Characterizing the risk of human leukocyte antigen-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in older recipients.

Older compatible living donor kidney transplant (CLDKT) recipients have higher mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) compared to younger recipients. These risks may be amplified in older incompatible living donor kidney transplant (ILDKT) recipients who undergo desensitization and intense immunosuppression. In a 25-center cohort of ILDKT recipients transplanted between September 24, 1997, and December 15, 2016, we compared mortality, DCGF, delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and length of stay (LOS) between 234 older (age ≥60 years) and 1172 younger (age 18-59 years) recipients. To investigate whether the impact of age was different for ILDKT recipients compared to 17 542 CLDKT recipients, we used an interaction term to determine whether the relationship between posttransplant outcomes and transplant type (ILDKT vs CLDKT) was modified by age. Overall, older recipients had higher mortality (hazard ratio: 1.632.072.65, P < .001), lower DCGF (hazard ratio: 0.360.530.77, P = .001), and AR (odds ratio: 0.390.540.74, P < .001), and similar DGF (odds ratio: 0.461.032.33, P = .9) and LOS (incidence rate ratio: 0.880.981.10, P = 0.8) compared to younger recipients. The impact of age on mortality (interaction P = .052), DCGF (interaction P = .7), AR interaction P = .2), DGF (interaction P = .9), and LOS (interaction P = .5) were similar in ILDKT and CLDKT recipients. Age alone should not preclude eligibility for ILDKT.

Delayed graft function and acute rejection following HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation.

Incompatible living donor kidney transplant recipients (ILDKTr) have pre-existing donor-specific antibody (DSA) that, despite desensitization, may persist or reappear with resulting consequences, including delayed graft function (DGF) and acute rejection (AR). To quantify the risk of DGF and AR in ILDKT and downstream effects, we compared 1406 ILDKTr to 17 542 compatible LDKT recipients (CLDKTr) using a 25-center cohort with novel SRTR linkage. We characterized DSA strength as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF); positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC); or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC). DGF occurred in 3.1% of CLDKT, 3.5% of PLNF, 5.7% of PFNC, and 7.6% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher DGF for PCC recipients (aOR = 1.03 1.682.72 ). However, the impact of DGF on mortality and DCGF risk was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction > .1). AR developed in 8.4% of CLDKT, 18.2% of PLNF, 21.3% of PFNC, and 21.7% of PCC recipients, which translated to higher AR (aOR PLNF = 1.45 2.093.02 ; PFNC = 1.67 2.403.46 ; PCC = 1.48 2.243.37 ). Although the impact of AR on mortality was no higher for ILDKT than CLDKT (p interaction = .1), its impact on DCGF risk was less consequential for ILDKT (aHR = 1.34 1.621.95 ) than CLDKT (aHR = 1.96 2.292.67 ) (p interaction = .004). Providers should consider these risks during preoperative counseling, and strategies to mitigate them should be considered.

Center-level Variation in HLA-incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization protocols for HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) vary across centers. The impact of these, as well as other practice variations, on ILDKT outcomes remains unknown. METHODS: We sought to quantify center-level variation in mortality and graft loss following ILDKT using a 25-center cohort of 1358 ILDKT recipients with linkage to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients for accurate outcome ascertainment. We used multilevel Cox regression with shared frailty to determine the variation in post-ILDKT outcomes attributable to between-center differences and to identify any center-level characteristics associated with improved post-ILDKT outcomes. RESULTS: After adjusting for patient-level characteristics, only 6 centers (24%) had lower mortality and 1 (4%) had higher mortality than average. Similarly, only 5 centers (20%) had higher graft loss and 2 had lower graft loss than average. Only 4.7% of the differences in mortality (P < 0.01) and 4.4% of the differences in graft loss (P < 0.01) were attributable to between-center variation. These translated to a median hazard ratio of 1.36 for mortality and 1.34 of graft loss for similar candidates at different centers. Post-ILDKT outcomes were not associated with the following center-level characteristics: ILDKT volume and transplanting a higher proportion of highly sensitized, prior transplant, preemptive, or minority candidates. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike most aspects of transplantation in which center-level variation and volume impact outcomes, we did not find substantial evidence for this in ILDKT. Our findings support the continued practice of ILDKT across these diverse centers.

Reversing donor-specific antibody responses and antibody-mediated rejection with bortezomib and belatacept in mice and kidney transplant recipients.

Active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a potentially devastating complication and consistently effective treatment remains elusive. We hypothesized that the reversal of acute AMR requires rapid elimination of antibody-secreting plasma cells (PC) with a proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, followed by the sustained inhibition of PC generation with CTLA4-Ig or belatacept (B/B). We show in mice that B/B therapy selectively depleted mature PC producing donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and reduced DSA, when administered after primary and secondary DSA responses had been established. A pilot investigation was initiated to treat six consecutive patients with active AMR with B/B. Compassionate use of this regimen was initiated for the first patient who developed early, severe acute AMR that did not respond to steroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin after his third kidney transplant. B/B treatment resulted in a rapid reversal of AMR, leading us to treat five additional patients who also resolved their acute AMR episode and had sustained disappearance of circulating DSA for ≤30 months. This study provides a proof-of-principle demonstration that mouse models can identify mechanistically rational therapies for the clinic. Follow-up investigations with a more stringent clinical design are warranted to test whether B/B improves on the standard of care for the treatment of acute AMR.

"Early" and "Late" Hospital readmissions in the first year after kidney transplant at a single center.

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission (HR) after surgery is considered a quality metric. METHODS: Data on 2371 first-time adult kidney transplant (KT) recipients were collected to analyze the "early" (≤30 days) and "late" (31-365 days) HR patterns after KT at a single center over a 12-year time span (2002-2013). RESULTS: 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year HR were 31%, 41%, and 53%, respectively. Risk factors for HR included age >50, female sex, black race, BMI >30, transplant LOS >5 days, and pre-transplant time on dialysis >765 days. Indications for early (n = 749) and late (n = 508) HR were similar. Early HR (OR: 3.80, P = .007) and black race (OR: 2.38, P = .009) were associated with higher odds of 1-year graft failure while frequency (1-2, 3-4, 5+) of HR (ORs: 4.68, 8.36, 9.44, P < .001) and age > 50 (OR: 2.11, P = .007) were associated with higher odds of 1-year mortality. Transplant LOS > 5 days increased both odds of 1-year graft failure (OR: 3.51, P = .001) and mortality (OR: 2.05, P = .006). One-year graft and recipient survival were 96.7% and 94.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital readmission was associated with reduced graft and patient survival; however, despite a relatively high and consistent HR rate after KT, overall 1-year graft and patient survival was high.

Inverse Association Between the Quantity of Human Peripheral Blood CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T Cells With De Novo DSA Production in the First Year After Kidney Transplant.

BACKGROUND: We recently reported that a novel CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T-cell subset significantly inhibits posttransplant alloantibody production in a murine transplant model. These findings prompted the current study to investigate the association of human CD8 T cells with the same phenotype with the development of de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) after kidney transplantation. METHODS: In the current studies, we prospectively and serially analyzed peripheral blood CD8 and CD4 T-cell subsets and monitored for the development of de novo DSA in kidney transplant recipients during the first-year posttransplant. We report results on 95 first-time human kidney transplant recipients with 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-three recipients (24.2%) developed de novo DSA within 1-year posttransplant. Recipients who developed DSA had significantly lower quantities of peripheral CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells (P = 0.01) and significantly lower ratios of CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cell to combined CD4 Th1/Th2 cell subsets (IFN-γCD4 and IL-4CD4 cells; P = 0.0001) compared to recipients who remained DSA-negative over the first-year posttransplant. CONCLUSIONS: Our data raise the possibility that human CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells are a homolog to murine CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells (termed antibody-suppressor CD8 T cells) and that the quantity of CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells (or the ratio of CXCR5IFN-γCD8 T cells to Th1/Th2 CD4 T cells) may identify recipients at risk for development of DSA.

Hospital readmissions following HLA-incompatible live donor kidney transplantation: A multi-center study.

Thirty percent of kidney transplant recipients are readmitted in the first month posttransplantation. Those with donor-specific antibody requiring desensitization and incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) constitute a unique subpopulation that might be at higher readmission risk. Drawing on a 22-center cohort, 379 ILDKTs with Medicare primary insurance were matched to compatible transplant-matched controls and to waitlist-only matched controls on panel reactive antibody, age, blood group, renal replacement time, prior kidney transplantation, race, gender, diabetes, and transplant date/waitlisting date. Readmission risk was determined using multilevel, mixed-effects Poisson regression. In the first month, ILDKTs had a 1.28-fold higher readmission risk than compatible controls (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.46; P < .001). Risk peaked at 6-12 months (relative risk [RR] 1.67, 95% CI 1.49-1.87; P < .001), attenuating by 24-36 months (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10-1.40; P < .001). ILDKTs had a 5.86-fold higher readmission risk (95% CI 4.96-6.92; P < .001) in the first month compared to waitlist-only controls. At 12-24 (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.95; P = .002) and 24-36 months (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84; P < .001), ILDKTs had a lower risk than waitlist-only controls. These findings of ILDKTs having a higher readmission risk than compatible controls, but a lower readmission risk after the first year than waitlist-only controls should be considered in regulatory/payment schemas and planning clinical care.

