Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems in Fulminant Myocarditis: Recent Advances and Outlook.

Background: Fulminant myocarditis (FM) constitutes a severe and life-threatening form of acute cardiac injury associated with cardiogenic shock. The condition is characterised by rapidly progressing myocardial inflammation, leading to significant impairment of cardiac function. Due to the acute and severe nature of the disease, affected patients require urgent medical attention to mitigate adverse outcomes. Besides symptom-oriented treatment in specialised intensive care units (ICUs), the necessity for temporary mechanical cardiac support (MCS) may arise. Numerous patients depend on these treatment methods as a bridge to recovery or heart transplantation, while, in certain situations, permanent MCS systems can also be utilised as a long-term treatment option. Methods: This review consolidates the existing evidence concerning the currently available MCS options. Notably, data on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), microaxial flow pump, and ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation are highlighted within the landscape of FM. Results: Indications for the use of MCS, strategies for ventricular unloading, and suggested weaning approaches are assessed and systematically reviewed. Conclusions: Besides general recommendations, emphasis is put on the differences in underlying pathomechanisms in FM. Focusing on specific aetiologies, such as lymphocytic-, giant cell-, eosinophilic-, and COVID-19-associated myocarditis, this review delineates the indications and efficacy of MCS strategies in this context.

HeartMate 3 Snoopy: Noninvasive cardiovascular diagnosis of patients with fully magnetically levitated blood pumps during echocardiographic speed ramp tests and Valsalva maneuvers.

PURPOSE: The HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes; however, pump speed optimization is challenging with the available HM3 monitoring. Therefore, this study reports on clinical HM3 parameters collected with a noninvasive HM3 monitoring system (HM3 Snoopy) during echocardiographic speed ramp tests and Valsalva maneuvers. METHODS: In this prospective, single-center study, the HM3 data communication between the controller and pump was recorded with a novel data acquisition system. Twelve pump parameters sampled every second (1 Hz) and clinical assessments (echocardiography, electrocardiogram (ECG), and blood pressure measurement) during speed ramp tests were analyzed using Pearson's correlation (r, median [IQR]). The cause for the occurrence of pulsatility index (PI)-events during ramp speed tests and valsalva maneuvers was investigated. RESULTS: In 24 patients (age: 58.9 ± 8.8 years, body mass index: 28.1 ± 5.1 kg/m2, female: 20.8%), 35 speed ramp tests were performed with speed changes in the range of ±1000 rpm from a baseline speed of 5443 ± 244 rpm. Eight HM3 pump parameters from estimated flow, motor current, and LVAD speed together with blood pressure showed positive collinearities (r = 0.9 [0.1]). Negative collinearities were observed for pump flow pulsatility, pulsatility index, rotor noise, and left ventricular diameters (r = -0.8 [0.1]), whereas rotor displacement and heartrate showed absence of collinearities (r = -0.1 [0.08]). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the HM3 Snoopy was successfully used to acquire more parameters from the HM3 at a higher sampling rate. Analysis of HM3 per-second data provide additional clinical diagnostic information on heart-pump interactions and cause of PI-events.

Outcome of patients supported with the HeartMate 3 after extracorporeal life support: On behalf of the Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support After Extracorporeal Life Support Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: The Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support System After Extracorporeal Life Support registry is a multicenter registry of patients who were bridged from extracorporeal life support to a durable mechanical circulatory support system. Although numerous studies have highlighted the favorable outcomes after implantation of the HeartMate 3 (Abbott), the objective of our study is to examine the outcomes of patients who received HeartMate 3 support after extracorporeal life support. METHODS: Data of patients undergoing HeartMate 3 implantation from January 2016 to April 2022 at 14 centers were collected and evaluated. Inclusion criteria were patients with extracorporeal life support before HeartMate 3 implantation. The outcome was reported and compared with patients receiving other types of pumps. RESULTS: A total of 337 patients were bridged to durable mechanical circulatory support system after extracorporeal life support in the study period. Of those patients, 140 were supported with the HeartMate 3. The other types of pumps included 170 HeartWare HVADs (Medtronic) (86%), 14 HeartMate II devices (7%), and 13 (7%) other pumps (7%). Major postoperative complications included right heart failure requiring temporary right ventricular assist device in 60 patients (47%). Significantly lower postoperative stroke (16% vs 28%, P = .01) and pump thrombosis (3% vs 8%, P = .02) rates were observed in the patients receiving the HeartMate 3. The 30-day, 1-year, and 3-year survivals in patients receiving the HeartMate 3 were 87%, 73%, and 65%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this critically ill patient population, the survivals of patients who were transitioned to the HeartMate 3 are deemed acceptable and superior to those observed when extracorporeal life support was bridged to other types of durable mechanical circulatory support systems.

