Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Low-Flow Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Low-flow (LF) aortic stenosis (AS) is common among older adults and associated with worse outcomes than AS with normal stroke volume. It is unknown whether left ventricular (LV) remodeling identifies patients with LF AS at higher risk of complications. LV remodeling was evaluated in 463 patients with severe LF AS referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and classified as adaptive (normal geometry and concentric remodeling) or maladaptive (concentric and eccentric hypertrophy) using the American Society of Echocardiography gender-specific criteria. Of these, the 390 patients who underwent TAVR were followed for the end points of heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality. The mean patient age was 79 (74.5 to 84) years. LV remodeling was adaptive in 57.4% (62 normal geometry, 162 concentric remodeling) and maladaptive in 42.6% (127 concentric hypertrophy, 39 eccentric hypertrophy). During a median follow-up of 3 years, 45 patients (11.5%) were hospitalized for HF and 73 (18.7%) died. After adjustment for widely used echocardiographic parameters, maladaptive remodeling was independently associated with HF hospitalization and death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.75, confidence interval 1.03 to 3.00). There was no significant difference between men and women in the association of maladaptive LV remodeling with the composite outcome (p = 0.40 for men and p = 0.06 for women). In conclusion, in patients with LF AS, maladaptive LV remodeling before TAVR is independently associated with higher incidences of postprocedural HF rehospitalization and death in both men and women. Assessment of LV remodeling has prognostic value over and above LV ejection fraction and may improve risk stratification for patients with LF AS.

Right coronary artery obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement by aortic valve mass.

A 93-year-old woman with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and normal biventricular function was referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) evaluation. Cardiac computed tomography revealed safe coronary heights and multiple large calcified mobile mass-like structures attached to the aortic valve (AV), confirmed also by transesophageal echocardiography, which were thought to be prominent Lambl's excrescences.

Prognostic Implication of Pulmonary Hypertension in Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Prognostic implications of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in low-flow low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unexplored. We aimed to investigate the impact of baseline and changes in PH after TAVR. In this single-center retrospective study, we included patients who underwent TAVR for low-flow LG AS. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: baseline pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) <46 mm Hg (no-to-mild PH) and PASP ≥46 mm Hg (moderate-to-severe PH). On the basis of changes in PASP after TAVR, patients were stratified into increased (ΔPASP ≥ + 5 mm Hg), no change (-4 to +4 mm Hg), and decreased (≤ -5 mm Hg) groups. Primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. In total, 210 patients were included, 148 in the no-to-mild PH group and 62 in the moderate-to-severe PH group. Median follow-up was 13.2 months. The moderate-to-severe PH group was at an increased risk of composite end point (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8 to 6.9), all-cause mortality (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.6), and heart failure rehospitalization (HR 8.3, 95% CI 2.9 to 23.7). There were no differences in clinical outcomes among those with increased (32%), no change (28%), and decreased (39%) PASP after TAVR. In conclusion, moderate-to-severe PH at baseline is an independent predictor of worse clinical outcomes in patients with low-flow LG AS who undergo TAVR, and this cohort of patients do not seem to derive the benefits of postoperative reduction of PASP.

Effect of acute CORticosteroids on conduction defects after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: the CORTAVI study.

AIMS: Conduction abnormalities, requiring a permanent pacemaker (PPM), are the most common electrical complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The exact mechanism for conduction system defects is not yet clear. The local inflammatory process and edema are thought to play a role in the development of electrical disorders. Corticosteroids are effective anti-inflammatory and antiedematous agents. We aim to investigate the potential protective effect of corticosteroids on conduction defects after TAVI. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of a single center. We analyzed 96 patients treated with TAVI. Thirty-two patients received oral prednisone 50 mg for 5 days after the procedure. This population was compared with the control group. All patients were followed up after 2 years. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients included, 32 (34%) were exposed to glucocorticoids after TAVI. No differences in age, preexisting right bundle branch block or left bundle branch block, or valve type were seen among patients exposed to glucocorticoids versus those who were unexposed. We observed no significant differences between the two groups in the overall frequency of new PPM implantations during hospitalization (12% vs. 17%, P  = 0.76). The incidence of atrioventricular block (AVB) (STx 9% vs. non-STx 9%, P  = 0.89), right bundle branch block (STx 6% vs. non-STx 11%, P  = 0.71), and left bundle branch block (STx 34% vs. non-STx 31%, P  = 0.9) was not significantly different between the STx and non-STx groups. At 2 years after TAVI, none of the patients had implanted PPM or had severe arrhythmias documented by 24-h Holter ECG or cardiac examination. CONCLUSION: Oral prednisone treatment does not appear to significantly reduce the incidence of AVB requiring acute PPM implantation after TAVI.

Acute effect of edge-to-edge repair of mitral regurgitation on left heart mechanics and health status.

AIMS: Examine the impact of acute changes in left heart strain and volumes with percutaneous edge-to-edge MitraClip repair on improvement in health status assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 (KCCQ-12) score. METHODS: Changes in left atrial strain, left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) were evaluated in 50 patients undergoing MitraClip repair for symptomatic primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) on transthoracic echocardiography before and 1 month after MitraClip. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate changes in left heart strain and volumes as predictors of change in KCCQ-12 scores, adjusting for baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. RESULTS: Both PMR and SMR patients had significant increase in LVGLS and reduction in LVEDV and LVESV ( P  < 0.05) after MitraClip, reduction trend in left atrial conduit strain (PMR P  = 0.053; SMR P  = 0.12) but no significant change in LV ejection fraction. KCCQ-12 score improved significantly in both PMR ( P  < 0.001) and SMR cohorts ( P  < 0.001). Higher delta KCCQ-12 tertiles were associated with greater reduction in LVEDV ( P  = 0.022) after MitraClip. On multiple regression analysis, lower preprocedural Society of Thoracic Surgeons for Mitral Valve Replacement and KCCQ-12 score, and greater reduction in LVESV and left atrial strain conduit phase were associated with KCCQ-12 score improvement ( P  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in LVGLS and reduction in LVEDV, LVESV and left atrial strain conduit after edge-to-edge MitraClip repair in both PMR and SMR. Lower preprocedural Society of Thoracic Surgeons for Mitral Valve Replacement and KCCQ-12 score, and greater reduction in LVESV and left atrial conduit strain were associated with KCCQ-12 score improvement after MitraClip. Further studies are warranted to understand the mechanism and significance of our findings.