'I was able to make a better decision about my health.' Wahine experiences of colposcopy at a marae-based health clinic: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Equitable access to colposcopy services is required if we are to realise the benefit of the introduction of human papilloma virus (HPV) screening in Aotearoa New Zealand. We piloted a community colposcopy clinic, co-located at an urban marae health clinic. AIM: To describe the experiences of wahine (women) attending the marae-based colposcopy clinic. METHODS: An in-depth reflexive thematic analysis from 34 people's accounts was undertaken. RESULTS: Five themes were identified from the experiences of wahine attending the clinic. Three themes related to how having a local clinic supported access: everyone was welcoming and friendly, the environment was familiar and non-clinical and the clinic was accessible. The fourth theme related to how this contributed to agency. A fifth theme relates to wahine views about informing the ongoing provision of colposcopy services. The experiences reflected the principles and values practised at the marae health clinic. Wahine described feeling cared for as soon as they entered the clinic. As the clinic was local, and for some based at their marae, it was a known space where they knew the experience would be safe. Whanau were welcome with spaces for children to play. Being local meant there were fewer logistics to manage, all of which supported access. DISCUSSION: Prioritising wahine through the provision of culturally safe and accessible colposcopy is feasible. It has the potential to contribute to the elimination of cervical cancer in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

Developing a transgender and non-binary inclusive obstetrics and gynaecology undergraduate medical curriculum in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Where are we at, and where do we need to be?

Internationally, undergraduate medical education is not currently enabling early career doctors to meet the needs of trans and gender diverse (TGD) people as healthcare consumers. This review outlines inclusion of TGD education in undergraduate medical education more broadly to contextualise curriculum development needs in obstetrics, gynaecology and reproductive medicine in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Limited, and lack of integrated content, teaching capability and current absence of TGD health knowledge as graduate outcomes, compounded by pedagogy (biomedical/binary framing) and more appropriate learning resources are indicators for curricula, and workforce, development.

Can storytelling of women's lived experience enhance empathy in medical students? A pilot intervention study.

PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed to investigate the acceptability and efficacy of a patient storytelling intervention (live and recorded) on empathy levels of medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical students participated in a storytelling intervention that had three components: listening to live or recorded stories from women with abnormal uterine bleeding, reflective writing, and a debriefing session. Empathy scores of students pre- and post-intervention were measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-student version (JSE-S). Students also completed a feedback survey. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used for text comments. RESULTS: Both live and recorded storytelling interventions had positive effects on student's empathy scores post intervention. Overall, students were satisfied with the intervention and reported that it improved their understanding of life experiences of women. Suggestions were made for an in-person storytelling session and interactive discussion after listening to each story. CONCLUSION: A storytelling intervention has the potential to improve medical students' empathy and understanding of lived experience of women with health conditions. This could be valuable when student-patient interactions are limited in healthcare settings, or to enable stories of small numbers of patient volunteers to reach students.

Administration of Routine Antenatal Anti-D Prophylaxis (RAADP) in Wellington, Aotearoa: is our practice equitable?

AIM: To assess local compliance with Routine Antenatal Anti-D Prophylaxis (RAADP) guidelines and to determine if its administration is equitable in Wellington, Aotearoa New Zealand. METHODS: A retrospective 6-month audit of people birthing in Wellington maternity units. Rhesus-negative people were identified and electronic heath records reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred and nine out of 1,881 (11%) of people birthing were Rhesus-negative. Two hundred and five people were included in the audit. Three people were excluded as they birthed prior to 28 weeks, and one was already isoimmunised. One became isoimmunised during pregnancy. Eighty-three out of 205 (40%) received RAADP as per guidelines. Factors that made it more likely for people to receive RAADP were private obstetrician care (78% versus 34%, p<0.01), living closer to hospital (p<0.01) and birthing in Wellington Hospital (43% versus 11% in a primary unit, p<0.01). There is no evidence that management was influenced by ethnicity, mode of birth, parity, age or attendance at a hospital antenatal clinic. CONCLUSION: RAADP guidelines are not being followed and some subgroups are disproportionately affected. There is evidence of harm, with one person becoming isoimmunised during pregnancy. Simplifying local protocols, establishing more sites for RAADP administration such as pharmacies or primary units and improving staff and patient education could help to address these inequities.

Uncovering social structures and informational prejudices to reduce inequity in delivery and uptake of new molecular technologies.

Advances in molecular technologies have the potential to help remedy health inequities through earlier detection and prevention; if, however, their delivery and uptake (and therefore any benefits associated with such testing) are not more carefully considered, there is a very real risk that existing inequities in access and use will be further exacerbated. We argue this risk relates to the way that information and knowledge about the technology is both acquired and shared, or not, between health practitioners and their patients.A healthcare system can be viewed as a complex social network comprising individuals with different worldviews, hierarchies, professional cultures and subcultures and personal beliefs, both for those giving and receiving care. When healthcare practitioners are not perceived as knowledge equals, they would experience informational prejudices, and the result is that knowledge dissemination across and between them would be impeded. The uptake and delivery of a new technology may be inequitable as a result. Patients would also experience informational prejudice when they are viewed as not being able to understand the information that is presented to them, and information may be withheld.Informational prejudices driven by social relations and structures have thus far been underexplored in considering (in)equitable implementation and uptake of new molecular technologies. Every healthcare interaction represents an opportunity for experiencing informational prejudice, and with it the risk of being inappropriately informed for undertaking (or offering) such screening or testing. Making knowledge acquisition and information dissemination, and experiences of informational prejudice, explicit through sociologically framed investigations would extend our understandings of (in)equity, and offer ways to affect network relationships and structures that support equity in delivery and uptake.