Bleeding and thrombotic events in post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support.

OBJECTIVES: Haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications are known obstacles in extracorporeal life support (ECLS), and patients requiring post-cardiotomy (PC)-ECLS are particularly prone. The objective of this study was to characterize the incidence, type and clinical relevance of bleeding and thrombotic events in patients on PC-ECLS. METHODS: A total of 504 patients receiving PC-ECLS between 2000 and 2021 at a single centre were included in a retrospective analysis. Incidence and type of haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients on PC-ECLS were assessed. Overall survival was compared, and perioperative risk factors for bleeding and thrombotic events were assessed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 504 patients requiring PC-ECLS, 196 patients (38.9%) had 235 bleeding events [surgical site: n = 135 (26.8%); cannulation site: n = 68(13.4%); requiring surgical revision: n = 39 (7.7%); cannulation site change: n = 17 (3.4%); fatal cannulation site bleeding: n = 4(0.8%); intracranial haemorrhage: n = 11 (2.1%); gastrointestinal haemorrhage: n = 8 (1.6%); pulmonary haemorrhage: n = 8 (1.6%); and intra-abdominal/retroperitoneal haemorrhage: n = 5 (1%)]. Overall mortality was higher in patients with major bleeding complications than in patients without bleeding complications (P < 0.0001).A total of 74 patients (14.7%) had 84 thrombotic events [ischaemic stroke, n = 39 (7.7%); cannula/circuit thrombosis, n = 26 (5.2%); peripheral embolism, n = 11 (2.2%); device exchange for haemolysis, n = 8 (1.6%)]. Another 246 patients (48.8%) had at least 1 haemocompatibility-related adverse event. Preoperative dual antiplatelet therapy [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.063-3.137] and ECLS duration (adjusted OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.086-1.197) were identified as independent risk factors for haemorrhage. Prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack (adjusted OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.08-3.83) and ECLS duration (adjusted OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.04-1.15) were identified as risk factors for thrombotic events. CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding complications in patients on ECLS are common and significantly impair survival. Nearly half of the patients were affected by any haemocompatibility-related event.

Identifying patients at risk: multi-centre comparison of HeartMate 3 and HeartWare left ventricular assist devices.

AIMS: Since the withdrawal of HeartWare (HVAD) from the global market, there is an ongoing discussion if and which patients require prophylactically exchange for a HeartMate 3 (HM3). Therefore, it is important to study outcome differences between HVAD and HM3 patients. Because centres differ in patient selection and standard of care, we performed a propensity score (PS)-based study including centres that implanted both devices and aimed to identify which HVAD patients are at highest risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an international multi-centre study (n = 1021) including centres that implanted HVAD and HM3. PS-matching was performed using clinical variables and the implanting centre. Survival and complications were compared. As a sensitivity analysis, PS-adjusted Cox regression was performed. Landmark analysis with conditional survival >2 years was conducted to evaluate long-term survival differences. To identify which HVAD patients may benefit from a HM3 upgrade, Cox regression using pre-operative variables and their interaction with device type was performed. Survival was significantly better for HM3 patients (P < 0.01) in 458 matched patients, with a median follow-up of 23 months. Within the matched cohort, HM3 patients had a median age of 58 years, and 83% were male, 80% of the HVAD patients were male, with a median age of 59 years. PS-adjusted Cox regression confirmed a significantly better survival for HM3 patients when compared with HVAD, with a HR of 1.46 (95% confidence interval 1.14-1.85, P < 0.01). Pump thrombosis (P < 0.01) and ischaemic stroke (P < 0.01) occurred less in HM3 patients. No difference was found for haemorrhagic stroke, right heart failure, driveline infection, and major bleeding. Landmark-analysis confirmed a significant difference in conditional survival >2 years after implantation (P = 0.03). None of the pre-operative variable interactions in the Cox regression were significant. CONCLUSIONS: HM3 patients have a significantly better survival and a lower incidence of ischaemic strokes and pump thrombosis than HVAD patients. This survival difference persisted after 2 years of implantation. Additional research using post-operative variables is warranted to identify which HVAD patients need an upgrade to HM3 or expedited transplantation.

