Updated overall survival from the MONALEESA-3 trial in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving first-line ribociclib plus fulvestrant.

BACKGROUND: The phase III MONALEESA-3 trial included first- (1L) and second-line (2L) patients and demonstrated a significant overall survival (OS) benefit for ribociclib + fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in the final protocol-specified and exploratory (longer follow-up) OS analyses. At the time of these analyses, the full OS benefit of 1L ribociclib was not completely characterized because the median OS (mOS) was not reached. As CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) + endocrine therapy (ET) is now a preferred option for 1L HR+/HER2- ABC, we report an exploratory analysis (median follow-up, 70.8 months; 14.5 months longer than the prior analysis) to fully elucidate the OS benefit in the MONALEESA-3 1L population. METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- ABC were randomized 2:1 to 1L/2L fulvestrant + ribociclib or placebo. OS in 1L patients (de novo disease or relapse > 12 months from completion of [neo]adjuvant ET) was assessed by Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier methods. Progression-free survival 2 (PFS2) and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS) were analyzed. MONALEESA-3 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02422615). RESULTS: At data cutoff (January 12, 2022; median follow-up time, 70.8 months), mOS was 67.6 versus 51.8 months with 1L ribociclib versus placebo (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67; 95% CI 0.50-0.90); 16.5% and 8.6% of ribociclib and placebo patients, respectively, were still receiving treatment. PFS2 (HR 0.64) and CFS (HR 0.62) favored ribociclib versus placebo. Among those who discontinued treatment, 16.7% and 35.0% on ribociclib or placebo, respectively, received a subsequent CDK4/6i. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of MONALEESA-3 reports the longest mOS thus far (67.6 months) for 1L patients in a phase III ABC trial. These results in a 1L population show that the OS benefit of ribociclib was maintained through extended follow-up, further supporting its use in HR+/HER2- ABC.

Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in the phase III randomized MONALEESA-3 trial: updated overall survival.

BACKGROUND: Ribociclib plus fulvestrant demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Here we present a new landmark in survival follow-up for a phase III cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor clinical trial in patients with ABC (median, 56.3 months). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 174 sites (30 countries). Patients were men and postmenopausal women (age ≥18 years) with histologically/cytologically confirmed HR+/HER2- ABC. Patients could have received ≤1 line of endocrine therapy (ET) but no chemotherapy for ABC. Patients, assigned 2:1, were stratified by the presence/absence of liver/lung metastases and previous ET. Patients received intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg, day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus day 15 of cycle 1) with oral ribociclib (600 mg/day, 3 weeks on, 1 week off) or placebo. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in patients receiving ≥1 dose study treatment. OS was a secondary endpoint. MONALEESA-3 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02422615; no longer enrolling). RESULTS: Between 18 June 2015 and 10 June 2016, 726 patients were randomly assigned (484, ribociclib; 242, placebo). At data cut-off (30 October 2020), median OS (mOS) was 53.7 months (ribociclib) versus 41.5 months (placebo) [hazard ratio (HR), 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.90]. Subgroup analyses were consistent with overall population. In the first-line setting, most patients in the ribociclib arm (∼60%) lived longer than median follow-up; mOS was 51.8 months in the placebo arm (HR, 0.64; 95% CI 0.46-0.88). In the second-line setting, mOS was 39.7 months (ribociclib) versus 33.7 months (placebo) (HR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.59-1.04). No apparent drug-drug interaction between ribociclib and fulvestrant or new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reported extended OS follow-up in MONALEESA-3. mOS was ∼12 months longer in patients with HR+/HER2- ABC treated with ribociclib plus fulvestrant compared with fulvestrant monotherapy.

Association of triple positivity with prognostic parameters and overall survival in a population-based study of 6,122 HER2-positive breast cancer patients: analysis of real-world clinical practice based on a research database.

Triple-positive breast cancer (TPBC), i.e. HER2-positive (HER2+) and hormone receptors-positive breast cancer, is a specific subgroup of breast cancers. TPBC biology is characterized by strong mutual interactions between signaling pathways stimulated by estrogens and HER2 amplification. The present study aims to carry out a population-based analysis of treatment outcomes in a cohort of hormone receptor (HR) positive and negative breast cancer patients who were treated with anti-HER2 therapy in the Czech Republic. The BREAST research database was used as the data source for this retrospective analysis. The database covers approximately 95% of breast cancer patients treated with targeted therapies in the Czech Republic. The analysis included 6,122 HER2-positive patients. The patients were divided into two groups, based on estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) positivity: hormone receptor negative (HR-) patients had both ER- and PR-negative tumors (n=2,518), unlike positive (HR+) patients (n=3,604). HR+ patients were more often diagnosed premenopausal at the time of diagnosis, presented more often at stage I or II and their tumors were less commonly poorly differentiated. The overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in subgroups of HR+ patients according to treatment setting. When evaluated by stages, significantly higher OS was observed in HR+ patients diagnosed at stages II, III, and IV and regardless of tumor grade.

Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Background: The phase III MONALEESA-2 study demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable toxicity profile for first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. Here, we report updated efficacy and safety data, together with exploratory biomarker analyses, from the MONALEESA-2 study. Patients and methods: A total of 668 postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- recurrent/metastatic breast cancer were randomized (1 : 1; stratified by presence/absence of liver and/or lung metastases) to ribociclib (600 mg/day; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off; 28-day treatment cycles) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day; continuous) or placebo plus letrozole. The primary end point was locally assessed PFS. The key secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Other secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Biomarker analysis was an exploratory end point. Results: At the time of the second interim analysis, the median duration of follow-up was 26.4 months. Median PFS was 25.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 23.0-30.3] for ribociclib plus letrozole and 16.0 months (95% CI 13.4-18.2) for placebo plus letrozole (hazard ratio 0.568; 95% CI 0.457-0.704; log-rank P = 9.63 × 10-8). Ribociclib treatment benefit was maintained irrespective of PIK3CA or TP53 mutation status, total Rb, Ki67, or p16 protein expression, and CDKN2A, CCND1, or ESR1 mRNA levels. Ribociclib benefit was more pronounced in patients with wild-type versus altered receptor tyrosine kinase genes. OS data remain immature, with 116 deaths observed; 50 in the ribociclib arm and 66 in the placebo arm (hazard ratio 0.746; 95% CI 0.517-1.078). The ORR was 42.5% versus 28.7% for all patients treated with ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole, respectively, and 54.5% versus 38.8%, respectively, for patients with measurable disease. Safety results, after a further 11.1 months of follow-up, were comparable with those reported at the first analysis, with no new or unexpected toxicities observed, and no evidence of cumulative toxicity. Conclusions: The improved efficacy outcomes and manageable tolerability observed with first-line ribociclib plus letrozole are maintained with longer follow-up, relative to letrozole monotherapy. Clinical trials number: NCT01958021.

[Evaluation of Anti-cancer Therapies with Reimbursement Limited to Comprehensive Cancer Centres Using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale]. / Hodnocení klinického benefitu protinádorových léku limitovaných na komplexní onkologická centra podle metodiky ESMO-MCBS.

BACKGROUND: The costs of oncology treatments are increasing, due to the rising prevalence of malignant diseases and the introduction of expensive novel anti-cancer agents. The new European Society for Clinical Oncology (ESMO) has recently developed a new parametric system to evaluate the clinical benefit of drugs. The Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) compares the contribution of a novel drug based on overall and progression-free survival and quality of life with those of current treatment options. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An expert group of the Czech Oncological Society conducted an assessment based on published data and an ESMO-MCBS methodology for antineoplastic agents used for the treatment of solid tumors with limited reimbursement to Comprehensive Cancer Centers. We evaluated drugs categorized as "S" that were eligible for public health insurance as of January 1, 2017. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The ESMO-MCBS score is a promising new parameter for the evaluation of new anticancer drugs. The ESMO-MCBS method for assessing the clinical benefit of drugs is simple, robust, and reproducible. The advantage of the assessment is that it is not based on a single index but rather combines several dimensions of drug performance. This parameter will be gradually added to Czech cancer guidelines. Scores obtained in the majority of cases correspond to the observed benefit of a drug in routine clinical practice.Key words: tumors - farmacotherapy - assesment study as a subject - survival - protocols of anti-cancer therapy The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 3. 5. 2017Accepted: 20. 6. 2017.

[Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinomas of the breast - analysis of 230 cases]. / Magnetická rezonance v predoperacní diagnostice invazivních lobulárních karcinomu prsu - analýza 230 prípadu.

INTRODUCTION: In breast cancer patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a supportive method characterized by high sensitivity. Its indications in the preoperative assessment are not clearly defined. More likely to benefit from preoperative MRI are younger women, women with a dense breast on mammography and patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). The aim of this study was to assess utilization of MRI and resulting benefits in preoperative tumour staging of ILC in patients treated in our institution. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of medical records of all patients with bioptically proven and primarily surgically treated ILC through the years 20142016. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients were evaluated, among them 131 (57.0%) underwent MRI. These patients were significantly younger than patients without MRI. The results of MRI were as follows: in 28.2% a small unicentric lesion, in 41.2% large infiltration or multifocality, and in 30.5% suspicion of multicentricity. The proportion of conservative surgeries and re-resections did not differ between the patients with and without MRI. The subgroup of patients with a small unicentric lesion on MRI showed a higher proportion of conservative surgeries and fewer re-resections compared to the other subgroups. In 41 women (31.3%) the MRI finding resulted in further assessments; in 29 (22.1%) an additional biopsy was done, with a malignant result in the ipsilateral breast in 8 cases and in the contralateral breast in 3 cases. The MRI finding had a substantial impact on surgery in 35 patients (26.7%) of whom it was evaluated as clinically beneficial in 23 (65.7%) cases. CONCLUSION: At our institution, more than a half of patients with ILC undergo MRI preoperatively. The finding has an impact on the scope of the surgery in approximately one fourth of the cases, being clinically beneficial in most of them. However, a high frequency of additional imaging assessments and biopsies should be taken into account. Due to the low specificity of MRI, every suspicious lesion has to be bioptically verified to avoid inappropriate surgery and patient harm.Key words: breast cancer - invasive lobular carcinoma - magnetic resonance imaging - occult lesion - biopsy.

[Reactive Lymphoid Hyperplasia of the Liver]. / Reaktivní lymfoidní hyperplazie jater.

CASE: Here, we present the case of a 50-year-old woman diagnosed with stage I hormone-dependent breast cancer. The patient underwent partial mastectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and hormone treatment with tamoxifen. Three years later, she presented with a solitary liver lesion on MRI, which was highly suspicious of malignancy. However, several fine needle biopsies were performed, and histopathological examination revealed no signs of neoplasia. As a result of these alarming discrepancies, the multidisciplinary board recommended a diag-nostic laparotomy, which yielded a finding consistent with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia, a pseudolymphoma of the liver, on a background of incipient steatohepatitis. This rare condition is characterized by proliferation of non-neoplastic lymphocytes in extranodular sites, and is usually an incidental finding on imaging modalities in clinically asymptomatic patients, predominantly women. Lesions share some radiologic features with primary malignant liver diseases such as hepatocellular carcinoma or cholangiocarcinoma. Although the etiology remains unclear, reactive lymphoid hyperplasia is believed to be associated with some malignancies, including breast cancer, or inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia usually progresses slowly, with some cases of spontaneous regression described in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, only 50 cases of hepatic reactive lymphoid hyperplasia have been reported so far.Key words: pseudolymphoma - hyperplasia - liver - lymphatic tissue The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 20. 3. 2017Accepted: 10. 4. 2017.

Pictilisib PI3Kinase inhibitor (a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K] inhibitor) plus paclitaxel for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, locally recurrent, or metastatic breast cancer: interim analysis of the multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase II randomised PEGGY study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 40% of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers (BCs) are associated with activating mutations of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. Pictilisib, a potent and highly specific class I pan-PI3K inhibitor, demonstrated preclinical activity in BC cell lines and may potentiate the effect of taxanes, benefiting patients with or without aberrant activation of the PI3K pathway. PEGGY (NCT01740336), a randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial, examined whether pictilisib augments the anti-tumour activity of paclitaxel in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic BC (mBC). We report results from the protocol-specified interim analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-three eligible patients were randomised (1:1) to receive paclitaxel (90 mg/m2 weekly for 3 weeks in every 28-day cycle) with either 260 mg pictilisib or placebo (daily on days 1-5 every week). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, and safety. RESULTS: In the ITT population, the median PFS was 8.2 months with pictilisib (n = 91) versus 7.8 months with placebo (n = 92) [hazard ratio (HR) for progression or death, 0.95; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-1.46; P = 0.83]. In patients with PIK3CA-mutated tumours, the median PFS was 7.3 months for pictilisib (n = 32) versus 5.8 months with placebo (n = 30) (HR, 1.06; 95% CI 0.52-2.12; P = 0.88). ORR was similar between treatment arms. The safety profile of pictilisib was consistent with previous reports, with no new safety signals. Proportions of patients with grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and dose reductions/discontinuations due to AEs were higher with pictilisib. CONCLUSIONS: PEGGY did not meet its primary end point, revealing no significant benefit from adding pictilisib to paclitaxel for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally recurrent or mBC. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01740336.

[Pregnancy after Treatment of Breast Cancer]. / Tehotenství po lécbe karcinomu prsu.

Thanks to improvement in cancer patients treatment results, growing attention has been paid to fertility issues. Physicians should discuss infertility risk and the possibilities of fertility preservation with all patients in reproductive age as soon as possible. Pregnancy in cancer survivors after adequate treatment should not be discouraged, including patients with endocrine-sensitive breast cancer. Embryo and oocyte cryopreservation are standard strategies for fertility cryopreservation. Several randomized clinical trials have addressed the role of LHRHa (luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs) as a way of fertility preservation with conflicting results. A meta-analysis of clinical trials, including also the largest trials POEMS and PROMISE, showed higher odds of achieving pregnancy. These data suggest that giving LHRHa before and during adjuvant chemotherapy could also be a reliable strategy to preserve ovarian function and fertility. The use of ovarian stimulating drugs in standard treatment protocols for ovarian stimulation in female cancer patients is safe according to current data. The meta-analysis of 14 studies did not show negative influence of pregnancy on overall survival of female cancer patients although the optimal interval between breast cancer diagnosis and pregnancy is not known. However, breast cancer patients are in higher risk of preterm labor and low birth weight of infants.Key words: breast neoplasms - fertility preservation - ovarian stimulation - LHRH - pregnancy - tamoxifen - aromatase inhibitors - adjuvant hormonal therapyThis work was supported by MEYS - NPS I - LO1413.The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 3. 8. 2016Accepted: 11. 8. 2016.

[Circulating Levels of Estradiol in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Aromatase Inhibitors and Their Clinical Implications]. / Sledování cirkulujících hladin estradiolu u pacientek s karcinomem prsu lécených inhibitory aromatázy - prínos v klinické praxi.

Adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors improves outcomes in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer; however, they should not be used in premenopausal women. Menopausal status is the most important factor in the choice of the hormonal treatment. There is no direct correlation between amenorrhea and ovarian function, as even the patients with amenorrhea may present with premenopausal plasma estradiol levels. The evaluation of hormonal status becomes more complicated in patients taking tamoxifen, which might lead to further increase of plasma estradiol levels. Therefore, its evaluation before and during the treatment with aromatase inhibitors is clinically important. There is a considerable caution needed when indicating aromatase inhibitors in patients with menopause caused by previous adjuvant chemotherapy, while recovery of ovarian function may appear after a certain period. This could take from 4 to 59 months (12 months on average) and it might not be accompanied by menses. This happens typically in women younger than 40 years, who should, therefore, not be treated by aromatase inhibitors alone. This supports the notion that monitoring of plasma estradiol levels is crucial in women from 40 to 50 years of age, especially before the start of aromatase inhibitors treatment.Key words: breast cancer - premenopause - postmenopause - perimenopause - estradiol - aromatase inhibitorsThis work was supported by MEYS - NPS I - LO1413 for RECAMO.The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study.The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 18. 2. 2016Accepted: 29. 6. 2016.

