ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: After extensive small and colon resections, quality of life can be affected. We propose the antiperistaltic transverse coloplasty as a solution that allows for preservation of the transverse colon after both right and left colectomies while achieving a tension-free colorectal anastomosis slowing the transit and increasing the absorption time, resulting in better stool consistency and quality of life compared with an ileorectal anastomosis. METHODS: This technique was performed in a 41-year-old woman with Goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix with peritoneal metastasis. The transverse colon is rotated anticlockwise over the axis of the middle colic vessels toward the left parietocolic flank and relocated to the usual position of the descending colon. RESULTS: After 1 year of follow-up, the patient led a normal life without parenteral nutrition with five bowel movements per day and a weight gain of 15%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an antiperistaltic transverse coloplasty may be worthwhile to perform in cases of extensive bowel resections during cytoreductive surgery leading to short-bowel syndrome to avoid a permanent stoma or intestinal failure and improve patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Intestinal Failure , Female , Humans , Adult , Colon/surgery , Antidiarrheals , Quality of Life , Colectomy/methods , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: Simultaneous liver resection and peritoneal cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial today. The aim of the study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes and survival of patients with advanced metastatic colon cancer (peritoneal and/or liver metastases). Methods: Retrospective observational study from a prospective maintained data base. Patients who underwent a simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and liver resection plus HIPEC were studied. Postoperative outcomes and overall and disease free survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: From January 2010 to October 2022, 22 patients operated with peritoneal and liver metastasis (LR+) were compared with 87 patients operated with peritoneal metastasis alone (LR-). LR+ group presented higher serious morbidity (36.4 vs. 14.9%; p: 0.034). Postoperative mortality did not reach statistical difference. Median overall and disease free survival was similar. Peritoneal carcinomatosis index was the only predictive factor of survival. Conclusions: Simultaneous peritoneal and liver resection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and hospital stay, but with similar postoperative mortality and OS and disease free survival. These results reflect the evolution of these patients, considered inoperable until recently, and justify the trend to incorporate this surgical strategy within a multimodal therapeutic plan in highly selected patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Wandering Spleen/diagnostic imaging , Laparoscopy , Splenic DiseasesABSTRACT
Introducción: La cirugía y la quimioterapia han aumentado la supervivencia de los pacientes con neoplasias pancreáticas. La disminución de la morbimortalidad postoperatoria y el aumento de la esperanza de vida han ampliado las indicaciones de la duodenopancreatectomía cefálica (DPC), aunque sigue siendo controvertida en la población geriátrica. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre una base de datos prospectiva, de pacientes con adenocarcinoma ductal de páncreas sometidos a una DPC entre 2007-2018. El objetivo principal fue analizar la morbimortalidad y supervivencia asociada a la DPC en pacientes≥75 años (ancianos). Resultados: Se incluyeron 79 pacientes, 21 de ellos mayores de 75 años (27%); dentro de este grupo el 23,9% tenían más de 80 años. El ASA de ambos grupos fue similar. Los pacientes≥75años requirieron más transfusiones. No se observaron diferencias en el tiempo operatorio, aunque en los ancianos se realizaron más resecciones vasculares (26 vs. 8,7%; p=0,037).La morbilidad fue mayor en los ancianos (61,9 vs. 46,6%), aunque sin diferencias. Los≥75años presentaron más complicaciones no quirúrgicas (33,3%; p=0,050) siendo la neumonía la más frecuente. La mortalidad postoperatoria fue superior en los≥75años (9 vs. 0%; p=0,017), constituyendo la resección venosa un factor de riesgo (p=0,01). La supervivencia global y la supervivencia libre de enfermedad no mostraron diferencias significativas en ambos grupos. Conclusiones: Los pacientes ancianos presentaron una mayor mortalidad postoperatoria y más complicaciones no quirúrgicas. La supervivencia no mostró diferencias, por lo que, con una adecuada selección de pacientes, la edad no debe constituirse por sí misma como una contraindicación para la DPC(AU).
Introduction: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. Methods: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018.The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients≥75 years (elderly). Results: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23.9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P=.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9 vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P=.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P=.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. Conclusions: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC(AU).
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Pancreatectomy/methods , Duodenostomy/methods , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. METHODS: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018. The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients ≥75 years (elderly). RESULTS: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23'9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients ≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; Pâ¯=â¯.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9% vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged ≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, Pâ¯=â¯.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the ≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; Pâ¯=â¯.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Gastrointestinal melanoma metastases are not uncommon, with the jejunum and ileum being the most common locations (58 %), followed by the stomach (26 %), colon (22 %), duodenum (12 %), and rectum (5 %).
