Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
bioRxiv ; 2024 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38979188

ABSTRACT

Recent malaria drug discovery approaches have been extensively focused on the development of oral, smallmolecule inhibitors for disease treatment whereas parenteral routes of administration have been avoided due to limitations in deploying a shelf-stable injectable even though it could be dosed less frequently. However, an updated target candidate profile from Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and stakeholders have advocated for long-acting injectable chemopreventive agents as an important interventive tool to improve malaria prevention. Here, we present strategies for the development of a long-acting, intramuscular, injectable atovaquone prophylactic therapy. We have generated three prodrug approaches that are contrasted by their differential physiochemical properties and pharmacokinetic profiles: mCBK068, a docosahexaenoic acid ester of atovaquone formulated in sesame oil, mCKX352, a heptanoic acid ester of atovaquone formulated as a solution in sesame oil, and mCBE161, an acetic acid ester of atovaquone formulated as an aqueous suspension. As a result, from a single 20 mg/kg intramuscular injection, mCKX352 and mCBE161 maintain blood plasma exposure of atovaquone above the minimal efficacious concentration for >70 days and >30 days, respectively, in cynomolgus monkeys. The differences in plasma exposure are reflective of the prodrug strategy, which imparts altered chemical properties that ultimately influence aqueous solubility and depot release kinetics. On the strength of the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles, mCBE161 is being advanced as a first-in-class clinical candidate for first-in-human trials.

2.
Malar J ; 23(1): 174, 2024 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe malaria is a life-threatening infection, particularly affecting children under the age of 5 years in Africa. Current treatment with parenteral artemisinin derivatives is highly efficacious. However, artemisinin partial resistance is widespread in Southeast Asia, resulting in delayed parasite clearance after therapy, and has emerged independently in South America, Oceania, and Africa. Hence, new treatments for severe malaria are needed, and it is prudent to define their characteristics now. This manuscript focuses on the target product profile (TPP) for new treatments for severe malaria. It also highlights preparedness when considering ways of protecting the utility of artemisinin-based therapies. TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE: Severe malaria treatments must be highly potent, with rapid onset of antiparasitic activity to clear the infection as quickly as possible to prevent complications. They should also have a low potential for drug resistance selection, given the high parasite burden in patients with severe malaria. Combination therapies are needed to deter resistance selection and dissemination. Partner drugs which are approved for uncomplicated malaria treatment would provide the most rapid development pathway for combinations, though new candidate molecules should be considered. Artemisinin combination approaches to severe malaria would extend the lifespan of current therapy, but ideally, completely novel, non-artemisinin-based combination therapies for severe malaria should be developed. These should be advanced to at least phase 2 clinical trials, enabling rapid progression to patient use should current treatment fail clinically. New drug combinations for severe malaria should be available as injectable formulations for rapid and effective treatment, or as rectal formulations for pre-referral intervention in resource-limited settings. CONCLUSION: Defining the TPP is a key step to align responses across the community to proactively address the potential for clinical failure of artesunate in severe malaria. In the shorter term, artemisinin-based combination therapies should be developed using approved or novel drugs. In the longer term, novel combination treatments should be pursued. Thus, this TPP aims to direct efforts to preserve the efficacy of existing treatments while improving care and outcomes for individuals affected by this life-threatening disease.


Subject(s)
Antimalarials , Malaria , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , Humans , Malaria/drug therapy , Artemisinins/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918235

ABSTRACT

Atoguanil™ is a novel complex of atovaquone (ATV) and proguanil (PG) with enhanced ATV bioavailability compared to Malarone®. This pilot study assessed whether the relative bioavailability (Frel) of ATV, PG, and the primary PG metabolite cycloguanil (CG) following a single oral dose in the fed state of Atoguanil was similar to Malarone despite a 50% lower ATV dose. This open-label, single-dose, randomized 2-period, 2-treatment, balanced crossover study was conducted between 17th November 2021 and 18th March 2022. Eligible participants (aged 18-55 years) were randomized (1:1) in period 1 to Atoguanil (ATV/PG 500/348 mg) or Malarone (ATV/PG hydrochloride 1000/400 mg) administered following a high-fat, high caloric meal. After a 24-day washout period, participants crossed treatment arms. For the doses tested, Frel was assumed similar if 90%CIs were between 80 and 125% for the geometric mean ratio of the least square mean differences for each exposure parameter. In 15 evaluable participants, Frel was similar for ATV Cmax (93.6% [90%CI 83.6, 104.9]) but not AUC0-inf (77.8% [67.4, 89.8]), for PG AUC0-inf (95.6% [92.1, 99.2]) but not Cmax (82.4% [75.8, 89.5]), and for both CG Cmax (100.8% [95.0, 107.0]) and AUC0-inf (102.9% [98.4, 107.7]). Nine adverse events occurred; all were of mild severity and not considered treatment related. At the doses tested, ATV Frel was lower following Atoguanil versus Malarone based on AUC0-inf, though when adjusted for dose Frel increased by 156%. Both drugs were well tolerated with no safety concerns. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04866602 (April 26th, 2021).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL