Does OSA Increase Risk for Cancer?: A Large Historical Sleep Clinic Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between OSA and cancer is unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the association between OSA and cancer prevalence and incidence in a large Western Australian sleep clinic cohort (N = 20,289)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: OSA severity was defined by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and nocturnal hypoxemia (duration and percentage at oxygen saturation < 90%) measured by in-laboratory polysomnogram. Measures of potential confounding included age, sex, BMI, smoking status, socioeconomic status, and BP. Outcomes were determined from the Western Australian cancer and death registries. Analyses were confined within periods using consistent AHI scoring criteria: January 1, 1989, to July 31, 2002 (American Sleep Disorders Association criteria), and August 1, 2002, to June 30, 2013 (Chicago criteria). We examined associations of AHI and nocturnal hypoxemia with cancer prevalence using logistic regression and cancer incidence using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Cancer prevalence at baseline was 329 of 10,561 in the American Sleep Disorders Association period and 633 of 9,728 in the Chicago period. Nocturnal hypoxemia but not AHI was independently associated with prevalent cancer following adjustment for participant age, sex, BMI, smoking status, socioeconomic status, and BP. Of those without prevalent cancer, cancer was diagnosed in 1,950 of 10,232 (American Sleep Disorders Association) and 623 of 9,095 (Chicago) participants over a median follow-up of 11.2 years. Compared with the reference category (no OSA, AHI < 5 events per hour), univariable models estimated higher hazard ratios for cancer incidence for mild (AHI 5-15 events per hour), moderate (AHI 15.1-30 events per hour), and severe (AHI > 30 events per hour) OSA. Multivariable analyses consistently revealed associations between age and, in some cases, sex, BMI, and smoking status, with cancer incidence. After adjusting for confounders, multivariable models showed no independent association between OSA severity and increased cancer incidence. INTERPRETATION: Nocturnal hypoxemia is independently associated with prevalent cancer. OSA severity is associated with incident cancer, although this association seems secondary to other risk factors for cancer development. OSA is not an independent risk factor for cancer incidence.

Telemedicine compared to standard face-to-face care for continuous positive airway pressure treatment: real-world Australian experience.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We tested a telemedicine model of care to initiate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) living in remote Western Australia. METHODS: A prospective study comparing telemedicine for CPAP initiation in a remote population versus standard face-to-face CPAP initiation in a metropolitan population. The primary outcome was average nightly CPAP use in the final week of a CPAP trial. RESULTS: A total of 186 participants were allocated to either telemedicine (n = 56) or standard care (n = 130). The average distance from the study center for the telemedicine group was 979 km (±792 km) compared to 19 km (±14 km) for the standard care group. The CPAP trial duration in the standard care group was less than the telemedicine group (37.6 vs 69.9 days, p < .001). CPAP adherence in the telemedicine group was not inferior to standard care (Standard 4.7 ± 0.2 h, Telemedicine 4.7 ± 0.3 h, p = 0.86). No differences were found between groups in residual apnea-hypopnea index, symptom response, sleep specific quality of life at the end of the trial, and continued CPAP use (3-6 months). Participant satisfaction was high in both groups. Total health care costs of the telemedicine model were less than the standard model of care. An estimated A$4538 per participant in travel costs was saved within the telemedicine group by reducing the need to travel to the sleep center for in-person management. CONCLUSIONS: In remote dwelling adults starting CPAP for the treatment of OSA, outcomes using telemedicine were comparable to in-person management in a metropolitan setting.

Continuous positive airway pressure and adverse cardiovascular events in obstructive sleep apnea: are participants of randomized trials representative of sleep clinic patients?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown no reduction in adverse cardiovascular (CV) events in patients randomized to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study examined whether randomized study populations were representative of OSA patients attending a sleep clinic. METHODS: Sleep clinic patients were 3,965 consecutive adults diagnosed with OSA by in-laboratory polysomnography from 2006 to 2010 at a tertiary hospital sleep clinic. Characteristics of these patients were compared with participants of five recent RCTs examining the effect of CPAP on adverse CV events in OSA. The percentage of patients with severe (apnea-hypopnea index, [AHI] ≥ 30 events/h) or any OSA (AHI ≥ 5 events/h) who met the eligibility criteria of each RCT was determined, and those criteria that excluded the most patients identified. RESULTS: Compared to RCT participants, sleep clinic OSA patients were younger, sleepier, more likely to be female and less likely to have established CV disease. The percentage of patients with severe or any OSA who met the RCT eligibility criteria ranged from 1.2% to 20.9% and 0.8% to 21.9%, respectively. The eligibility criteria that excluded most patients were preexisting CV disease, symptoms of excessive sleepiness, nocturnal hypoxemia and co-morbidities. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of sleep clinic patients diagnosed with OSA meet the eligibility criteria of RCTs of CPAP on adverse CV events in OSA. OSA populations in these RCTs differ considerably from typical sleep clinic OSA patients. This suggests that the findings of such OSA treatment-related RCTs are not generalizable to sleep clinic OSA patients.Randomized Intervention with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in CAD and OSA (RICCADSA) trial, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00519597, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00519597.Usefulness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Treatment in Patients with a First Ever Stroke and Sleep Apnea Syndrome, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00202501, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00202501.Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Morbidity-Mortality in Patients with Sleep Apnea and no Daytime Sleepiness, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00127348, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00127348.Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) (ISAACC), https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01335087, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01335087.