[Recommended Extension of Indication Criteria for Genetic Testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome]. / Doporucení rozsírení indikacních kriterií ke genetickému testování mutací v genech BRCA1 a BRCA2 u hereditárního syndromu nádoru prsu a ovarií.

Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome is indicated by a genetic counselor on the basis of personal and family history evaluation, with regards to consensual criteria, reflecting the current knowledge. The latest recommendation accepted by Czech Oncology Society and Society of Medical Genetics was published in the supplement 22 to the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2009. Since the availability of PARP inhibitors for treatment of ovarian cancer in BRCA1/ 2 mutation carriers, an update of these guidelines is urgently needed. Another reason is a higher incidence of other malignancies in high-risk families, such as prostate or pancreatic cancer. The goal is to refine the detection of mutations in selected families, to improve preventive care and collect data necessary for targeted cancer treatment.

[Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome]. / Syndrom hereditárního karcinomu prsu a ovarií.

Population with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, i.e. BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, are at higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer as well as other solid tumours such as pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer and melanoma. With the increasing experience, screening recommendations and preventive strategies including prophylactic surgery are being settled. Surveillance of women with hereditary breast cancer syndrome comprises clinical breast examination every six months, breast ultrasound and MRI in patients aged 25 to 29 and MRI and mammography in women aged 30 to 65. Screening of pancreatic cancer should be considered in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, who have two cases of pancreatic cancer in their family lineage or one first-degree relative with pancreatic cancer. Prostate cancer screening should be recommended to BRCA2 carriers from the age of 40 onwards and it should be considered in BRCA1 carriers as well. Screening for melanoma should be recommended on an individual basis with regards to a family history.

[Triple Negative Breast Cancer]. / Triple negativní karcinom prsu.

BACKGROUND: In the Czech Republic, around 6,500 women get breast cancer each year; out of this number, nearly 1,000 women are triple negative subtype. Triple negative breast cancer is characterized by lack of expression of α-estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors. Vast majority of these cases are low-differentiated carcinomas, majority belonging to the basal-like subgroup defined originally by DNA chips. Clinically, they are characterized by greater aggressiveness, frequent rate of local recurrence and organ metastases. They are more common in younger women and are associated with the occurrence of hereditary forms of breast cancer caused by pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 gene and in rare cases also BRCA2. AIM: The objective of this review is to provide comprehensive information about current knowledge of triple negative breast cancer. This paper summarizes information about epidemiology and etiopathogenesis of this disease, describes risk factors for both sporadic and hereditary forms of triple negative breast cancer, addresses histopathologic and molecular classification of triple negative breast cancer, and these characteristics associates with treatment and prediction of disease development. The article also addresses new anticancer drugs tested for triple negative breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Triple negative breast cancer is a heterogeneous group of diseases with limited therapeutic options. The key to further shift in therapy is detailed knowledge of its clinical and molecular diversity and identification of predictive biomarkers. Further improvement of therapy results of triple negative breast cancer cannot be expected before targeted therapy of this disease is found.

[Lobular breast cancer in man - case report and review of the literature]. / Lobulární karcinom prsu u muze - kazuistikaa prehled literatury.

CASE: Herein we report a case of a man with a B- cell non-Hodgkin lymfoma, primarily diagnosed by topographic and morfology tokens as lobular breast carcinoma and, as such, it was treated by chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. The treatment resulted in complete remission for 3,5 years. However, the subsequent relapses that arised in retrocrural and left axilary area did not respond adequately to breast cancer targeted chemotherapy. Therefore the patient underwent re-exstirpation of axillary lymph node yielding a surprising histology finding of folicular lymphoma. The primary biopsy specimen was histologicaly reevaluated and the initial dia-gnosis was reclassified as folicular lymphoma. The patient was given an adequate chemotherapy and targeted treatment that established a complete remission. Six months afterwards there was a relapse detected in the retrocrural area. The patient underwent palliative radiotherapy that brought about complete remission and, so far, he is in good condition. It has been eight years since the cancer dia-gnosis was established. This case report is appended by review of literature dealing with diagnostic confusion of these two malignancies. CONCLUSION: Re -biopsy plays a significant role in case of treatment strategy controversies, predominantly on condition of atypical course of malignant disease. It should always be considered in case of cancer relapse, especially if the phenotype specfication could affect the treatment decision.