Clinical utility of C3d binding donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody detection by single antigen beads after kidney transplantation-a retrospective study.

Development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after renal transplantation is known to be associated with worse graft survival, yet determining which specificities in which recipients are the most deleterious remains under investigation. This study evaluated the relationship of the complement binding capacity of post-transplant de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies with subsequent clinical outcome. Stored sera from 265 recipients previously identified as having de novo DSA were retested for DSA and their C3d binding capacity using Luminex-based solid-phase assays. Most recipients had anti-HLA class II-reactive DSA (class I = 12.5%, class II = 68.7%, class I and class II = 18.9%). The recipients that had C3d binding DSA (67.5%) had a significantly higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection and any rejection. They also had significantly lower kidney survival, with the lowest survival in those that had both anti-HLA class I and class II C3d binding DSA. Concurrent biopsy comparison revealed a 96.2% positive predictive value and 47.4% negative predictive value for C4d peritubular capillary (Ptc) deposition. Anti-HLA class I and class II C3d binding DSA carried a twofold and 1.5-fold increased risk of kidney loss, respectively, in multivariate analysis.

High mortality in diabetic recipients of high KDPI deceased donor kidneys.

BACKGROUND: Deceased donor (DD) kidney quality is determined by calculating the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI). Optimizing high KDPI (≥85%) DD transplant outcome is challenging. This retrospective study was performed to review our high KDPI DD transplant results to identify clinical practices that can improve future outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively calculated the KDPI for 895 DD kidney recipients transplanted between 1/2002 and 11/2013. Age, race, body mass index (BMI), retransplantation, gender, diabetes (DM), dialysis time, and preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD) (previous myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass (CABG), or stenting) were determined for all recipients. RESULTS: About 29.7% (266/895) of transplants were from donors with a KDPI ≥85%. By Cox regression older age, diabetes, female gender, and dialysis time >4 years correlated with shorter patient survival time. Diabetics with CAD who received a high KDPI donor kidney had a significantly increased risk of death (HR 4.33 (CI 1.82-10.30), P=.001) compared to low KDPI kidney recipients. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve for diabetic recipients of high KDPI kidneys was significantly worse if they had preexisting CAD (P<.001 by log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Patient survival using high KDPI donor kidneys may be improved by avoiding diabetic candidates with preexisting CAD.

Survival Benefit with Kidney Transplants from HLA-Incompatible Live Donors.

BACKGROUND: A report from a high-volume single center indicated a survival benefit of receiving a kidney transplant from an HLA-incompatible live donor as compared with remaining on the waiting list, whether or not a kidney from a deceased donor was received. The generalizability of that finding is unclear. METHODS: In a 22-center study, we estimated the survival benefit for 1025 recipients of kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors who were matched with controls who remained on the waiting list or received a transplant from a deceased donor (waiting-list-or-transplant control group) and controls who remained on the waiting list but did not receive a transplant (waiting-list-only control group). We analyzed the data with and without patients from the highest-volume center in the study. RESULTS: Recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors had a higher survival rate than either control group at 1 year (95.0%, vs. 94.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 89.6% for the waiting-list-only control group), 3 years (91.7% vs. 83.6% and 72.7%, respectively), 5 years (86.0% vs. 74.4% and 59.2%), and 8 years (76.5% vs. 62.9% and 43.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons with the two control groups). The survival benefit was significant at 8 years across all levels of donor-specific antibody: 89.2% for recipients of kidney transplants from incompatible live donors who had a positive Luminex assay for anti-HLA antibody but a negative flow-cytometric cross-match versus 65.0% for the waiting-list-or-transplant control group and 47.1% for the waiting-list-only control group; 76.3% for recipients with a positive flow-cytometric cross-match but a negative cytotoxic cross-match versus 63.3% and 43.0% in the two control groups, respectively; and 71.0% for recipients with a positive cytotoxic cross-match versus 61.5% and 43.7%, respectively. The findings did not change when patients from the highest-volume center were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study validated single-center evidence that patients who received kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors had a substantial survival benefit as compared with patients who did not undergo transplantation and those who waited for transplants from deceased donors. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases.).