Three-month outcomes after the implantation of two HeartMate 3 devices in total artificial heart configuration.

BACKGROUND: Total artificial heart (TAH) implantation is a rarely performed procedure. Contrarily, left ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is rather common in many centers. As transplantation is quantitatively limited cardiac replacement with artificial hearts is a viable alternative in the treatment of severe biventricular heart failure. An alternative to TAH is the implantation of two VADs in a TAH configuration. We hereby present the first multi-center study on 3-months outcomes of patients treated by cardiectomy and placement of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated a cohort of 15 patients that underwent HM3-TAH-implantation at three international institutions. Follow-up was 3 months after implantation. Baseline, intra- and postoperative parameters as well as survival data and adverse events were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1089 days on HM3-TAH were observed. Thirty-day survival after HM3-TAH implantation was 53% (8/15) and three month survival was 40% (6/15). The longest duration on device was 274 days. Causes of death were multi-organ failure, sepsis, and neurological adverse events. No technical complications were documented. Two patients remained on the device. Four patients (26%) were successfully bridged to transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of two HeartMate 3s in a TAH configuration is a last resort and off-label concept in cases of extreme biventricular heart failure. In a diligently selected patient cohort, HM3-TAH implantation is a feasible method to increase the chance of survival in a severely ill patient cohort and successfully bridge patients to heart transplantation that would otherwise have died.

Quality of Anticoagulation With Phenprocoumon and Warfarin in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients: A Multicenter Study.

VISUAL ABSTRACT: of key results. INR, international normalized ratio; TTR, time in therapeutic range; PTR, percentage of tests in range; HRAE, hemocompatibility-related adverse event; FFUV, first follow-up visit; GIB, gastrointestinal bleeding; HR, hazard ratio.http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A961.

It's not only the pump: Assessment of human factors of wearable components and user experience of patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Despite design improvements in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) over the past decade, limitations of external, wearable VAD components affect patient quality of life and safety. The aim of this study was to describe both user experience and human factor issues of 2 contemporary LVADs. METHODS: This single-center, cross-sectional study included LVAD outpatients who were at least 3 months after implantation. Before developing the 16-item survey, a systematic literature review and 2-round Delphi method involving 9 VAD clinicians were used to select items in 6 domains: power supply, emergency situations, wearability, mobility, and freedom to travel, user modifications, lifestyle, and home adaptations. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (61.6 ± 11.6 years, 13.8% female, HeartMate 3 (HM3)/HVAD: n = 39/19) completed the one-time survey after median of 853 days on device: 10.3% reported problems changing power supply, 12.7% unintentional driveline disconnection (HM3: 5.6% vs HVAD: 26.3%, p = 0.041). Against the recommendation 74.1% sleep with battery-support (HM3: 88.9% vs HVAD: 44.4%, p = 0.001). About 65.3% criticized the carry bag weight/size (HM3: 71.4% vs HVAD: 50.0%, p = 0.035), thus 24.1% wear an own carrying-system, 42.1% modified their wearables, 38.9% their clothing, and 65.3% their home to cope with life on LVAD support. Mobility is reduced due to limited wearability: 18.9% went abroad (only 3.7% by plane) and 40.0% use less public transport than before implantation (the older the less: r = -0.37, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: HVAD and HM3 wearables still show a variety of human factors issues and potential for improved user experience. User-centered design and incorporation of patient feedback may increase user satisfaction, and patient safety.

Stroke Complications in Patients Requiring Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Systems After Extracorporeal Life Support.

Stroke is one of the leading complications following durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) implantation. The aim of this multicenter study was to investigate stroke complications in patients requiring durable MCS following extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Data of 11 high volume MCS centers were collected and evaluated to identify patients who underwent durable MCS implantation after ECLS support between January 2010 and August 2018. The primary outcome was stroke following durable MCS implantation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of stroke. Overall, 531 patients met the inclusion criteria. Only patients who were supported with continuous flow pumps were included in this study accounting for 495 patients (median age 54 years old [interquartile range 47-60]). A total of 136 patients (27%) developed postoperative stroke on device during the follow-up (48% ischemic and 52% hemorrhagic) after a median durable MCS support of 320 [32-1,000] days, accounting for 0.17 events per patient-year. Of 133 patients with known date of stroke, a total of 47 (10%) developed stroke during the first 30 days (64% ischemic and 36% hemorrhagic), and 86 patients developed stroke after 30 days (38% ischemic and 62% hemorrhagic) of durable MCS support (late stroke). Survival rate was significantly lower in patients with hemorrhagic stroke ( p = 0.00091). Stroke appears to be a common complication in patients transitioned to durable MCS support after ECLS. Hemorrhagic stroke is a more common type of late stroke and is associated with inferior outcomes.

The effect of occlusive polytetrafluoroethylene outflow graft protectors in left ventricular assist device recipients.

BACKGROUND: The use of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) material as a protective cover for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outflow grafts (OG) is a common practice. However, it has descriptively been linked to the development of blood flow obstruction (BFO). METHODS: Patient data from 194 consecutive HVAD (Medtronic Inc; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) recipients implanted between March 2006 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. PTFE covers were used in 102 patients. Study outcomes included the incidence of BFO and survival on LVAD support. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (19.1%) developed BFO during the study period. On a multivariable Cox regression analysis, PTFE use was an independent predictor for the development of BFO (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.03-4.48, p = .04). BFO comprised of 2 types of device malfunction: eleven patients (5.7%) developed outflow graft stenosis (OGS), and 31 patients (16.0%) developed pump thrombosis (PT). There was a significantly higher cumulative incidence of OGS in patients with PTFE cover than in those without (Gray's test, p =.03). However, the observed higher cumulative incidence of PT in PTFE patients was non-significant (Gray's test, p =.06). In a multivariable Cox regression model, the effect of PTFE use on survival was non-significant (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.60-1.48, p =.81), while the development of BFO was independently associated with increased mortality (HR 3.43, 95% CI 1.94-6.06, p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of PTFE OG cover in LVAD patients is associated with an increased cumulative probability of development of BFO, the latter adversely impacting survival and is therefore, harmful.

Validation of Intrinsic Left Ventricular Assist Device Data Tracking Algorithm for Early Recognition of Centrifugal Flow Pump Thrombosis.

Advanced stage heart failure patients can benefit from the unloading effects of an implantable left ventricular assist device. Despite best clinical practice, LVADs are associated with adverse events, such as pump thrombosis (PT). An adaptive algorithm alerting when an individual's appropriate levels in pump power uptake are exceeded, such as in the case of PT, can improve therapy of patients implanted with a centrifugal LVAD. We retrospectively studied 75 patients implanted with a centrifugal LVAD in a single center. A previously optimized adaptive pump power-tracking algorithm was compared to clinical best practice and clinically available constant threshold algorithms. Algorithm performances were analyzed in a PT group (n = 16 patients with 30 PT events) and a thoroughly selected control group (n = 59 patients, 34.7 patient years of LVAD data). Comparison of the adaptive power-tracking algorithm with the best performing constant threshold algorithm resulted in sensitivity of 83.3% vs. 86.7% and specificity of 98.9% vs. 95.3%, respectively. The power-tracking algorithm produced one false positive detection every 11.6 patient years and early warnings with a median of 3.6 days prior to PT diagnosis. In conclusion, a retrospective single-center validation study with real-world patient data demonstrated advantageous application of a power-tracking algorithm into LVAD systems and clinical practice.