Subject(s)
Colon, Transverse , Melanoma , Colon , Duodenum , Humans , Ileum , Jejunum , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Melanoma/pathology , Stomach/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Surgery and chemotherapy have increased the survival of pancreatic cancer. The decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality and increase in life expectancy, has expanded the indications por cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PDC), although it remains controversial in the geriatric population. METHODS: Retrospective study on a prospective database of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreas who underwent PDC between 2007-2018.The main objective was to analyse the morbidity-mortality and survival associated with PDC in patients≥75 years (elderly). RESULTS: 79 patients were included, 21 of them older than 75 years (27%); within this group, 23.9% were over 80 years old. The ASA of both groups was similar. Patients≥75 years required more transfusions. No differences in operating time were observed, although more vascular resection were performed in the elderly (26 vs. 8.7%; P=.037). Morbidity was higher in the elderly (61.9 vs. 46.6%), although without differences. Patients aged≥75 years had more non-surgical complications (33.3%, P=.050), being pneumonia the most frequent. Postoperative mortality was higher in the≥75 years (9 vs. 0%; P=.017). The overall survival and disease-free survival did not show significant differences in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients had higher postoperative mortality and more non-surgical complications. Survival did not show differences, so with an adequate selection of patients, age should not be considered itself as a contraindication for PDC.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is indicated in many patients with abdominal and pelvic malignancy. If cancer cells are present within the peritoneal space, there is a possibility for port site metastases to develop. METHODS: The pathophysiology for occurrence of port site metastases was reviewed. Technical modifications to reduce the incidence of these abdominal wall sites for disease progression were suggested. RESULTS: Evacuation of all gases and all fluid from the peritoneal space through the trocars prior to their removal will reduce the contamination of the tissue surrounding the port site by intraperitoneal cancer cells. If port sites are confined to the midline, they can be removed as part of a midline abdominal incision if metastases occur. If port site metastases occur through lateral port sites, the rectus abdominus muscle may need to be widely excised to achieve negative margins. CONCLUSION: Technical modifications of laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal metastases may reduce incidence of this iatrogenic dissemination of cancer.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall/pathology , Laparoscopy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Peritoneal Neoplasms/secondary , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Margins of Excision , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathologyABSTRACT
Background: The liver is the most injured organ following abdominal trauma. Uncontrolled bleeding remains the main cause of early liver injury-related death, with a mortality rate of 50-54% in the first 24 h after admission and with 80% of operative deaths. Packing and reoperation account for the increased survival in severe liver trauma, and they are recommended for severe liver injuries (grades IV-V).Perihepatic packing can lead to several potential complications. An excessive packing can cause complications due to abdominal compartment syndrome, while a soft packing may be ineffective, and thus, bleeding can continue inadvertently with the consequent hypovolemic shock and potentially death. Methods: We designed a new vacuum-based device to perform perihepatic packing without the negative side-effects of the classic technique. We conducted a prospective pilot feasibility study in a porcine model. We compared the traditional perihepatic packing (PHP) (n = 2) with the new VacBagPack device (VBP) (n = 2). Results: Both pigs survived with the new device and showed an equivalent outcome to the one that survived in the traditional technique group. Blood tests were similar too. This suggests that VBP could be at least as effective as traditional PHP. Conclusions: We establish a first step towards the development of a new packing device. A new study with a bigger sample size still in pigs will be conducted. Also, an industrial model of the device is currently in production.
Subject(s)
Equipment Design/standards , Hemostatics/therapeutic use , Liver/injuries , Liver/surgery , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Feasibility Studies , Hemostatics/standards , Laparoscopy/methods , Liver/blood supply , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , SwineABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Urinary Bladder Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Urinary Bladder Diseases/surgery , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Gallbladder/diagnostic imaging , Gallbladder/injuriesSubject(s)
Bile Ducts/injuries , Drainage/methods , Intraoperative Complications/surgery , Female , Humans , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The most frequent intraabdominal complication after lost stones are abscesses, which account for 65% of complications. The main risk factors are: old age, male gender, surgical difficulty, leakage of lithiasis of more than 1.5 cm or more than 15 stones, perihepatic location and pigmented gallstones. We report the case of a 73-year-old man with a medical history of hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney failure and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Subject(s)
Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Abscess/etiology , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Gallstones/surgery , Inflammation/diagnostic imaging , Inflammation/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/therapyABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Lithiasis/surgery , Lithiasis , Thoracic Vertebrae/pathology , Thoracic Vertebrae , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Radiology, Interventional/instrumentation , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Abscess/complications , Abscess/surgery , AbscessABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Balconing is the term that has been given to consciously jumping into a swimming pool from a balcony or falling from height while climbing from one balcony to another in hotels during holidays METHOD: A 5 years retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary referral centre for severe trauma in the Balearic Islands, where balconing is endemic. Demographic data such as age, sex, nationality, personal records, alcohol or drug consumption, height of the fall and season of the year were collected. Scales of trauma severity and mortality rates were also included. RESULTS: Most of the patients were males, 45 (97.83%), aged 24.20±5.98years, 28 of them of British nationality (60.87%). In 44 (95.65%) cases, alcohol consumption was present accompanied by other drugs in 17 (36.96%) cases. The mean height of the fall was approximately 3 floors. Only 6 (13.04%) were intentional jumpers whereas 40 (86.96%) fell while trying to reach another balcony. CONCLUSION: Balconing is a new injury mechanism for alcohol-related falls from heights. Alcohol and other drug consumption are almost always involved, so balconing could be addressed as another consequence of alcohol abuse and binge drinking.