Early immunosuppression treatment correlates with later de novo donor-specific antibody development after kidney and pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) post-transplant correlate with a higher risk of immunologic graft injury and loss following kidney and pancreas transplantation. Post-transplant dnDSA can occur within the first post-transplant year. METHODS: In this study, 817 of 1290 kidney and simultaneous kidney/pancreas recipients were tested for dnDSA post-transplant. Recipient immunosuppressive treatment at one, three, six, and 12 months post-transplant was correlated with dnDSA incidence by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The overall incidence of dnDSA was 21.3% detected a median of 3.5 yr post-transplant. By univariate analysis, the immunosuppressive treatment at all time points correlated with dnDSA (p < 0.01). Month 6 treatment correlated best in multivariable analysis (p = 0.004). At six months, recipients receiving rapamune/mycophenolic acid (Rapa/MPA) had the highest dnDSA incidence at five yr (25.3%) and last follow-up (30.7%), those treated with cyclosporine/rapamune (CNI/Rapa) had the lowest incidence at five yr (10.8%) and last follow-up (18.6%), and cyclosporine/mycophenolic acid (CNI/MPA) treatment had an intermediate incidence at five yr (16.7%) and last follow-up (20.4%) (p < 0.01). Six-month CNI/MPA and Rapa/MPA treatment significantly correlated with dnDSA (hazard ratios of 2.36 and 1.80, respectively) by Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. CONCLUSION: The risk of post-transplant dnDSA development correlates with early immunosuppressive management.

Human leukocyte antigen type and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an infrequent but serious complication of solid organ transplantation. Early detection and initiation of therapy may improve outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify human leukocyte antigen (HLA) type as risk and prognostic factors for PTLD. METHODS: A review was undertaken to identify PTLD cases treated at our institution over the past 25 years. Logistic regression and Cox Proportional Hazards were used to model risk factors for PTLD and clinical outcomes in patients with PTLD. RESULTS: One hundred six cases of PTLD were identified with 1392 solid-organ transplant recipient controls. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seronegative status pretransplant (odds ratio [OR] = 7.61, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 3.83-15.1) and receipt of a nonkidney transplant were associated with an increased risk of PTLD. Being African American and receipt of a living-related kidney transplant were associated with a decreased risk of PTLD. The HLA-B40 group was a risk factor for PTLD in EBV-seronegative individuals (OR = 8.38, 95% CI = 2.18-32.3), whereas HLA-B8 was a risk factor for PTLD in EBV-seropositive individuals (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 1.52-7.09). Specific HLA types were not associated with graft failure or mortality after PTLD diagnosis. In PTLD patients, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, bone marrow involvement, T-cell PTLD, and age were associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: Human leukocyte antigen-B40 group and HLA-B8 were identified as novel susceptibility factors for PTLD in EBV-seropositive and EBV-seronegative individuals, respectively. Multicentered, large prospective studies of PTLD with correlative immunologic work are needed to test the significance of these observed associations.

The safety of hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: the Ohio State University experience with 1500 cases.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor (HALD) nephrectomy has been performed at our institution since December 1999. Through May 2014, a total of 1500 HALD procedures have been performed. We have evaluated the outcomes of HALD. The HALD procedure consists of a hand-port incision as well as two 12-mm ports. Mean donor age was 40.8 ± 10.8 yr, BMI was 27.9 ± 5.0, there were 541 males, 1271 Caucasians, and the left kidney was removed in 1236 patients. All procedures were successfully completed. Four donors (0.27%) were converted to an open technique due to bleeding. Four donors required blood transfusions. 53 donors (3.5%) were readmitted in the first month post-donation; almost half were due to gastrointestinal complaints. Six donors required reoperation; three for SBO and three for wound dehiscence. 27 patients (1.8%) developed incisional hernias. Seven donors (0.47%) developed bowel obstruction. All donors recovered well with a mean hospital stay after donation of 2.1 ± 0.3 d. All except one kidney were successfully implanted. Twenty-one recipients (1.4%) experienced DGF. Ureter complications occurred in 17 (1.1%) recipients. Early graft loss occurred in 13 patients (0.9%). In conclusion, HALD is a safe procedure for the donor with good recipient outcomes.

Effects of cardiovascular comorbidity adjustment on SRTR risk-adjusted cox proportional hazard models of graft survival.