When Nothing Goes Right: Risk Factors and Biomarkers of Right Heart Failure after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Right heart failure (RHF) is a severe complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and biomarkers for late RHF including the possible superiority of the device and implantation method. This retrospective, single-center study included patients who underwent LVAD implantation between 2014 and 2018. Primary outcome was freedom from RHF over one-year after LVAD implantation; secondary outcomes included pre- and postoperative risk factors and biomarkers for RHF. Of the 145 consecutive patients (HeartMate 3/HVAD: n = 70/75; female: 13.8%), thirty-one patients (21.4%) suffered RHF after a mean LVAD support of median (IQR) 105 (118) days. LVAD implantation method (less invasive: 46.7% vs. 35.1%, p = 0.29) did not differ significantly in patients with or without RHF, whereas the incidence of RHF was lower in HeartMate 3 vs. HVAD patients (12.9% vs. 29.3%, p = 0.016). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis identified HVAD (HR 4.61, 95% CI 1.12-18.98; p = 0.03), early post-op heart rate (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; p = 0.02), and central venous pressure (CVP) (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.39; p = 0.01) as independent risk factors for RHF, but no association of RHF with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01; p = 0.50) was found. To conclude, HVAD use, lower heart rate, and higher CVP early post-op were independent risk factors for RHF following LVAD implantation.

Inflow cannula position as risk factor for stroke in patients with HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: A relation between the left ventricular assist device inflow cannula (IC) malposition and pump thrombus has been reported. This study aimed to investigate if the pump position, derived from chest X-rays in HeartMate 3 (HM3) patients, correlates with neurological dysfunction (ND), ischemic stroke (IS), hemorrhagic stroke (HS) and survival. METHODS: This analysis was performed on routinely acquired X-rays of 42 patients implanted with a HM3 between 2014 and 2017. Device position was quantified in patients with and without ND from frontal and lateral X-rays characterizing the IC and pump in relation to spine, diaphragm or horizontal line. The primary end-point was freedom from stroke and survival one-year after HM3 implantation stratified by pump position. RESULTS: The analysis of X-rays, 33.5 (41.0) days postoperative, revealed a significant smaller IC angle of HM3 patients with ND versus no ND (0.1° ± 14.0° vs. 12.9° ± 10.1°, p = 0.005). Additionally, the IC angle in the frontal view, IS: 4.1 (20.9)° versus no IS: 13.8 (7.5)°, p = 0.004 was significantly smaller for HM3 patients with IS. Using receiver operating characteristics derived cut-off, IC angle <10° provided 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity (C-statistic = 0.85) for predicting IS. Stratified by IC angle, freedom from IS at 12 months was 100% (>10°) and 60% (<10°) respectively (p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in any end-point between patients with and without HS. One-year survival was significantly higher in patients with IC angle >10° versus <10° (100% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: IC malposition derived from standard chest X-rays serves as a risk factor for ND, IS and worse survival in HM3 patients.

Fate of patients weaned from post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support.

OBJECTIVES: Although post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) is a potentially life-saving resource for patients with cardiopulmonary failure after cardiac surgery, adverse outcomes have been reported even in successfully weaned patients. The goal of this study was to assess outcome in patients weaned from PC-ECLS. METHODS: Of 573 consecutive patients who received PC-ECLS at a single centre between 2000 and 2019, 478 patients were included in a retrospective analysis. Successful weaning was defined as survival >24 h after extracorporeal life support (ECLS) explantation. Mortality of patients on ECLS, as well as in-hospital mortality of weaned patients, was assessed. A binary logistic regression model with backward elimination was used to identify predictors for in-hospital mortality after successful ECLS explantation. RESULTS: Of 478 included patients, 120 patients (25.1%) died on ECLS or within 24 h after ECLS explantation. A total of 358 patients were successfully separated from ECLS and survived for >24 h (n = 352 weaned, n = 3 transitioned to durable left ventricular assist device and n = 3 transitioned to a heart transplant). A total of 35.5% of patients who were successfully weaned from ECLS did not survive until hospital discharge. In-hospital deaths of the whole cohort were 51.7% (247/478 patients). For patients who survived to discharge (231/478 patients, 48.3%), survival was 87% after 1 year and 68.9% after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality of patients requiring PC-ECLS is high even in case of successful weaning. Longer ECLS duration, older age, female gender and low preoperative glomerular filtration rate were risk factors for in-hospital mortality after ECLS weaning. Survival of patients discharged after PC-ECLS was encouraging.

Impact of Less Invasive Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation on Heart Transplant Outcomes.

Left ventricular assist device implantation without sternotomy (LIS) may simplify heart transplantation (HTX) by avoiding adhesions and eliminating the need for a re-sternotomy. This study investigates the impact of LIS LVAD implantation on HTX outcomes. A retrospective comparison of 46 patients undergoing HTX between 07/13 and 06/19 after conventional LVAD implantation with a full sternotomy (FS) and LIS LVAD implantation (LIS: n = 27 patients, 59%; FS: n = 19 patients, 41%) was performed. Endpoints were perioperative data including blood product use, de-novo formation of donor specific antibodies (DSAs) and survival. Patient demographics (mean age FS: 60.3 ± 9.3 years vs LIS 58.0 ± 7.7 years, P = 0.313; male gender FS: 84% vs LIS: 82%, P = 1.000; urgent HTX FS: 16% vs LIS 18%, P = 1.000) were comparable between LIS and FS patients. The primary finding was a significantly higher risk to develop de novo donor specific antibodies (DSAs) after HTX in patients of the FS group (FS: 36% vs LIS: 4%; P = 0.006). LIS patients had a significant reduction of intraoperative packed red blood cells (PRBCs) use (LIS: 4 (IQR 2-7) Units vs FS: 7 (IQR 4-8) Units; P = 0.045). Other adverse events rates and in-hospital mortality (LIS: 7% vs FS 5%, P = 1.000) were comparable between both groups. LIS LVAD reduces formation of donor specific antibodies after HTX.

The HeartMate 6 and CardioMEMS for Fixed Pulmonary Hypertension.

Fixed pulmonary hypertension (FPH) is a contraindication for heart transplantation (HTX). However, this condition might be reversed by continuous left-ventricular unloading with a left-ventricular assist device. We present a case of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with extensive left-ventricular endocardial calcification and severe FPH (systolic pulmonary artery pressure, 102 mm Hg). To bridge the patient to candidacy for HTX, two Abbott HeartMate 3 ventricular assist devices were implanted in a total artificial heart (TAH) configuration ("HeartMate 6"). Before TAH implantation, an Abbott CardioMEMS pressure sensor was implanted to assess reversal of FPH before listing for HTX.

Incidence, clinical relevance and therapeutic options for outflow graft stenosis in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed our institutional experience with outflow graft stenosis (OGS) in 3 contemporary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). METHODS: Data from 347 consecutive adult recipients of LVAD [Medtronic HVAD (n = 184, 53.0%), Abbott HeartMate II (n = 62, 17.9%) and Abbott HeartMate 3 (n = 101, 29.1%)] implanted between March 2006 and October 2019 were analysed retrospectively. Primary study end points were the incidence of OGS necessitating treatment and survival on LVAD support. RESULTS: During the study period, 17 patients (4.9%) developed OGS requiring treatment with a probability of 0.6% at 1 year, 1.9% at 2 years, 3.8% at 3 years, 4.7% at 4 years and 5.9% at 5 years of LVAD support. Notably, in 13.8% of patients, a compression-related narrowing of the outflow graft with a probability of 1.5% at 6 months, 1.8% 1 year, 6.0% at 2 years, 12.3% at 3 years, 15.4% at 4 years and 16.6% at 5 years of LVAD support with no difference between devices (P = 0.26) was observed. There was a trend towards increased risk of mortality with OGS (hazard ratio 2.21, 95% confidence interval 0.87-5.51; P = 0.09). OGS preferentially occurred in segments of the outflow graft covered by a protective coating. CONCLUSIONS: OGS is a rare but potentially lethal complication during LVAD support. Modifications of pump design and implant techniques may be needed because OGS preferentially occurs within covered portions of the outflow graft. Systematic screening may be warranted.

