and SA were treated as time-varying covariates. RESULTS: Youths with NSSI had elevated risks of all outcomes, compared with youths without NSSI or SA; the HR was 2.3, 95% confidence interval [1.6, 3.4] for self-injury, 1.4 [0.9, 2.1] for alcohol/substance use disorder, and 1.3 [1.0, 1.7] for psychiatric inpatient care. Youths with SA displayed higher risks for the outcomes than the NSSI group; the HR was 5.5 [2.4, 12.6] for self-injury, 2.0 [0.9, 4.4] for alcohol/substance use disorder, and 2.6 [1.5, 4.5] for psychiatric inpatient care. Youths with both NSSI and SA showed similar risks as youths with SA; HR 4.1 [2.0, 8.3] for self-injury, 2.0 [1.1, 4.1] for alcohol/substance use disorder, but a higher risk of psychiatric inpatient care; HR 5.0 [3.1, 7.9]. All results remained virtually unchanged in the adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Youths with NSSI and/or SA had higher risks for subsequent adverse clinical outcomes. These excess risks were more pronounced among youths with SA and youths with both NSSI and SA, and the risk for psychiatric inpatient care was particularly high in youths with both NSSI and SA. Our findings suggest that early interventions for youths with NSSI or SA should not exclusively focus on suicide prevention, but also consider the risk of subsequent alcohol/substance use disorder.
Subject(s)
Self-Injurious Behavior , Substance-Related Disorders , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Risk Factors , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Self-Injurious Behavior/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Suicidal Ideation , Suicide, Attempted/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether patients with clozapine treatment are at an increased risk of a more severe COVID-19 infection as compared with patients on other antipsychotic drugs. METHODS: In this register-based cohort study, all residents (age 18 or older) in the Stockholm Region with a psychotic disorder diagnosis and antipsychotic treatment were included (N = 8 233) and followed from 1 March 2020 to 14 January 2021. The exposure was defined as clozapine treatment and the outcome measures (indicating a more severe COVID-19 infection) were: inpatient care, care within intensive care unit or death due to COVID-19 infection. Differences in outcome rates between exposed (n = 966) and unexposed (other antipsychotics; n = 7 267) were examined using Cox proportional hazards models and expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in outcome rates were found between the two groups of patients after adjusting for age, sex and residence in retirement homes. The adjusted HR for the exposed compared to the unexposed was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.54, 1.70) for inpatient care; 1.69 (0.48, 5.93) for care in intensive care unit (ICU); and 0.86 (0.26, 2.80) for death. Regarding inpatient care, additional adjusting for country of birth, living in socioeconomically vulnerable areas, number of care visits during the previous year, and comorbid medical illnesses did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may add support to the present guidelines, recommending sustained clozapine treatment during the current COVID-19 pandemic with careful monitoring and readiness to alter drug doses as needed.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Clozapine , Adolescent , Clozapine/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Little is known about sex differences in outcomes of self-harm, and there are inconclusive results concerning the association between sex, self-harm, and suicide attempts. The aim of this study was to explore sex differences in outcomes of self-harm in adolescence. In this cohort study, all individuals (0-17 years) enrolled at the child- and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Stockholm between 2001 and 2015 (N = 110,072) were followed in national registers from their last contact with the CAMHS, until end of 2015. Exposure was self-harm as reason for contact, outcome measures were: alcohol-/substance use disorder, psychiatric hospitalization, non-violent or violent crime, and suicide. Differences in outcomes rates between exposed versus unexposed males, and exposed versus unexposed females, were examined using Cox regressions, expressed as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Median follow-up time was 5.8 years (Q1: 2.3 years; Q3: 9.7 years). Self-harm was documented in 2.2% (N = 1241) males and 8.7% (4716) females. Exposed individuals had higher HR for all outcomes as compared with unexposed individuals of their own sex. Exposed females had more pronounced risk for drug use disorder (HR 11.2; 95% CI 9.9-12.7) compared with exposed males (HR 6.5, 95% 5.2-8.0). Both males and females who had engaged in self-harm had elevated risks for future suicide. Adjusting for socio-economic status and age at start of follow-up only marginally affected the associations. Females and males with self-harm had similarly elevated risk for suicide, and self-harm was also an important risk marker for other adverse outcomes within both sexes.
Subject(s)
Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Suicide, Attempted/psychology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Self-harm is common and there is a need for studies that investigate the relevance of this behavior in clinical samples to inform risk assessment and treatment. The objectives in the current studies were to compare clinical and psychosocial correlates and subsequent adverse outcomes in youth who present to child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) with self-harm only (SH), self-harm with suicidality (SH+SU), with those without any indication of SH or SH+SU. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study and a longitudinal cohort study using data from a regional clinical care register, and Swedish national registers. The case-control study included all patients (5-17 years) between 2011 and 2015 (N = 25,161). SH and SH+SU cases were compared with controls (patients without SH) regarding a range of correlates. The longitudinal study included former CAMHS patients (N = 6,120) who were followed for a median time of 2.8 years after termination of CAMHS contact regarding outcomes such as clinical care consumption, social welfare recipiency, and crime conviction. RESULTS: In the case-control study, both the SH and SH+SU groups received more clinical care, had lower global functioning, and higher odds of having mental disorders compared to controls. In most comparisons, the SH+SU group had more problems than the SH group. In the longitudinal study, the same pattern emerged for most outcomes; for example, the adjusted hazard ratio for recurrent care due to self-harm was 23.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.0-31.4) in the SH+SU group compared to 3.9 (95% CI, 2.3-6.7) in the SH group. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent patients presenting with self-harm have higher risks for adverse outcomes than patients without self-harm. Suicidality in addition to self-harm is associated with more severe outcomes, importantly recurrent episodes of care for self-harm.
Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Child Behavior , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of HIV-1 with major drug resistance-associated mutations among 261 men who have sex with men (MSM) who were newly diagnosed as HIV-1-infected at Venhälsan, Stockholm, between 1992-2002. METHODS: Major resistance-associated mutations were identified using an in-house method on stored plasma samples collected within 6 months of diagnosis. Additional samples were investigated from selected patients. Phylogenetic tree analyses were used to study evolutionary relationships between the viruses. Epidemiological data were retrieved from the partner notification investigations and the medical records. RESULTS: Informed consent as well as results from the resistance test were available for 201 out of 261 patients (77%) diagnosed during 1992-2002. Viruses from 28 of these 201 patients (14%) displayed major resistance-associated mutations; 27 of these viruses displayed only zidovudine/stavudine resistance-associated mutations. None of the patients displayed resistance mutations to protease inhibitors. The prevalence of resistance-associated mutations decreased over time; 20% in 1992-1996 versus 9% in 1997-2002 (P=0.04). A transmission cluster involving six patients with a singleton M41L mutation was identified. These viruses were phenotypically sensitive to zidovudine and stavudine. The M41L mutation, as well as most other resistance mutations, was stable for many years after transmission and may have been fixated by other putative compensatory mutations. CONCLUSIONS: In this Swedish population of MSM with newly diagnosed HIV-1 infection, the prevalence of resistance-associated mutations decreased over time. Reversion of resistance-associated mutations following transmission was slow and incomplete. A large transmission cluster with an interesting M41L singleton mutation was also observed.