BACKGROUND: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) determine expected graft survivals to identify potentially underperforming transplant centers. There has been recent interest in evaluating adjustments for comorbidities when performing these calculations. This study was performed to determine the influence that adjustment for pre-transplant cardiovascular disease comorbidity can have on risk-adjusted Cox models, such as those used by SRTR and CMS. METHODS: We analyzed Cox proportional hazards models for 1-year and 3-year graft survival for kidney recipients from a single center where cardiovascular disease covariates were added to a baseline model derived by using the SRTR calculated risk scores and including all standard SRTR parameters. RESULTS: Living and deceased donor recipient 1-year and living donor 3-year Cox models that included all seven covariates demonstrated 8% to 13% improved discrimination. Only the 1-year deceased donor recipient Cox model demonstrated significantly improved calibration (likelihood ratio test P=0.038). The expected graft losses increased by >30% for living donor recipients at 1 and 3 years and decreased by 2% to 4% for deceased donor recipients at 1 and 3 years. CONCLUSION: SRTR and CMS use of pre-transplant cardiovascular comorbidity adjustment might impact center performance evaluations.

Change in bone mineral density at one year following glucocorticoid withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients.

Glucocorticoid (GC) therapy induces deleterious effects on the skeleton in kidney transplantation but studies of GC discontinuation in this population are limited. This study evaluated changes in areal bone mineral density (BMD) with GC withdrawal. Subjects were enrolled one yr after renal transplantation and randomized to continue or stop prednisone; all subjects continued cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. BMD measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed at enrollment and repeated at one yr and values were standardized. Mean ± standard deviation of annualized change in standardized BMD between GC withdrawal vs. continuation group at the lumbar spine was +4.7% ± 5.5 vs. +0.9% ± 5.3 (p = 0.0014); total hip +2.4% ± 4.2 vs. -0.4% ± 4.2 (p = 0.013), and femoral neck +2.1% ± 4.6 vs. +1.0% ± 6.0 (p = 0.37). There was no confounding by prednisone dose prior to enrollment, change in creatinine clearance, weight, or use of bone-active medications following study entry. Multivariate analysis determined that the change in BMD was positively associated with baseline alkaline phosphatase and creatinine clearance and negatively associated with baseline BMD. BMD improves with GC withdrawal after renal transplantation, and this gain in BMD is dependent on the baseline bone turnover, renal function, and BMD.

A nonsimultaneous, extended, altruistic-donor chain.

We report a chain of 10 kidney transplantations, initiated in July 2007 by a single altruistic donor (i.e., a donor without a designated recipient) and coordinated over a period of 8 months by two large paired-donation registries. These transplantations involved six transplantation centers in five states. In the case of five of the transplantations, the donors and their coregistered recipients underwent surgery simultaneously. In the other five cases, "bridge donors" continued the chain as many as 5 months after the coregistered recipients in their own pairs had received transplants. This report of a chain of paired kidney donations, in which the transplantations were not necessarily performed simultaneously, illustrates the potential of this strategy.

Peritubular capillary C4d staining in late acute renal allograft rejection--is it relevant?

BACKGROUND: In the early post-transplant period, renal allograft rejection with diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition predicts poor graft survival. In the late post-transplant setting, that is, one or more yr after transplantation, the implication of diffuse PTC C4d deposition is still a topic of debate. The purpose of our study was to see if diffuse PTC C4d deposition, in late acute rejection (LAR), occurring more than one yr post-transplant, has any impact on graft survival and function. METHODS: We selected cases, both cadaveric as well as living donor renal transplant recipients, in whom acute rejection with PTC C4d deposition was first detected after the first year post-transplant. Recipients with multiple acute rejection episodes during the first year post-transplant were excluded from the study. The first biopsy diagnosed with LAR was considered the index biopsy (n = 40). We formed two groups: group 1, C4d-positive LAR (n = 20), and group 2, C4d-negative LAR (n = 20). Groups were matched for maintenance and post-rejection immunosuppressive therapy, baseline serum creatinine levels before the time of the index biopsy, time from transplant to index biopsy, as well as chronic allograft damage index (CADI) score in the index biopsies. We compared the rate of graft loss, and the graft function of the surviving grafts at the end of the study period, as well as histologic parameters in the index biopsy specimens between the two groups. The mean follow-up period was 20 months. RESULTS: No significant differences in the rate of graft loss or graft function were found between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the follow-up period. Histologically, PTC margination and transplant glomerulopathy were more common in the C4d-positive group, and this difference was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of plasma cell infiltrates. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike in the acute setting, the presence or absence of PTC C4d staining in renal allografts with LAR may not have a predictive value regarding graft outcome.

Steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression with rapamune and low-dose neoral in pancreas transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Steroid-free immunosuppression is an attractive option because it avoids the many side effects of chronic corticosteroid use. It is especially attractive in pancreas recipients because it avoids the diabetogenic effects of steroids. METHODS: We evaluated the outcome of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol in pancreas transplant recipients. Between August 2003 and May 2006, a total of 97 pancreas transplant recipients received steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression, consisting of induction with thymoglobulin and prednisone for the first 5 days. Patients were maintained on sirolimus adjusted to a target rapamycin trough level and reduced-dose cyclosporine adjusted to target C2 levels. All pancreas transplants (n=124) performed in the previous 3 years and maintained on a steroid-based immunosuppressive protocol with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil were used for comparison. RESULTS: One-year patient and death censored pancreas graft survival were 93.8% and 94.8% for the steroid free group versus 95.2% and 87.9% for the comparator group, respectively. The incidence of acute rejection was 9.3% in the steroid-free group versus 28.3% in the comparator group (P<0.01). No pancreas loss in the steroid-free group was caused by acute rejection, whereas seven (5.6%) patients in the comparator group lost their pancreases because of acute rejection (P<0.05). At 1 year after transplant, the mean serum glucose and creatinine levels were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that excellent graft survival with a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection can be achieved using a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol consisting of sirolimus and cyclosporine.

Evaluation of immune regulation in transplant patients using the trans vivo delayed type hypersensitivity assay.

Allograft recipient IL-10 and/or transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) dependent anti-inflammatory T-cell delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to donor derived antigens, or regulatory T-cell responses, have been demonstrated in rodents and transplant patients using a previously described trans vivo DTH assay. We used this assay to determine the incidence of recipient anti-inflammatory T-cell responses to donor antigens in a large cohort (n = 420) of primary kidney and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant patients tested a mean of 4.8 years after transplantation. The results were compared with clinical outcomes and the presence of detectable circulating alloantibodies. We found an unexpectedly high incidence (21.9%) of this anti-inflammatory T-cell response to donor antigens in these recipients. There was a significant correlation between this T-cell phenotype and the presence of detectable circulating alloantibodies (p = 0.03). There was no correlation between this T-cell phenotype and the degree of HLA mismatch. In addition, the presence of an anti-inflammatory DTH response to donor antigens did not correlate with an improved clinical outcome at a median of nearly 5 years after transplantation. These findings suggest that detection of an anti-inflammatory T-cell response to donor antigens does not identify patients that have developed graft protective, regulatory T-cell responses.

Excellent clinical outcomes in primary kidney transplant recipients treated with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression.

Steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression is desirable to eliminate the side effects of chronic corticosteroid use. Complete steroid avoidance or rapid post-transplant steroid withdrawal has recently been used in renal transplant recipients with encouraging results. The present study evaluated the outcome of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol in kidney transplant recipients with at least one-yr follow up. Between April 2002 and October 2004, a total of 301 primary kidney transplant recipients received steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression. The regimen consisted of induction with thymogobulin and prednisone for the first five d. Patients were maintained on Sirolimus and Neoral. Neoral dose was adjusted to target C2 levels and the Sirolimus dose was adjusted to a target rapamycin trough level. All primary kidney transplants (n = 502) performed in the two yr (starting January 2000) prior to institution of the steroid-free regimen and thus maintained on a steroid-based immunosuppressive protocol were used for comparison. One-year patient and death censored graft survival were 93.1% and 98.1% for the steroid-free group vs. 95.2% and 95.2% for the comparator groups (p = ns). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 4.9% in the steroid-free group vs. 9.4% in the comparator group (p < 0.01). Two (0.7%) of 301 patients in the steroid-free group lost their grafts because of acute rejection compared with nine (1.8%) patients in the comparator group (p < 0.05). At one-yr post-transplant the mean serum creatinine level was not different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in mean serum cholesterol and triglycerides levels as well as the percentage of patients on lipid lowering agents between the groups. White blood cell counts, daily doses of Neoral and weight gain were significantly lower in the steroid-free group vs. the comparator group. However, more patients in the steroid-free group required erythropoietin and iron therapy for anemia (p < 0.001). We conclude that excellent graft survival with a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection can be achieved using a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol consisting of Neoral and Sirolimus.