[Precursors of breast cancer]. / Prekurzory karcinomu prsu.

It has become apparent that estrogen receptor (ER) - positive and - negative breast lesions are completely distinct diseases. Precursors of low-grade breast cancer are low-grade premalignant lesions, usually ER and progesterone receptor (PR) positive and HER2 negative. On the other hand, precursors of high-grade breast cancer are high-grade premalignant lesions, usually ER and PR negative and HER2 positive. Lobular neoplasia (LN) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are important from the clinical point of view. LN increases the risk of bilateral breast cancer. This is why the recommendation for the treatment of LN is very different -  from just following up up to bilateral mastectomy. The complete surgical excision of the lesion with negative margins is the usual treatment of DCIS. Several big randomized clinical trials showed the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Some of them suppose that there is a group of patients who do not need adjuvant treatment. The benefit of adjuvant tamoxifen is clear only for patients with ER positive disease. The UK/ ANZ study showed the benefit of tamoxifen only in patients without RT.

[Li-Fraumeni syndrome - a proposal of complex prevention care for carriers of TP53 mutation with total-body MRI]. / Li-Fraumeni syndrom - návrh komplexní preventivní péce o nosice TP53 mutace s pouzitím celotelové magnetické rezonance.

Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is one of the most serious hereditary cancer syndromes with high risk of malignancy already in childhood. Adrenocortical carcinoma, brain tumor, leukemia, sarcoma are the most frequent malignancies in children. Early breast cancer, brain tumor, sarcoma, skin cancer, gastrointestinal, lung, gynecological, hematological and other malignancies can be seen in adults. Predictive testing in families with detected LFS and TP53 mutation is offered from the age of 18 for various reasons. One of the most important reasons is a very limited effectivity of prevention especially in children, also the possible risk of psychological harm to the child and his family caused by the diagnosis of this syndrome. Progress in diagnostic methods, especially total body MRI, enables to propose preventive care for early cancer diagnoses for children and adults. Biochemical tests, ultrasound, MRI may improve survival of these high risk individuals and support the possibility of predictive testing in children.

[Diagnostics of breast cancer in high-risk women - our own experience]. / Diagnostika nádoru prsu ve skupine rizikových zen - vlastní zkusenosti.

Preventive oncology clinic of MMCI provides complex preventive care for women with high hereditary risk of breast and ovarian cancer due to germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Clinical follow-up is also provided to women with mutations in other genes causing a higher risk of different tumors, and also to women with increased lifetime empirical risk of breast cancer due to positive family history. Our clinic was established in 2000 and takes care for about 700 women. The goal of the clinic is to extend the life expectancy of these women to the level of the regular population. The risk of breast cancer can be reduced by prophylactic surgeries. Prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy are offered to women at a high risk. Other modality in breast cancer risk reduction is a chemoprevention by Tamoxifen. Most women accept only secondary prevention with the goal of the detection of breast cancer in clinical stage I, where the tumor is smaller than 1 cm and the risk of recurrence is less than 10%. The algorithm of prevention care was changed over the time and our diagnostic methods were improved by magnetic resonance imaging of breasts. During the 11 years of clinical follow-up 32 breast cancers in 31 women were detected. High risk women are examined every 6 month by physical examination, breast ultrasound and MRI plus mammography yearly.

[Avastin in the treatment of breast cancer]. / Avastin v lécbe karcinomu prsu.

Over the last decades, various new agents have been developed for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and overall survival of these patients has increased. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer is well established. Bevacizumab is a potent antiangiogenic agent active in many solid tumors. Three randomised clinical trials (E2100, AVADO and RIBBON I) proved the benefit of chemotherapy, especially a combination of taxanes and bevacizumab, as the first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The combination improved patient progression-free survival in all trials with no impact on the known toxic effects of taxanes. This may be a potent treatment option particularly for patients with triple negative breast cancer, and a potentially less toxic alternative to combination chemotherapy.