Left ventricular assist device implants in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: do we need cardiopulmonary bypass?

OBJECTIVES: Implanting a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in a patient on extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is challenging. The goal of this study was to compare the results of patients from a European registry who had a durable LVAD implanted with or without transition from ECLS to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). METHODS: A total of 531 patients on ECLS support who had an LVAD implant between January 2010 and August 2018 were analysed; after 1:1 propensity score matching, we identified and compared 175 patients in each group. RESULTS: The duration of preoperative ECLS was 7 [standard deviation (SD) 6] vs 7 (SD 6) days in patients with or without CPB (P = 0.984). The surgical time was longer in the CPB group [285 (SD 72) vs 209 [SD 75] min; P ≤ 0.001). The postoperative chest tube output was comparable [1513 (SD 1311) vs 1390 (SD 1121) ml; P = 0.3]. However, re-exploration for bleeding was necessary in 41% vs 29% of patients with or without CPB (P = 0.01) and a significantly higher number of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma [8 (SD 8) vs 6 (SD 4) units; P = 0.001 and 6 (SD 7) vs 5 (SD 5) units; P = 0.03] were administered to patients operated on with CPB. A postoperative mechanical right ventricular support device was necessary in 50% vs 41% of patients (P = 0.08). The stroke rate was not significantly different (P 0.99). No difference in survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Omitting CPB for an LVAD implant in patients on ECLS is safe and results in shorter operating time, less re-exploration for bleeding and fewer blood products. However, no survival benefit is observed.

Access site complications of postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of primary arterial access in patients receiving peripheral postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support on associated complications and outcome. METHODS: Of 573 consecutive patients requiring PC-ECLS between 2000 and 2019 at a single center, 436 were included in a retrospective analysis and grouped according to primary arterial extracorporeal life support access site. Survival and rate of access-site-related complications with special emphasis on fatal/disabling stroke were compared. RESULTS: The axillary artery was cannulated in 250 patients (57.3%), whereas the femoral artery was used as primary arterial access in 186 patients (42.6%). There was no significant difference in 30-day (axillary: 62%; femoral: 64.7%; P = .561) and 1-year survival (axillary: 42.5%; femoral: 44.8%; P = .657). Cerebral computed tomography-confirmed stroke with a modified ranking scale ≥4 was significantly more frequent in the axillary group (axillary: n = 28, 11.2%; femoral: n = 4, 2.2%; P = .0003). Stroke localization was right hemispheric (n = 20; 62.5%); left hemispheric (n = 5; 15.6%), bilateral (n = 5; 15.6%), or infratentorial (n = 2; 6.25%). Although no difference in major cannulation site bleeding was observed, cannulation site change for bleeding was more frequent in the axillary group (axillary: n = 13; 5.2%; femoral: n = 2; 1.1%; P = .03). Clinically apparent limb ischemia was significantly more frequent in the femoral group (axillary: n = 12, 4.8%; femoral: n = 31, 16.7%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although survival did not differ, surgeons should be aware of access-site-specific complications when choosing peripheral PC-ECLS access. Although lower rates of limb ischemia and the advantage of antegrade flow seem beneficial for axillary cannulation, the high incidence of right hemispheric strokes in axillary artery cannulation should be considered.